Skip to content

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Globus Pallidus (GP) in Huntington's Disease (HD)

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Globus Pallidus (GP) in Huntington's Disease (HD): A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, International, Multi-centre Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02535884
Acronym
HD-DBS
Enrollment
48
Registered
2015-08-31
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Huntington Disease

Keywords

Huntington Disease, DBS, Chorea

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to prove the efficacy and safety of pallidal DBS in HD patients and to show superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to stimulation-off group

Detailed description

In this study the efficacy and safety of pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in HD patients shall be investigated and superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to the stimulation-off group shall be shown. This study is a prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, sham-controlled, multi-centre trial. Patients in the stimulation group will be stimulated for three months while the stimulator in the sham-group will be turned off for three months. After three months the primary endpoint will be assessed. Afterwards the stimulator will be turned on in all patients.

Interventions

DEVICEACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)

the stimulator in the stimulation group will be turned on after implantation of the device

Sponsors

KKS Netzwerk
CollaboratorNETWORK
Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The George Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons
CollaboratorOTHER
CHDI Foundation, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

During the first 3 month the one group will be stimulated (pallidal DBS), thereafter 12 weeks open follow up, where patients in both groups are stimulated.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically symptomatic and genetically confirmed HD (number of CAG repeats ≥ 36) * Age ≥18 years * Moderate stage of the disease (UHDRS motor score ≥ 30) * Chorea despite best medical treatment (UHDRS chorea subscore ≥ 10) * Mattis Dementia Rating Scale ≥ 120 (or \> 80% of items testable independently from motor impairment) * Patient has stable medication prior six weeks before inclusion * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Juvenile HD (Westphal variant) or predominant bradykinesia * Postural instability with UHDRS retropulsion score \> 2 * Severe comorbidity compromising operability and/or life expectancy and/or quality of life during the trial duration (e.g. cancer with life expectancy \< 6 months, NYHA 3 and 4 rising the anaesthetic risk according to the anaesthesiologist) * Acute suicidality * Acute psychosis (symptoms within previous 6 months) * Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 2 months before screening * Cortical atrophy grade 3 * Patients with risk of coagulopathies and/or increased risk of haemorrhage * Patients with an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator * Pregnancy * lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
UHDRS-TMS difference12 weeks postoperatively compared to baselineDifference between the groups in the UHDRS total motor score (UHDRS-TMS) at 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
UHDRS-bradykinesia difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the UHDRS bradykinesia subscore (items 22-25 and 27-29)
BFMDRS difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score
Reilmann Battery differences6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Q-Motor choreomotography test (Reilmann Battery)
MDRS difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS)
Verbal Fluency Test difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Verbal Fluency Test (formal lexical, categorical, category change)
UHDRS-Chorea difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) chorea subscore (items 14-20)
STROOP Test differences6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in STROOP word reading, colour naming and colour of the word naming
HADS-SIS difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale combined with Snaith Irritability Scale (HADS-SIS)
PBA-s difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Problem Behaviours Assessment Short Form (PBA-s)
SF 36 difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)
CGI difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
SDMT difference6 months postoperatively compared to baselineDifference in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

Countries

Austria, France, Germany, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026