Skip to content

Stroke and CPAP Outcome Study: A Sham-controlled Trial of CPAP Among Stroke Rehabilitation Patients

Randomized Trial of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients Undergoing Intensive Inpatient Rehabilitation After Acute Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02551757
Acronym
SCOUTS
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-09-16
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2021-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on functional outcome in patients with acute stroke, the investigators conducted a sham-controlled, double-blind pilot trial during inpatient rehabilitation. Patients with acute stroke were recruited and randomly assigned to auto-titrating or sham-CPAP during their rehabilitation stay.

Detailed description

All acute stroke patients admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation service at the University of Washington were invited to participate in the study. Given the high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in this population, no screen for OSA was performed. Enrolled patients were assigned randomly to active-CPAP with auto-titrating pressures or to sham-CPAP with an otherwise identical device but with pressures ≤ 1 cm water. Subjects used active or sham-CPAP for the duration of inpatient rehabilitation, but no longer than 28 days. CPAP compliance was assessed by memory card that recorded mask-on time. Other information on download, such as apnea-hypopnea index, was only available on active-CPAP and not assessed by investigators in real time. In this study, the investigators defined tolerance as any continued use of CPAP at night and adherence as mean hours of CPAP use per night in those who were CPAP tolerant.

Interventions

DEVICEAuto-titrating CPAP

Auto-titrating CPAP was initiated after admission to the inpatient rehabilitation unit for the duration of rehabilitation but not exceeding 28 days. A respiratory therapist visited patients nightly to document adherence and address issues arising at night. A sleep technologist also met with patients at least twice weekly to monitor safety and adverse events and make any adjustments to the CPAP mask or machine. Efforts to improve adherence to CPAP for patients treated with active-CPAP included patient education, desensitization of CPAP through brief periods of daytime use, adjustments of humidity and mask (including addition of a chin strap), decreasing CPAP maximum pressure and use of expiratory pressure relief (CFlex) for patients treated with active-CPAP.

DEVICESham-CPAP

Sham-CPAP was initiated after admission to the inpatient rehabilitation unit for the duration of rehabilitation but not exceeding 28 days. A respiratory therapist visited patients nightly to document adherence and address issues arising at night. A sleep technologist also met with patients at least twice weekly to monitor safety and adverse events and make any adjustments to the CPAP mask or machine. Efforts to improve adherence to CPAP for patients treated with sham-CPAP included patient education, desensitization of CPAP through brief periods of daytime use and adjustments of humidity and mask, including addition of a chin strap.

Sponsors

University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* greater than 18 years of age * admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit at the University of Washington * head CT or brain MRI demonstrating an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke * enrolled in another research study

Exclusion criteria

* stroke was a subarachnoid hemorrhage or due to a secondary cause (vascular malformation, vasculitis, brain tumor, head trauma, or predisposition to bleeding) * history of CPAP use, advanced chronic lung disease requiring supplemental oxygen, heart failure (NYHA class III or IV) * require a nasogastric feeding tube.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Enrolling Eligible Stroke Patients Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation for an Acute Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke Into a Pilot, Randomized Clinical Trial of Active Versus Sham CPAP.18 monthsNumber of stroke patients willing to participate during inpatient rehabilitation over 18 months and be randomized in this clinical trial to treatment with active or sham auto-titrating CPAP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hours of CPAP Per Nightup to 28 daysMean hours of nightly CPAP use, regardless of treatment allocation, at hospital discharge.
Median Change in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Between Admission and Discharge From the Rehabilitation Unit Comparing Active-CPAP Versus Sham-CPAP.Baseline and discharge up to 28 daysThe Functional Independence Measure (FIM), a sensitive disability scale, is an 18-item instrument measuring the burden of care associated with aspects of motor and cognitive function. Higher scores represent better stroke recovery where scores for each of the 18 items range from 1 (complete dependence) to 7 (complete independence). The overall FIM score ranges between 18 and 126. The FIM score can also be further broken down based on its motor and cognitive components. The 13 items of the motor FIM subscale range between 13 and 91, whereas the 5 items of the cognitive FIM subscale can range between 5 and 35. The motor and cognitive sub scales are summed to provide the total FIM score and the difference between the FIM scores on admission to the rehabilitation unit and discharge from the unit were calculated for each eligible participant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active-CPAP
Patients assigned to active-CPAP were treated with auto-titrating CPAP, where an auto-titrator adjusted the delivered pressure between 4 to 20 cm of water to eliminate obstructive events for a goal apnea-hypopnea index less than or equal to 5. Auto-titrating CPAP was initiated after admit to the inpatient rehabilitation unit for the duration of rehabilitation but not exceeding 28 days. A respiratory therapist visited patients nightly to document adherence and address issues arising at night. A sleep technologist also met with patients at least twice weekly to monitor safety and adverse events and make any adjustments to the CPAP mask or machine. Efforts to improve CPAP adherence for patients treated with active-CPAP included education, desensitization of CPAP through brief periods of daytime use, adjustments of humidity and mask (including addition of a chin strap), decreasing maximum pressure and use of expiratory pressure relief (CFlex) for patients treated with active-CPAP.
20
Sham-CPAP
The sham-CPAP device was designed to entail no risks beyond those with CPAP and provide a high level of blinding. The sham-CPAP device has an internal flow restrictor and a modified elbow attached to the mask, which creates a larger than standard air leak that delivers a pressure of roughly 0.75 to 1 cm water. The modification is not noticeable when the device is fully assembled to avoid unblinding patients, providers, or study personnel. The elbow modification could only be used on standard nasal masks so full face masks and nasal pillows were excluded for patients in both active and sham-CPAP. Sham-CPAP was initiated after admission to rehabilitation for the duration of rehabilitation but not exceeding 28 days. Efforts to improve adherence to CPAP for patients treated with sham-CPAP included education, desensitization of CPAP through brief periods of daytime use and adjustments of humidity and mask, including addition of a chin strap.
20
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive-CPAPTotalSham-CPAP
Age, Continuous55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants23 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants40 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants18 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants22 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility of Enrolling Eligible Stroke Patients Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation for an Acute Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke Into a Pilot, Randomized Clinical Trial of Active Versus Sham CPAP.

Number of stroke patients willing to participate during inpatient rehabilitation over 18 months and be randomized in this clinical trial to treatment with active or sham auto-titrating CPAP.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: Eligible recruited participants included those randomized to sham or active CPAP during inpatient rehabilitation.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eligible Recruited Participants: Active-CPAPFeasibility of Enrolling Eligible Stroke Patients Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation for an Acute Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke Into a Pilot, Randomized Clinical Trial of Active Versus Sham CPAP.13 Participants
Eligible Recruited Participants: Sham-CPAPFeasibility of Enrolling Eligible Stroke Patients Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation for an Acute Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Stroke Into a Pilot, Randomized Clinical Trial of Active Versus Sham CPAP.17 Participants
Secondary

Hours of CPAP Per Night

Mean hours of nightly CPAP use, regardless of treatment allocation, at hospital discharge.

Time frame: up to 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eligible Recruited Participants: Active-CPAPHours of CPAP Per Night3.9 hours of CPAP per nightStandard Deviation 2.7
Eligible Recruited Participants: Sham-CPAPHours of CPAP Per Night3.6 hours of CPAP per nightStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Median Change in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Between Admission and Discharge From the Rehabilitation Unit Comparing Active-CPAP Versus Sham-CPAP.

The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), a sensitive disability scale, is an 18-item instrument measuring the burden of care associated with aspects of motor and cognitive function. Higher scores represent better stroke recovery where scores for each of the 18 items range from 1 (complete dependence) to 7 (complete independence). The overall FIM score ranges between 18 and 126. The FIM score can also be further broken down based on its motor and cognitive components. The 13 items of the motor FIM subscale range between 13 and 91, whereas the 5 items of the cognitive FIM subscale can range between 5 and 35. The motor and cognitive sub scales are summed to provide the total FIM score and the difference between the FIM scores on admission to the rehabilitation unit and discharge from the unit were calculated for each eligible participant.

Time frame: Baseline and discharge up to 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Eligible Recruited Participants: Active-CPAPMedian Change in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Between Admission and Discharge From the Rehabilitation Unit Comparing Active-CPAP Versus Sham-CPAP.34 scores on a scale
Eligible Recruited Participants: Sham-CPAPMedian Change in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Between Admission and Discharge From the Rehabilitation Unit Comparing Active-CPAP Versus Sham-CPAP.26 scores on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026