Skip to content

A Study to Examine the Effect of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) Therapy Relative to That of Optimized Medical Treatment (OMT) on Non-motor Symptoms (NMS) Associated With Advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD)

An Open-label, Randomized 26-Week Study Comparing Levodopa-Carbidopa INteStInal Gel (LCIG) THerapy to Optimized Medical Treatment (OMT) on Non-Motor Symptoms (NMS) in Subjects With Advanced Parkinson's Disease - INSIGHTS Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02549092
Enrollment
89
Registered
2015-09-15
Start date
2015-10-26
Completion date
2022-11-18
Last updated
2023-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, levodopa, carbidopa, Advanced Parkinson's Disease, Non-Motor Symptom Scale NMSS, Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale PDSS-2, efficacy

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to examine the effect of LCIG relative to that of OMT on NMS associated with PD.

Detailed description

The study will consist of 3 sequential parts: Part 1: Screening period. The screening period will consist of 3 visits, Visit 1 (V1), Visit 2 (\[V2\] \[optional\]) and the Randomization Visit (V3) in which the participant will be assessed to determine eligibility. The duration of the Screening Period can be between 30 to 67 days to accommodate the required procedures, training and collection of diaries, and to allow for stabilization of anti-PD medications and medications to treat NMS. All anti-PD medications and medications to treat NMS are required to be stable for a minimum of 30 days prior to randomization. Part 2: Treatment period. Those participants randomized to OMT at the end of V3 will remain on their current optimized regimen. The day after randomization will be considered Day 1 of their treatment period and participants will have study visits at the end of Weeks 2, 6, 12, and 26. All participants randomized to the LCIG group should have all anti-PD medications, with the exception of levodopa formulations, tapered off within 14 days after randomization. Optional nasojujunal (NJ) and/or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with a jejunal tube (PEG-J) placement will then occur. After that, the participant may begin initiation and titration of LCIG infusion to be adjusted to obtain the optimal clinical response. The day of initial NJ or PEG-J placement will be considered Day 1 for participants in the LCIG group. Study visits happen at the end of Weeks 2, 6, 12, and 26. Part 3: Extension/Transition Period. Eligible participants who complete the 26 week study may continue into the Extension Period of the study. Participants in the LCIG arm will have study drug dispensation every 4 weeks and will have study visits every 6 months. Participants from the OMT arm will undergo the NJ (optional) and PEG-J procedures, titration, plus have visits at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post NJ or PEG-J. Participants will then continue to receive study drug every 4 weeks and will have study visits every 6 months until Duodopa is commercially available. Transition to a Post-Trial Access protocol will be possible if Duodopa does not become commercially available in a location.

Interventions

Oral, sublingual or transdermal anti-PD medications and medications to treat NMS per Investigator discretion and/or in accordance with approved product label of the prescribed medications.

DEVICENasojejunal (NJ) tube

optional prior to PEG-J placement

DEVICEPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with a jejunal (PEG-J) tube

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participant(s) must have a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease according to the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society (UKPDS) Brain Bank Criteria. 2. Participant(s) demonstrates persistent motor fluctuations in spite of individually optimized treatment. 3. The participant's Parkinson's disease is levodopa-responsive. 4. Participant(s) has had optimized treatment with available anti-PD medication and their motor symptoms are judged inadequately controlled on this optimized treatment. Optimized treatment is defined as the maximum therapeutic effect obtained with pharmacological antiparkinsonian therapies when no further improvement is expected regardless of any additional manipulations of levodopa and/or other antiparkinsonian medication. This will be based on the Investigator's clinical judgment. 5. Male or female participant(s) must be at least 30 years of age. 6. Minimum Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale 2 (PDSS-2) total score of 18 at Baseline assessment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Participant's PD diagnosis is unclear or there is a suspicion that the subject has a parkinsonian syndrome such as secondary parkinsonism (e.g. caused by drugs, toxins, infectious agents, vascular disease, trauma, brain neoplasm), parkinson-plus syndrome (e.g. Multiple System Atrophy, Progressive supranuclear Palsy, Diffuse Lewy Body disease) or other neurodegenerative disease that might mimic the symptoms of PD. 2. Participant(s) has undergone neurosurgery for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. 3. Known hypersensitivity to levodopa, carbidopa or radiopaque material. 4. Participant(s) has contraindications to levodopa (e.g. narrow angle glaucoma, malignant melanoma). 5. Participant(s) experiencing clinically significant sleep attacks or clinically significant impulsive behavior (e.g. pathological gambling, hypersexuality) at any point during the three months prior to the Screening evaluation as judged by the Principal Investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Total ScoreBaseline, Week 26The NMSS consists of 30 questions in 9 domains (cardiovascular/falls, sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, GI tract, urinary, sexual function, miscellaneous). Score of each question is calculated by multiplying severity\*frequency. Severity and frequency are rated using a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) for severity and from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent) for frequency. Total score is the sum of 9 domains, and ranges from 0 to 360, with a lower value indicating a more desirable outcome. Repeated-measure analysis.
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Total ScoreBaseline, Week 26The PDSS-2 addresses PD-specific sleep disturbances such as restless leg syndrome (RLS), morning akinesia, pain, and sleep apnea. The frequency is assessed for the 15 sleep problems based on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 \[never\] to 4 \[very often\]). Scores are calculated for each of the 3 domains (motor symptoms at night, PD symptoms at night, and disturbed sleep) as well as a total score. The PDSS-2 domain scores range from 0 to 20 and the total score is a sum of the 3 domains and ranges from 0 to 60. Repeated measure analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II ScoreBaseline, Week 26UPDRS is an investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease of 42 total questions. Part I (Questions 1 - 4), Part II (Questions 5 - 17), Part III (Questions 18 - 31), and Part IV (Questions 32 - 42). Questions 35 - 38 and 40 - 42 are 2-point (0 and 1), all other questions are 5-point (0 - 4). Part II scores range from 0 to 52 with lower value desirable.
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresBaseline, Week 26The NMSS consists of 30 questions in 9 domains. Score of each question is calculated by multiplying severity\*frequency. Severity and frequency are rated using a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) for severity and from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent) for frequency. Cardiovascular/falls scores range from 0 - 24 with lower value desirable. Sleep/fatigue scores range from 0 - 48 with lower value desirable. Mood/cognition scores range from 0 - 72 with lower value desirable. Perceptual problems/hallucinations scores range from 0 - 36 with lower value desirable. Attention/memory scores range from 0 - 36 with lower value desirable. Gastrointestinal tract scores range from 0 - 36 with lower value desirable. Urinary scores range from 0 - 36 with lower value desirable. Sexual function scores range from 0 - 24 with lower value desirable. Miscellaneous scores range from 0 - 48 with lower value desirable. Repeated-measure analysis.
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Domain ScoresBaseline, Week 26The PDSS-2 addresses PD-specific sleep disturbances such as restless leg syndrome (RLS), morning akinesia, pain, and sleep apnea. The frequency is assessed for the 15 sleep problems based on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 \[never\] to 4 \[very often\]). Scores are calculated for each of the 3 domains (motor symptoms at night, PD symptoms at night, and disturbed sleep) as well as a total score. The PDSS-2 domain scores range from 0 to 20 and the total score is a sum of the 3 domains and ranges from 0 to 60. Repeated measure analysis.
Change From Baseline at Week 26 in UPDRS Parts I, III, and IV ScoreBaseline, Week 26UPDRS is an investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease of 42 total questions. Part I (Questions 1 - 4), Part II (Questions 5 - 17), Part III (Questions 18 - 31), and Part IV (Questions 32 - 42). Questions 35 - 38 and 40 - 42 are 2-point (0 and 1), all other questions are 5-point (0 - 4). Part I is the sum of Questions 1 - 4; scores range from 0 to 16 with lower value desirable. Part III is the sum of Questions 18 - 31 (Questions 20 - 26 apply to multiple body parts, resulting in 27 answers total); scores range from 0 to 108 with lower value desirable. Part IV is the sum of Questions 32 - 42; scores range from 0 to 23 with lower value desirable.
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) Summary Index ScoreBaseline, Week 26The PDQ-8 is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure aspects of health relevant to PD. Eight questions including the mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort are assessed on a 5-point scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Occasionally, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always (or cannot do at all, if applicable). Summary index score is the sum of each question divided by 32 and multiplied by 100. Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower values desirable.
Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) ScoreBaseline, Week 26The GDS-15 is a short, self-report reliable and valid screening instrument for depression in the elderly of 15 yes/no questions: 1) Satisfied with life 2) Dropped many activities and interests 3) Life is empty 4) Often get bored 5) In good spirits most of the time 6) Afraid that something bad is going to happen 7) Feel happy most of the time 8) Often feel helpless 9) Prefer to stay at home, rather than going out and doing things 10) Feel that have more problems with memory than most 11) Think it is wonderful to be alive now 12) Feel worthless 13) Feel full of energy 14) Situation is hopeless 15) Most subjects are better off. Answers of 'yes' to questions 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15 are scored 1 point. Answers of 'no' to questions 1, 5, 7, 11, 13 are scored 1 point. The 15 items are summed and scores range from 0 - 15 with lower value desirable.
Change From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreBaseline, Week 26The KPPS score is a clinical PD-specific pain scale of 14 items addressing the following 7 domains: musculoskeletal pain, chronic pain, fluctuation-related pain, nocturnal pain, orofacial pain, neuropathic pain, radicular pain. Each domain item is scored by severity (0, none to 3, very severe) multiplied by frequency (0, never to 4, all the time) resulting in a subscore of 0 - 12 (with lower value desirable), the sum of the 14 items gives the total score with a range from 0 to 168 with lower value desirable.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Final ScoreEnd of Treatment Period (up to Week 26)The PGIC is a 7-point response scale. The participant was asked by the Investigator or qualified designee to rate their change in status using the following 7-point scale: 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse. PGIC score ranges from 1 to 7 with lower score desirable.
Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 26PAS is a 12-item scale developed specifically to measure severity in anxiety in Parkinson's disease for the following items: Feeling anxious or nervous; Feeling tense or stressed; Being unable to relax; Excessive worrying about everyday matters; Fear of something bad, or even the worst, happening; Panic or intense fear; Shortness of breath; Heart palpitations or heart beating fast; Fear of losing control; Social situations; Public settings; Specific objects or situations. Severity for each item is rated as: 0, Never; 1 Rarely; 2, Sometimes; 3, Often; 4, Nearly always. Total score is the sum of the12 item scores, with a range of 0 to 48; a lower value is desirable.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Final ScoreEnd of Treatment Period (up to Week 26)CGI-C score is a clinician's impression of a subject's change in status on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally Improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse). Scores range from 1 to 7, with lower score desirable.

Countries

Australia, Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 32 sites in 9 countries.

Pre-assignment details

After a 30- to 67-day Screening Period for required procedures, training, and medication stabilization, eligible participants were randomized to Optimized Medical Treatment (OMT) or Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) for a 26-week Treatment Period. Before Treatment Period Day 1, LCIG participants had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with a jejunal extension (PEG-J; with an initial, optional, temporary nasojejunal \[NJ\] tube placement to titrate the dose of LCIG prior to the PEG-J).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Optimized Medical Treatment
Participants randomized to continue OMT remained on their current optimized regimen during the 26-week treatment phase. Changes to anti-PD and NMS medications are to remain stable and can only be made if medically indicated. Participants in the United States or South Korea may have elected to enter an Extension/Transition follow-up period to receive an individually optimized LCIG dose (after NJ and/or PEG-J placement), in order to transition to commercially available LCIG.
44
LCIG
Participants randomized to LCIG at an individually optimized dose, in accordance with the LCIG approved product label for countries participating in the study during the 26-week treatment phase. Changes to anti-PD and NMS medications were to remain stable and were only made if medically indicated. The total daily dose of LCIG was composed of 3 components: (i) the morning dose, (ii) continuous maintenance infusion dose and (iii) extra doses. The continuous infusion was expected to run over a period of 16 consecutive hours each day. Participants in the United States or South Korea may have elected to enter an Extension/Transition follow-up period to receive an individually optimized LCIG dose, in order to transition to commercially available LCIG.
43
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Extension/Transition PeriodAdverse Event11
Extension/Transition PeriodOther, Not Specified42
Extension/Transition PeriodWithdrawal by Subject01
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event22
Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy02
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalLCIGOptimized Medical Treatment
Age, Continuous67.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.81
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.34
68.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.21
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
71 Participants36 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Modified Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS-2) Total Score30.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.94
29.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.36
30.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.55
Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) Total Score106.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 49.14
99.7 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.49
112.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.37
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
17 Participants8 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants34 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants14 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants29 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 440 / 451 / 100 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 4433 / 436 / 104 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 449 / 432 / 101 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Total Score

The PDSS-2 addresses PD-specific sleep disturbances such as restless leg syndrome (RLS), morning akinesia, pain, and sleep apnea. The frequency is assessed for the 15 sleep problems based on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 \[never\] to 4 \[very often\]). Scores are calculated for each of the 3 domains (motor symptoms at night, PD symptoms at night, and disturbed sleep) as well as a total score. The PDSS-2 domain scores range from 0 to 20 and the total score is a sum of the 3 domains and ranges from 0 to 60. Repeated measure analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with baseline and a post-baseline measurement are reported in this table.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Total Score-8.98 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Total Score-7.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.01
p-value: 0.50995% CI: [-3.16, 6.3]mixed model repeated measures
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Total Score

The NMSS consists of 30 questions in 9 domains (cardiovascular/falls, sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, GI tract, urinary, sexual function, miscellaneous). Score of each question is calculated by multiplying severity\*frequency. Severity and frequency are rated using a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) for severity and from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent) for frequency. Total score is the sum of 9 domains, and ranges from 0 to 360, with a lower value indicating a more desirable outcome. Repeated-measure analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with baseline and a post-baseline measurement are reported in this table.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Total Score-23.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 8.3
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Total Score-32.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 8.53
p-value: 0.4195% CI: [-27.98, 11.55]mixed model repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) Score

The GDS-15 is a short, self-report reliable and valid screening instrument for depression in the elderly of 15 yes/no questions: 1) Satisfied with life 2) Dropped many activities and interests 3) Life is empty 4) Often get bored 5) In good spirits most of the time 6) Afraid that something bad is going to happen 7) Feel happy most of the time 8) Often feel helpless 9) Prefer to stay at home, rather than going out and doing things 10) Feel that have more problems with memory than most 11) Think it is wonderful to be alive now 12) Feel worthless 13) Feel full of energy 14) Situation is hopeless 15) Most subjects are better off. Answers of 'yes' to questions 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15 are scored 1 point. Answers of 'no' to questions 1, 5, 7, 11, 13 are scored 1 point. The 15 items are summed and scores range from 0 - 15 with lower value desirable.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) Score0.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) Score0.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
p-value: 0.86895% CI: [-0.99, 0.84]repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) Score

The KPPS score is a clinical PD-specific pain scale of 14 items addressing the following 7 domains: musculoskeletal pain, chronic pain, fluctuation-related pain, nocturnal pain, orofacial pain, neuropathic pain, radicular pain. Each domain item is scored by severity (0, none to 3, very severe) multiplied by frequency (0, never to 4, all the time) resulting in a subscore of 0 - 12 (with lower value desirable), the sum of the 14 items gives the total score with a range from 0 to 168 with lower value desirable.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreTotal score-11.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.83
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreMusculoskeletal Pain Score-1.72 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreChronic pain score-0.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreFluctuation related pain score-3.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreNocturnal pain score-2.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreOrofacial pain score-0.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreDiscoloration and edema score-0.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreRadicular pain score-1.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreRadicular pain score-1.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreTotal score-12.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.77
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreNocturnal pain score-2.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreMusculoskeletal Pain Score-1.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreDiscoloration and edema score-2.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreChronic pain score-0.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreOrofacial pain score-0.87 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) ScoreFluctuation related pain score-3.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.28
Comparison: Total scorep-value: 0.72895% CI: [-7.68, 5.39]repeated measures model
Comparison: Musculoskeletal pain scorep-value: 0.91695% CI: [-1.5, 1.35]repeated measures model
Comparison: Chronic pain scorep-value: 0.91995% CI: [-1.28, 1.42]repeated measures model
Comparison: Fluctuation related pain scorep-value: 0.6895% CI: [-2.42, 3.68]repeated measures model
Comparison: Nocturnal pain scorep-value: 0.76795% CI: [-2.83, 2.09]repeated measures model
Comparison: Orofacial pain scorep-value: 0.80495% CI: [-1.15, 0.9]repeated measures model
Comparison: Discoloration and edema scorep-value: 0.02595% CI: [-3.38, -0.23]repeated measures model
Comparison: Radicular pain scorep-value: 0.9395% CI: [-0.99, 0.9]repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS) Total Score

PAS is a 12-item scale developed specifically to measure severity in anxiety in Parkinson's disease for the following items: Feeling anxious or nervous; Feeling tense or stressed; Being unable to relax; Excessive worrying about everyday matters; Fear of something bad, or even the worst, happening; Panic or intense fear; Shortness of breath; Heart palpitations or heart beating fast; Fear of losing control; Social situations; Public settings; Specific objects or situations. Severity for each item is rated as: 0, Never; 1 Rarely; 2, Sometimes; 3, Often; 4, Nearly always. Total score is the sum of the12 item scores, with a range of 0 to 48; a lower value is desirable.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with baseline and a post-baseline measurement are reported in this table.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS) Total Score-0.75 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.28
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in Parkinson's Anxiety Scale (PAS) Total Score-2.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.27
p-value: 0.30795% CI: [-4.52, 1.44]repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score

UPDRS is an investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease of 42 total questions. Part I (Questions 1 - 4), Part II (Questions 5 - 17), Part III (Questions 18 - 31), and Part IV (Questions 32 - 42). Questions 35 - 38 and 40 - 42 are 2-point (0 and 1), all other questions are 5-point (0 - 4). Part II scores range from 0 to 52 with lower value desirable.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score0.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II Score-2.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
Comparison: Statistical significance for the 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints (PDQ-8 index score, CGI-C score, and UPDRS Part II) could only be evaluated using the Hochberg procedure for multiplicity control if both primary endpoints had been statistically significant after multiplicity adjustment.p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-4.77, -0.81]Repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 26 in UPDRS Parts I, III, and IV Score

UPDRS is an investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease of 42 total questions. Part I (Questions 1 - 4), Part II (Questions 5 - 17), Part III (Questions 18 - 31), and Part IV (Questions 32 - 42). Questions 35 - 38 and 40 - 42 are 2-point (0 and 1), all other questions are 5-point (0 - 4). Part I is the sum of Questions 1 - 4; scores range from 0 to 16 with lower value desirable. Part III is the sum of Questions 18 - 31 (Questions 20 - 26 apply to multiple body parts, resulting in 27 answers total); scores range from 0 to 108 with lower value desirable. Part IV is the sum of Questions 32 - 42; scores range from 0 to 23 with lower value desirable.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with baseline and a post-baseline measurement are reported in this table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in UPDRS Parts I, III, and IV ScorePart I0.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in UPDRS Parts I, III, and IV ScorePart III1.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.84
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline at Week 26 in UPDRS Parts I, III, and IV ScorePart IV-0.61 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in UPDRS Parts I, III, and IV ScorePart I0.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in UPDRS Parts I, III, and IV ScorePart III-0.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
LCIGChange From Baseline at Week 26 in UPDRS Parts I, III, and IV ScorePart IV-2.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Comparison: Part I scorep-value: 0.67295% CI: [-0.72, 1.1]repeated measures model
Comparison: Part III scorep-value: 0.30295% CI: [-6.47, 2.04]repeated measures model
Comparison: Part IV scorep-value: 0.00795% CI: [-2.91, -0.48]repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) Summary Index Score

The PDQ-8 is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure aspects of health relevant to PD. Eight questions including the mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort are assessed on a 5-point scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Occasionally, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always (or cannot do at all, if applicable). Summary index score is the sum of each question divided by 32 and multiplied by 100. Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower values desirable.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) Summary Index Score-1.75 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.96
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) Summary Index Score-5.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.97
Comparison: Statistical significance for the 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints (PDQ-8 index score, CGI-C score, and UPDRS Part II) could only be evaluated using the Hochberg procedure for multiplicity control if both primary endpoints had been statistically significant after multiplicity adjustment.p-value: 0.29195% CI: [-10.96, 3.34]Repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Domain Scores

The PDSS-2 addresses PD-specific sleep disturbances such as restless leg syndrome (RLS), morning akinesia, pain, and sleep apnea. The frequency is assessed for the 15 sleep problems based on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 \[never\] to 4 \[very often\]). Scores are calculated for each of the 3 domains (motor symptoms at night, PD symptoms at night, and disturbed sleep) as well as a total score. The PDSS-2 domain scores range from 0 to 20 and the total score is a sum of the 3 domains and ranges from 0 to 60. Repeated measure analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with baseline and a post-baseline measurement are reported in this table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Domain ScoresMotor symptoms at night-2.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Domain ScoresPD symptoms at night-1.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Domain ScoresDisturbed sleep-4.88 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Domain ScoresMotor symptoms at night-2.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Domain ScoresPD symptoms at night-1.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the Modified PDSS-2 Domain ScoresDisturbed sleep-2.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Comparison: Motor symptoms at nightp-value: 0.64395% CI: [-3.09, 1.92]repeated measures model
Comparison: PD symptoms at nightp-value: 0.76995% CI: [-1.39, 1.87]repeated measures model
Comparison: Disturbed sleepp-value: 0.0295% CI: [0.32, 3.66]repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain Scores

The NMSS consists of 30 questions in 9 domains. Score of each question is calculated by multiplying severity\*frequency. Severity and frequency are rated using a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) for severity and from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent) for frequency. Cardiovascular/falls scores range from 0 - 24 with lower value desirable. Sleep/fatigue scores range from 0 - 48 with lower value desirable. Mood/cognition scores range from 0 - 72 with lower value desirable. Perceptual problems/hallucinations scores range from 0 - 36 with lower value desirable. Attention/memory scores range from 0 - 36 with lower value desirable. Gastrointestinal tract scores range from 0 - 36 with lower value desirable. Urinary scores range from 0 - 36 with lower value desirable. Sexual function scores range from 0 - 24 with lower value desirable. Miscellaneous scores range from 0 - 48 with lower value desirable. Repeated-measure analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with baseline and a post-baseline measurement are reported in this table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresSleep/fatigue-7.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.02
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresGastrointestinal tract-0.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresPerceptual problems/hallucinations-1.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresUrinary-3.65 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresMood/cognition-5.99 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.06
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresSexual function0.88 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresAttention/memory-1.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresMiscellaneous-3.87 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.53
Optimized Medical TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresCardiovascular including falls-1.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresMiscellaneous-5.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresCardiovascular including falls-1.76 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresSleep/fatigue-6.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.06
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresMood/cognition-7.84 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.11
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresPerceptual problems/hallucinations-1.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresAttention/memory-2.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.66
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresGastrointestinal tract-3.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.14
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresUrinary-4.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.96
LCIGChange From Baseline to Week 26 in the NMSS Domain ScoresSexual function0.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Comparison: Cardiovascular including fallsp-value: 0.93395% CI: [-1.89, 2.06]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Sleep/fatiguep-value: 0.65595% CI: [-3.63, 5.74]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Mood/cognitionp-value: 0.61695% CI: [-9.18, 5.48]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Miscellaneousp-value: 0.46895% CI: [-4.8, 2.23]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Perceptual problems/hallucinationsp-value: 0.64595% CI: [-1.3, 2.08]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Attention/memoryp-value: 0.64595% CI: [-5.03, 3.14]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Gastrointestinal tractp-value: 0.05895% CI: [-5.25, 0.09]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Urinaryp-value: 0.58895% CI: [-5.52, 3.15]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Sexual functionp-value: 0.46495% CI: [-2.88, 1.33]Repeated measures model
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Final Score

CGI-C score is a clinician's impression of a subject's change in status on a 7-point scale (1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally Improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse). Scores range from 1 to 7, with lower score desirable.

Time frame: End of Treatment Period (up to Week 26)

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment are reported in this table.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentClinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Final Score4.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
LCIGClinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Final Score2.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Comparison: Statistical significance for the 3 key secondary efficacy endpoints (PDQ-8 index score, CGI-C score, and UPDRS Part II) could only be evaluated using the Hochberg procedure for multiplicity control if both primary endpoints had been statistically significant after multiplicity adjustment.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.84, -1.82]ANCOVA
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Final Score

The PGIC is a 7-point response scale. The participant was asked by the Investigator or qualified designee to rate their change in status using the following 7-point scale: 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse. PGIC score ranges from 1 to 7 with lower score desirable.

Time frame: End of Treatment Period (up to Week 26)

Population: Intent-to-Treat Data Set: all participants who were randomized to the OMT arm, and all participants who were randomized to LCIG arm and received at least one dose of study drug. Participants with an assessment are reported in this table.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Optimized Medical TreatmentPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Final Score4.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
LCIGPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Final Score2.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.89, -1.87]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026