Skip to content

Effects of Workplace Intervention in Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work

Effects of Workplace Intervention in Inpatient Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work for Persons With Somatic and/or Common Mental Health Problems. A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02541890
Enrollment
175
Registered
2015-09-04
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2018-03-31
Last updated
2021-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Mental Disorders, Musculoskeletal Diseases

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Return to Work

Brief summary

Aim is to study the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work. The intervention is compared with inpatient rehabilitation only, and participants will be recruited from the diagnostic groups dominating the sick-leave statistics, namely musculoskeletal disorders, common mental disorders (e.g. stress, depression and anxiety), and unspecific disorders including chronic fatigue.

Detailed description

Long-term sick-listing from work has considerable impact on social function, on the families of the sick-listed persons, the companies they work for, and society as a whole. Hence, the need for documented effective vocational rehabilitation programs is pressing. Vocational rehabilitation services described in the scientific literature have been specific to one single or a specific group of medical conditions (e.g.low back pain). In contrast, most people on sick leave have several health complaints, and many of the factors influencing sick leave are shared regardless of disorder (e.g. social surroundings, workplace environment), calling for rehabilitation programs that can be employed for both musculoskeletal, unspecific and common mental disorders. Research indicates that interventions on the work place might facilitate return to work. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWork place intervention

Meeting at the work place including the patient, the employer and the rehabilitation therapist. Aim of meeting is to discuss challenges and possibilities in the patient's return to work process and to make a plan for return to work.

Sponsors

Trondheim University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Resident of Central Norway * Sick-listed due to common mental disorders, musculoskeletal pain/problems, unspecific disorders and/or fatigue * Sick-listed more than 50 % * Sick-listed longer than 8 weeks * Has employer and is willing to participate in a work place intervention during the rehabilitation program

Exclusion criteria

* is self-employed * has, or is currently examined for, a serious somatic or psychiatric disorder * suffers from substance abuse * has trouble with participating in a group * is in a rehabilitation process that will interfere with the occupational rehabilitation program * function level is to weak to participate in the rehabilitation program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of days on sick-leave12 monthsRegister data from the national health and welfare services
Time until sustainable return to work12 monthsRegister data from the national health and welfare services

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health related quality of life. Questionnaire12 monthsThe 15D health-related quality of life instrument. 160 participants
Psychological flexibility and acceptance. Questionnaire5 monthsAcceptance and action questionnaire and work acceptance and action questionnaire (AAQ2). 160 participants
Return to work self efficacy. Questionnaire.5 monthsReturn to work self-efficacy-19 (RTWSE-19). 160 participants.
Fear and avoidance beliefs about work. Questionnaire5 monthsFear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ). 160 participants
Use of health services. Questionnaire. How much of this health/social service have you used during the last 4 months?12 months160 participants. How much of this health/social service have you used during the last 4 months? Somatic and mental health specialized care (in-patient and outpatient), general practitioner, psychologist, group therapy, physiotherapist, chiropractor, occupational rehabilitation, welfare services, complementary practitioner, emergency unit, ambulatory services, occupational health services, other treatment.
Work ability. Single question5 months160 participants. How will you rate your work ability? (scale from 0 (no ability) to 10 (my best ability)).
Well-being at work. Single question5 months160 participants. How happy are you at work? (not at all, not so good, good. very good)
Readiness for return to work. Questionnaire5 months160 participants. Readiness for return to work (RRTW) questionnaire.
Expectations about sick leave and return to work. Questionnaire5 months160 participants. How long do you anticipate to be sick-listed (partly/fully)? 3 questions.
Pain. Questionnaire12 monthsBrief pain inventory (BPI). 160 participants

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026