Skip to content

Targeted Electrotherapy for Aphasia Stroke Rehabilitation (TEASER) - Phase II Multi-Center Study

Targeted Transcranial Electrotherapy for Stroke Rehabilitation - Exploratory Trial on Aphasia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02540109
Enrollment
58
Registered
2015-09-03
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2023-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Aphasia

Keywords

Stroke, Anomia

Brief summary

This Phase II study aims to ascertain the effectiveness of HD-tDCS for adjunctive treatment of anomia in chronic aphasia post stroke. Furthermore, it will help explore factors such as alternate outcome measures, subject selection criteria, and benefits of extended treatment duration. These results will be compared to an existing trial using conventional non-targeted tDCS with the same design and outcomes. Patients will be treated with HD-tDCS while performing computerized anomia treatment. The basis behind this method is that language therapy is mediated by cortical areas that are most effectively activated during the training tasks, thus increasing electric stimulation in these areas may improve learning outcomes. To better understand the long term benefits of the adjunctive treatment, patients will be screened again four weeks and six months after study using the same anomia tests. If HD-tDCS shows promising results in increasing the learning outcomes of anomia treatment, a Phase III trial can be considered.

Interventions

DEVICEHD-tDCS (Soterix Medical, Active)

Subject will be given individualized dose (number of electrodes and electrode placement) through High-Definition electrodes to target fMRI determined targets.

DEVICEHD-tDCS (Soterix Medical, Sham)

Subject will be given individualized dose (number of electrodes and electrode placement) through High-Definition electrodes to target fMRI determined targets.

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Georgetown University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER
The City College of New York
CollaboratorOTHER
Medstar Health Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of South Carolina
CollaboratorOTHER
Soterix Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* one-time ischemic stroke in the left hemisphere * greater than 6-months post-stroke onset * between 25 and 75 years of age * aphasia diagnosis (as determined by pre-treatment language-based testing) * right-handed (before the stroke) * native speaker of English * ability to provide informed written or verbal consent

Exclusion criteria

* clinically reported history of dementia, alcohol abuse, psychiatric disorder, traumatic brain injury, or extensive visual acuity or visual-spatial problems * factors contraindicative of tDCS administration (sensitive scalp, previous brain surgery) * prior history of epileptic or unprovoked seizures occurring during the previous 12 months. * Presence of Metal implants of claustrophobia (not able to undergo MRI) * Pregnancy * Presence of any other neurological disease than stroke * Childhood history of speech, language, hearing, or intellectual impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect size of HD-tDCS for the adjunctive treatment of anomia in chronic aphasia after stroke3 weeksThe primary outcome measures the ability of subjects to name objects in a standardized naming task. Prior to treatment MRI and fMRI are acquired to inform the individualized current flow models for optimal targeting.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determine alternate outcome measures4 weeks and 6 months follow upDetermine alternate outcome measures, such as naming performance at 4 weeks and 6 months after treatment and improvements in more general discourse performance. An additional secondary exploratory objective is to perform a screening comparison of HD-tDCS with historical data on conventional non-targeted tDCS using sponge electrodes.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026