Skip to content

Improving Cognition in Schizophrenia Using tDCS

Improving Cognition in Schizophrenia Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02539797
Acronym
ICDC
Enrollment
37
Registered
2015-09-03
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2018-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Brief summary

This study will examine the benefits of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a new tool that is being developed as a safe and non-invasive neurostimulation method, for improving neurocognitive and social cognitive functions in schizophrenia. This procedure is non-invasive and painless and it results in increase or decrease of spontaneous neuronal firing in the brain. Its safety and beneficial effect on cognition has been demonstrated in healthy individuals and several clinical populations. In this pilot study, the investigators will examine the effect of tDCS on cognitive functions in 40 individuals with schizophrenia. Each participant will arrive for three visits, with approximately one week between each visit. During the first visit, participants will be interviewed about their psychiatric symptoms, personal life experiences, and emotional well being by a specially-trained interviewer. On each of the three visits, participants will receive one of three stimulations: a type of tDCS designed to increase neuronal firing, an alternative form of tDCS designed to decrease neuronal firing, and a sham tDCS (stimulation with no current). Immediately following the stimulation, participants will be asked to complete measures of mental abilities, including tests presented on a computer screen and paper-and-pencil tests. During each visit, participants will also undergo a standard measure of brain activity (EEG) while listening to tones. The first visit will last approximately five hours, and the other two visits will last approximately four hours each. The project will take approximately two years to complete.

Detailed description

The investigators plan to recruit 40 individuals diagnosed with Schizophrenia. Participants will range from 18-55 years old. We will select stable, medicated patients who have not been hospitalized nor had any changes in their antipsychotic medications during the previous two months. Participants will not be tested within 12 hours of taking medications that may affect cognition (such as benzodiazepines and anticholinergics). All medications will be recorded. The investigators expect most of the patients to be relatively chronic (mean illness chronicity approximately 15 years, based on previous studies), although we will not select for chronicity. All participants will provide written informed consent after receiving a full explanation of the procedures according to approvals by the Institutional Review Boards. They will arrive for three visits. In the first visit, they will be consented, complete the diagnostic interview, the rating scales, and will undergo one of three randomly assigned stimulation conditions: 1) anodal tDCS, 2) cathodaltDCS, and 3) sham stimulation. They will also undergo an electroencephalography (EEG) procedure, in order to more directly assess the effect of tDCS on brain function. This visit will take approximately five hours to complete, and breaks will be given as needed. Immediately following stimulation, participants will complete neurocognitive, social cognitive, and EEG measures. There will be two 20-minute stimulation sessions, with a break of one hour between the sessions. After each session, participants will be asked to complete a portion of the basic cognitive, social cognitive, and EEG measures, so that half of the measures will be completed after the first 20 minute stimulation session and the other half will be completed after the second 20 minute stimulation session. The order of administration of the neurocognitive, social cognitive, and EEG measures will be randomized across participants within each group. During the second and third visits, participants will undergo the remaining two stimulation conditions, one randomly assigned condition each visit. These visits will take approximately four hours to complete, and each visit will be separated by at least one week from the previous visit.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

comparing anodal, cathodal, and sham tDCS

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-V Diagnosis of Schizophrenia * Must understand spoken English sufficiently to comprehend testing procedures * Estimated premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ) \> 70 (based on reading ability) * Ongoing care of a Psychiatrist, Psychologist, or other qualified mental health professional

Exclusion criteria

* Metal in cranium * Cardiac lines/pacemaker * Medication pump * Increased intracranial pressure * Lifetime history of serious head injury (LOC \> 1 hr.) * Sedatives or Benzodiazepines within 12 hours of testing * Clinically significant neurological disease (e.g., seizures) * History of mental retardation or developmental disability * Alcohol or substance dependence in the last 6 months * Alcohol or substance abuse in the last 1 month * Change in medication in past 6 weeks * Change in in living situation in the last 2 months * Inpatient hospitalization in past 3 months * Participation in prior studies involving tDCS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Cognition on MCCBbaseline and 20 minutesSummary score of the cognitive domains on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Four nonsocial neurocognitive tasks were included: speed of processing, working memory, verbal memory, and reasoning/problem solving. Normed T-scores were calculated for each cognitive subdomain, as well as the cognitive composite score consisting of the average across the four subdomains. The T-scores have a mean of 50, with a difference of 10 points from the mean equaling one standard deviation. Higher T-scores are indicative of higher cognition.
Change From Baseline in Managing Emotions on MSCEITbaseline and 20 minutesTotal score on the Managing Emotions component of Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) The test consists of 141 items and 8 ability subtests, which assess four components of emotional processing. In this study, only branches 1 and 4 were administered, focusing on the Managing Emotions component. The total score reflects mean performance across the branches. The scores were converted to normed T-scores that have a mean of 50, with a difference of 10 points from the mean equaling one standard deviation. Higher T-scores are indicative of better performance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
tDCS: comparing anodal, cathodal, and sham tDCS
38
Total38

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.57
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 370 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 370 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Cognition on MCCB

Summary score of the cognitive domains on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Four nonsocial neurocognitive tasks were included: speed of processing, working memory, verbal memory, and reasoning/problem solving. Normed T-scores were calculated for each cognitive subdomain, as well as the cognitive composite score consisting of the average across the four subdomains. The T-scores have a mean of 50, with a difference of 10 points from the mean equaling one standard deviation. Higher T-scores are indicative of higher cognition.

Time frame: baseline and 20 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS Anodal StimulationChange From Baseline in Cognition on MCCB45.0 T-scoresStandard Error 1.65
tDCS Cathodal StimulationChange From Baseline in Cognition on MCCB45.2 T-scoresStandard Error 1.65
Sham StimulationChange From Baseline in Cognition on MCCB45.8 T-scoresStandard Error 1.64
Primary

Change From Baseline in Managing Emotions on MSCEIT

Total score on the Managing Emotions component of Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) The test consists of 141 items and 8 ability subtests, which assess four components of emotional processing. In this study, only branches 1 and 4 were administered, focusing on the Managing Emotions component. The total score reflects mean performance across the branches. The scores were converted to normed T-scores that have a mean of 50, with a difference of 10 points from the mean equaling one standard deviation. Higher T-scores are indicative of better performance.

Time frame: baseline and 20 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS Anodal StimulationChange From Baseline in Managing Emotions on MSCEIT36.4 T-scoresStandard Error 2.06
tDCS Cathodal StimulationChange From Baseline in Managing Emotions on MSCEIT37.7 T-scoresStandard Error 2.05
Sham StimulationChange From Baseline in Managing Emotions on MSCEIT37.1 T-scoresStandard Error 2.05

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026