Skip to content

Glycemic Control and Treatment Satisfaction Using Finesse Versus Pen for Initiating Bolus Insulin Dosing in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Glycemic Control and Treatment Satisfaction Using Finesse Versus Pen for Initiating Bolus Insulin Dosing in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Not Achieving Glycemic Targets on Basal Insulin With/Without Anti-Hyperglycemic Agents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02542631
Enrollment
278
Registered
2015-09-07
Start date
2015-08-01
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

To compare glycemic control and treatment satisfaction using a novel bolus insulin patch (Finesse) versus a pen for initiating and managing bolus insulin dosing in patients with T2DM not achieving glycemic targets on basal insulin with/without anti-hyperglycemic agents.

Detailed description

Patients sub-optimally controlled on basal insulin (with/without other antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs)) will be randomized 1:1 to either Finesse or pen to initiate bolus insulin dosing and followed for a 44-week intervention period. Patients will have both basal and bolus doses of insulin adjusted throughout the trial, as is clinically indicated, based on an easy to follow insulin dosing algorithm. After the final endpoint evaluation at week 44, patients will crossover to the alternate bolus insulin delivery device for 4 weeks and complete a patient preference survey at week 48.

Interventions

DEVICEBolus Insulin Patch (Calibra Finesse)
DEVICEInsulin Pen (Novo-Nordisk FlexPen®)

Sponsors

Medpace, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Calibra Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of T2DM * Treated with basal insulin for ≥ 6 months, with current dose stable for ≥ 6 weeks of ≥ 0.3 U/kg/day, with or without anti-hyperglycemic agents and in whom the Investigator feels advancement from basal to basal and bolus therapy is needed for the patient * A1C 7.5-11.0% by central lab value at screening visit * Already perform self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and willing to test blood glucose (BG) over the course of the study * Body Mass Index of ≤ 40 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Currently on or has been treated in the past year with insulin regimens that include bolus insulins except the need for insulins in the settings of acute illness or hospitalization * History of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), or secondary forms of diabetes such as cystic fibrosis * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to insulin-glargine or its excipients or any other insulins * Two or more severe hypoglycemic episodes within the prior year * Hypoglycemia unawareness defined by history * History of proliferative diabetic retinopathy * Is currently unstable and/or has moderate-to-severe medical illness in the Investigator's judgment * Uncontrolled hypertension (either treated or untreated) defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg at screening * History of recent major surgery within 6 months, or minor surgery within 3 months (such as appendectomy) prior to screening visit, or a planned surgery during the study period * History of bariatric surgery * Active chronic infections * Women of child-bearing age who are pregnant, planning pregnancy, breast-feeding, or, if capable of pregnancy, are not practicing contraception if heterosexually active * Known hypersensitivity to plastics/polymers/adhesives * Known difficulties with adherence of adhesives, bandages, or dressings * Participated in any research study within the past 30 days * Currently participating in another investigational trial * Use of short term or chronic systemic steroids within three months of entry into the study or likelihood that same might be required during the conduct of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in A1C From Baseline to the Completion of 24 Weeks of Basal and Bolus Insulin Therapy24 weeksChange in A1C, with bolus insulin dosing with patch versus pen, from baseline to the completion of 24 weeks of basal and bolus insulin therapy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in A1C From Week 24 to Week 4444 weeksChange in A1C from week 24 to week 44 after basal and bolus insulin therapy
Number of Patients With A1C ≤7.0% at Week 2424 weeksNumber of patients with A1C ≤7.0% at week 24
Change in Percent of Glucose Values of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Measurements Within Targeted Range of 71 and 180 mg/dl (4.0 and 10.0 mmol/l) From Baseline to Week 2424 weeksChange in percent of glucose values of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) measurements within targeted range of 71 and 180 mg/dl (4.0 and 10.0 mmol/l) from baseline to week 24 (in a subset of patients)
Number of Patients With A1C ≤7.0% at Week 4444 weeksNumber of patients with A1C ≤7.0% after 44 weeks of basal and bolus insulin therapy
Number of Participants With Severe Hypoglycemic Event44 weeksAn event requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate (including IV dextrose), glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.
Change in A1C From Baseline to Week 4444 weeksChange in A1C from baseline to the completion of 44 weeks of basal and bolus insulin therapy

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Treatment Satisfaction From Baseline to Week 2424 weeksChange in treatment satisfaction with insulin delivery system from baseline to week 24 was assessed by self-report on the validated Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire. Scale is 0-100. Higher score is better.
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to Week 2424 weeksChange in Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life (QOL), baseline to week 24. was assessed by self-report on the validated Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Survey. Scale is 0-100. Higher score is better.

Countries

France, Germany, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bolus Insulin Patch
Experimental Treatment Arm
139
Insulin Pen
Comparator Treatment Arm
139
Total278

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyDeath12
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up65
Overall StudyOther21
Overall StudyPhysician Decision64
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudySponsor Termination10
Overall StudyUsed Prohibited Medication21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1116

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalInsulin PenBolus Insulin Patch
A1C8.7 A1C %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
8.7 A1C %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
8.6 A1C %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Age, Continuous59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
23 Participants11 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
246 Participants126 Participants120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
110 Participants52 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
168 Participants87 Participants81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1392 / 139
other
Total, other adverse events
100 / 13999 / 139
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 13913 / 139

Outcome results

Primary

Change in A1C From Baseline to the Completion of 24 Weeks of Basal and Bolus Insulin Therapy

Change in A1C, with bolus insulin dosing with patch versus pen, from baseline to the completion of 24 weeks of basal and bolus insulin therapy

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The primary outcome measure analysis used a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population data set which included all the intent-to-treat (ITT) patients who had a baseline A1C and at least one post-baseline A1C measurement. For missing values, the last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bolus Insulin PatchChange in A1C From Baseline to the Completion of 24 Weeks of Basal and Bolus Insulin Therapy-1.69 A1C %Standard Error 0.08
Insulin PenChange in A1C From Baseline to the Completion of 24 Weeks of Basal and Bolus Insulin Therapy-1.60 A1C %Standard Error 0.08
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.32, 0.14]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in A1C From Baseline to Week 44

Change in A1C from baseline to the completion of 44 weeks of basal and bolus insulin therapy

Time frame: 44 weeks

Population: Only patients with non-missing baseline and endpoint values were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bolus Insulin PatchChange in A1C From Baseline to Week 44-1.63 A1C %Standard Error 0.1
Insulin PenChange in A1C From Baseline to Week 44-1.63 A1C %Standard Error 0.1
p-value: 0.9995% CI: [-0.28, 0.28]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in A1C From Week 24 to Week 44

Change in A1C from week 24 to week 44 after basal and bolus insulin therapy

Time frame: 44 weeks

Population: Only patients with non-missing week 24 and week 44 values were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bolus Insulin PatchChange in A1C From Week 24 to Week 440.12 A1C %Standard Error 0.06
Insulin PenChange in A1C From Week 24 to Week 440.07 A1C %Standard Error 0.06
p-value: 0.5295% CI: [-0.12, 0.24]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Percent of Glucose Values of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Measurements Within Targeted Range of 71 and 180 mg/dl (4.0 and 10.0 mmol/l) From Baseline to Week 24

Change in percent of glucose values of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) measurements within targeted range of 71 and 180 mg/dl (4.0 and 10.0 mmol/l) from baseline to week 24 (in a subset of patients)

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Modified intent-to-treat population data subset.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bolus Insulin PatchChange in Percent of Glucose Values of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Measurements Within Targeted Range of 71 and 180 mg/dl (4.0 and 10.0 mmol/l) From Baseline to Week 2426.87 % of glucose valuesStandard Error 2.33
Insulin PenChange in Percent of Glucose Values of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Measurements Within Targeted Range of 71 and 180 mg/dl (4.0 and 10.0 mmol/l) From Baseline to Week 2429.84 % of glucose valuesStandard Error 2.4
p-value: 0.3895% CI: [-9.63, 3.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Severe Hypoglycemic Event

An event requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate (including IV dextrose), glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.

Time frame: 44 weeks

Population: Intent to Treat. All patients randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bolus Insulin PatchNumber of Participants With Severe Hypoglycemic Event3 Participants
Insulin PenNumber of Participants With Severe Hypoglycemic Event3 Participants
p-value: 1Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Patients With A1C ≤7.0% at Week 24

Number of patients with A1C ≤7.0% at week 24

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population data set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bolus Insulin PatchNumber of Patients With A1C ≤7.0% at Week 2485 Participants
Insulin PenNumber of Patients With A1C ≤7.0% at Week 2477 Participants
p-value: 0.2695% CI: [0.81, 2.14]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Patients With A1C ≤7.0% at Week 44

Number of patients with A1C ≤7.0% after 44 weeks of basal and bolus insulin therapy

Time frame: 44 weeks

Population: Only patients with non-missing baseline and endpoint values were included.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bolus Insulin PatchNumber of Patients With A1C ≤7.0% at Week 4470 Participants
Insulin PenNumber of Patients With A1C ≤7.0% at Week 4468 Participants
p-value: 0.7195% CI: [0.64, 1.93]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Other Pre-specified

Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to Week 24

Change in Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life (QOL), baseline to week 24. was assessed by self-report on the validated Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Survey. Scale is 0-100. Higher score is better.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Per Protocol. Only patients with non-missing baseline and endpoint values were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bolus Insulin PatchChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to Week 242.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Insulin PenChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to Week 24-1.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.44
p-value: 0.0395% CI: [0.33, 8.32]ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Change in Treatment Satisfaction From Baseline to Week 24

Change in treatment satisfaction with insulin delivery system from baseline to week 24 was assessed by self-report on the validated Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire. Scale is 0-100. Higher score is better.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Per Protocol. Only patients with non-missing baseline and endpoint values were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bolus Insulin PatchChange in Treatment Satisfaction From Baseline to Week 2413.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.94
Insulin PenChange in Treatment Satisfaction From Baseline to Week 244.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.01
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [3.65, 14.67]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026