Skip to content

Impact of Front-of-pack Nutrition Labelling on Consumer Purchases

Impact of Front-of-pack Nutrition Labelling on Consumer Purchases - Controlled Trial in Shopper Laboratory Stores

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02546505
Enrollment
900
Registered
2015-09-11
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2015-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Consumer Behavior, Nutrition Labeling

Keywords

Consumer behavior, Nutrition Labeling

Brief summary

Introducing Front-Of-Pack (FOP) nutrition labelling, providing simplified information on nutritional content at a glance, in order to help consumer make informed choices, has been identified as of major interest by public health specialists. In France, a recent report to the Minister of Health has proposed the introduction of a Front-of-Pack nutrition label, the 5-Colour nutrition label. Existing studies on FOP labels mainly focused on assessment of consumers' acceptability/liking and understanding. If most of the studies on purchasing behavior, conducted in real supermarkets, suggested a positive effect of FOP labels on consumers' food choices, the impact of the 5-CNL has not been evaluated. The main objective is to evaluate the impact of a Front-of-pack nutrition label, the 5-Colour Nutrition Label on consumer purchases in a controlled environment close to real-world settings. Nutritional quality of the items purchased will be compared using the Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system (FSA score). The study relies on a comparison across three independent samples : * Control group: The current situation with current way brands show or not nutritional information on Front of Pack (FoP) - without consumer information * Intervention n°1: Introduction of a Front-of-pack nutrition label (5-CNL) on selected categories of foods. No additional consumer information * Intervention n°3: Introduction of a Front-of-pack nutrition label (5-CNL) on selected categories of foods. Additional consumer information specifically targeting nutritional information and explaining the 5-CNL will be performed (this information will consist in a concept shown to respondents before the shopping session). Participants are recruited in the street through quota sampling, based on criteria of gender, age and purchasing habits on the products categories selected for the introduction of the FOP nutrition label. The study relies on LabStores®, i.e. shopper laboratory stores, which are controlled study spaces in which a store is recreated in reality.The real lab store mimics a store environment with real shelves, product, and cash register, and presents several product categories in a realistic shopping environment. At the end of the shopping session, the respondents proceed to the cashier but don't actually pay for their purchases. The selected foodstuffs come from actual retailers' brand products available on the French market. Three categories of products were selected, based on expected variability in nutritional quality of the products and logistic criteria (exclusion of fresh products): * Breakfast cereals * Sweet biscuits * Salty snacks The impact of the different labels on nutritional quality (FSA score, calories, lipids, saturated fatty acids, sugars, proteins, fibre, sodium) of the shopping cart is investigated using one way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons among FOP labels are assessed by using Tukey's multiple comparisons tests. All tests of significance are two-sided, and a P value \<0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analyses are performed using SAS software (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc.).

Interventions

OTHERFront-of-pack nutrition labeling

Introduction of a Front-of-pack nutrition label (5-CNL) on selected categories of foods.

OTHERConsumer information

Information specifically targeting nutritional information and explaining the 5-CNL is presented to the subject (this information will consist in a concept shown to respondents before the shopping session).

Sponsors

BVA nudge unit
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Paris 13
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults \>18 years old * Usually purchasing the selected categories of foods (Breakfast cereals, appetizers, biscuits)

Exclusion criteria

* Not used to purchasing the selected categories of foods

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FSA score to evaluate nutritional quality of the items purchasedEstimated time frame 6 weeksMean Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system (FSA score) of the items purchased

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Saturated fatty acid content of the items purchasedEstimated time frame 6 weeksSaturated fatty acids content (g) for 100g of the items purchased
Sodium content of the items purchasedEstimated time frame 6 weeksSodium content (mg) for 100g of the items purchased
Sugar content of the items purchasedEstimated time frame 6 weeksSugar content (mg) for 100g of the items purchased
Energy content of the items purchasedEstimated time frame 6 weeksEnergy content (Kcal) for 100g of the items purchased
Fiber content of the items purchasedEstimated time frame 6 weeksFiber content (mg) for 100g of the items purchased
Number of purchased items labelled in green/yellow/orange/pink/redEstimated time frame 6 weeks
Protein content of the items purchasedEstimated time frame 6 weeksProtein content (mg) for 100g of the items purchased

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026