Metastatic Breast Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will examine the safety and efficacy of pertuzumab in combination with high-dose trastuzumab in adult participants with HER2-positive MBC with CNS metastases and disease progression in the brain following radiotherapy.
Interventions
Participants will receive 840 milligrams (mg) loading dose of pertuzumab, followed every 3 weeks thereafter by a dose of 420 mg via intravenous (IV) infusion until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.
Participants will receive trastuzumab at a dose of 6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight once weekly via IV infusion until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Pathologically confirmed HER2-positive MBC * Progression of or new brain metastases after completion of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery * Completion of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery more than 60 days prior to enrollment * Stable systemic disease * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 * LVEF at least 50% * Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function * Life expectancy more than 12 weeks
Exclusion criteria
* Progression of systemic disease at Screening * Leptomeningeal disease * History of intolerance or hypersensitivity to study drug * Use of certain investigational therapies within 21 days prior to enrollment * Current anthracycline use * Unwillingness to discontinue ado-trastuzumab emtansine or lapatinib use * Active infection * Pregnant or lactating women * Significant history or risk of cardiac disease * Symptomatic intrinsic lung disease or lung involvement * History of other malignancy within the last 5 years
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) Criteria | From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 3.5 years) | Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. An objective response in the central nervous system (CNS) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed by repeat assessment, according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all CNS target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; no corticosteroids; and stable or improved clinically; for non-target lesions, a CR was the disappearance of all enhancing CNS non-target lesions and no new CNS lesions. A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum longest diameter (LD) of CNS target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; stable to decreased corticosteroid dose; and stable or improved clinically. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 5 years) | Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 4 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR or PR were defined in the same way as for objective response in the CNS. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) while on study. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses. |
| Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | From documentation of first complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥4 months to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years) | Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 4 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR, PR, or SD ≥4 months to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of clinical benefit was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of clinical benefit was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 5 years) | Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR or PR were defined in the same way as for objective response in the CNS. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) while on study. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses. |
| Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | From documentation of first complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years) | Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR, PR, or SD ≥6 months to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of clinical benefit was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of clinical benefit was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Progression-Free Survival (CNS), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | From the date of first dose to disease progression in the CNS or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years) | Progression-free survival (CNS) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to disease progression in the CNS or death from any cause. If no progressive disease in the CNS and no death occurred, progression-free survival (CNS) was censored on the date of the last CNS tumor assessment. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, progression-free survival (CNS) was censored on Day 1. |
| Progression-Free Survival (Systemic), Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) | From the date of first dose to systemic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years) | Progression-free survival (systemic) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to systemic disease progression or death from any cause. If no systemic disease progression and no death occurred, progression-free survival (systemic) was censored on the date of the last systemic tumor assessment. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, progression-free survival (systemic) was censored on Day 1. |
| Progression-Free Survival (CNS or Systemic), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria and RECIST v1.1 | From the date of first dose to CNS or systemic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years) | Progression-free survival (CNS or systemic) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to CNS or systemic disease progression or death from any cause. If no CNS or systemic disease progression and no death occurred, data was censored on the date of the last CNS or systemic tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, data was censored on Day 1. |
| Overall Survival | From the date of first dose until death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years) | Overall survival was defined as the period from the date of first dose until the date of death from any cause. If no death occurred, overall survival was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. |
| Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death | From date of first dose until death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years) | — |
| Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) | From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years) | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade. |
| Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years) | Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as all adverse events that met seriousness criteria (as defined in the protocol; same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definition) occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All SAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any SAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated; and Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. The terms severe and serious are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each adverse event. Multiple occurrences of SAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade. |
| Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years) | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade. |
| Median Duration of Response in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | From documentation of first complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 3.5 years) | Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. An objective response in the central nervous system (CNS) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed by repeat assessment, according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved an objective response, duration of response in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR or PR to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of response was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of response was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years) | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE of Special Interest by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years) | Protocol-defined TEAEs of special interest, occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, included the following: An elevated ALT or AST (\>3 times baseline value) in combination with either an elevated total bilirubin (\>2 times the upper limit of normal) or clinical jaundice; Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study treatment; Congestive heart failure; An asymptomatic decline in LVEF (a value 10 percentage points below baseline or lower, and \<45%) that requires treatment or that leads to discontinuation of study treatment. All TEAEs of special interest were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs of special interest were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade. |
| Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 (Treatment Period); and every 3 months during Survival Follow-Up (up to approximately 5 years) | Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of the percentage of blood that is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. All participants were required to have had a baseline LVEF of at least 50% to participate in this study. Measurements were done by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or mulitple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (with ECHO as the preferred method). Participants were to be reassessed with the same technique used for baseline cardiac evaluation throughout the study. |
| Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 (Treatment Period); and every 3 months during Survival Follow-Up (up to approximately 5 years) | Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of the percentage of blood that is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. All participants were required to have had a baseline LVEF of at least (≥)50% to participate in this study. Measurements were done by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or mulitple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (with ECHO as the preferred method). Participants were to be reassessed with the same technique used for baseline cardiac evaluation throughout the study. The following are definitions for the three categories of LVEF findings: 'Normal' was defined as LVEF \>45% or LVEF 40-45% with less than (\<)10% points drop below baseline; 'Abnormal' was defined as LVEF \<40% or LVEF ≥10% points drop below baseline, and clinically significant versus non-clinically significant was subject to the investigator's assessment of whether symptoms were present or absent. |
| Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Baseline, Weeks 18, 36, and 60 (up to approximately 5 years) | Clinical laboratory tests for hematology parameters were performed every 6 weeks and any abnormal values (High or Low) were based on NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grades. Laboratory abnormalities of NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 are presented. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: clinically significant (per investigator); accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or required a change in concomitant therapy. For the overall category, multiple occurrences of the same laboratory abnormality over time in one participant were only counted once. |
| Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Weeks 6, 12, and 18, and Unscheduled Visits (up to approximately 5 years) | Clinical laboratory tests for blood chemistry parameters were performed every 6 weeks and any abnormal values (High or Low) were based on NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grades. Laboratory abnormalities of NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 are presented. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: clinically significant (per investigator); accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or required a change in concomitant therapy. For the overall category, multiple occurrences of the same laboratory abnormality over time in one participant were only counted once. |
| Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Pre-dose (0-4 hours) on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 4, 10, and 16 | Per protocol eligibility criteria, participants were not required to be pertuzumab naïve; therefore pertuzumab was detectable in some participants pre-dose at Week 1. |
| Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Post-infusion (0-30 minutes, infused over 60 minutes) on Day 1 of Week 1 and 16 | — |
| Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Pre-dose (0-4 hours) on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 4, 10, and 16 | Per protocol eligibility criteria, participants were not required to be trastuzumab naïve; therefore trastuzumab was detectable in some participants pre-dose at Week 1. |
| Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Post-infusion (0-30 minutes, infused over 60 minutes) on Day 1 of Week 1 and 16 | — |
| Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64 | The MDASI-BT consists of 28 items and is a multi-symptom measure of cancer-related symptoms (Cleeland et al. 2000) that are sensitive to disease and treatment changes. The MDASI-BT is composed of the symptom severity scale and the symptom interference scale. In the symptom severity scale, participants rate the severity of their symptoms in the last 24 hours on 0-10 numeric scales, ranging from 0 = not present to 10 = as bad as you can imagine. The MDASI-BT symptom severity scale score will be calculated by (sum of total scores of non-missing items) divided by (total number of non-missing items), if participants answered at least 12 of the 22 severity scale items. The score will be considered missing if less than 12 items are completed. |
| Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64 | The MDASI-BT consists of 28 items and is a multi-symptom measure of cancer-related symptoms that are sensitive to disease and treatment changes. The MDASI-BT is composed of the symptom severity scale and the symptom interference scale. In the symptom interference scale, participants rate interference with daily activities caused by their symptoms on 0-10 numeric scales ranging from 0 = did not interfere to 10 = interfered completely. The MDASI-BT symptom interference scale score will be calculated by (sum of total scores of non-missing items) divided by (total number of non-missing items), if participants answered at least 4 of the 6 interference scale items. The score will be considered missing if less than 4 items are completed. |
| Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years) | Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab Participants with CNS metastases secondary to HER2-positive MBC, who had disease progression in the brain following previous treatment with radiotherapy (whole-brain radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery) for brain metastases, received treatment with pertuzumab in combination with high-dose trastuzumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination by the Sponsor, whichever occurred first. | 40 |
| Total | 40 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 20 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 |
| Overall Study | Treatment discontinued | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 50.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 33 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants |
| Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Value at Baseline | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Reported | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other Race | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 36 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 40 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants |
| Women of Childbearing Potential Status Childbearing Potential | 12 Participants |
| Women of Childbearing Potential Status Non-Childbearing Potential - Postmenopausal | 21 Participants |
| Women of Childbearing Potential Status Non-Childbearing Potential - Surgically Sterile | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 20 / 39 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 38 / 39 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 7 / 39 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) Criteria
Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. An objective response in the central nervous system (CNS) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed by repeat assessment, according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all CNS target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; no corticosteroids; and stable or improved clinically; for non-target lesions, a CR was the disappearance of all enhancing CNS non-target lesions and no new CNS lesions. A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum longest diameter (LD) of CNS target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; stable to decreased corticosteroid dose; and stable or improved clinically. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 3.5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) Criteria | With Objective Response (Confirmed CR or PR) | 10.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) Criteria | Confirmed Complete Response (CR) | 0.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) Criteria | Confirmed Partial Response (PR) | 10.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in the CNS, Assessed Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) Criteria | Without Objective Response | 89.2 Percentage of Participants |
Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints
Time frame: Post-infusion (0-30 minutes, infused over 60 minutes) on Day 1 of Week 1 and 16
Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK)-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one PK assessment unless there were major protocol deviations or if information impacting PK evaluation (e.g., exact blood sampling time, labeling error, technical failure in sample analysis) were unavailable.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 1 Day 1 | 275.94 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 88.8 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 16 Day 1 | 225.55 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 56.22 |
Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints
Time frame: Post-infusion (0-30 minutes, infused over 60 minutes) on Day 1 of Week 1 and 16
Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK)-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one PK assessment unless there were major protocol deviations or if information impacting PK evaluation (e.g., exact blood sampling time, labeling error, technical failure in sample analysis) were unavailable.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 1 Day 1 | 181.43 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 72.49 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Maximum Serum Concentrations (Cmax) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 16 Day 1 | 394.14 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 94.09 |
Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria
Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 4 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR, PR, or SD ≥4 months to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of clinical benefit was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of clinical benefit was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From documentation of first complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥4 months to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment. Only those with confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥4 months in the CNS were included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | 6.64 Months |
Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria
Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR, PR, or SD ≥6 months to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of clinical benefit was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of clinical benefit was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From documentation of first complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months to the date of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment. Only those with confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 months in the CNS were included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Duration of Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | 9.23 Months |
Median Duration of Response in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria
Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. An objective response in the central nervous system (CNS) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed by repeat assessment, according to RANO-BM criteria. Among participants who achieved an objective response, duration of response in the CNS was defined as the time from documentation of the first CR or PR to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. If a participant did not experience death or disease progression in the CNS before the end of the study, duration of response was censored on the last date the participant was known to be progression free. Duration of response was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From documentation of first complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the time of disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 3.5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment. Only participants who had a confirmed CR or PR in the CNS were included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Duration of Response in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | 4.60 Months |
Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of the percentage of blood that is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. All participants were required to have had a baseline LVEF of at least 50% to participate in this study. Measurements were done by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or mulitple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (with ECHO as the preferred method). Participants were to be reassessed with the same technique used for baseline cardiac evaluation throughout the study.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 (Treatment Period); and every 3 months during Survival Follow-Up (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants with evaluable assessments at each visit were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Baseline | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 6 | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 12 | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 24 | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 36 | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 48 | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 60 | 62.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 72 | 55.50 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 84 | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 96 | 63.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 108 | 62.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 120 | 64.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Week 132 | 64.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 1 | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 2 | 59.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 3 | 60.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 4 | 69.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 5 | 67.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 6 | 57.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 7 | 57.50 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 8 | 57.00 Percentage Points of LVEF (%) |
Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death
Time frame: From date of first dose until death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death | Primary Cause of Death: Unknown | 3 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death | All Deaths | 20 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death | Deaths ≤30 Days From Last Dose of Study Drug | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death | Deaths >30 Days From Last Dose of Study Drug | 19 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death | Primary Cause of Death: Progressive Disease | 16 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Deaths by Time (≤30 or >30 Days) From Last Study Drug Administration and by Primary Cause of Death | Primary Cause of Death: Other Cause (and Cancer) | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of the percentage of blood that is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. All participants were required to have had a baseline LVEF of at least (≥)50% to participate in this study. Measurements were done by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or mulitple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan (with ECHO as the preferred method). Participants were to be reassessed with the same technique used for baseline cardiac evaluation throughout the study. The following are definitions for the three categories of LVEF findings: 'Normal' was defined as LVEF \>45% or LVEF 40-45% with less than (\<)10% points drop below baseline; 'Abnormal' was defined as LVEF \<40% or LVEF ≥10% points drop below baseline, and clinically significant versus non-clinically significant was subject to the investigator's assessment of whether symptoms were present or absent.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 (Treatment Period); and every 3 months during Survival Follow-Up (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants with evaluable assessments at each visit were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Baseline | Normal | 39 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Baseline | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Baseline | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 6 | Normal | 33 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 6 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 6 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 12 | Normal | 30 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 12 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 12 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 24 | Normal | 14 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 24 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 24 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 36 | Normal | 9 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 36 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 36 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 48 | Normal | 6 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 48 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 48 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 60 | Normal | 6 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 60 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 60 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 72 | Normal | 4 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 72 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 72 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 84 | Normal | 3 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 84 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 84 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 96 | Normal | 3 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 96 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 96 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 108 | Normal | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 108 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 108 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 120 | Normal | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 120 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 120 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 132 | Normal | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 132 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Week 132 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 1 | Normal | 5 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 1 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 1 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 2 | Normal | 12 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 2 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 2 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 3 | Normal | 5 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 3 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 3 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 4 | Normal | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 4 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 4 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 5 | Normal | 3 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 5 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 5 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 6 | Normal | 3 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 6 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 6 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 7 | Normal | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 7 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 7 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 8 | Normal | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 8 | Abnormal, Not Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants by Investigator Interpretation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessments Over Time | Survival Follow-Up 8 | Abnormal, Clinically Significant | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Any Grade | 7 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Pertuzumab Infusion Delay, Slow Down, or Interruption, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Any Grade | 12 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Trastuzumab Dose Modification by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE - Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Withdrawal of Any Study Drug - Any Grade TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Withdrawal of Any Study Drug - Grade 3 TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Withdrawal of Pertuzumab Only - Any Grade TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Withdrawal of Both Study Drugs - Any Grade TEAE | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Any Study Drug, Pertuzumab Only, or Both Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab, by Highest Grade of Severity According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Withdrawal of Both Study Drugs - Grade 3 TEAE | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as all adverse events occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All TEAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any TEAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) | Any TEAE - Any Grade | 38 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) | Any TEAE - Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) | Any TEAE - Grade 2 | 16 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) | Any TEAE - Grade 3 | 14 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) | Any TEAE - Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0) | Any TEAE - Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0
Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as all adverse events that met seriousness criteria (as defined in the protocol; same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definition) occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All SAEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0; any SAE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated; and Grade 5 = death related to adverse event. The terms severe and serious are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each adverse event. Multiple occurrences of SAEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any SAE - Any Grade | 7 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any SAE - Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any SAE - Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any SAE - Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any SAE - Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE) by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any SAE - Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time
Clinical laboratory tests for blood chemistry parameters were performed every 6 weeks and any abnormal values (High or Low) were based on NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grades. Laboratory abnormalities of NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 are presented. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: clinically significant (per investigator); accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or required a change in concomitant therapy. For the overall category, multiple occurrences of the same laboratory abnormality over time in one participant were only counted once.
Time frame: Weeks 6, 12, and 18, and Unscheduled Visits (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants with evaluable assessments at each visit were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Overall: Glucose (mmol/L), Low - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Overall: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Overall: Glucose (mmol/L), Low - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Overall: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Week 6: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Week 12: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Week 18: Glucose (mmol/L), High - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Overall: Potassium (mmol/L), Low - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Overall: Potassium (mmol/L), High - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Overall: Potassium (mmol/L), Low - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Overall: Potassium (mmol/L), High - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Blood Chemistry Tests Over Time | Unscheduled Visit: Potassium (mmol/L),Low -Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time
Clinical laboratory tests for hematology parameters were performed every 6 weeks and any abnormal values (High or Low) were based on NCI-CTCAE v4.0 grades. Laboratory abnormalities of NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 are presented. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: clinically significant (per investigator); accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or required a change in concomitant therapy. For the overall category, multiple occurrences of the same laboratory abnormality over time in one participant were only counted once.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 18, 36, and 60 (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants with evaluable assessments at each visit were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Overall: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Overall: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), High - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Overall: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Overall: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), High - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Baseline: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Baseline: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Week 18: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Week 18: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Week 36: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Week 36: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Week 60: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grades 3 and 4 Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology Tests Over Time | Week 60: Lymphocytes (10^9/L), Low - Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints
Per protocol eligibility criteria, participants were not required to be pertuzumab naïve; therefore pertuzumab was detectable in some participants pre-dose at Week 1.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0-4 hours) on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 4, 10, and 16
Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK)-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one PK assessment unless there were major protocol deviations or if information impacting PK evaluation (e.g., exact blood sampling time, labeling error, technical failure in sample analysis) were unavailable.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 1 Day 1 | 43.12 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 101.45 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 4 Day 1 | 88.03 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 29.91 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 10 Day 1 | 94.46 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 38.47 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Pertuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 16 Day 1 | 101.99 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 41.59 |
Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints
Per protocol eligibility criteria, participants were not required to be trastuzumab naïve; therefore trastuzumab was detectable in some participants pre-dose at Week 1.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0-4 hours) on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 4, 10, and 16
Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK)-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one PK assessment unless there were major protocol deviations or if information impacting PK evaluation (e.g., exact blood sampling time, labeling error, technical failure in sample analysis) were unavailable.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 1 Day 1 | 57.00 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 52.73 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 4 Day 1 | 190.82 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 52.22 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 10 Day 1 | 294.50 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 70.33 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Observed Trough Serum Concentrations (Cmin) of Trastuzumab at Specified Timepoints | Week 16 Day 1 | 306.14 micrograms per millilitre (ug/mL) | Standard Deviation 90.22 |
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the period from the date of first dose until the date of death from any cause. If no death occurred, overall survival was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Time frame: From the date of first dose until death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Overall Survival | 27.17 Months |
Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE of Special Interest by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0
Protocol-defined TEAEs of special interest, occurring on or after Day 1 of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, included the following: An elevated ALT or AST (\>3 times baseline value) in combination with either an elevated total bilirubin (\>2 times the upper limit of normal) or clinical jaundice; Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study treatment; Congestive heart failure; An asymptomatic decline in LVEF (a value 10 percentage points below baseline or lower, and \<45%) that requires treatment or that leads to discontinuation of study treatment. All TEAEs of special interest were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Multiple occurrences of TEAEs of special interest were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Time frame: From the first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE of Special Interest by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Any TEAE of Special Interest - Any Grade | 2.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE of Special Interest by Highest Grade of Severity, According to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 | Asymptomatic Decline in LVEF - Grade 3 | 2.6 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria
Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR or PR were defined in the same way as for objective response in the CNS. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) while on study. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR,PR,or SD≥6mos) | 51.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | Confirmed Complete Response (CR) | 0.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | Confirmed Partial Response (PR) | 10.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | Confirmed Stable Disease (SD) ≥6 Months | 40.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or SD ≥6 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | Without Clinical Benefit | 48.6 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria
Responses were assessed by the investigator, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, physical examinations, routine neurological examinations, and corticosteroid dosing. Clinical benefit in the central nervous system (CNS) was defined here as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for at least 4 months, confirmed by repeat assessment according to RANO-BM criteria. A CR or PR were defined in the same way as for objective response in the CNS. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) while on study. The 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence intervals were calculated for responses.
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for first 2 scans, followed by every 8 weeks for 2 scans, then every 12 weeks until disease progression; up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR,PR,or SD≥4mos) | 67.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | Confirmed Complete Response (CR) | 0.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | Confirmed Partial Response (PR) | 10.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | Confirmed Stable Disease (SD) ≥4 Months | 56.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Confirmed CR, PR, or Stable Disease [SD] ≥4 Months) in the CNS, Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | Without Clinical Benefit | 32.4 Percentage of Participants |
Progression-Free Survival (CNS), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria
Progression-free survival (CNS) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to disease progression in the CNS or death from any cause. If no progressive disease in the CNS and no death occurred, progression-free survival (CNS) was censored on the date of the last CNS tumor assessment. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, progression-free survival (CNS) was censored on Day 1.
Time frame: From the date of first dose to disease progression in the CNS or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Progression-Free Survival (CNS), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria | 4.63 Months |
Progression-Free Survival (CNS or Systemic), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria and RECIST v1.1
Progression-free survival (CNS or systemic) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to CNS or systemic disease progression or death from any cause. If no CNS or systemic disease progression and no death occurred, data was censored on the date of the last CNS or systemic tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, data was censored on Day 1.
Time frame: From the date of first dose to CNS or systemic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Progression-Free Survival (CNS or Systemic), Assessed Using RANO-BM Criteria and RECIST v1.1 | 4.63 Months |
Progression-Free Survival (Systemic), Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Progression-free survival (systemic) was defined as the time from the date of first dose to systemic disease progression or death from any cause. If no systemic disease progression and no death occurred, progression-free survival (systemic) was censored on the date of the last systemic tumor assessment. If a post-baseline assessment was not available, progression-free survival (systemic) was censored on Day 1.
Time frame: From the date of first dose to systemic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Population: Efficacy-Evaluable Population: all participants who received any dose of study treatment and had at least one follow-up CNS tumor assessment or died without follow-up tumor assessment within 30 days from the last dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Progression-Free Survival (Systemic), Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) | 16.26 Months |
Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire
The MDASI-BT consists of 28 items and is a multi-symptom measure of cancer-related symptoms that are sensitive to disease and treatment changes. The MDASI-BT is composed of the symptom severity scale and the symptom interference scale. In the symptom interference scale, participants rate interference with daily activities caused by their symptoms on 0-10 numeric scales ranging from 0 = did not interfere to 10 = interfered completely. The MDASI-BT symptom interference scale score will be calculated by (sum of total scores of non-missing items) divided by (total number of non-missing items), if participants answered at least 4 of the 6 interference scale items. The score will be considered missing if less than 4 items are completed.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64
Population: Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population: all treated participants who had both a nonmissing baseline and at least one post-baseline PRO assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Baseline | 2.51 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.629 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Week 6 | 2.23 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.787 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Week 12 | 2.81 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.391 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Week 20 | 2.11 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.858 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Week 28 | 1.76 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.427 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Week 40 | 3.24 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.548 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Week 52 | 4.25 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.522 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Interference Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the MDASI-BT Questionnaire | Week 64 | 3.93 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.57 |
Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire
The MDASI-BT consists of 28 items and is a multi-symptom measure of cancer-related symptoms (Cleeland et al. 2000) that are sensitive to disease and treatment changes. The MDASI-BT is composed of the symptom severity scale and the symptom interference scale. In the symptom severity scale, participants rate the severity of their symptoms in the last 24 hours on 0-10 numeric scales, ranging from 0 = not present to 10 = as bad as you can imagine. The MDASI-BT symptom severity scale score will be calculated by (sum of total scores of non-missing items) divided by (total number of non-missing items), if participants answered at least 12 of the 22 severity scale items. The score will be considered missing if less than 12 items are completed.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 20, 28, 40, 52, and 64
Population: Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population: all treated participants who had both a nonmissing baseline and at least one post-baseline PRO assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Baseline | 1.65 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.618 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Week 6 | 1.97 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.822 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Week 12 | 2.24 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.141 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Week 20 | 2.09 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.111 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Week 28 | 1.94 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.547 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Week 40 | 2.78 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.856 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Week 52 | 3.53 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.018 |
| Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab | Symptom Severity Scale Score Over Time, Assessed by Participant Reporting on the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Questionnaire | Week 64 | 3.12 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |