Skip to content

Efficacy Of Bacterial Lysate In Asthmatic Children

Influence of Polyvalent Mechanical Bacterial Lysate ISMIGEN® on Clinical Course of Asthma and Related Immunological Parameters in Asthmatic Children (EOLIA Study): Randomised Double-blind Placebo-controlled Multicentre Parallel-group Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02541331
Acronym
EOLIA
Enrollment
150
Registered
2015-09-04
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2015-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Asthma

Keywords

IgE-dependent asthma

Brief summary

This study evaluate the efficacy of Mechanical Bacterial Lysate (PMBL - Ismigen®) to improve the asthma control level (ACT score) as add-on treatment to routine asthma treatment in children aged 6 to 16 with uncontrolled or partly controlled asthma. Half of the 150 participants will receive Ismigen® and their current asthma therapy while the other half will receive Placebo and their current asthma treatment.

Detailed description

Acute and recurrent respiratory infections of the upper and middle respiratory tracts in the paediatric population of asthmatic patients represent a leading clinical burden, particularly during the winter. Respiratory tract infections, mainly viral infection are important factors that exacerbate asthma course in children. Currently no clinical data demonstrated the benefit of oral or sublingual bacterial lysates on asthma clinical course in children apart from one trial with OM-85 BV (Bronchovaxom®) suggesting reduced number and duration of infection-related wheezing attacks in children with asthma wheezing. Therefore it was hypothesized that PMBL (Ismigen®) used in asthmatic children should significantly improve asthma course and control. A seasonal approach of active prevention, based on full-fledged antibacterial oral vaccination would be useful to show the potential benefit of this type of products. The Primary objective was to assess the benefit of Ismigen® versus Placebo on the mean ACT score after administration of a Polyvalent Mechanical Bacterial Lysate (PMBL - Ismigen®) as add-on to routine asthma treatment. Secondary objectives investigated: * the potential reduction (vs Placebo) of number of asthma exacerbations, time to first event with Ismigen®; * the potential decrease in number of respiratory tract infections during the observation period (3-month treatment and 6-month follow-up) after treatment; * the specific changes occurring in a panel of immunological markers as the result of Ismigen® effect (subset of 48 patients).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALISMIGEN

Tablets of 30 billion organisms/mg - Sublingual use 1 tablet per day over 10 days for 3 successive months.

BIOLOGICALPLACEBO

Matched tablets without any active substance.

Sponsors

Lallemand Pharma AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Children of both genders aged 6 to 16 years. 2. Allergic asthma diagnosis with at least one perennial allergen according to the Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (GINA 2012 guidelines) prior to screening visit. 3. Patient shows clinical characteristics of partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma according to GINA 2012. 4. Already treated with SABA prn and ICS or ICS + LABA during the previous 3 months. 5. Patient shows antigen-specific IgE against HDM ≥ class 2 or positive skin prick test or RAST for at least one perennial allergen. 6. Patient who had at least 2 exacerbations of asthma within the 12-mo period before V1. 7. Patient not treated with Polyvalent Mechanical Bacterial Lysate (Ismigen®) within the previous 6 months prior to Visit 1.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient received mechanical or any other bacterial lysate immunostimulation within the previous 6 months before Visit 1. 2. Patient received oral/subcutaneous allergen-immunotherapy within the previous 6 months before Visit 1. 3. History of near fatal asthma (e.g. brittle asthma, hospitalization for asthma exacerbation in Intensive Care Unit). 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in asthma control level (mean ACT or P-ACT) scoreat 3-monthsThe main criterion is the improvement in mean ACT/P-ACT score versus baseline (between-groups comparison)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of respiratory infections occurring during the 3-mo treatment and the 6-mo follow-up after treatmentat 3-months, at 6-months and at 9-monthsComparison of frequency of events between groups during the observation period.
Time to first mild or severe asthma exacerbationFrom baselineTo assess the exacerbation-free time after baseline (between-groups comparison)
Standardized mean daily dose of Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) usedFrom baseline, up to the 9-month time pointTo assess the amount of current asthma treatment (ICS) required to maintain a stable asthma control level (between-groups comparison)
Frequency of short acting beta-2 agonists use as rescue medicationFrom baseline, up to the 9-month time pointTo assess the necessary amount of rescue medication to cure exacerbations (between-groups comparison)
Serum ImmunoglobulinsAt baseline and at 3-monthsLevels of total IgE, IgA, IgM, IgG (including IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4) (between-groups comparison, biology subset)
Serum antibacterial antibodies concentrationAt baseline, at 3-weeks and at 3-monthsSpecific immunological response to Ismigen vaccination: IgG levels of Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus Influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia, Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella Ozenae, Streptococcus group A-G (between-groups comparison, biology subset)
Time-dependent change in asthma control level (mean ACT or P-ACT) scoreat 6-months and at 9-monthsImprovement in ACT/P-ACT score versus baseline (between-groups comparison)
Activation of CD4 T cells in peripheral bloodAt baseline and at 3-monthsFlow cytometric analyses of Foxp3 and CD25 expression as markers of conversion of T cells into nTreg and iTreg (between-groups comparison, biology subset)
Specific T cells responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)At baseline, at 3-weeks and at 3-monthsNumber of vaccine specific T cells positive to IFN-gamma, IL-4, IL-13 assessed as spot-forming units by ELISPOT assay (between-groups comparison, biology subset)
PAQLQ (Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) and PACQLQ (Paediatric Asthma Caregivers Quality of Life Questionnaire)At baseline and at 9-monthsPatient and caregiver auto-questionnaires to assess the change in quality of life relative to asthma (between-groups comparison)
Cumulative number of days with respiratory tract infectionsFrom baseline, up to the 9-month time pointCumulative number of days with an event (Between-groups comparison)
Number of lost school days due to respiratory infections and to asthma exacerbationsFrom baseline, up to the 9-month time pointCumulative number of days of absences (Between-groups comparison)
Blood Specific markers of Lymphocyte activationAt baseline and at 3-monthsLevels of CD23 (B cells), CD25 (T cells) and CD69 (T, B and NK cells) (between-groups comparison, biology subset)

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026