Skip to content

Cefaly® Device in the Treatment of Patients With Fibromyalgia.

A Single Center, Pilot, Open Trial of the Cefaly® Device in the Treatment of Patients With Fibromyalgia.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02546362
Enrollment
50
Registered
2015-09-10
Start date
2015-12-03
Completion date
2018-05-15
Last updated
2019-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Brief summary

The objective of this pilot open trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of external trigeminal nerve stimulation (e-TNS) with the Cefaly® device in fibromyalgia.

Detailed description

The main objective of this clinical pilot trial was to evaluate the use of external trigeminal nerve stimulation (e-TNS) with the Cefaly® neurostimulator device as a new therapeutic treatment for fibromyalgia.

Interventions

DEVICECefaly

Sponsors

Cefaly Technology
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged from18 to 65 years (on the day of signing the informed consent form). 2. Diagnosed with fibromyalgia according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR 2010). 3. Having a minimum pain score of at least 4 on the 0-10 Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) pain scale at screening and baseline.

Exclusion criteria

1. Women: Pregnant, lactating or \<6 months post partum. 2. Episodic or Chronic Migraine according to the diagnostic criteria listed in International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 beta (2013) section 1, migraine 1, having two or more attacks per month. 3. Change in any medication acting on the central nervous system (CNS) within 28 days before start of the study or during the study. 4. Severe depression i.e. having a Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) score \>12. 5. Botox injection within 4 months before baseline or during the study. 6. Psychiatric disorders that could interfere with study participation: bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders and dementia. 7. Suicidal behavior and/or ideation i.e. having a Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) score ≥ 4 during the preceding 2 years. 8. Patients currently taking any opioid medication. 9. Patients currently taking medically prescribed marijuana. 10. Current or history during the preceding year of alcohol or substance abuse including marijuana. 11. Widespread rheumatic diseases (other than fibromyalgia), evidence of inflammatory rheumatic disease. 12. Any unstable medical condition in the judgment of the investigator that would interfere with study participation or study assessments. 13. Implanted active metal or electrical devices in the head. 14. Cardiac pacemaker or implanted or wearable defibrillator. 15. Intolerance to supraorbital neurostimulation that makes the treatment not applicable (test of nociceptive threshold with specific Cefaly program).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain Intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Pain Score) Between Baseline and 12-week Timepointbetween baseline and 12-week timepointPain intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) pain score) is defined on a numeric rating scale scoring the pain between 0 (=no pain) and 10 (=unbearable pain).
Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Total Score Between Baseline and 12-week Timepointbetween baseline and 12-week timepointFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) total score is ranging from 0 to 100, where lower score corresponds to a better quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 4-week Timepointat 4-week timepointPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is defined on a 7-level scale where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse (4=no change).
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12-week Timepointat 12-week timepointPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is defined on a 7-level scale where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse (4=no change).
Change in EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Score Between Baseline and 4-week Timepointbetween baseline and 4-week timepointEuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS score is defined on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (= worth imaginable health state) to 100 (=best imaginable health state).
Change in EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Score Between Baseline and 12-week Timepointbetween baseline and 12-week timepointEuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS score is defined on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (= worth imaginable health state) to 100 (=best imaginable health state).
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Depression Between Baseline and 4-week Timepointbetween baseline and 4-week timepointPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for depression is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher depression level.
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Depression Between Baseline and 12-week Timepointbetween baseline and 12-week timepointPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for depression is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher depression level.
Change in Pain Intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Pain Score) Between Baseline and 4-week Timepointbetween baseline and 4-week timepointPain Intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Pain Score) is defined on a numeric rating scale scoring the pain between 0 (=no pain) and 10 (=unbearable pain).
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Fatigue Between Baseline and 12-week Timepointbetween baseline and 12-week timepointPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for fatigue is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher fatigue level.
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Sleep Disturbance Between Baseline and 4-week Timepointbetween baseline and 4-week timepointPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for sleep disturbance is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher sleep disturbance level.
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Sleep Disturbance Between Baseline and 12-week Timepointbetween baseline and 12-week timepointPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for sleep disturbance is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher sleep disturbance level.
Change in Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) Between Baseline and 4-week Timepointbetween baseline and 4-week timepointMultiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) score is ranging from 38 to 190, where higher score indicates more difficulty.
Change in Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) Between Baseline and 12-week Timepointbetween baseline and 12-week timepointMultiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) score is ranging from 38 to 190, where higher score indicates more difficulty.
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Fatigue Between Baseline and 4-week Timepointbetween baseline and 4-week timepointPatient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for fatigue is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher fatigue level.
Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Total Score Between Baseline and 4-week Timepointbetween baseline and 4-week timepointFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) total score is ranging from 0 to 100, where lower score corresponds to a better quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cefaly Active Device
12 weeks of treatment using Cefaly twice a day (treatment session of 20 minutes)
50
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
12-week Treatment PeriodChange in medication1
12-week Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up2
12-week Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject6
4-week Treatment PeriodChange in medication2
4-week Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCefaly Active Device
Age, Continuous48.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.15
EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS score57.49 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.14
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) pain score6.14 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.29
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) total score53.59 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.32
Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) score91.28 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.04
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for depression17.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.24
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for fatigue31.12 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for sleep disturbance25.86 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Total Score Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint

Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) total score is ranging from 0 to 100, where lower score corresponds to a better quality of life.

Time frame: between baseline and 12-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Total Score Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint-9.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.51
Primary

Change in Pain Intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Pain Score) Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint

Pain intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) pain score) is defined on a numeric rating scale scoring the pain between 0 (=no pain) and 10 (=unbearable pain).

Time frame: between baseline and 12-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Pain Intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Pain Score) Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint-1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Secondary

Change in EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Score Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint

EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS score is defined on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (= worth imaginable health state) to 100 (=best imaginable health state).

Time frame: between baseline and 12-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Score Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint5.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.05
Secondary

Change in EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Score Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint

EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS score is defined on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (= worth imaginable health state) to 100 (=best imaginable health state).

Time frame: between baseline and 4-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in EuroQol 5-dimensions - 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Score Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint5.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.32
Secondary

Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Total Score Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint

Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) total score is ranging from 0 to 100, where lower score corresponds to a better quality of life.

Time frame: between baseline and 4-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Total Score Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint-11.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.18
Secondary

Change in Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint

Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) score is ranging from 38 to 190, where higher score indicates more difficulty.

Time frame: between baseline and 12-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint-4.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.41
Secondary

Change in Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint

Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) score is ranging from 38 to 190, where higher score indicates more difficulty.

Time frame: between baseline and 4-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire (MASQ) Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint-2.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.35
Secondary

Change in Pain Intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Pain Score) Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint

Pain Intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Pain Score) is defined on a numeric rating scale scoring the pain between 0 (=no pain) and 10 (=unbearable pain).

Time frame: between baseline and 4-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Pain Intensity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-revised (FIQR) Pain Score) Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint-1.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Depression Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for depression is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher depression level.

Time frame: between baseline and 12-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Depression Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint-1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.95
Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Depression Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for depression is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher depression level.

Time frame: between baseline and 4-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Depression Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint-0.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.47
Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Fatigue Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for fatigue is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher fatigue level.

Time frame: between baseline and 12-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Fatigue Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint-4.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.73
Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Fatigue Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for fatigue is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher fatigue level.

Time frame: between baseline and 4-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Fatigue Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint-4.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.35
Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Sleep Disturbance Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for sleep disturbance is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher sleep disturbance level.

Time frame: between baseline and 12-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Sleep Disturbance Between Baseline and 12-week Timepoint-3.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.35
Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Sleep Disturbance Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score for sleep disturbance is ranging from 8 to 40 where higher score is associated with higher sleep disturbance level.

Time frame: between baseline and 4-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DeviceChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measure for Sleep Disturbance Between Baseline and 4-week Timepoint-3.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12-week Timepoint

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is defined on a 7-level scale where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse (4=no change).

Time frame: at 12-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DevicePatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 12-week Timepoint3.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 4-week Timepoint

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is defined on a 7-level scale where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse (4=no change).

Time frame: at 4-week timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cefaly Active DevicePatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 4-week Timepoint3.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026