Skip to content

Training Lay Healthcare Workers to Optimize TB Care and Improve Outcomes in Malawi

Training Lay Healthcare Workers to Optimize TB Care and Improve Outcomes in Malawi

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02533089
Enrollment
1153
Registered
2015-08-26
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tuberculosis

Brief summary

Task shifting of less complex healthcare tasks to lay health workers (LHWs) is increasingly employed strategy to address the global shortage of skilled health workers. Despite availability of effective treatment, tuberculosis (TB) remains an important cause of mortality with 1.3 million lives lost globally to TB in 2012. The greatest proportion of new TB cases occurs in Africa and over 95% of TB deaths occur in low income countries (LICs). In response to the combined high TB burden and severe healthcare worker shortages in these settings, outpatient TB care is among the tasks commonly shifted to LHWs. LHWs are community members who have received some training but are not healthcare professionals. Randomised trials show LHWs improve access to basic health services and TB treatment outcomes, however, insufficient training and supervision are recognized barriers to their effectiveness. The investigators' goal is to improve TB care provided by LHWs in Malawi by implementing and evaluating a knowledge translation (KT) strategy designed to facilitate incorporation of evidence into LHW practice. The investigators will employ a mixed methods design including a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of the strategy and qualitative methods to understand barriers and facilitators to scalability and sustainability of the program.

Interventions

OTHERKT intervention

Multifaceted KT intervention employing peer-trainer led educational outreach, a point of care reminder tool, and a peer mentoring network.

Sponsors

Unity Health Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Dignitas International
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all health centers in participating districts that routinely provide TB care will be included. * LHWs who have received the intervention and patients receiving care at participating health centers will be eligible to participate in interviews

Exclusion criteria

* health centers that do not routinely provide TB care * LHWs unwilling or unable to give informed consent. * TB patients less than 18 years of age unaccompanied by a parent or guardian, patients/guardians or LHWs unwilling or unable to give informed consent, patients presenting to a health center they are not routinely followed at.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Cases Successfully Treated, Defined as the Total Number of Cases Cured and Completing Treatment.1 yearprimary outcome =proportion of cases successfully treated, defined as the total number of cases cured and completing treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Default Cases (Treatment Interrupted >= 2 Consecutive Months)1 yearsecondary outcome =proportion of default cases (treatment interrupted \>= 2 consecutive months)
Proportion of Successes Among HIV Co-infected Cases1 yearsecondary outcome = proportion of successes among HIV co-infected cases

Countries

Malawi

Participant flow

Recruitment details

103 health centers enrolled, a total of 1153 patients

Pre-assignment details

109 health centers assessed for eligability, 6 health centers excluded as TB care not provided at the health center: all patients registered for TB care with treatment start and end dates within the study period included

Participants by arm

ArmCount
KT Intervention
Multifaceted KT strategy employing peer-trainer led educational outreach, a point of care reminder tool, and a peer mentoring network. KT intervention: Multifaceted KT intervention employing peer-trainer led educational outreach, a point of care reminder tool, and a peer mentoring network.
605
Control
Control sites will receive no intervention, with LHW training left to the discretion of the health centers TB focus LHW. Control sites will not have access to the point of care tool.
548
Total1,153

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalKT InterventionControl
Age, Continuous35.9 years35.4 years36.3 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
500 Participants273 Participants227 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
653 Participants332 Participants321 Participants
TB type = pulmonary TB912 Participants457 Participants455 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
49 / 60561 / 548
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 6050 / 548
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6050 / 548

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Cases Successfully Treated, Defined as the Total Number of Cases Cured and Completing Treatment.

primary outcome =proportion of cases successfully treated, defined as the total number of cases cured and completing treatment.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
KT InterventionProportion of Cases Successfully Treated, Defined as the Total Number of Cases Cured and Completing Treatment.297 Participants
ControlProportion of Cases Successfully Treated, Defined as the Total Number of Cases Cured and Completing Treatment.348 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Default Cases (Treatment Interrupted >= 2 Consecutive Months)

secondary outcome =proportion of default cases (treatment interrupted \>= 2 consecutive months)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: analysis not conducted due to small proportion of default cases

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
KT InterventionProportion of Default Cases (Treatment Interrupted >= 2 Consecutive Months)4 Participants
ControlProportion of Default Cases (Treatment Interrupted >= 2 Consecutive Months)6 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Successes Among HIV Co-infected Cases

secondary outcome = proportion of successes among HIV co-infected cases

Time frame: 1 year

Population: analysis not conducted due to large proportion of missing data

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
KT InterventionProportion of Successes Among HIV Co-infected Cases0 Participants
ControlProportion of Successes Among HIV Co-infected Cases0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026