Skip to content

Electrical Stimulation of the Muscle Pumps of the Leg

Electrical Stimulation of the Muscle Pumps of the Leg

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02532556
Acronym
Muscle Pump
Enrollment
12
Registered
2015-08-25
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2020-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Haemodynamic Physiology

Keywords

Haemodynamic physiology

Brief summary

The most efficient way of electrically stimulating the calf muscles has not been identified. The investigators aim to investigate this using a matrix of electrical parameters, and measuring the outcome with vascular ultrasound of the leg.

Detailed description

Blood is aided on its journey to the heart by the action of the muscles of the legs. Muscle contraction squeezes the deep veins of the leg and pushes blood upwards, back towards the heart. In immobilised patients, or those with blood vessel problems, the pumping process can be helped by machines that either squeeze or shock the muscles of the calf (e.g. intermittent pneumatic compression, electrical stimulating devices). Many are licensed for medical use, and some are common place in hospitals and outpatient departments.

Interventions

DEVICEElectrical stimulation (Digitimer)

Stimulation with Digitimer (DS7A HV, Digitimer Ltd, UK) over motor point of muscle in protocol. 1Hz, pulse duration 1ms, maximum compliance voltage 200V. Current set to twice motor threshold

Sponsors

Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older * Current good health

Exclusion criteria

* History of cardiovascular disease * Ankle Brachial Pressure Index \<0.9 * Venous reflux\>0.5s * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Baseline compared to that after 10-mins stimulation (2-mins to take measurements)Measurement by ultrasound, in right femoral vein. Flow rate (ml/min).
Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Baseline compared to that after 10-mins stimulation (2-mins to take measurements)Measurement by ultrasound, in right femoral vein. Time averaged maximum velocity (cm/s).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Grading on StimulationDuring stimulation (10-mins each muscle)Visual analogue scale (0-minimum pain, to 100-maximum pain)

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Electrical Muscle Stimulation Participants
All participants for electrical stimulation of respective muscles (tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, gastrocnemius, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, vastus medialis)
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElectrical Muscle Stimulation Participants
Age, Continuous23.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Body mass index23.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)

Measurement by ultrasound, in right femoral vein. Time averaged maximum velocity (cm/s).

Time frame: Baseline compared to that after 10-mins stimulation (2-mins to take measurements)

Population: Muscle stimulated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Vastus LateralisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Baseline8.2 cm/sStandard Deviation 10
Vastus LateralisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Stimulation8.2 cm/sStandard Deviation 15
Rectus FemorisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Baseline8.8 cm/sStandard Deviation 14
Rectus FemorisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Stimulation10.6 cm/sStandard Deviation 10
Vastus MedialisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Baseline11.3 cm/sStandard Deviation 10
Vastus MedialisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Stimulation10.9 cm/sStandard Deviation 8
Gastrocnemius (Medial)Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Baseline8.5 cm/sStandard Deviation 12
Gastrocnemius (Medial)Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Stimulation11.6 cm/sStandard Deviation 19
Gastrocnemius (Lateral)Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Baseline7.5 cm/sStandard Deviation 12
Gastrocnemius (Lateral)Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Stimulation10.5 cm/sStandard Deviation 11
Tibialis AnteriorVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Baseline11.3 cm/sStandard Deviation 13
Tibialis AnteriorVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Stimulation12 cm/sStandard Deviation 9
Peroneus LongusVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Baseline13.4 cm/sStandard Deviation 14
Peroneus LongusVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Time Averaged Maximum Velocity)Stimulation10.8 cm/sStandard Deviation 17
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxan signed-rank test
Primary

Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)

Measurement by ultrasound, in right femoral vein. Flow rate (ml/min).

Time frame: Baseline compared to that after 10-mins stimulation (2-mins to take measurements)

Population: Muscle stimulated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Vastus LateralisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Baseline119 ml/minStandard Deviation 67
Vastus LateralisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Stimulation148 ml/minStandard Deviation 97
Rectus FemorisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Baseline158 ml/minStandard Deviation 123
Rectus FemorisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Stimulation158 ml/minStandard Deviation 123
Vastus MedialisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Baseline158 ml/minStandard Deviation 134
Vastus MedialisVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Stimulation150 ml/minStandard Deviation 125
Gastrocnemius (Medial)Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Baseline144 ml/minStandard Deviation 100
Gastrocnemius (Medial)Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Stimulation178 ml/minStandard Deviation 120
Gastrocnemius (Lateral)Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Baseline161 ml/minStandard Deviation 168
Gastrocnemius (Lateral)Venous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Stimulation114 ml/minStandard Deviation 205
Tibialis AnteriorVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Baseline164 ml/minStandard Deviation 66
Tibialis AnteriorVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Stimulation153 ml/minStandard Deviation 171
Peroneus LongusVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Baseline139 ml/minStandard Deviation 135
Peroneus LongusVenous Haemodynamic Measurements (Volume Flow Rate)Stimulation149 ml/minStandard Deviation 113
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxan signed-rank test
Secondary

Pain Grading on Stimulation

Visual analogue scale (0-minimum pain, to 100-maximum pain)

Time frame: During stimulation (10-mins each muscle)

Population: Muscle stimulated

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vastus LateralisPain Grading on Stimulation15 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Rectus FemorisPain Grading on Stimulation66.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Vastus MedialisPain Grading on Stimulation21.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Gastrocnemius (Medial)Pain Grading on Stimulation28.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Gastrocnemius (Lateral)Pain Grading on Stimulation31.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Tibialis AnteriorPain Grading on Stimulation21.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Peroneus LongusPain Grading on Stimulation30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026