Skip to content

All Comers Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) With Multi-LOC for flOw liMiting Outcomes

All Comers Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) With Multi-LOC for flOw liMiting Outcomes After Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) and/or Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Treatment in the Infra-inguinal Position With the objectiVE to Implant Multiple Stent Segments

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02531230
Acronym
LOCOMOTIVE
Enrollment
75
Registered
2015-08-24
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2018-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Multi-LOC® peripheral stent system to treat de novo and restenotic lesions (no in-stent restenosis (ISR), no restenosis post drug coated balloon (DCB) after flow limiting plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and/or DCB dilatations in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal segments (P1, P2 & P3)

Detailed description

This study is an non-randomized, prospective, multi-center, non-interventional study (registry, for Germany: §23b MPG)

Interventions

Multi-LOC® peripheral stent system for bailout stenting after Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) or Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Angioplasty

Sponsors

Deaconess Hospital Mannheim
CollaboratorOTHER
B. Braun Melsungen AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willingness to treat flow-limiting dissections/recoil after plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)/drug coated balloon (DCB) interventions * Patients in Rutherford classes 2 through 5 * Patients eligible for peripheral revascularization by means of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting * Patients must be at least 18 years of age * Patient with a life expectance of at least 12 months * Patients who are mentally and linguistically able to understand the aim of the study and to show sufficient compliance in the following study protocol * Patients must agree to undergo at least the 6-month clinical follow-up * Patient is able to verbally acknowledge an understanding of the associated risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives to therapeutic options of this trial, e.g. balloon angioplasty by means of other suitable stent devices. Patients, by providing their informed consent, agree to these risks and benefits as stated in the patient informed consent document. * Lesions with unsatisfying angiographic results due to recoil and/or dissections after POBA/DCB interventions * Infra-inguinal lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal segments (P1,P2 & P3) reference vessel diameters between 4 and 7.0 mm, lesion length suitable for the release of at least 2 Stent (up to 6) segments implanted with a minimum inter-stent distance of 1 cm * Diameter stenosis pre-procedure must be larger or equal to 70% * Vessels must have adequate distal run-off with at least one vessel to the foot or with collaterals in the calf supplying sufficient flow to the foot. (Lesions separated by less than 2 cm are considered as one lesion)

Exclusion criteria

* Patient not suitable for revascularization by interventional means

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
target lesion revascularization6 monthstarget lesion revascularization surgical & interventional

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
maximum walking distance< 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 monthsmaximum walking distance
target lesion revascularization12 monthstarget lesion revascularization
patency rates6 and 12 monthspatency rates observed using non-invasive Duplex ultrasound
Rutherford classificationbaseline, < 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 monthsRutherford classification
pain free walking distance< 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 monthspain free walking distance
Rutherford classification shift< 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 monthsdifference in Rutherford classification compared to previous time point
amputation rate6 and 12 monthsrate of major and minor amputations
procedural successimmediately after Multi-LOC implantation (within the first 30 minutes)procedural success to pass and treat the target lesion
ankle brachial index< 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 monthsankle brachial index
quality of life assessment6 and 12 monthsquality of life assessment through validates CRF's

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026