Skip to content

Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared to Mammography

Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared to Mammography ADAPT-Enrich: Recruitment Plan for Initially Asymptomatic Women Referred for Breast Biopsy After Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Exam

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02540083
Acronym
ADAPT-ENRICH
Enrollment
94
Registered
2015-09-03
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2017-05-30
Last updated
2019-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Tumors, Breast

Brief summary

The aim of this recruitment plan (ADAPT-Enrich) is to collect image and technical data on both digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM), along with other subject data including histology results from biopsy specimen examination and cancer classification data from initially asymptomatic women referred for clinically indicated breast biopsy based on suspicious DBT screening breast imaging results. These data will be included in a subsequent and prospectively planned pooled analysis described in a separate protocol (ADAPT-BIE) examining superiority of DBT to FFDM for breast cancer diagnosis and other performance measures.

Detailed description

ADAPT-ENRICH will supplement an on-going program (ADAPT) which consists of 2 additional recruitment plans (ADAPT-SCR and ADAPT-BX) followed by an off-line read of the images and data collected (ADAPT-BIE). This study involves the comparison of two devices that can identify abnormalities in routine breast screening and diagnostic mammography. Mammography is usually done with full-field digital mammography (FFDM), which takes flat, two-dimensional X-ray images of the breast. Doctors use the two-dimensional images to look for cancers and other abnormal tissue. The purpose of this study is to learn more about the accuracy of full-field digital mammography devices and a new mammography device called digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). DBT is similar to full-field digital mammography, but can also move around the breast to get X-ray images from different angles, which provides a three-dimensional view that doctors can use to look for cancers and abnormal tissue. Subjects will be recruited from an initially asymptomatic population that have been referred for clinically indicated breast biopsy based on suspicious DBT screening breast imaging results. Subjects will undergo a DBT mammogram prior to biopsy. If FFDM was not performed within 30 days, subjects will also undergo FFDM prior to biopsy. Results of biopsy(ies) and histopathology, including lesion characteristics, will be recorded and considered as truth if positive for cancer status. Subjects with negative or benign histological findings will be followed for approximately one year (10-16 months) by FFDM and any additional standard of care practice.

Interventions

Subjects underwent FFDM breast imaging followed by DBT breast imaging

Sponsors

GE Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 30 years or older (≥30 years old); * Initially asymptomatic women who underwent routine bilateral screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), followed by diagnostic work-up showing one or more abnormalities and referred for breast biopsy; * Are able and willing to comply with study procedures; * Have signed and dated the informed consent form; * Documented as non-pregnant based on the investigator's medical judgment and in consideration of local clinical practice standards for evidence of non-pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria

* Have been previously included in this study , ADAPT-SCR recruitment plan or ADAPT-BX recruitment plan; * Have undergone diagnostic or surgical intervention(s) or procedure(s) on either breast, including mastectomy and cytopunction, before study-related imaging; * Have breasts too large to be adequately positioned on 24 x 31 centimeter (cm) DBT or FFDM digital receptor without anatomical cut-off during a DBT or FFDM examination; * Have participated in (within the prior 30 days) another trial of an investigational product expected to interfere with study procedures or outcomes; * Have breast implant(s); * Have reconstructed breast(s).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With DBT, FFDM and Biopsy Specimens CollectedApproximately 8 weeksFor each participant, obtain image data using two methods (DBT and FFDM) and obtain histology results of biopsy specimens from women referred for biopsy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lesion Type Observed by FFDM ImagingApproximately 8 weeksLesions were characterized based on findings identified during image evaluations performed by qualified readers.
Lesion Type Observed by DBT ImagingApproximately 8 weeksLesions were characterized based on findings identified during image evaluations performed by qualified researchers.
Lesion Size as Observed by DBTApproximately 8 weeksLength of lesions (measured in mm) when images were collected using DBT.
Biopsy Finding of LesionsApproximately 8 weeksDescribes histologic cancer and non-cancer findings of lesion biopsy.
Lesion Size as Observed by FFDMApproximately 8 weeksLength of Lesions (measured in mm) when images were collected using FFDM.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety - Device Related MalfunctionsApproximately 8 weeksNumber of device-related malfunctions by imaging modality.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental: DBT and FFDM
Subjects underwent 2D breast imaging with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) followed by 3D breast imaging with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). DBT and FFDM: Subjects underwent FFDM breast imaging followed by DBT breast imaging
78
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental: DBT and FFDM
Age, Continuous52.8 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 94
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 94
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 94

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With DBT, FFDM and Biopsy Specimens Collected

For each participant, obtain image data using two methods (DBT and FFDM) and obtain histology results of biopsy specimens from women referred for biopsy.

Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks

Population: Total number of participants enrolled.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental: DBT and FFDMNumber of Participants With DBT, FFDM and Biopsy Specimens CollectedParticipants taht did not complete all three tests16 Participants
Experimental: DBT and FFDMNumber of Participants With DBT, FFDM and Biopsy Specimens CollectedParticipants that completed DBT, FFDM and Biopsy78 Participants
Secondary

Biopsy Finding of Lesions

Describes histologic cancer and non-cancer findings of lesion biopsy.

Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks

Population: All participants who completed the study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Experimental: DBT and FFDMBiopsy Finding of LesionsLesion is positive/malignant32 Participants
Experimental: DBT and FFDMBiopsy Finding of LesionsLesion is negative/benign43 Participants
Experimental: DBT and FFDMBiopsy Finding of LesionsBiopsy was non-conclusive3 Participants
Secondary

Lesion Size as Observed by DBT

Length of lesions (measured in mm) when images were collected using DBT.

Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks

Population: Lesions observed and measured when images were collected using DBT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Experimental: DBT and FFDMLesion Size as Observed by DBT13.8 millimeters (mm)
Secondary

Lesion Size as Observed by FFDM

Length of Lesions (measured in mm) when images were collected using FFDM.

Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks

Population: Lesions as observed by FFDM

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Experimental: DBT and FFDMLesion Size as Observed by FFDM15.3 millimeters (mm)
Secondary

Lesion Type Observed by DBT Imaging

Lesions were characterized based on findings identified during image evaluations performed by qualified researchers.

Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks

Population: Lesions observed using DBT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Experimental: DBT and FFDMLesion Type Observed by DBT ImagingLesion description = mass51 lesions
Experimental: DBT and FFDMLesion Type Observed by DBT ImagingLesion description = calcification33 lesions
Experimental: DBT and FFDMLesion Type Observed by DBT ImagingLesion description = all other34 lesions
Secondary

Lesion Type Observed by FFDM Imaging

Lesions were characterized based on findings identified during image evaluations performed by qualified readers.

Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks

Population: Lesions observed using FFDM imaging

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Experimental: DBT and FFDMLesion Type Observed by FFDM ImagingLesion type = mass43 Lesions
Experimental: DBT and FFDMLesion Type Observed by FFDM ImagingLesion type = calcification32 Lesions
Experimental: DBT and FFDMLesion Type Observed by FFDM ImagingLesion type = all other32 Lesions
Other Pre-specified

Safety - Device Related Malfunctions

Number of device-related malfunctions by imaging modality.

Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Experimental: DBT and FFDMSafety - Device Related MalfunctionsDevice malfunctions for FFDM0 malfunctions
Experimental: DBT and FFDMSafety - Device Related MalfunctionsDevice malfunctions for DBT0 malfunctions

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026