Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of LEO 43204 in Field Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on Balding Scalp Including 12-month Follow-up

Efficacy and Safety of LEO 43204 in Field Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on Balding Scalp Including 12-month Follow-up

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02547363
Enrollment
373
Registered
2015-09-11
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2025-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratosis

Brief summary

The objective of the trial is to compare the short term efficacy of LEO 43204 gel with vehicle gel in AK on the balding scalp when applied topically once daily for 3 consecutive days as field treatment.

Interventions

DRUGVehicle gel

Sponsors

LEO Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with 5 to 20 clinically typical, visible and discrete AKs within a treatment area of sun-damaged skin on the full balding scalp (the balding part of the scalp should be greater than 25 cm2 (4 in2) and up to approximately 250 cm2 (40 In2) * Subjects with minimum 3 clinically typical, visible and discrete AKs within a tracking area of 50 cm2 (8 In2). The tracking area must be within the treatment area

Exclusion criteria

* Location of the treatment area (full balding scalp) within 5 cm of an incompletely healed wound or within 5 cm of a suspected BCC or SCC * Treatment with ingenol mebutate gel in the treatment area within the last 12 months * Lesions in the treatment area that have: atypical clinical appearance (e.g. hyperthrophic, hyperkeratotic or cutaneous horns) and /or, recalcitrant disease (e.g. did not respond to cryotherapy on two previous occasions) * History or evidence of skin conditions other than the trial indication that would interfere with the evaluation of the trial medication (e.g. eczema, unstable psoriasis, xeroderma pigmentosum)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Complete Clearance of Actinic Keratosis (AK)At Week 8The number of clinically visible actinic keratosis lesions (AKs) identified in the treatment area was recorded at Day 1 (baseline), Week 4 and Week 8. Complete clearance was defined as no clinically visible AKs in the treatment area.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Partial Clearance of AKsAt Week 8Partial clearance was defined as at least 75% reduction from baseline in the number of clinically visible AKs in the treatment area.
Percent Reduction in AK Count in the Treatment Area Compared to BaselineAt Week 8The percent reduction at Week 8 from baseline was analysed using a negative binomial regression for the AK count at Week 8 with treatment group and pooled sites as factors and baseline count as offset variable. The table presents adjusted mean percent reduction at Week 8 from baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

373 participants were enrolled, 57 were screening failures, and 316 participants were randomized. Only 313 of the randomized participants were treated with investigational medicinal product (IMP), the number of participants treated is reflected as the number of participants started in the first period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LEO 43204 0.037% Gel
Treatment once daily for 3 days with LEO 43204 0.037% gel
209
Vehicle Gel
Treatment once daily for 3 days with vehicle gel
104
Total313

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
12-month Follow-upLack of Efficacy11
12-month Follow-upLost to Follow-up41
12-month Follow-upOther10
12-month Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject43
3-day Treatment and 8-week Follow-upAdverse Event01
3-day Treatment and 8-week Follow-upLost to Follow-up11
3-day Treatment and 8-week Follow-upOther11
3-day Treatment and 8-week Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLEO 43204 0.037% GelVehicle GelTotal
Age, Continuous70.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
69.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
70.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Age, Customized
Age group
18-64 years
45 Participants28 Participants73 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
65-84 years
155 Participants70 Participants225 Participants
Age, Customized
Age group
>=85 years
9 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
69 Participants37 Participants106 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
13 Participants7 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
18 Participants9 Participants27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
109 Participants51 Participants160 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
208 Participants104 Participants312 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
153 / 2099 / 10418 / 20412 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 2092 / 1041 / 2040 / 86

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Clearance of Actinic Keratosis (AK)

The number of clinically visible actinic keratosis lesions (AKs) identified in the treatment area was recorded at Day 1 (baseline), Week 4 and Week 8. Complete clearance was defined as no clinically visible AKs in the treatment area.

Time frame: At Week 8

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LEO 43204 0.037% GelPercentage of Participants With Complete Clearance of Actinic Keratosis (AK)25.8 percentage of participants
Vehicle GelPercentage of Participants With Complete Clearance of Actinic Keratosis (AK)0.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Fisher exact test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Partial Clearance of AKs

Partial clearance was defined as at least 75% reduction from baseline in the number of clinically visible AKs in the treatment area.

Time frame: At Week 8

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LEO 43204 0.037% GelPercentage of Participants With Partial Clearance of AKs58.9 percentage of participants
Vehicle GelPercentage of Participants With Partial Clearance of AKs1.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: The p-values for secondary endpoints have been corrected by the Holm-Bonferroni method to account for multiplicity. The prespecified multiplicity adjustment by the Holm-Bonferroni method requires the ordering of the p-values for the secondary endpoints by size.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [8.68, 451.08]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Partial Clearance of AKs

Partial clearance was defined as at least 75% reduction from baseline in the number of clinically visible AKs in the treatment area.

Time frame: At Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LEO 43204 0.037% GelPercentage of Participants With Partial Clearance of AKs57.4 percentage of participants
Vehicle GelPercentage of Participants With Partial Clearance of AKs1.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: The p-values for secondary endpoints have been corrected by the Holm-Bonferroni method to account for multiplicity. The prespecified multiplicity adjustment by the Holm-Bonferroni method requires the ordering of the p-values for the secondary endpoints by size.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [8.44, 415.35]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Reduction in AK Count in the Treatment Area Compared to Baseline

The percent reduction at Week 8 from baseline was analysed using a negative binomial regression for the AK count at Week 8 with treatment group and pooled sites as factors and baseline count as offset variable. The table presents adjusted mean percent reduction at Week 8 from baseline.

Time frame: At Week 8

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LEO 43204 0.037% GelPercent Reduction in AK Count in the Treatment Area Compared to Baseline72.3 percentage of reduction
Vehicle GelPercent Reduction in AK Count in the Treatment Area Compared to Baseline-2.0 percentage of reduction
Comparison: The p-values for secondary endpoints have been corrected by the Holm-Bonferroni method to account for multiplicity. The prespecified multiplicity adjustment by the Holm-Bonferroni method requires the ordering of the p-values for the secondary endpoints by size.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.23, 0.32]Mantel Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026