Skip to content

A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of PRM-151 in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

A Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of PRM-151 in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02550873
Enrollment
117
Registered
2015-09-16
Start date
2015-09-01
Completion date
2017-05-02
Last updated
2022-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Brief summary

This study is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, pilot study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRM-151 administered through Week 24 to subjects with IPF.

Detailed description

PRM-151 is an anti-fibrotic immunomodulator being developed for treatment of fibrotic diseases.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPRM-151

PRM 151 10 mg/kg IV infusion over 60 minutes days 1, 3, and 5, then one infusion every 4 weeks

OTHERplacebo

Placebo IV infusion over 60 minutes on days 1, 3, and 5, then one infusion every 4 weeks

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Is aged 40-80 years. 2. Has IPF satisfying the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society /Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association (ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT) diagnostic criteria (Raghu, Collard et al. 2011). In the absence of a surgical lung biopsy, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) must be consistent with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) defined as meeting either criteria A, B, and C, or criteria A and C, or criteria B and C below: * Definite honeycomb lung destruction with basal and peripheral predominance. * Presence of reticular abnormality AND traction bronchiectasis consistent with fibrosis, with basal and peripheral predominance. * Atypical features are absent, specifically nodules and consolidation. Ground glass opacity, if present, is less extensive than reticular opacity pattern. 3. If on pirfenidone or nintedanib, subject must have been on a stable dose of pirfenidone or nintedanib for at least 3 months without increase in forced vital capacity (FVC)% predicted on two consecutive pulmonary function tests (PFTs), including screening PFTs. Subjects may not be on both pirfenidone and nintedanib. 4. If not currently receiving pirfenidone or nintedanib, subject must have been off pirfenidone or nintedanib for ≥ 4 weeks before baseline. 5. Has a FVC ≥ 50% and ≤ 90% of predicted. 6. Has a DLCO ≥ 25% and ≤ 90% of predicted. 7. Minimum distance on 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) of 150 meters. 8. Has a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FVC ratio \> 0.70. 9. Women of child bearing potential (WCBP), defined as a sexually mature woman not surgically sterilized or not post-menopausal for at least 24 consecutive months if ≤ 55 years or 12 months if \> 55 years, must have a negative serum pregnancy test within four weeks prior to the first dose of study drug and must agree to use adequate methods of birth control throughout the study. Adequate methods of contraception are defined in the protocol. 10. Has a life expectancy of at least 9 months 11. According to the investigator's best judgment, can comply with the requirements of the protocol. 12. Has provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Has emphysema ≥ 50% on HRCT or the extent of emphysema is greater than the extent of fibrosis according to reported results from the most recent HRCT. 2. Has a history of cigarette smoking within the previous 3 months. 3. Has received investigational therapy for IPF within 4 weeks before baseline. 4. Is receiving systemic corticosteroids equivalent to prednisone \> 10 mg/day or equivalent within 2 weeks of baseline. 5. Received azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, or cyclosporine A within 4 weeks of baseline. 6. Has a history of a malignancy within the previous 5 years, with the exception of basal cell skin neoplasms. In addition, a malignant diagnosis or condition first occurring prior to 5 years must be considered cured, inactive, and not under current treatment. 7. Has any concurrent condition other than IPF that, in the Investigator's opinion, is unstable and/or would impact the likelihood of survival for the study duration or the subject's ability to complete the study as designed, or may influence any of the safety or efficacy assessments included in the study. 8. Has baseline resting oxygen saturation of \< 89% on room air or supplemental oxygen. 9. Is unable to refrain from use of the following: * Short acting bronchodilators on the day of and within 12 hours of pulmonary function, DLCO, and 6 minute walk assessments. * Long acting bronchodilators on the day of and within 24 hours of these assessments. 10. Has a known post bronchodilator (short acting beta agonist \[SABA\] - albuterol or salbutamol) increase in FEV1 of \>10% and in FVC of \>7.5%.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [% Predicted]0 to 28 weeksDetermine the effect size of PRM-151 relative to placebo in change from Baseline to Week 28 in mean FVC% predicted, pooling subjects on a stable dose of pirfenidone or nintedanib with subjects not on other treatment for IPF.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Volume of Normal Lung on HRCT0 to 28 weeksMean change from baseline in volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of normal lung (non-ILA), including normal and mild low attenuation areas, using quantitative imaging software.
Change From Baseline in % of Normal Lung on HRCT (%)0 to 28 weeksMean change from baseline in % of total lung volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of normal lung (non-ILA), including normal and mild low attenuation areas, using quantitative imaging software.
Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)0 to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline in Total Lung Volume on High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)0 to 28 weeksMean change from baseline in total lung volume on HRCT using quantitative imaging software.
Change From Baseline in Volume of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILA) on HRCT0 to 28 weeksMean change from baseline in volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of ILA, including ground glass density, reticular changes, and honeycombing, using quantitative imaging software
Change From Baseline in % of Total Lung Volume of ILA on HRCT0 to 28 weeksMean change from baseline in % of total lung volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of ILA, including ground glass density, reticular changes, and honeycombing, using quantitative imaging software
Correlation Between Mean Change From Baseline in FVC [% Predicted] and Mean Change From Baseline in ILA0 to 28 weeksCorrelation between mean change from Baseline in FVC \[% predicted\] and mean change from Baseline in volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of ILA, including ground glass density, reticular changes, and honeycombing by quantitative imaging software.
Number of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.0 to 28 weeksPulmonary Function Tests for the Proportion (%) of subjects with a decline in FVC% predicted of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% from Baseline to Week 28.
Number of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.0 to 28 weeks
Number of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.0 to 28 weeks
Number of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 280 to 28 weeks
Number of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC of < 100 mL From Baseline to Week 28.0 to 28 weeks
Change From Baseline in % Predicted Diffusion Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO).0 to 28 weeksPulmonary Function Tests to discern the mean change from Baseline to Week 28 in % predicted diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO).
Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)0 to 28 weeksTolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the number of reported TEAEs
Percentage of Subjects Discontinuing Study Drug Due to AEs0 to 28 weeksTolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the proportion of subjects who discontinued study drug due to AEs
Percentage of Subjects Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 to 28 weeksTolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by incidence of SAEs
Percentage of Subjects Reporting Respiratory Decline SAEs [Safety and Tolerability]0 to 28 weeksTolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the number of reported serious respiratory decline AEs
Percentage of Subjects Reporting Respiratory Decline AEs0 to 28 weeksTolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the number of reported respiratory decline AEs, defined as follows: * Unscheduled visits to a healthcare professional for respiratory status deterioration. * Urgent care visits for respiratory status deterioration. * Hospitalization due to a worsening or exacerbation of respiratory symptoms.
Percentage of Subjects With Infusion Related Reactions0 to 28 weeksInfusion Related Reactions were defined as events of headache, fever, facial flushing, pruritus, myalgia, nausea, chest tightness, dyspnea, vomiting, erythema, abdominal discomfort, diaphoresis, shivers, hypertension, hypotension, lightheadedness, palpitations, urticaria and somnolence occurring between the start of a study treatment infusion and one hour after completion of the infusion.
All Cause Mortality0 to 28 weeksTolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the incidence of all cause mortality
Mortality Due to Respiratory Deterioration0 to 28 weeksTolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the incidence of mortality due to respiratory deterioration
Mortality Due to Disease Related Events0 to 28 weeksNumber of patients who died over the 28 week study period due to disease-related events (defined as cough, IPF exacerbation, IPF progression and respiratory decline AEs)
Number of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC [% Predicted] of < 5% From Baseline to Week 28.0 to 28 weeks

Other

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in FVC Volume0 to 28 weeks

Countries

Czechia, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

One hundred fifty-one (151) patients were screened for the study. Of these, one hundred seventeen (117) were found to be eligible and were randomized. One randomized patient dropped out of the study prior to receiving any study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PRM-151 10 mg/kg
Dosing Every 4 Weeks PRM-151: PRM 151 10 mg/kg IV infusion over 60 minutes days 1, 3, and 5, then one infusion every 4 weeks
77
Placebo
Dosing Every 4 weeks placebo: Placebo IV infusion over 60 minutes on days 1, 3, and 5, then one infusion every 4 weeks
39
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Open Label ExtensionStudy ongoing00111
Randomized Double BlindAdverse Event310
Randomized Double BlindDisease progression110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPRM-151 10 mg/kgPlacebo
6MWD442.5 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 101.7
434.8 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 92.5
457.7 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 117.7
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
78 Participants53 Participants25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
38 Participants24 Participants14 Participants
Comorbid Conditions
Cardiac Disorders
36 Participants29 Participants7 Participants
Comorbid Conditions
Coronary Artery Disorders
19 Participants15 Participants4 Participants
Comorbid Conditions
Emphysema
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Comorbid Conditions
GERD
63 Participants47 Participants16 Participants
Comorbid Conditions
Hypertension
52 Participants38 Participants14 Participants
Comorbid Conditions
Pulmonary Hypertension
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
FEV1/FVC81.3 Percentage of FEV1/FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
81.2 Percentage of FEV1/FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
81.6 Percentage of FEV1/FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
FVC2743 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 635
2733 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 630
2763 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 654
FVC [% predicted]67.6 Percentage of predicted FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
67.7 Percentage of predicted FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
67.4 Percentage of predicted FVC
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Hemoglobin-corrected DLCO41.2 Percentage of predicted DLCO
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
40.1 Percentage of predicted DLCO
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
43.2 Percentage of predicted DLCO
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
IPF Therapy Status at Baseline
Concurrent IPF Therapy
91 Participants61 Participants30 Participants
IPF Therapy Status at Baseline
Concurrent nintedanib
30 Participants22 Participants8 Participants
IPF Therapy Status at Baseline
Concurrent pirfenidone
61 Participants39 Participants22 Participants
IPF Therapy Status at Baseline
IPF therapy naiive
15 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
IPF Therapy Status at Baseline
No concurrent IPF therapy
25 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Race
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Race
Black/African
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Race
Hispanic
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity/Race
White
113 Participants74 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
94 Participants65 Participants29 Participants
SpO2 at rest95.6 Percentage of SpO2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
95.6 Percentage of SpO2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
95.5 Percentage of SpO2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Weight86.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
86.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
87.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Years since IPF diagnosis, mean (SD)3.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.32
3.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.16
3.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.62

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 771 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 7728 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 774 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [% Predicted]

Determine the effect size of PRM-151 relative to placebo in change from Baseline to Week 28 in mean FVC% predicted, pooling subjects on a stable dose of pirfenidone or nintedanib with subjects not on other treatment for IPF.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated patients

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [% Predicted]-2.5 Percentage of predicted FVC
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [% Predicted]-4.8 Percentage of predicted FVC
Comparison: The sample size calculation was based on the following assumptions:~Normal distribution Homogeneity of variance the same in both arms, and for both types of patients Randomization ratio PRM-151:placebo = 2:1 Expected value for patients on pirfenidone or nintedanib = -1.5 Expected value for patients on no other treatment = -3 Expected value for patients on PRM-151 ≥ 0.75 Standard deviation = 5 75% of patients on a stable dose of pirfenidone or nintedanib α=0.10 two-sided Power = 80%p-value: 0.001490% CI: [1.1, 3.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

All Cause Mortality

Tolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the incidence of all cause mortality

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgAll Cause Mortality0 Participants
PlaceboAll Cause Mortality1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated patients

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)-0.5 meters
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)-31.8 meters
p-value: 0.000290% CI: [17.4, 45.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in % of Normal Lung on HRCT (%)

Mean change from baseline in % of total lung volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of normal lung (non-ILA), including normal and mild low attenuation areas, using quantitative imaging software.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All patients from the ATS population who had HRCT data at both the Baseline and Week 28 time points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in % of Normal Lung on HRCT (%)-2.6 percentage of total lung volume
PlaceboChange From Baseline in % of Normal Lung on HRCT (%)-3.3 percentage of total lung volume
Placebo; No Background TherapyChange From Baseline in % of Normal Lung on HRCT (%)-1.4 percentage of total lung volume
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibChange From Baseline in % of Normal Lung on HRCT (%)-2.1 percentage of total lung volume
p-value: 0.5290% CI: [-4.4, 1.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in % of Total Lung Volume of ILA on HRCT

Mean change from baseline in % of total lung volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of ILA, including ground glass density, reticular changes, and honeycombing, using quantitative imaging software

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All patients from the ATS population who had HRCT data at both the Baseline and Week 28 time points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in % of Total Lung Volume of ILA on HRCT2.6 percentage of total lung volume
PlaceboChange From Baseline in % of Total Lung Volume of ILA on HRCT3.0 percentage of total lung volume
Placebo; No Background TherapyChange From Baseline in % of Total Lung Volume of ILA on HRCT1.5 percentage of total lung volume
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibChange From Baseline in % of Total Lung Volume of ILA on HRCT1.9 percentage of total lung volume
p-value: 0.583590% CI: [-2.2, 4.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in % Predicted Diffusion Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO).

Pulmonary Function Tests to discern the mean change from Baseline to Week 28 in % predicted diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO).

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in % Predicted Diffusion Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO).-2.8 percentage of predicted DLCO
PlaceboChange From Baseline in % Predicted Diffusion Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO).-3.0 percentage of predicted DLCO
Placebo; No Background TherapyChange From Baseline in % Predicted Diffusion Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO).-2.4 percentage of predicted DLCO
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibChange From Baseline in % Predicted Diffusion Capacity of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO).-2.5 percentage of predicted DLCO
p-value: 0.742490% CI: [-2.6, 1.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Lung Volume on High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)

Mean change from baseline in total lung volume on HRCT using quantitative imaging software.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All patients from the ATS population who had HRCT data at both the Baseline and Week 28 time points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Total Lung Volume on High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)-103.8 milliliters
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Lung Volume on High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)-108.1 milliliters
Placebo; No Background TherapyChange From Baseline in Total Lung Volume on High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)-197.3 milliliters
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibChange From Baseline in Total Lung Volume on High-resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)-201.6 milliliters
p-value: 0.203290% CI: [-27.7, 214.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Volume of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILA) on HRCT

Mean change from baseline in volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of ILA, including ground glass density, reticular changes, and honeycombing, using quantitative imaging software

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All patients from the ATS population who had HRCT data at both the Baseline and Week 28 time points.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Volume of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILA) on HRCT49.7 millilitersStandard Error 49.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Volume of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILA) on HRCT80.9 millilitersStandard Error 29.21
Placebo; No Background TherapyChange From Baseline in Volume of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILA) on HRCT17.8 millilitersStandard Error 55.26
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibChange From Baseline in Volume of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILA) on HRCT49.0 millilitersStandard Error 39.64
p-value: 0.492790% CI: [-45, 108.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Volume of Normal Lung on HRCT

Mean change from baseline in volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of normal lung (non-ILA), including normal and mild low attenuation areas, using quantitative imaging software.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All patients from the ATS population who had HRCT data at both the Baseline and Week 28 time points.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Volume of Normal Lung on HRCT-165.2 milliliters
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Volume of Normal Lung on HRCT-201.1 milliliters
Placebo; No Background TherapyChange From Baseline in Volume of Normal Lung on HRCT-208.8 milliliters
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibChange From Baseline in Volume of Normal Lung on HRCT-244.7 milliliters
p-value: 0.670790% CI: [-126.3, 213.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Correlation Between Mean Change From Baseline in FVC [% Predicted] and Mean Change From Baseline in ILA

Correlation between mean change from Baseline in FVC \[% predicted\] and mean change from Baseline in volume of parenchymal features on HRCT representative of ILA, including ground glass density, reticular changes, and honeycombing by quantitative imaging software.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All patients from the ATS population who had FVC and HRCT data at both the Baseline and Week 28 time points.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgCorrelation Between Mean Change From Baseline in FVC [% Predicted] and Mean Change From Baseline in ILA-0.5027 Correlation coefficient
PlaceboCorrelation Between Mean Change From Baseline in FVC [% Predicted] and Mean Change From Baseline in ILA-0.4570 Correlation coefficient
p-value: 0.0001Pearson's correlation
Comparison: This study was not powered to test hypotheses beyond the primary endpoint.p-value: 0.0069Pearson's correlation
Secondary

Mortality Due to Disease Related Events

Number of patients who died over the 28 week study period due to disease-related events (defined as cough, IPF exacerbation, IPF progression and respiratory decline AEs)

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgMortality Due to Disease Related Events0 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Disease Related Events0 Participants
Secondary

Mortality Due to Respiratory Deterioration

Tolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the incidence of mortality due to respiratory deterioration

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgMortality Due to Respiratory Deterioration0 Participants
PlaceboMortality Due to Respiratory Deterioration1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated patients with data at baseline and Week 28

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.Decrease in FVC ≥ 200 mL2 Participants
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.Decrease in FVC ≥ 100 mL5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.Decrease in FVC ≥ 100 mL32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.Decrease in FVC ≥ 200 mL19 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.Decrease in FVC ≥ 200 mL1 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.Decrease in FVC ≥ 100 mL2 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.Decrease in FVC ≥ 200 mL8 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28.Decrease in FVC ≥ 100 mL16 Participants
p-value: 0.7773Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.5976Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.

Pulmonary Function Tests for the Proportion (%) of subjects with a decline in FVC% predicted of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% from Baseline to Week 28.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated patients with data at baseline and 28 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.Decline in % Predicted FVC ≥ 5%2 Participants
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.Decline in % Predicted FVC ≥10%1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.Decline in % Predicted FVC ≥10%1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.Decline in % Predicted FVC ≥ 5%18 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.Decline in % Predicted FVC ≥ 5%2 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.Decline in % Predicted FVC ≥10%0 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.Decline in % Predicted FVC ≥ 5%11 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With a Decline in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% From Baseline to Week 28.Decline in % Predicted FVC ≥10%3 Participants
p-value: 0.4179Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.2184Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated patients with FVC data at Baseline and Week 28

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28Increase in FVC ≥ 100 mL1 Participants
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28Increase in FVC ≥ 200 mL0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28Increase in FVC ≥ 200 mL0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28Increase in FVC ≥ 100 mL6 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28Increase in FVC ≥ 100 mL0 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28Increase in FVC ≥ 200 mL0 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28Increase in FVC ≥ 100 mL0 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC of ≥ 100 mL and ≥ 200 mL From Baseline to Week 28Increase in FVC ≥ 200 mL0 Participants
p-value: 0.0508Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.Increase in % Predicted FVC ≥5%1 Participants
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.Increase in % Predicted FVC ≥10%0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.Increase in % Predicted FVC ≥10%0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.Increase in % Predicted FVC ≥5%1 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.Increase in % Predicted FVC ≥5%0 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.Increase in % Predicted FVC ≥10%0 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.Increase in % Predicted FVC ≥5%0 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With an Increase in FVC [% Predicted] of ≥ 5% and ≥10% From Baseline to Week 28.Increase in % Predicted FVC ≥10%0 Participants
p-value: 0.29Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC of < 100 mL From Baseline to Week 28.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated subjects with FVC data at Baseline and Week 28

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC of < 100 mL From Baseline to Week 28.7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC of < 100 mL From Baseline to Week 28.16 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC of < 100 mL From Baseline to Week 28.6 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC of < 100 mL From Baseline to Week 28.11 Participants
p-value: 0.1846Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC [% Predicted] of < 5% From Baseline to Week 28.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated subjects with data at baseline and week 28

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgNumber of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC [% Predicted] of < 5% From Baseline to Week 28.10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC [% Predicted] of < 5% From Baseline to Week 28.35 Participants
Placebo; No Background TherapyNumber of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC [% Predicted] of < 5% From Baseline to Week 28.6 Participants
Placebo; Pirfenidone or NintedanibNumber of Subjects With Stable Disease, Defined as a Change in FVC [% Predicted] of < 5% From Baseline to Week 28.16 Participants
p-value: 0.6308Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Discontinuing Study Drug Due to AEs

Tolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the proportion of subjects who discontinued study drug due to AEs

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgPercentage of Subjects Discontinuing Study Drug Due to AEs2 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Discontinuing Study Drug Due to AEs1 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Reporting Respiratory Decline AEs

Tolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the number of reported respiratory decline AEs, defined as follows: * Unscheduled visits to a healthcare professional for respiratory status deterioration. * Urgent care visits for respiratory status deterioration. * Hospitalization due to a worsening or exacerbation of respiratory symptoms.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgPercentage of Subjects Reporting Respiratory Decline AEs11 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Reporting Respiratory Decline AEs4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Reporting Respiratory Decline SAEs [Safety and Tolerability]

Tolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the number of reported serious respiratory decline AEs

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgPercentage of Subjects Reporting Respiratory Decline SAEs [Safety and Tolerability]4 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Reporting Respiratory Decline SAEs [Safety and Tolerability]4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Tolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by incidence of SAEs

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgPercentage of Subjects Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)6 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Infusion Related Reactions

Infusion Related Reactions were defined as events of headache, fever, facial flushing, pruritus, myalgia, nausea, chest tightness, dyspnea, vomiting, erythema, abdominal discomfort, diaphoresis, shivers, hypertension, hypotension, lightheadedness, palpitations, urticaria and somnolence occurring between the start of a study treatment infusion and one hour after completion of the infusion.

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgPercentage of Subjects With Infusion Related ReactionsAny Infusion Related Reaction2 Participants
PRM-151 10 mg/kgPercentage of Subjects With Infusion Related ReactionsDizziness1 Participants
PRM-151 10 mg/kgPercentage of Subjects With Infusion Related ReactionsHypertensive crisis1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Infusion Related ReactionsAny Infusion Related Reaction1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Infusion Related ReactionsDizziness0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Infusion Related ReactionsHypertensive crisis1 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Tolerability/safety was assessed over the 28-week study period by the number of reported TEAEs

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: Safety population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgPercentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)71 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)36 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in FVC Volume

Time frame: 0 to 28 weeks

Population: All treated subjects

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PRM-151 10 mg/kgChange From Baseline in FVC Volume-127.7 milliliters
PlaceboChange From Baseline in FVC Volume-242.3 milliliters
p-value: 0.041690% CI: [22.2, 207.1]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026