Skip to content

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of MV140

Prospective Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-controlled Versus Placebo in a Polyvalent Sublingual Bacterial Vaccine to 3 Months and 6 Months in Women With RUTI for the Immunomodulatory Efficacy Evaluation, Safety and Clinical Impact

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02543827
Acronym
MV140
Enrollment
240
Registered
2015-09-07
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial

Keywords

Vaccine, Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (RUTI)

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a biological vaccine (MV140) in women with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (RUTI) compared with a placebo group.

Detailed description

Double blind parallel placebo controlled study. The subjects will receive medication during three or six months and will be followed up during another twelve months.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALMV140

The subjects will receive daily dose of MV140 during 3 or 6 months

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

The subjects will receive daily dose of placebo during 3 or 6 months

Sponsors

Inmunotek S.L.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women who gave their informed consent. * Age between 18 and 75 years. * Must be able to meet the dosage regimen. * Subjects who had had at least 5 episodes of cystitis in the last 12 months. * Subjects who had not responded to hygienic-sanitary measures and / or suppressive treatment and / or postcoital prophylaxis. * Subjects who were free of urinary tract infections at the time of inclusion in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Had not given their informed consent. * Age was not within the established age range. * Could not offer cooperation and/or had severe psychiatric disorders. * Presented a pathologic post-micturition residue. * Presented moderate to severe incontinence. * Presented genital tumours. * Presented Urinary tract tumours. * Presented lithiasis. * Presented alterations in the immune system. * Presented complicated UTIs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decrease in the number of RUTI exacerbations.1 yearAverage reduction of RUTI exacerbations

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of difference in immunological parameters from baseline to end of the trial1 yearCompare the changes from specific cell proliferation baseline against antigens of the vaccine.
Severity of RUTI exacerbations1 yearReview of RUTI exacerbations episodes severity per patient
First RUTI exacerbation1 yearWhen takes place the First RUTI exacerbation for every single patient
Medication consumption1 yearReview of medication consumed from the beginning to the end of the RUTI exacerbation
Changes from baseline in RUTI Assessment Test1 yearCompare the RUTI Assessment Test results at the beginning and at the end of the trial
Number of visits to the emergency service1 yearCounting the number of visits to the emergency service due to RUTI exacerbation
Number of hospitalizations due to RUTI exacerbations1 yearCounting the number of hospitalization days due to RUTI exacerbations
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability1 yearReview of the number of adverse event per patient
Health resource consumption1 yearCounting the Health resource consumption due to RUTI exacerbation: visits to specialists, telephone calls, analyzes and urocultures

Countries

Spain, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026