Skip to content

The Role of the Rate of Force Application in Responses to Spinal Manipulation Therapy

Neuromechanical Response to Spinal Manipulation Therapy: Effects of a Constant Rate of Force Application

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02550132
Enrollment
25
Registered
2015-09-15
Start date
2013-06-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2016-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Manipulation

Keywords

electromyography, biomechanical phenomena, dose-response relationship, musculoskeletal manipulations, spinal manipulation

Brief summary

The objective of the present study is to determine if spinal manipulations with a constant rate of force application but with different peak force and time to peak force lead to similar responses in healthy adults.

Detailed description

Although there are indirect evidences that the rate of force application modulates neuromuscular responses to spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) through peak force or thrust duration modulations, such an assumption remains to be confirmed. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine if different SMT force-time profiles where a constant rate of force application would be maintained (through the modulation of the peak force and the time to peak force) lead to similar neuromechanical responses. Based on the available data relative to the effect of SMT biomechanical parameters modulation, it was hypothesized that neuromuscular responses would be similar across SMT force-time profiles, while vertebral displacements would increase as SMT peak force increases.

Interventions

PROCEDURESpinal manipulation

Participants will lie down during the 45-minute experimental session. Vertebral displacements (cm) and muscle response amplitude (RMS value) will be recorded through kinematic markers (on T6, T7 and T8 spinous processes) and surface electromyography electrodes (on the left and right erector spinae at T6 and T8 vertebra level). Each SMT (4 per participant) will be delivered at T7 transverse processes by an apparatus. Responses during the thrust phase (duration equal to twice the time to peak force) and after the thrust (1,5s duration) will be compared between SMTs.

DEVICEApparatus used to deliver spinal manipulations

An apparatus using a servo-controlled linear actuator motor (Linear Motor Series P01-48x360, LinMot Inc., Switzerland) will be used to deliver spinal manipulations.

Sponsors

Fondation Chiropratique du Québec
CollaboratorOTHER
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy adult

Exclusion criteria

* Thoracic or lumbar pain * History of back trauma or surgery * Severe osteoarthritis * Inflammatory arthritis * Vascular conditions * Contraindication to the use of SMT

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Left T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) ValueDuring the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onsetNormalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.
Left T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) ValueDuring the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onsetNormalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.
Right T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) ValueDuring the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onsetNormalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.
Right T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) ValueDuring the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onsetNormalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.
Vertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic VertebraDuring the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onsetAbsolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter
Vertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic VertebraDuring the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onsetAbsolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter
Vertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic VertebraDuring the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onsetAbsolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants
All volunteers will participate in an experimental session. Participants will be delivered four different spinal manipulations (SMT) at T7 with a rate of force application of about 2200 Newtons/seconds and a preload force of 25 Newtons (N). SMTs will differed in their time to peak force (ms) and peak force (N), respectively fixed as follow for each applied SMT: (1)57 ms / 150 N, (2)80 ms / 200 N, (3)102 ms / 250 N and (4)125 ms / 300 N.
25
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants
Age, Continuous24.76 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Region of Enrollment
Canada
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Left T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 250N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsLeft T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value4.92 ratioStandard Error 0.91
Primary

Left T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 300N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsLeft T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value4.17 ratioStandard Error 0.53
Primary

Left T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsLeft T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.72 ratioStandard Error 0.68
Primary

Left T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 200N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsLeft T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value4.75 ratioStandard Error 0.76
Primary

Left T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsLeft T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value2.83 ratioStandard Error 0.3
Primary

Left T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 250N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsLeft T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value4.03 ratioStandard Error 0.52
Primary

Left T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 200N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsLeft T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value4.12 ratioStandard Error 0.5
Primary

Left T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 300N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsLeft T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value4.80 ratioStandard Error 0.88
Primary

Right T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsRight T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.03 ratioStandard Error 0.35
Primary

Right T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 200N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsRight T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.13 ratioStandard Error 0.33
Primary

Right T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 300N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsRight T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.87 ratioStandard Error 0.64
Primary

Right T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 250N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsRight T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.40 ratioStandard Error 0.4
Primary

Right T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 300N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsRight T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.79 ratioStandard Error 0.49
Primary

Right T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 250N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsRight T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.57 ratioStandard Error 0.55
Primary

Right T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 200N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsRight T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.46 ratioStandard Error 0.41
Primary

Right T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value

Normalized amplitude (RMS) of surface electromyography response. The normalisation was achieved by dividing the obtained RMS by the RMS value before thrust application.

Time frame: During the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsRight T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value3.51 ratioStandard Error 0.84
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 300N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra1.70 cmStandard Error 0.07
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 200N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra1.10 cmStandard Error 0.05
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 250N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra1.40 cmStandard Error 0.05
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra0.76 cmStandard Error 0.04
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra1.01 cmStandard Error 0.03
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 250N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra1.69 cmStandard Error 0.05
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 300N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra1.40 cmStandard Error 0.08
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 200N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra1.32 cmStandard Error 0.06
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 150N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra0.81 cmStandard Error 0.04
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 300N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra1.74 cmStandard Error 0.09
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 250N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra1.48 cmStandard Error 0.06
Primary

Vertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra

Absolute posterior to anterior vertebral displacement during the spinal manipulation in centimeter

Time frame: During the 200N spinal manipulation procedure, assessed up to 2 seconds following thrust onset

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsVertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra1.18 cmStandard Error 0.07

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026