Skip to content

Conducting Annual Asthma Reviews Using Telehealthcare: Comparison With Standard Care (Face-to-face Consultations)

Conducting Annual Asthma Reviews Using Telehealthcare: Comparison With Standard Care (Face-to-face Consultations)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02545998
Enrollment
88
Registered
2015-09-10
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2023-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Telehealthcare

Brief summary

The National Report of Asthma Deaths published in 2014 highlighted significant deficiencies in both primary and secondary care resulting in one of the highest mortality rates in Europe. A key recommendation in the report is the provision of an annual asthma review in primary care. Telehealthcare is an alternative means of service delivery incorporating the use of telephone and e-mail consultations which may improve access and quality of patient care. There is scant data on the role of teleheathcare in asthma care. This is a single-centre, primary care-based, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of telehealthcare to conduct the annual asthma review for adult patients with well-controlled asthma. This will be compared with standard care (face-to-face consultations). Telehealthcare will consist of a telephone consultation followed by an e-mail with an attached personalised asthma action plan and a link to a video demonstrating inhaler technique. Standard care will involve a face-to-face consultation in primary care. The two patient groups will be compared prospectively to determine whether there is a difference in the quality of care evaluated in terms of the patient experience/ satisfaction, health-related quality of life, asthma control and frequency of asthma exacerbations over a 6 month period after the asthma review. The data will be presented in the form of frequency tables, bar charts and pie charts. Non-parametric tests will be applied to determine whether there is a significant difference in the quality of care received.

Interventions

OTHERTelehealthcare

Telephone consultation plus e-mail with attached PAAP and video link

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 and over, registered at Balham Park Surgery * Patients diagnosed with asthma (patients on the asthma register) * Patients with well-controlled asthma (ACT score 20 and over; no out of hours/ A&E attendances/ PO steroids/ hospital admissions since the last asthma review in primary care)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients aged less than 18 * Patients with poorly controlled asthma (ACT score 19 or less; out of hours/ A&E attendance/ hospital admission/ PO steroids since last asthma review in primary care) * Patients with a mental health diagnosis * Patients without an up to date contact telephone number or with communication difficulties that would prevent or restrict their use of the technology.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Experience: Overall Patient Experience Score (General Practice Assessment Questionnaire GPAQ Score)Up to 2 weeks after the asthma reviewGeneral Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) is a widely used questionnaire to assess the patient experience of general practice in the UK. It is designed to measure satisfaction across four domains: communication (8 items), confidence (3 items), access to care (2 items) and overall satisfaction (2 items). Patients rate their experience by selecting not of usually 5 responses (1= very good to 5= very poor). Response items were linearly rescaled to a 0-100 range (100 = most favourable response). 'Does not apply' responses were excluded from the analysis. This yielded four median domain scores for each patient (range 0-100 per domain). An overall patient experience score was calculated for each patient by adding the four domain scores together to give a total score out of 400 (range 0-400). The median overall patient experience score (+/- interquartile range) was calculated for each group and the scores were compared (tele healthcare vs control)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Consultation Length (Time)BaselineThe average time taken for a standard asthma review vs a telehealthcare review will be recorded at the time of the asthma review
Health Related Quality of Life Score (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ))Baseline and 6 monthsQuality of life will be assessed using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) in each group at the start of the study (before the asthma review) and 6 months after the asthma review. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a valid, reliable questionnaire that measures the functional problems (physical, emotional, social and occupational) that are most troublesome to adults aged 17-70 years with asthma. For the purpose of this study, a 15-item mini-AQLQ was used, with scores ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). The 6 month AQLQ score is presented in each group. The p value compares the change in AQLQ score from baseline to 6 months between the two groups.
Dropout RateBaselineThe dropout rate is the number of patients that failed to attend for an asthma review ('Did not attend', lost to follow up, or withdrew consent) in each patient group.
Number of Exacerbations.In the six months after the asthma review.Number of exacerbations (unscheduled asthma consultations in primary care, courses of systemic steroids, out of hour attendances, hospital admissions) in the six months after the asthma review in each group.
Future PreferenceWithin 2 weeks of the asthma review.After the asthma review, patients were asked whether they would prefer a tele healthcare asthma review in future. Percentage of patients that expressed preference for THC review is presented.
Asthma Control Test Score6 months after asthma review.Assessment of asthma control using validated questionnaire at baseline (before the asthma review) and 6 months after the asthma review. The ACT score at 6 months is presented. The p value compares the change in ACT score from baseline to 6 months, in each group. Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a simple, five-item, validated questionnaire that is designed to identify patients (\>12 years old) with poorly controlled asthma. The scores range from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma), with higher scores reflecting greater asthma control. An ACT score \>19 indicates well-controlled asthma.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Care
Patients received a face-to-face asthma review
33
Telehealthcare
Patients received a telehealthcare asthma review consisting of a telephone consultation and an e-mail with attached PAAP and video link.
42
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up123
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard CareTelehealthcareTotal
Age, Customized38.0 years38.5 years38.0 years
Median ACT score24 units on a scale23 units on a scale23 units on a scale
Median AQLQ score5.9 units on a scale6.2 units on a scale6.2 units on a scale
Median length of time since last asthma review32 months25 months30 months
Occupation
Employed/ full time education
29 participants37 participants66 participants
Occupation
Unemployed/ retired
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-white
4 participants2 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
29 participants40 participants69 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants24 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants18 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 330 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Experience: Overall Patient Experience Score (General Practice Assessment Questionnaire GPAQ Score)

General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ) is a widely used questionnaire to assess the patient experience of general practice in the UK. It is designed to measure satisfaction across four domains: communication (8 items), confidence (3 items), access to care (2 items) and overall satisfaction (2 items). Patients rate their experience by selecting not of usually 5 responses (1= very good to 5= very poor). Response items were linearly rescaled to a 0-100 range (100 = most favourable response). 'Does not apply' responses were excluded from the analysis. This yielded four median domain scores for each patient (range 0-100 per domain). An overall patient experience score was calculated for each patient by adding the four domain scores together to give a total score out of 400 (range 0-400). The median overall patient experience score (+/- interquartile range) was calculated for each group and the scores were compared (tele healthcare vs control)

Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after the asthma review

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard CarePatient Experience: Overall Patient Experience Score (General Practice Assessment Questionnaire GPAQ Score)390.0 score on a scale
TelehealthcarePatient Experience: Overall Patient Experience Score (General Practice Assessment Questionnaire GPAQ Score)400.0 score on a scale
p-value: 0.51Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Asthma Control Test Score

Assessment of asthma control using validated questionnaire at baseline (before the asthma review) and 6 months after the asthma review. The ACT score at 6 months is presented. The p value compares the change in ACT score from baseline to 6 months, in each group. Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a simple, five-item, validated questionnaire that is designed to identify patients (\>12 years old) with poorly controlled asthma. The scores range from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma), with higher scores reflecting greater asthma control. An ACT score \>19 indicates well-controlled asthma.

Time frame: 6 months after asthma review.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard CareAsthma Control Test Score24 score on a scale
TelehealthcareAsthma Control Test Score23 score on a scale
p-value: 0.471Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Average Consultation Length (Time)

The average time taken for a standard asthma review vs a telehealthcare review will be recorded at the time of the asthma review

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard CareAverage Consultation Length (Time)20.0 minutes
TelehealthcareAverage Consultation Length (Time)15.0 minutes
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Dropout Rate

The dropout rate is the number of patients that failed to attend for an asthma review ('Did not attend', lost to follow up, or withdrew consent) in each patient group.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard CareDropout Rate11 Participants
TelehealthcareDropout Rate2 Participants
p-value: 0.014Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Future Preference

After the asthma review, patients were asked whether they would prefer a tele healthcare asthma review in future. Percentage of patients that expressed preference for THC review is presented.

Time frame: Within 2 weeks of the asthma review.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard CareFuture Preference26 Participants
TelehealthcareFuture Preference38 Participants
Secondary

Health Related Quality of Life Score (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ))

Quality of life will be assessed using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) in each group at the start of the study (before the asthma review) and 6 months after the asthma review. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a valid, reliable questionnaire that measures the functional problems (physical, emotional, social and occupational) that are most troublesome to adults aged 17-70 years with asthma. For the purpose of this study, a 15-item mini-AQLQ was used, with scores ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). The 6 month AQLQ score is presented in each group. The p value compares the change in AQLQ score from baseline to 6 months between the two groups.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard CareHealth Related Quality of Life Score (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ))6.4 units on a scale
TelehealthcareHealth Related Quality of Life Score (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ))6.4 units on a scale
p-value: 0.589Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Number of Exacerbations.

Number of exacerbations (unscheduled asthma consultations in primary care, courses of systemic steroids, out of hour attendances, hospital admissions) in the six months after the asthma review in each group.

Time frame: In the six months after the asthma review.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard CareNumber of Exacerbations.0 exacerbations
TelehealthcareNumber of Exacerbations.0 exacerbations
p-value: 0.264Sign test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026