Skip to content

A Study of Pertuzumab With High-Dose Trastuzumab for the Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) With Central Nervous System (CNS) Progression Post-Radiotherapy

An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study of Pertuzumab With High-Dose Trastuzumab for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Progression Post-Radiotherapy in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (PATRICIA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02536339
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-08-31
Start date
2015-12-16
Completion date
2020-12-29
Last updated
2021-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This study will examine the safety and efficacy of pertuzumab in combination with high-dose trastuzumab in adult participants with HER2-positive MBC with CNS metastases and disease progression in the brain following radiotherapy.

Interventions

DRUGPertuzumab

Participants will receive 840 milligrams (mg) loading dose of pertuzumab, followed every 3 weeks thereafter by a dose of 420 mg via intravenous (IV) infusion until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.

DRUGTrastuzumab

Participants will receive trastuzumab at a dose of 6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight once weekly via IV infusion until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pathologically confirmed HER2-positive MBC * Progression of or new brain metastases after completion of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery * Completion of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery more than 60 days prior to enrollment * Stable systemic disease * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 * LVEF at least 50% * Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function * Life expectancy more than 12 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Progression of systemic disease at Screening * Leptomeningeal disease * History of intolerance or hypersensitivity to study drug * Use of certain investigational therapies within 21 days prior to enrollment * Current anthracycline use * Unwillingness to discontinue ado-trastuzumab emtansine or lapatinib use * Active infection * Pregnant or lactating women * Significant history or risk of cardiac disease * Symptomatic intrinsic lung disease or lung involvement * History of other malignancy within the last 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) CriteriaFrom Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 3.5 years)Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. An objective response in the central nervous system (CNS) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed by repeat assessment, according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all CNS target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; no corticosteroids; and stable or improved clinically; for non-target lesions, a CR was the disappearance of all enhancing CNS non-target lesions and no new CNS lesions. A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum longest diameter (LD) of CNS target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; stable to decreased corticosteroid dose; and stable or improved clinically. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaFrom Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 5 years)Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 4 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR or PR were defined in the same way as for objective response in the CNS. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) while on study. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.
Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaFrom documentation of first complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥4 months to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 4 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR, PR, or SD ≥4 months to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of clinical benefit was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of clinical benefit was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaFrom Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 5 years)Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR or PR were defined in the same way as for objective response in the CNS. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) while on study. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.
Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaFrom documentation of first complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR, PR, or SD ≥6 months to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of clinical benefit was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of clinical benefit was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Progression-Free Survival (CNS), Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaFrom the date of first dose to disease progression in the CNS or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)Progression-free survival (CNS) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to disease progression in the CNS or death from any cause. If no progressive disease in the CNS and no death occurred, progression-free survival (CNS) was censored on the date of the last CNS tumor assessment. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, progression-free survival (CNS) was censored on Day 1.
Progression-Free Survival (Systemic), Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)From the date of first dose to systemic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)Progression-free survival (systemic) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to systemic disease progression or death from any cause. If no systemic disease progression and no death occurred, progression-free survival (systemic) was censored on the date of the last systemic tumor assessment. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, progression-free survival (systemic) was censored on Day 1.
Progression-Free Survival (CNS or Systemic), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria and RECIST v1.1From the date of first dose to CNS or systemic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)Progression-free survival (CNS or systemic) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to CNS or systemic disease progression or death from any cause. If no CNS or systemic disease progression and no death occurred, data was censored on the date of the last CNS or systemic tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, data was censored on Day 1.
Overall SurvivalFrom the date of first dose until death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years)Overall survival was defined as the period from the date of first dose until the date of death from any cause. If no death occurred, overall survival was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of DeathFrom date of first dose until death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years)
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as all adverse events that met seriousness criteria (as defined in the protocol; same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definition) occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All SAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any SAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated; and Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. The terms severe and serious are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each adverse event. Multiple occurrences of SAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Median Duration of Response in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaFrom documentation of first complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 3.5 years)Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. An objective response in the central nervous system (CNS) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed by repeat assessment, according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved an objective response, duration of response in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR or PR to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of response was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of response was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE of Special Interest by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)Protocol-defined TEAEs of special interest, occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, included the following: An elevated ALT or AST (\>3 times baseline value) in combination with either an elevated total bilirubin (\>2 times the upper limit of normal) or clinical jaundice; Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study treatment; Congestive heart failure; An asymptomatic decline in LVEF (a value 10 percentage points below baseline or lower, and \<45%) that requires treatment or that leads to discontinuation of study treatment. All TEAEs of special interest were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs of special interest were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 (Treatment Period); and every 3 months during Survival Follow-Up (up to approximately 5 years)Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of the percentage of blood that is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. All participants were required to have had a baseline LVEF of at least 50% to participate in this study. Measurements were done by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or mulitple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (with ECHO as the preferred method). Participants were to be reassessed with the same technique used for baseline cardiac evaluation throughout the study.
Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 (Treatment Period); and every 3 months during Survival Follow-Up (up to approximately 5 years)Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of the percentage of blood that is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. All participants were required to have had a baseline LVEF of at least (≥)50% to participate in this study. Measurements were done by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or mulitple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (with ECHO as the preferred method). Participants were to be reassessed with the same technique used for baseline cardiac evaluation throughout the study. The following are definitions for the three categories of LVEF findings: 'Normal' was defined as LVEF \>45% or LVEF 40-45% with less than (\<)10% points drop below baseline; 'Abnormal' was defined as LVEF \<40% or LVEF ≥10% points drop below baseline, and clinically significant versus non-clinically significant was subject to the investigator's assessment of whether symptoms were present or absent.
Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 18, 36, and 60 (up to approximately 5 years)Clinical laboratory tests for hematology parameters were performed every 6 weeks and any abnormal values (High or Low) were based on NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grades. Laboratory abnormalities of NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 are presented. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: clinically significant (per investigator); accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or required a change in concomitant therapy. For the overall category, multiple occurrences of the same laboratory abnormality over time in one participant were only counted once.
Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeWeeks 6, 12, and 18, and Unscheduled Visits (up to approximately 5 years)Clinical laboratory tests for blood chemistry parameters were performed every 6 weeks and any abnormal values (High or Low) were based on NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grades. Laboratory abnormalities of NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 are presented. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: clinically significant (per investigator); accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or required a change in concomitant therapy. For the overall category, multiple occurrences of the same laboratory abnormality over time in one participant were only counted once.
Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified TimepointsPre-dose (0-4 hours) on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 4, 10, and 16Per protocol eligibility criteria, participants were not required to be pertuzumab naïve; therefore pertuzumab was detectable in some participants pre-dose at Week 1.
Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Pertuzumab at Specified TimepointsPost-infusion (0-30 minutes, infused over 60 minutes) on Day 1 of Week 1 and 16
Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified TimepointsPre-dose (0-4 hours) on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 4, 10, and 16Per protocol eligibility criteria, participants were not required to be trastuzumab naïve; therefore trastuzumab was detectable in some participants pre-dose at Week 1.
Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Trastuzumab at Specified TimepointsPost-infusion (0-30 minutes, infused over 60 minutes) on Day 1 of Week 1 and 16
Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireBaseline, Weeks 6, 12, 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64The MDASI-BT consists of 28 items and is a multi-symptom measure of cancer-related symptoms (Cleeland et al. 2000) that are sensitive to disease and treatment changes. The MDASI-BT is composed of the symptom severity scale and the symptom interference scale. In the symptom severity scale, participants rate the severity of their symptoms in the last 24 hours on 0-10 numeric scales, ranging from 0 = not present to 10 = as bad as you can imagine. The MDASI-BT symptom severity scale score will be calculated by (sum of total scores of non-missing items) divided by (total number of non-missing items), if participants answered at least 12 of the 22 severity scale items. The score will be considered missing if less than 12 items are completed.
Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireBaseline, Weeks 6, 12, 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64The MDASI-BT consists of 28 items and is a multi-symptom measure of cancer-related symptoms that are sensitive to disease and treatment changes. The MDASI-BT is composed of the symptom severity scale and the symptom interference scale. In the symptom interference scale, participants rate interference with daily activities caused by their symptoms on 0-10 numeric scales ranging from 0 = did not interfere to 10 = interfered completely. The MDASI-BT symptom interference scale score will be calculated by (sum of total scores of non-missing items) divided by (total number of non-missing items), if participants answered at least 4 of the 6 interference scale items. The score will be considered missing if less than 4 items are completed.
Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab
Participants with CNS metastases secondary to HER2-positive MBC, who had disease progression in the brain following previous treatment with radiotherapy (whole-brain radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery) for brain metastases, received treatment with pertuzumab in combination with high-dose trastuzumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination by the Sponsor, whichever occurred first.
40
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyTreatment discontinued2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPertuzumab + Trastuzumab
Age, Continuous50.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Value at Baseline60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other Race
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
Women of Childbearing Potential Status
Childbearing Potential
12 Participants
Women of Childbearing Potential Status
Non-Childbearing Potential - Postmenopausal
21 Participants
Women of Childbearing Potential Status
Non-Childbearing Potential - Surgically Sterile
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
20 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) Criteria

Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. An objective response in the central nervous system (CNS) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed by repeat assessment, according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all CNS target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; no corticosteroids; and stable or improved clinically; for non-target lesions, a CR was the disappearance of all enhancing CNS non-target lesions and no new CNS lesions. A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum longest diameter (LD) of CNS target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; stable to decreased corticosteroid dose; and stable or improved clinically. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.

Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 3.5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) CriteriaWith Objective Response (Confirmed CR or PR)10.8 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) CriteriaConfirmed Complete Response (CR)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) CriteriaConfirmed Partial Response (PR)10.8 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) CriteriaWithout Objective Response89.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints

Time frame: Post-infusion (0-30 minutes, infused over 60 minutes) on Day 1 of Week 1 and 16

Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK)-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one PK assessment unless there were major protocol deviations or if information impacting PK evaluation (e.g., exact blood sampling time, labeling error, technical failure in sample analysis) were unavailable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMaximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Pertuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 1 Day 1275.94 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 88.8
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMaximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Pertuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 16 Day 1225.55 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 56.22
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints

Time frame: Post-infusion (0-30 minutes, infused over 60 minutes) on Day 1 of Week 1 and 16

Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK)-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one PK assessment unless there were major protocol deviations or if information impacting PK evaluation (e.g., exact blood sampling time, labeling error, technical failure in sample analysis) were unavailable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMaximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Trastuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 1 Day 1181.43 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 72.49
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMaximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Trastuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 16 Day 1394.14 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 94.09
Secondary

Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria

Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 4 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR, PR, or SD ≥4 months to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of clinical benefit was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of clinical benefit was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From documentation of first complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥4 months to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment. Only those with confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥4 months in the CNS were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria6.64 Months
Secondary

Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria

Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR, PR, or SD ≥6 months to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of clinical benefit was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of clinical benefit was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From documentation of first complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment. Only those with confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 months in the CNS were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria9.23 Months
Secondary

Median Duration of Response in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria

Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. An objective response in the central nervous system (CNS) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed by repeat assessment, according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved an objective response, duration of response in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR or PR to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of response was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of response was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From documentation of first complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 3.5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment. Only participants who had a confirmed CR or PR in the CNS were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Duration of Response in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria4.60 Months
Secondary

Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of the percentage of blood that is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. All participants were required to have had a baseline LVEF of at least 50% to participate in this study. Measurements were done by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or mulitple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (with ECHO as the preferred method). Participants were to be reassessed with the same technique used for baseline cardiac evaluation throughout the study.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 (Treatment Period); and every 3 months during Survival Follow-Up (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants with evaluable assessments at each visit were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeBaseline60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 660.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 1260.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 2460.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 3660.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 4860.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 6062.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 7255.50 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 8460.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 9663.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 10862.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 12064.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeWeek 13264.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 160.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 259.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 360.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 469.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 567.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 657.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 757.50 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabMedian Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 857.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%)
Secondary

Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death

Time frame: From date of first dose until death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of DeathPrimary Cause of Death: Unknown3 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of DeathAll Deaths20 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of DeathDeaths ≤30 Days From Last Dose of Study Drug1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of DeathDeaths >30 Days From Last Dose of Study Drug19 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of DeathPrimary Cause of Death: Progressive Disease16 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of DeathPrimary Cause of Death: Other Cause (and Cancer)1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of the percentage of blood that is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. All participants were required to have had a baseline LVEF of at least (≥)50% to participate in this study. Measurements were done by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or mulitple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (with ECHO as the preferred method). Participants were to be reassessed with the same technique used for baseline cardiac evaluation throughout the study. The following are definitions for the three categories of LVEF findings: 'Normal' was defined as LVEF \>45% or LVEF 40-45% with less than (\<)10% points drop below baseline; 'Abnormal' was defined as LVEF \<40% or LVEF ≥10% points drop below baseline, and clinically significant versus non-clinically significant was subject to the investigator's assessment of whether symptoms were present or absent.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 (Treatment Period); and every 3 months during Survival Follow-Up (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants with evaluable assessments at each visit were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeBaselineNormal39 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeBaselineAbnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeBaselineAbnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 6Normal33 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 6Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 6Abnormal, Clinically Significant1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 12Normal30 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 12Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 12Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 24Normal14 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 24Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 24Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 36Normal9 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 36Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 36Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 48Normal6 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 48Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 48Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 60Normal6 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 60Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 60Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 72Normal4 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 72Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 72Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 84Normal3 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 84Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 84Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 96Normal3 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 96Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 96Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 108Normal2 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 108Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 108Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 120Normal1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 120Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 120Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 132Normal1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 132Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeWeek 132Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 1Normal5 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 1Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 1Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 2Normal12 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 2Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 2Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 3Normal5 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 3Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 3Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 4Normal1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 4Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant1 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 4Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 5Normal3 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 5Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 5Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 6Normal3 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 6Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 6Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 7Normal2 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 7Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 7Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 8Normal2 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 8Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over TimeSurvival Follow-Up 8Abnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.

Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Any Grade7 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 11 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 24 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 31 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 41 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 50 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.

Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Any Grade12 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 12 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 24 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 35 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 41 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE - Grade 50 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.

Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Withdrawal of Any Study Drug - Any Grade TEAE2 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Withdrawal of Any Study Drug - Grade 3 TEAE2 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Withdrawal of Pertuzumab Only - Any Grade TEAE0 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Withdrawal of Both Study Drugs - Any Grade TEAE2 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Withdrawal of Both Study Drugs - Grade 3 TEAE2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.

Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)Any TEAE - Any Grade38 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)Any TEAE - Grade 15 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)Any TEAE - Grade 216 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)Any TEAE - Grade 314 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)Any TEAE - Grade 43 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)Any TEAE - Grade 50 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0

Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as all adverse events that met seriousness criteria (as defined in the protocol; same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definition) occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All SAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any SAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated; and Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. The terms severe and serious are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each adverse event. Multiple occurrences of SAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.

Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any SAE - Any Grade7 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any SAE - Grade 10 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any SAE - Grade 21 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any SAE - Grade 35 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any SAE - Grade 42 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any SAE - Grade 50 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time

Clinical laboratory tests for blood chemistry parameters were performed every 6 weeks and any abnormal values (High or Low) were based on NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grades. Laboratory abnormalities of NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 are presented. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: clinically significant (per investigator); accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or required a change in concomitant therapy. For the overall category, multiple occurrences of the same laboratory abnormality over time in one participant were only counted once.

Time frame: Weeks 6, 12, and 18, and Unscheduled Visits (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants with evaluable assessments at each visit were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeOverall: Glucose (mmol/L), Low - Grade 30 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeOverall: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 32 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeOverall: Glucose (mmol/L), Low - Grade 40 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeOverall: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 40 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeWeek 6: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 31 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeWeek 12: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 31 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeWeek 18: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 31 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeOverall: Potassium (mmol/L), Low - Grade 30 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeOverall: Potassium (mmol/L), High - Grade 30 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeOverall: Potassium (mmol/L), Low - Grade 41 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeOverall: Potassium (mmol/L), High - Grade 40 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over TimeUnscheduled Visit: Potassium (mmol/L),Low -Grade 41 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time

Clinical laboratory tests for hematology parameters were performed every 6 weeks and any abnormal values (High or Low) were based on NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grades. Laboratory abnormalities of NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 are presented. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: clinically significant (per investigator); accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or required a change in concomitant therapy. For the overall category, multiple occurrences of the same laboratory abnormality over time in one participant were only counted once.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 18, 36, and 60 (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants with evaluable assessments at each visit were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeOverall: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 33 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeOverall: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), High - Grade 30 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeOverall: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 41 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeOverall: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), High - Grade 40 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeBaseline: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 32 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeBaseline: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 40 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeWeek 18: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 31 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeWeek 18: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 40 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeWeek 36: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 31 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeWeek 36: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 40 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeWeek 60: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 30 Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over TimeWeek 60: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 41 Participants
Secondary

Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints

Per protocol eligibility criteria, participants were not required to be pertuzumab naïve; therefore pertuzumab was detectable in some participants pre-dose at Week 1.

Time frame: Pre-dose (0-4 hours) on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 4, 10, and 16

Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK)-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one PK assessment unless there were major protocol deviations or if information impacting PK evaluation (e.g., exact blood sampling time, labeling error, technical failure in sample analysis) were unavailable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabObserved Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 1 Day 143.12 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 101.45
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabObserved Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 4 Day 188.03 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 29.91
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabObserved Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 10 Day 194.46 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 38.47
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabObserved Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 16 Day 1101.99 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 41.59
Secondary

Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints

Per protocol eligibility criteria, participants were not required to be trastuzumab naïve; therefore trastuzumab was detectable in some participants pre-dose at Week 1.

Time frame: Pre-dose (0-4 hours) on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 4, 10, and 16

Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK)-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one PK assessment unless there were major protocol deviations or if information impacting PK evaluation (e.g., exact blood sampling time, labeling error, technical failure in sample analysis) were unavailable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabObserved Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 1 Day 157.00 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 52.73
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabObserved Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 4 Day 1190.82 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 52.22
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabObserved Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 10 Day 1294.50 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 70.33
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabObserved Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified TimepointsWeek 16 Day 1306.14 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL)Standard Deviation 90.22
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the period from the date of first dose until the date of death from any cause. If no death occurred, overall survival was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.

Time frame: From the date of first dose until death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabOverall Survival27.17 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE of Special Interest by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0

Protocol-defined TEAEs of special interest, occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, included the following: An elevated ALT or AST (\>3 times baseline value) in combination with either an elevated total bilirubin (\>2 times the upper limit of normal) or clinical jaundice; Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study treatment; Congestive heart failure; An asymptomatic decline in LVEF (a value 10 percentage points below baseline or lower, and \<45%) that requires treatment or that leads to discontinuation of study treatment. All TEAEs of special interest were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs of special interest were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.

Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE of Special Interest by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Any TEAE of Special Interest - Any Grade2.6 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE of Special Interest by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0Asymptomatic Decline in LVEF - Grade 32.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria

Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR or PR were defined in the same way as for objective response in the CNS. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) while on study. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.

Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaWith Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR,PR,or SD≥6mos)51.4 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaConfirmed Complete Response (CR)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaConfirmed Partial Response (PR)10.8 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaConfirmed Stable Disease (SD) ≥6 Months40.5 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaWithout Clinical Benefit48.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria

Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 4 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR or PR were defined in the same way as for objective response in the CNS. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) while on study. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.

Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaWith Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR,PR,or SD≥4mos)67.6 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaConfirmed Complete Response (CR)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaConfirmed Partial Response (PR)10.8 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaConfirmed Stable Disease (SD) ≥4 Months56.8 Percentage of Participants
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM CriteriaWithout Clinical Benefit32.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (CNS), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria

Progression-free survival (CNS) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to disease progression in the CNS or death from any cause. If no progressive disease in the CNS and no death occurred, progression-free survival (CNS) was censored on the date of the last CNS tumor assessment. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, progression-free survival (CNS) was censored on Day 1.

Time frame: From the date of first dose to disease progression in the CNS or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabProgression-Free Survival (CNS), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria4.63 Months
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (CNS or Systemic), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria and RECIST v1.1

Progression-free survival (CNS or systemic) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to CNS or systemic disease progression or death from any cause. If no CNS or systemic disease progression and no death occurred, data was censored on the date of the last CNS or systemic tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, data was censored on Day 1.

Time frame: From the date of first dose to CNS or systemic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabProgression-Free Survival (CNS or Systemic), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria and RECIST v1.14.63 Months
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (Systemic), Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

Progression-free survival (systemic) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to systemic disease progression or death from any cause. If no systemic disease progression and no death occurred, progression-free survival (systemic) was censored on the date of the last systemic tumor assessment. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, progression-free survival (systemic) was censored on Day 1.

Time frame: From the date of first dose to systemic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabProgression-Free Survival (Systemic), Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)16.26 Months
Secondary

Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire

The MDASI-BT consists of 28 items and is a multi-symptom measure of cancer-related symptoms that are sensitive to disease and treatment changes. The MDASI-BT is composed of the symptom severity scale and the symptom interference scale. In the symptom interference scale, participants rate interference with daily activities caused by their symptoms on 0-10 numeric scales ranging from 0 = did not interfere to 10 = interfered completely. The MDASI-BT symptom interference scale score will be calculated by (sum of total scores of non-missing items) divided by (total number of non-missing items), if participants answered at least 4 of the 6 interference scale items. The score will be considered missing if less than 4 items are completed.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64

Population: Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population: all treated participants who had both a nonmissing baseline and at least one post-baseline PRO assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireBaseline2.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.629
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireWeek 62.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.787
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireWeek 122.81 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.391
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireWeek 202.11 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.858
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireWeek 281.76 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.427
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireWeek 403.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.548
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireWeek 524.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.522
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT QuestionnaireWeek 643.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.57
Secondary

Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire

The MDASI-BT consists of 28 items and is a multi-symptom measure of cancer-related symptoms (Cleeland et al. 2000) that are sensitive to disease and treatment changes. The MDASI-BT is composed of the symptom severity scale and the symptom interference scale. In the symptom severity scale, participants rate the severity of their symptoms in the last 24 hours on 0-10 numeric scales, ranging from 0 = not present to 10 = as bad as you can imagine. The MDASI-BT symptom severity scale score will be calculated by (sum of total scores of non-missing items) divided by (total number of non-missing items), if participants answered at least 12 of the 22 severity scale items. The score will be considered missing if less than 12 items are completed.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64

Population: Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population: all treated participants who had both a nonmissing baseline and at least one post-baseline PRO assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireBaseline1.65 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.618
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireWeek 61.97 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.822
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireWeek 122.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.141
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireWeek 202.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.111
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireWeek 281.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.547
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireWeek 402.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.856
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireWeek 523.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.018
Pertuzumab + TrastuzumabSymptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) QuestionnaireWeek 643.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026