Skip to content

An Open-label Extension Trial of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P, CBD) for Seizures in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (GWPCARE6)

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P, CBD) as Add-on Therapy in Patients With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Who Experience Inadequately-controlled Seizures

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02544750
Enrollment
199
Registered
2015-09-09
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2021-06-11
Last updated
2022-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, Seizures

Brief summary

This trial consists of 2 parts: a double-blinded phase and an open-label extension phase. The open-label extension phase only will be described in this record. All participants will receive the same dose of GWP42003-P. However, investigators may subsequently decrease or increase the participant's dose until the optimal dose is found.

Interventions

Yellow oily solution containing cannabidiol dissolved in the excipients sesame oil and anhydrous ethanol with added sweetener (sucralose) and strawberry flavoring.

Sponsors

GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Completion of the GWEP1521 Blinded Phase

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)OLE Day 1 up to 4 yearsAn adverse event (AE) was defined as any new unfavorable/unintended signs/symptoms (including abnormal laboratory findings), or diagnosis or worsening of a pre-existing condition, which occurred following screening and at any point up to the post-treatment safety follow-up visit, which may or may not be related to the IMP. An AE that started, or worsened in severity or seriousness, following the first dose of IMP was considered a TEAE. A serious AE was defined as any AE that results in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening adverse experience, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or cancer, any other experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above, or an event that changes the risk/benefit ratio of the study.
Number of Participants With Any TEAE, by SeverityOLE Day 1 up to 4 yearsAn adverse event (AE) was defined as any new unfavorable/unintended signs/symptoms (including abnormal laboratory findings), or diagnosis or worsening of a pre-existing condition, which occurred following screening and at any point up to the post-treatment safety follow-up visit, which may or may not be related to the IMP. An AE that started, or worsened in severity or seriousness, following the first dose of IMP was considered a TEAE. Grade 1 (Mild) is defined as asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 (Moderate) is defined as minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3 (Severe) is defined as medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of TSC-associated Seizures During the OLE Treatment PeriodOLE Day 1 up to 4 yearsTSC-associated seizures include: focal motor seizures without impairment of consciousness or awareness; focal seizures with impairment of consciousness or awareness; focal seizures evolving to bilateral generalized convulsive seizures and tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic or atonic seizures. A negative percent change from baseline indicates improvement.
Number of Participants Considered Treatment Responders During the OLE Treatment PeriodOLE Day 1 up to 4 yearsTreatment responders were defined as those participants with a ≥50% reduction from baseline in TSC-associated seizure frequency, during the treatment period, for participants who had not withdrawn from the trial during the treatment period. TSC-associated seizures included: focal motor seizures without impairment of consciousness or awareness (Type 1 focal motor); focal seizures with impairment of consciousness or awareness (Type 2 focal); focal seizures evolving to bilateral generalized convulsive seizures (Type 3 focal); and tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures that were countable. Participants who withdrew from the trial during the treatment period were considered non-responders.
Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) Score During the OLE Treatment PeriodOLE Day 1 and up to 4 yearsThe CGIC comprised the following question to be rated on a 7-point scale (1, Very Much Improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Slightly Improved; 4, No Change; 5, Slightly Worse; 6, Much Worse; 7, Very Much Worse): Since your child started treatment, please assess the status of your child's overall condition (comparing their condition now to their condition before treatment). The SGIC comprised the following question to be rated on a 7-point scale (1, Very Much Improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Slightly Improved; 4, No Change; 5, Slightly Worse; 6, Much Worse; 7, Very Much Worse): Since you started treatment, please assess the status of your overall condition (comparing your condition now to your condition before treatment). The average CGIC and SGIC scores are being reported, with higher values indicating worse condition.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Seizure Frequency During the OLE Treatment PeriodOLE Day 1 up to 4 yearsTotal seizures included all seizure types, eg. combination of TSC-associated and other seizures. TSC-associated seizures included: focal motor seizures without impairment of consciousness or awareness (Type 1 focal motor); focal seizures with impairment of consciousness or awareness (Type 2 focal); focal seizures evolving to bilateral generalized convulsive seizures (Type 3 focal); and tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures that were countable. A negative percent change from baseline indicates improvement in total seizure frequency.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 199 participants with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) who met all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria and completed the double-blind study GWEP1521 (NCT02544763) were enrolled into this Open-label Extension (OLE) study to receive GWP42003-P.

Pre-assignment details

OLE investigational medicinal product (IMP) was titrated up to 25 mg/kg/day while blinded IMP was simultaneously tapered down to zero to accommodate those participants who had been randomized to placebo during the double-blind phase (DBP) of the study. All participants were to complete the transition and enter the OLE taking 25 mg/kg/day GWP42003-P.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)
Participants who had received GWP42003-P during the double-blind phase and then GWP42003-P in the OLE phase.
124
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)
Participants who had received placebo during the double-blind phase and then GWP42003-P in the OLE phase.
75
Total199

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event810
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyMet withdrawal criteria22
Overall StudyOther reasons6939
Overall StudyPhysician Decision31
Overall StudyTransition To Commercial Product10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Parent/Guardian87
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject104

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Total
Age, Continuous12.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
13.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.63
13.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.02
Baseline Total Seizures59.95 Seizures56.97 Seizures58.90 Seizures
Baseline Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)-Associated Seizures58.08 Seizures55.10 Seizures56.90 Seizures
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
111 Participants66 Participants177 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants30 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants45 Participants118 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1240 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
117 / 12475 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
38 / 12418 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Any TEAE, by Severity

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any new unfavorable/unintended signs/symptoms (including abnormal laboratory findings), or diagnosis or worsening of a pre-existing condition, which occurred following screening and at any point up to the post-treatment safety follow-up visit, which may or may not be related to the IMP. An AE that started, or worsened in severity or seriousness, following the first dose of IMP was considered a TEAE. Grade 1 (Mild) is defined as asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 (Moderate) is defined as minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3 (Severe) is defined as medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL.

Time frame: OLE Day 1 up to 4 years

Population: Adverse events were assessed in the OLE Safety Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any TEAE, by SeverityMild TEAE35 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any TEAE, by SeverityModerate TEAE63 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any TEAE, by SeveritySevere TEAE19 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any TEAE, by SeverityMild TEAE16 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any TEAE, by SeverityModerate TEAE48 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any TEAE, by SeveritySevere TEAE11 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any new unfavorable/unintended signs/symptoms (including abnormal laboratory findings), or diagnosis or worsening of a pre-existing condition, which occurred following screening and at any point up to the post-treatment safety follow-up visit, which may or may not be related to the IMP. An AE that started, or worsened in severity or seriousness, following the first dose of IMP was considered a TEAE. A serious AE was defined as any AE that results in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening adverse experience, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or cancer, any other experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above, or an event that changes the risk/benefit ratio of the study.

Time frame: OLE Day 1 up to 4 years

Population: Adverse events were assessed in the OLE Safety Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any TEAE117 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any treatment-related TEAE80 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any treatment-related TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation of IMP9 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any serious TEAE38 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any treatment-related serious TEAE7 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any fatal TEAEs1 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation of IMP11 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any TEAE75 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any treatment-related serious TEAE8 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any treatment-related TEAE60 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation of IMP7 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any treatment-related TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation of IMP7 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any fatal TEAEs0 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events, Discontinuations Due to AEs, Serious AEs, and Treatment-related AEs (TEAE)Any serious TEAE18 Participants
Secondary

Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) Score During the OLE Treatment Period

The CGIC comprised the following question to be rated on a 7-point scale (1, Very Much Improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Slightly Improved; 4, No Change; 5, Slightly Worse; 6, Much Worse; 7, Very Much Worse): Since your child started treatment, please assess the status of your child's overall condition (comparing their condition now to their condition before treatment). The SGIC comprised the following question to be rated on a 7-point scale (1, Very Much Improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Slightly Improved; 4, No Change; 5, Slightly Worse; 6, Much Worse; 7, Very Much Worse): Since you started treatment, please assess the status of your overall condition (comparing your condition now to your condition before treatment). The average CGIC and SGIC scores are being reported, with higher values indicating worse condition.

Time frame: OLE Day 1 and up to 4 years

Population: Caregiver Global Impression of Change and Subject Global Impression of Change were assessed in the OLE Safety Analysis Set in participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) Score During the OLE Treatment PeriodSubjects4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) Score During the OLE Treatment PeriodCombined Caregiver and Subjects3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) Score During the OLE Treatment PeriodCaregiver3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) Score During the OLE Treatment PeriodSubjects2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) Score During the OLE Treatment PeriodCombined Caregiver and Subjects3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) Score During the OLE Treatment PeriodCaregiver3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Secondary

Number of Participants Considered Treatment Responders During the OLE Treatment Period

Treatment responders were defined as those participants with a ≥50% reduction from baseline in TSC-associated seizure frequency, during the treatment period, for participants who had not withdrawn from the trial during the treatment period. TSC-associated seizures included: focal motor seizures without impairment of consciousness or awareness (Type 1 focal motor); focal seizures with impairment of consciousness or awareness (Type 2 focal); focal seizures evolving to bilateral generalized convulsive seizures (Type 3 focal); and tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures that were countable. Participants who withdrew from the trial during the treatment period were considered non-responders.

Time frame: OLE Day 1 up to 4 years

Population: Treatment responders were assessed in the OLE Safety Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants Considered Treatment Responders During the OLE Treatment Period≥ 50% reduction: Yes70 Participants
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants Considered Treatment Responders During the OLE Treatment Period≥ 50% reduction: No54 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants Considered Treatment Responders During the OLE Treatment Period≥ 50% reduction: Yes36 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Number of Participants Considered Treatment Responders During the OLE Treatment Period≥ 50% reduction: No39 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of TSC-associated Seizures During the OLE Treatment Period

TSC-associated seizures include: focal motor seizures without impairment of consciousness or awareness; focal seizures with impairment of consciousness or awareness; focal seizures evolving to bilateral generalized convulsive seizures and tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic or atonic seizures. A negative percent change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: OLE Day 1 up to 4 years

Population: TSC-associated seizures were assessed in the OLE Safety Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of TSC-associated Seizures During the OLE Treatment Period-55.66 percent change
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of TSC-associated Seizures During the OLE Treatment Period-46.76 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Seizure Frequency During the OLE Treatment Period

Total seizures included all seizure types, eg. combination of TSC-associated and other seizures. TSC-associated seizures included: focal motor seizures without impairment of consciousness or awareness (Type 1 focal motor); focal seizures with impairment of consciousness or awareness (Type 2 focal); focal seizures evolving to bilateral generalized convulsive seizures (Type 3 focal); and tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures that were countable. A negative percent change from baseline indicates improvement in total seizure frequency.

Time frame: OLE Day 1 up to 4 years

Population: Total seizure frequency was assessed in the OLE Safety Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
GWP42003-P (Double-blind Phase)Percent Change From Baseline in Total Seizure Frequency During the OLE Treatment Period-55.18 percent change
Placebo (Double-blind Phase)Percent Change From Baseline in Total Seizure Frequency During the OLE Treatment Period-46.76 percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026