Skip to content

Omadacycline vs Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of CABP (EudraCT #2013-004071-13)

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline Intravenous (IV)/Oral (PO) to Moxifloxacin IV/PO for Treating Adults Subjects With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02531438
Enrollment
774
Registered
2015-08-24
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2017-03-10
Last updated
2019-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bacterial Pneumonia, Community-Acquired Infections

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omadacycline as compared to moxifloxacin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Interventions

Injection for IV; Oral tablets

DRUGMoxifloxacin

IV solution; Oral tablets

Sponsors

Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients, ages 18 years or older who have signed the informed consent * Has qualifying bacterial pneumonia * Female patients must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment * Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

* Known or suspected hospital-acquired pneumonia * Evidence of significant immunological disease * Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to any fluoroquinolone antibiotic * Has received an investigational drug within past 30 days * Women who are pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseScreening; 72 to 120 hours after the first dose of test articleEarly clinical response is defined as clinical success, categorized by survival with improvement of at least 1 level compared to Baseline in at least 2 CABP symptoms (cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain, and dyspnea) with no worsening in the other CABP symptoms. Response was determined programmatically using the investigator's assessment of the CABP symptoms. The severity of the participant's CABP symptoms was evaluated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe) based upon the CABP Subject Symptom Severity Guidance Framework for Investigator Assessment. An indeterminate response is defined as one that could not be adequately inferred because the participant was not assessed because they withdrew consent, were lost to follow-up, or other specified reason. Clinical failure is defined as no improvement by at least 1 level in CABP symptoms, worsening of any CABP symptom, alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP, discontinuation due to adverse event, or death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitScreening; 5 to 10 days after the last day of therapyAt the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit. Indeterminate: the clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CT-PTE) PopulationScreening; 5 to 10 days after the last day of therapyAt the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit.

Countries

Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Latvia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participant randomization was stratified by Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Risk Class (II or III/IV), receipt of an allowed antibacterial therapy in the 72 hours prior to study treatment, and geographic region. All participants were expected to present with CABP severe enough to require at least 3 days of intravenous (IV) treatment.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who met inclusion criteria and did not meet exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to a treatment group, and received their first dose of test article within 4 hours after randomization. All participants were expected to present with CABP PORT Risk Class II, III, or IV to require a minimum of at least 3 days of IV treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Omadacycline
Participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams (mg) intravenously (IV) every 12 hours (q12h) (first 2 doses), followed by 100 mg IV every 24 hours (q24h) (starting 24 hours after the first dose), with the option to switch to a 300 mg (two 150 mg omadacycline tablets and 1 over-encapsulated placebo tablet matching moxifloxacin) oral administration q24h after at least 3 days (4 doses) of IV treatment. The total duration of test article therapy (IV plus oral administration) for all participants was at least 7 days and no more than 14 days.
386
Moxifloxacin
Participants received moxifloxacin 400 mg IV q24h (with a single placebo infusion to match the omadacycline dosing regimen 12 hours after the first dose on Day 1) with the option to switch to a 400 mg (one 400 mg moxifloxacin over-encapsulated tablet and 2 placebo tablets matching omadacycline tablets) oral administration q24h after at least 3 days (4 doses) of IV treatment. The total duration of test article therapy (IV plus oral administration) for all participants was at least 7 days and no more than 14 days.
388
Total774

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event79
Overall StudyDeath63
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up03
Overall StudyMissed EOT/PTE Visit52
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyRandomized, but Not Treated40
Overall StudyRandomized with Exclusion Criteria10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject78

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOmadacyclineMoxifloxacinTotal
Age, Customized
18 to 45 years old
62 Participants61 Participants123 Participants
Age, Customized
>45 to 65 years old
172 Participants155 Participants327 Participants
Age, Customized
>65 years old
152 Participants172 Participants324 Participants
Age, Customized
>75 years old
75 Participants83 Participants158 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
17 Participants18 Participants35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
356 Participants355 Participants711 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
178 Participants169 Participants347 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
208 Participants219 Participants427 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 3824 / 388
other
Total, other adverse events
63 / 38294 / 388
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 38226 / 388

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response

Early clinical response is defined as clinical success, categorized by survival with improvement of at least 1 level compared to Baseline in at least 2 CABP symptoms (cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain, and dyspnea) with no worsening in the other CABP symptoms. Response was determined programmatically using the investigator's assessment of the CABP symptoms. The severity of the participant's CABP symptoms was evaluated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe) based upon the CABP Subject Symptom Severity Guidance Framework for Investigator Assessment. An indeterminate response is defined as one that could not be adequately inferred because the participant was not assessed because they withdrew consent, were lost to follow-up, or other specified reason. Clinical failure is defined as no improvement by at least 1 level in CABP symptoms, worsening of any CABP symptom, alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP, discontinuation due to adverse event, or death.

Time frame: Screening; 72 to 120 hours after the first dose of test article

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received the test article

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OmadacyclineNumber of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseClinical success313 Participants
OmadacyclineNumber of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseClinical failure49 Participants
OmadacyclineNumber of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseIndeterminate24 Participants
MoxifloxacinNumber of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseClinical success321 Participants
MoxifloxacinNumber of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseClinical failure47 Participants
MoxifloxacinNumber of Participants With Early Clinical ResponseIndeterminate20 Participants
95% CI: [-7.1, 3.8]
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CT-PTE) Population

At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit.

Time frame: Screening; 5 to 10 days after the last day of therapy

Population: CE-PTE Population: all participants in the ITT Population meeting additional pre-defined criteria

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OmadacyclineNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CT-PTE) PopulationClinical success316 Participants
OmadacyclineNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CT-PTE) PopulationClinical failure24 Participants
MoxifloxacinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CT-PTE) PopulationClinical success312 Participants
MoxifloxacinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CT-PTE) PopulationClinical failure33 Participants
95% CI: [-1.7, 6.8]
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit

At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit. Indeterminate: the clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.

Time frame: Screening; 5 to 10 days after the last day of therapy

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OmadacyclineNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitClinical failure32 Participants
OmadacyclineNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitClinical success338 Participants
OmadacyclineNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitIndeterminate16 Participants
MoxifloxacinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitClinical success330 Participants
MoxifloxacinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitIndeterminate16 Participants
MoxifloxacinNumber of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) VisitClinical failure42 Participants
95% CI: [-2.4, 7.4]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026