Skip to content

Listen in: Developing and Testing a Therapy Application for Patients With Speech Comprehension Deficits After Stroke.

Listen-In: the Development and Testing of a Web-based Therapy Application for Patients With Impaired Speech Comprehension Caused by Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02540889
Acronym
Listen-in
Enrollment
36
Registered
2015-09-04
Start date
2016-05-16
Completion date
2018-04-12
Last updated
2018-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aphasia

Brief summary

The main aim is to develop and test the clinical efficacy of a novel, web based, rehabilitation application. Listen-In will provide an effective speech comprehension training tool that patients with aphasia can use to practice independently. This will free up therapists time to provide additional assessment, supervision and functional intervention in a highly cost effective manner.

Detailed description

The main aim is to develop and test the clinical efficacy of a novel, web based, rehabilitation application. Listen In will provide an effective speech comprehension training tool that patients can use to practice independently. This will free up SALT time to provide additional assessment, supervision and functional intervention in a highly cost effective manner. Phase 1 (24 months. London, Newcastle, Cambridge): Development of Listen In, including diagnostic and therapeutic components, driven by patient user's feedback (alpha and beta testing). The intervention is detailed below and is based on current SALT practice. It will be adaptive, provide feedback and target auditory perception at many levels: the phonemic, lexical and sentence level processing of heard verbal stimuli, as well as auditory short term memory and nonverbal sound discrimination. Phase 2 (12 months. London and Cambridge): A pilot, randomised, crossover, clinical trial of Listen-In in a group of aphasic patients in the chronic post-stroke period. A power calculation suggests that we will need 36 patents, 18 in each arm. The comparison will be standard SALT clinical care. The main outcome measure is a clinically relevant improvement on the comprehension of spoken language score of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Swinburn, 2004). Secondary outcomes include improvements in social activity and participation. The milestones for this phase will be: 50% recruitment into study and last patient, last visit. Phase 3 (funded outside i4i grant) will be the rollout of the therapy application on the internet with a pragmatic trial of whether therapy gains can be made outside the confines of a clinical trial. The comparison will be on similar outcome measures as Phase 2 with a control test on sustained attention (internal control) that we predict will not improve with therapy.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAuditory comprehension therapy.

100 hours of Auditory comprehension therapy embedded within a computer game.

Sponsors

University College London Hospitals
CollaboratorOTHER
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* any type of stroke but greater than 6 months post onset * evidence of receptive aphasia * English as their main language * able to give informed consent * age 18 years or above * no diagnosis of degenerative brain disease.

Exclusion criteria

* Stroke less than 6 months post onset * No evidence of receptive aphasia * English not their main language * Unable to give informed consent * Less than 18 years old * diagnosis of degenerative brain disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in auditory comprehension on the comprehensive aphasia test.Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeksInvestigation of improvement on a functionally relevant area of a widely used test of aphasia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in production of languageMeasured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeksInvestigation of improvement on a functionally relevant area of a widely used test of aphasia.
Performance on the Sustained attention to response taskMeasured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeksInvestigation of improvement on sustained attention using the SART.
Environmental sounds testMeasured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeksInvestigation of improvement on the non verbal environmental sounds test.
Improvement in functional communicationMeasured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeksUsing patient reported outcomes to look at functional communication changes.
Improvement in written language comprehensionMeasured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeksInvestigation of improvement on a functionally relevant area of a widely used test of aphasia.
Improvement on auditory descriminationMeasured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeksInvestigation of improvement on a test of auditory discrimination developed by Dr Holly Robson.
Test of semanticsMeasured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeksInvestigation of improvement in semantics knowledge.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026