Skip to content

Comparison Study Using APAP With and Without SensAwake in Patients With OSA and PTSD

Comparison Study Using APAP With and Without SensAwake in Patients With OSA and PTSD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02549508
Enrollment
85
Registered
2015-09-15
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2018-05-31
Last updated
2020-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Brief summary

The purpose of this research is to examine the application of AutoCPAP with and without SensAwake in subjects with OSA and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and evaluate whether patients achieve better sleep quality and compliance with SensAwake, compared to the same treatment without SensAwake.

Detailed description

Conceptually, awareness of pressure occurs only during wakefulness. Thus reducing the pressure during wakefulness may improve therapy comfort and potentially adherence without compromising therapy efficacy. SensAwake™ is a unique pressure relief technology developed by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare which detects irregularity in the flow signal indicative of the transition from sleep to wake. When the transition from sleep to wake is detected the device promptly reduces the pressure to help facilitate a return to sleep. It is hypothesised that AutoCPAP with SensAwake will improve patient comfort and compliance in the PTSD and OSA patients who are naïve to CPAP therapy. The investigators will not be blinded to the study. The participants will be blinded to the study.

Interventions

DEVICEAutoCPAP with SensAwake On

The comfort feature 'SensAwake' will be turned on

DEVICEAutoCPAP with SensAwake Off

The comfort feature 'SensAwake' will be turned off

Sponsors

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Male and female subjects \> 18 years Diagnosed with OSA by a practicing sleep physician, within the last six months Diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder as diagnosed by a behavioral health professional, and quantified by McChord PTSD checklist All races and ethnicities will be included Naïve to CPAP therapy (has not used CPAP within the last 5 years)

Exclusion criteria

\< 18 years of age if mental status is questionable, the patient will be excluded at the discretion of the consenting provider Unable/unwilling to follow the directions necessary for CPAP use Patients contraindicated for CPAP/AutoCPAP, at the discretion of the consenting provider

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence (Hours on Therapy)4 weeksHours per night averaged over total time period measured.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Quality (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)Change from Baseline after 4 weeksThe ESS is a validated questionnaire that assesses an idnviduals likelihood of falling asleep in a variety of given situations (such as having a conversation with someone or stopped a red light while driving.) Each question is given a rating between 0 and 3, with 0 being no chance of falling asleep and 3 being high chance of falling asleep. Answers are then summed together to determine the level of sleepiness an individual is experiencing with a maximum score of 24. The higher the score, the more sleepy the person is. From a clinical perspective an ESS score of 0-10 indicates a normal level sleepiness, a score of 11-14 indicates mild sleepiness, a score of 15-17 indicates moderate sleepiness and a score of 18+ indicates severe sleepiness. Results below are reported as a mean change from baseline in which negative scores indicate reduction in ESS from baseline (less sleepiness). Positive scores indicate increase in ESS from baseline (more sleepiness.)
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)Change from Baseline after 4 weeksISI; 0-7 = No clinically significant insomnia, 8-14 = Sub threshold insomnia, 15-21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity), 22-28 = Clinical insomnia (severe). Results reported in mean change from baseline. Negative scores indicate improvement in ISI, positive scores indicate increase in ISI.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AutoCPAP With SensAwake On First, Then SensAwake Off
Randomized participants in this group will experience SensaAwake On first while using AutoCPAP for the first 4 weeks of the intervention. After 4 weeks, participants will cross over to the opposite arm and complete 4 weeks with SensAwake off while using AutoCPAP.
47
AutoCPAP With SensAwake Off First, Then SensAwake On
Randomized participants in this group will experience SensaAwake Off first while using AutoCPAP for the first 4 weeks of the intervention. After 4 weeks, participants will cross over to the opposite arm and complete 4 weeks with SensAwake On while using AutoCPAP.
38
Total85

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAutoCPAP With SensAwake Off First, Then SensAwake OnTotalAutoCPAP With SensAwake On First, Then SensAwake Off
Age, Continuous37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
37.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants85 participants47 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants73 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 710 / 72
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 710 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 710 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Adherence (Hours on Therapy)

Hours per night averaged over total time period measured.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AutoCPAP With SensAwake OnAdherence (Hours on Therapy)1.1 Hours/night
AutoCPAP With SensAwake Off FirstAdherence (Hours on Therapy)0.5 Hours/night
Secondary

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

ISI; 0-7 = No clinically significant insomnia, 8-14 = Sub threshold insomnia, 15-21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity), 22-28 = Clinical insomnia (severe). Results reported in mean change from baseline. Negative scores indicate improvement in ISI, positive scores indicate increase in ISI.

Time frame: Change from Baseline after 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AutoCPAP With SensAwake OnInsomnia Severity Index (ISI)-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
AutoCPAP With SensAwake Off FirstInsomnia Severity Index (ISI)-4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Secondary

Sleep Quality (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

The ESS is a validated questionnaire that assesses an idnviduals likelihood of falling asleep in a variety of given situations (such as having a conversation with someone or stopped a red light while driving.) Each question is given a rating between 0 and 3, with 0 being no chance of falling asleep and 3 being high chance of falling asleep. Answers are then summed together to determine the level of sleepiness an individual is experiencing with a maximum score of 24. The higher the score, the more sleepy the person is. From a clinical perspective an ESS score of 0-10 indicates a normal level sleepiness, a score of 11-14 indicates mild sleepiness, a score of 15-17 indicates moderate sleepiness and a score of 18+ indicates severe sleepiness. Results below are reported as a mean change from baseline in which negative scores indicate reduction in ESS from baseline (less sleepiness). Positive scores indicate increase in ESS from baseline (more sleepiness.)

Time frame: Change from Baseline after 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AutoCPAP With SensAwake OnSleep Quality (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
AutoCPAP With SensAwake Off FirstSleep Quality (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026