Skip to content

Treatment of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries. Clinical Efficiency of Syndactyly Treatment and Digital Compression

Treatment of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries. Comparative Study of the Clinical Efficiency and Cost of Syndactyly Treatment Versus Immobilization and Compression Versus no Compression

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02548260
Enrollment
33
Registered
2015-09-14
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2018-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Finger Injuries

Brief summary

Proximal interphalangeal joint injuries of the fingers may be treated in various ways and no treatment has been shown to be superior. The investigators wish to study the effectiveness of syndactyly versus digital splint when comparing joint mobility. The investigators also wish to study the effectiveness of finger compression in reducing edema and therefore allowing a greater arc of motion.

Detailed description

Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) injuries of the fingers are a common occurrence. They may be treated various ways: strict immobilization in a finger splint for one to three weeks, syndactyly, no immobilization. Immobilization is often responsible for joint stiffness whereas immediate mobilization might produce pain. Injuries to the joints of the hand produce edema that is responsible for additional stiffness. Compressive garment may be worn to limit the extent of the edema and help its resorption. Although PIPJ injuries are frequent, their treatment does not benefit from a consensus. Most studies are retrospective or aimed at a pediatric population. The investigators wish to evaluate the outcome of PIPJ injury after different treatments: either strict immobilization in a rigid splint for three weeks, of relative immobilization in a syndactyly for three weeks.The investigators also wish to study the effect of finger compression on edema resolution and finger motion. Therefore there will be four treatment groups: syndactyly with and without compression, rigid splint with and without compression. The study will be conducted in the hand surgery unit of a university hospital in a prospective way. The assignment to a particular treatment group will be randomly performed. Patients will be followed for 6 months.

Interventions

DEVICERigid splint with compression

three week rigid immobilization by splint and compression

DEVICESyndactyly without compression

three week relative immobilization by syndactyly

DEVICESyndactyly with compression

three week relative immobilization by syndactyly and compression

DEVICERigid splint without compression

three week rigid immobilization by splint

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* proximal interphalangeal joint injury with or without dorsal or lateral luxation * less than seven days after injury * injured joint stability * fracture of the palmar rim of the intermediate phalanx less than 30% of articular surface

Exclusion criteria

* palmar luxation of the proximal interphalangeal joint * fracture of the palmar rim of the intermediate phalanx greater than 30% of articular surface * injury to the central band of the extensor tendon * fracture other than palmar rim of the intermediate phalanx less than 30% of articular surface * non reducible luxation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in digital mobility of wounded finger3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsEvaluation of digital mobility by measuring the palm-tip of the finger distance with a ruler. The active and passive mobility of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal and distal interphalangeal joints will be measured with a goniometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global function3 monthsPatient has to fill out the validated QuickDASH questionnaire relative to activities of daily living.
Satisfaction3 monthsPatient has to rate its satisfaction with the treatment outcome on a scale from 1 to 10 (greatest satisfaction = 10)
Change in pain3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsPatient has to rate the pain in the wounded finger during the last two days using a visual analog scale.
Change in strength3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsPinch strength and global hand strength will be evaluated with specific devices (pinch and dynamometer)
Change in finger diameter3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 monthsDiameter of the injured finger at the proximal interphalangeal joint will be assessed with a specific device (rings of various diameter)
Costsix monthsThe cost of the whole treatment will be calculated for each patient after the final consultation at 6 months. It will include the consultations themselves, the cost of the devices used, the hand therapy, the absence from work.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026