Skip to content

Phlebotomy to Prevent Blood Loss in Major Hepatic Resections

The PRICE Trial: Phlebotomy Resulting in Controlled Hypovolemia to Prevent Blood Loss in Major Hepatic Resections

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02548910
Acronym
PRICE
Enrollment
62
Registered
2015-09-14
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2018-03-31
Last updated
2021-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatectomy, Liver Neoplasms

Brief summary

Major liver resection is associated with substantial intraoperative blood loss. Blood loss in elective liver surgery is a significant factor of perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as possibly long-term oncologic outcome. The purpose of this study is to use whole blood phlebotomy to decrease the central venous pressure, resulting in a state of relative hypovolemia. It is hypothesized that this intervention will lead to a decrease in blood loss at the time of liver resection.

Detailed description

Major liver resection is associated with significant intraoperative blood loss. Blood loss in elective liver surgery is a key determinant of perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as possibly long-term oncologic outcome. Whole blood phlebotomy is a simple intervention, whose aim is to decrease the central venous pressure yielding a state of relative hypovolemia and thus lead to decreased blood loss. Small studies, mostly from the liver transplant literature, would suggest that phlebotomy with controlled hypovolemia can result in decreased blood loss and blood transfusion. Since blood loss is an important issue in liver surgery, and the benefits of phlebotomy and controlled hypovolemia are unknown in liver resection patients, a rigorously conducted trial in a representative population of patients undergoing liver resection is warranted, and feasible. In this proposal, it is hypothesized that by the use of phlebotomy and controlled hypovolemia, it is possible to decrease blood loss and blood transfusions. To test this hypothesis the investigators plan to randomly allocate participants to phlebotomy plus standard of care or to standard of care. Participants will be those patients undergoing elective major liver resection at the Ottawa Hospital for any indication. The primary outcome will be intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes will include transfusion requirements, perioperative morbidity and mortality, safety, physiologic parameters, and feasibility elements. A total of 62 patients will be randomized. The efficacy of phlebotomy in terms of blood loss prevention will be assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPhlebotomy

A central venous catheter will be inserted for every patient to measure central venous pressure, as is the standard of care in elective liver surgery. Strict aseptic technique will be maintained. A total volume of whole blood of 7-10 mL per kg of body weight will be removed, as tolerated. The volume of removed blood will not be replaced by intravenous fluid administration. Collected blood will be transfused back at the end of the liver parenchymal transection, or within 8 hours of collection.

DEVICECitrated whole blood collection bag

Transfusion Medicine will send the requested number of whole blood collection bags labelled with the patient's name and MRN. These whole blood collection bags are used in standard practice for collection of whole blood.

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient being considered for a major elective liver resection will be considered for trial enrollment. Patients who are undergoing a concurrent additional abdominal or thoracic procedure (eg. colonic resection) will also be included.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years * Pregnancy * Refusal of blood products * Active cardiac conditions: unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV; worsening or new-onset heart failure), significant arrhythmias, severe valvular disease * History of significant cerebrovascular disease * Renal dysfunction (patients with an estimated GFR \<60 mL/min) * Abnormal coagulation parameters (INR \>1.5 not on warfarin and/or platelets count \<100 X109/L ) * Evidence of hepatic metabolic disorder (bilirubin \>35 umol/L) * Presence of active infection * Preoperative autologous blood donation * Hemoglobin \<100 g/L

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin Levels1 week prior to surgery (hemoglobin level), and day two of post-op (hemoglobin again).Intraoperative blood loss is notoriously difficult to measure. It is suggested that calculation of blood loss using preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels in most consistently accurate. In order to minimize the risk of bias associated with any one method of intraoperative measurement of blood loss, three methods will be used independently. In the operating room, all blood and fluid aspirated from the abdomen will be measured accurately using graduated suction containers. As well, the amount of irrigation fluid will be carefully monitored and recorded. Finally, the weight of all surgical sponges will be measured. This information will be used by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to independently visually estimate blood loss, as is commonly done in clinical practice. In parallel, intraoperative blood loss will also be calculated based on an equation.
Trial Feasibilitythrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsTrial accrual

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Perioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and MortalityPostoperative setting up to 30 days following surgery
Blood Product Transfusion RatesWill be measured in the operating room and in the first postoperative week
Changes in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)Will be measured in the operating room
Change in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)Will be measured in the operating room

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phlebotomy
For patients randomized to phlebotomy, the intervention will consist of the standard of care (low CVP surgery), plus whole blood phlebotomy. Blood will be collected in citrated whole blood collection bag. Phlebotomy: A central venous catheter will be inserted for every patient to measure central venous pressure, as is the standard of care in elective liver surgery. Strict aseptic technique will be maintained. A total volume of whole blood of 7-10 mL per kg of body weight will be removed, as tolerated. The volume of removed blood will not be replaced by intravenous fluid administration. Collected blood will be transfused back at the end of the liver parenchymal transection, or within 8 hours of collection. Citrated whole blood collection bag: Transfusion Medicine will send the requested number of whole blood collection bags labelled with the patient's name and MRN. These whole blood collection bags are used in standard practice for collection of whole blood.
31
Control
Standard of care (low CVP surgery). In this arm, standard anesthesia will be maintained.
31
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalPhlebotomy
Age, Continuous62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
31 participants62 participants31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants33 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 311 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 3112 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 311 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Total Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin Levels

Intraoperative blood loss is notoriously difficult to measure. It is suggested that calculation of blood loss using preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels in most consistently accurate. In order to minimize the risk of bias associated with any one method of intraoperative measurement of blood loss, three methods will be used independently. In the operating room, all blood and fluid aspirated from the abdomen will be measured accurately using graduated suction containers. As well, the amount of irrigation fluid will be carefully monitored and recorded. Finally, the weight of all surgical sponges will be measured. This information will be used by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to independently visually estimate blood loss, as is commonly done in clinical practice. In parallel, intraoperative blood loss will also be calculated based on an equation.

Time frame: 1 week prior to surgery (hemoglobin level), and day two of post-op (hemoglobin again).

Population: incomplete data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PhlebotomyTotal Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin LevelsAnaesthetist Estimate862 mL
PhlebotomyTotal Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin LevelsSurgeon Estimate761 mL
PhlebotomyTotal Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin LevelsCalculated EBL1116 mL
ControlTotal Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin LevelsAnaesthetist Estimate872 mL
ControlTotal Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin LevelsSurgeon Estimate872 mL
ControlTotal Intraoperative Blood Loss, by Measurement of Change in Hemoglobin LevelsCalculated EBL1249 mL
Primary

Trial Feasibility

Trial accrual

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PhlebotomyTrial Feasibility62 Participants
Secondary

Blood Product Transfusion Rates

Time frame: Will be measured in the operating room and in the first postoperative week

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PhlebotomyBlood Product Transfusion RatesIntraoperative1 Participants
PhlebotomyBlood Product Transfusion RatesPostoperative5 Participants
PhlebotomyBlood Product Transfusion RatesTotal5 Participants
ControlBlood Product Transfusion RatesTotal4 Participants
ControlBlood Product Transfusion RatesIntraoperative1 Participants
ControlBlood Product Transfusion RatesPostoperative3 Participants
Secondary

Change in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)

Time frame: Will be measured in the operating room

Population: the number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to incomplete data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PhlebotomyChange in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)Before transection3.5 I per min per m2
PhlebotomyChange in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)transection3.5 I per min per m2
ControlChange in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)Before transection4.2 I per min per m2
ControlChange in Physiologic Parameters (Cardiac Index)transection3.9 I per min per m2
Secondary

Changes in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)

Time frame: Will be measured in the operating room

Population: the number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to incomplete data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PhlebotomyChanges in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)before transection8 cmH2O
PhlebotomyChanges in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)transection8 cmH2O
ControlChanges in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)before transection7 cmH2O
ControlChanges in Physiologic Parameters (CVP)transection7.5 cmH2O
Secondary

Perioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and Mortality

Time frame: Postoperative setting up to 30 days following surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PhlebotomyPerioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and Mortalitypostoperative complications10 Participants
PhlebotomyPerioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and MortalityMajor complication2 Participants
ControlPerioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and Mortalitypostoperative complications15 Participants
ControlPerioperative Morbidity (Dindo-Clavien Grade 3b of Higher) and MortalityMajor complication3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026