Skip to content

Preovulatory Uterine Flushing With Saline as a Treatment for Unexplained Infertility

Preovulatory Uterine Flushing With Saline as a Treatment for Unexplained Infertility: A Randomised Controlled Trial Protocol

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02539290
Enrollment
192
Registered
2015-09-03
Start date
2015-12-30
Completion date
2025-03-30
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility, Unexplained Infertility

Keywords

Unexplained infertility, Infertility, Tubal flushing, Uterine flushing, Live birth, Pregnancy, Randomized controlled trial, Saline, Physiological saline

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether preovulatory uterine flushing with physiological saline is effective in the treatment of unexplained infertility.

Detailed description

In vitro fertilisation is the only current reasonable treatment for unexplained infertility. Uterine flushing, associated with a five-fold increase in pregnancy when performed preovulatory, has been proposed as a new alternative. This treatment could flush out debris or alter inflammatory factors preventing fertilisation and implantation. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of pre-ovulatory uterine flushing with physiological saline for the treatment of unexplained infertility. This study is a randomised controlled trial based on consecutive women aged between 18 and 37 years consulting for unexplained infertility for at least one year. The day of their luteinizing hormone surge, 192 participants will be randomised in two equal groups to either receive 20 millilitres of physiological saline by an intra-uterine catheter or 10 millilitres of saline intravaginally. Investigators will assess relative risk of live birth (primary outcome), as well as pregnancy over one cycle of treatment. Side effects, complications, and acceptability of the intervention will be reported.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDetection of ovulation

Detecting the luteinizing hormone surge using test sticks in a urine sample

PROCEDUREUterine flushing

Injection of 20 millilitres of physiological saline by an intra-uterine catheter the day of the luteinizing hormone surge

PROCEDUREVaginal flushing

Injection of 10 millilitres of physiological saline intravaginally the day of the luteinizing hormone surge

Sexual intercourse on the day of the intervention and the following day

Sponsors

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 37 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary or secondary infertility ≥12 months. * Diagnosis of unexplained infertility ≤24 months: * Anti-Mullerian hormone ≥0.4 ng/mL and/or follicle-stimulating hormone ≤13 IU/L in early follicular phase; * regular cycle of 21-35 days, * positive ovulation tests, and/or * luteal phase serum progesterone ≥25mmol/L in a natural cycle; * semen analysis with total motile sperm count ≥ 5 million; * normal uterine cavity; * patent tubes. * Negative genitourinary test for gonorrhoea and chlamydia ≤12 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index ≥35 kg/m2. * Ongoing pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants with a live birth resulting from one cycle of treatment10 months after randomisationProportion of participants with a live birth resulting from one cycle of treatment based on questionnaire and medical data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants with a pregnancy resulting from one cycle of treatmentOne month after randomisationProportion of participants with a positive urinary or serum pregnancy test, gestational sac on ultrasound or histological evidence of trophoblastic tissue resulting from one cycle of treatment based on questionnaire and medical data.
Adverse effectsOne month after randomisationNumber of participants with treatment-related pain, vagal symptoms, nausea, vomiting, temperature, pelvic infection
Proportion of participants who find the intervention acceptableOne month after randomisationProportion of participants that would be willing to receive the intervention for a second time and find the intervention acceptable.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026