Skip to content

Effect of a Multi-directional Power Toothbrush on Recession

Effect of a Multi-directional Power and a Manual Toothbrush in Subjects Susceptible to Gingival Recession: A 12-month Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02530671
Enrollment
110
Registered
2015-08-21
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2025-01-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Keywords

multi-directional power toothbrush, manual toothbrush

Brief summary

Background: Clinical studies have explored the relationship between toothbrushing and the development of recession, but relevant recession data for the multi-directional power toothbrush (PT) are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with either a multi-directional power toothbrush (PT) or an ADA (American Dental Association) reference manual toothbrush (MT) on pre-existing mid-buccal gingival recession (Pre-GR) over 12 months Methods: This was a 12-month, prospective, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical study. Healthy participants without periodontitis but with at least 2 teeth showing Pre-GR ≥2mm were randomized to a group either brushing with a MT or a PT. The primary outcome parameter was the change at sites with Pre-GR ≥2mm. All recession measurements were performed by one calibrated examiner at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were changes of recession at all buccal sites (with or without pre-GR), changes in the percentage of recession sites demonstrating a change of ≥1mm as well as changes in pocket probing depths.

Interventions

DEVICEToothbrushing with manual toothbrush
DEVICEToothbrushing with power toothbrush

Sponsors

Procter and Gamble
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 scorable teeth without orthodontic appliances or crowns and bridges * at least 2 teeth showing recession of ≥ 2 mm on the mid-buccal surfaces (high risk teeth)

Exclusion criteria

* evidence of neglected dental health * periodontitis and/or major hard/soft tissue lesions * any physical limitations or restrictions potentially interfering with normal oral hygiene * therapy with any drug within 28 days prior to the study * pregnancy or breast feeding * any systematic condition or significant illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gingival Recession at Sites With Preexisting Recessions ≥2mm12 months
Bristle Splay Index (BSI) After a Specific Time-of-use3, 6, 9 and 12 monthsA digital computer program (ImageJ, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) for evaluating the index was applied. All brushes were photographed from both top and side view in a standardized set-up including a benchmark (Lego GmbH (Gemeinschaft mit beschränkter Haft), Grasbrunn, Germany) as reference for measurement. Subsequently, an independent examiner (N.H.) measured the lengths twice. To devise the BSI formula the results were averaged and inserted. The formula is defined by: BSI (%) = ((a´- a)/a + (b´- b)/b + (c´- c)/c + (d´- d)/d)/4 x 100. BSI was standardized for usage time by dividing it by the number of days used (BSI/T).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Recession at All Buccal Sites12 months
Percentage of Recession Sites Demonstrating a Change of ≥1mm12 months
Pocket Probing Depths at 12months12 months
Comparison of BSI Between Periods0-3, 9-12 months

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Manual Toothbrush
ADA reference manual toothbrush Toothbrushing with manual toothbrush
55
Power Toothbrush
Multi-directional power toothbrush Toothbrushing with power toothbrush
55
Total110

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPower ToothbrushTotalManual Toothbrush
Age, Continuous32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Previous used toothbrush (MT/PT)
Manual Toothbrush
27 participants67 participants40 participants
Previous used toothbrush (MT/PT)
Power Toothbrush
28 participants43 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
55 participants110 participants55 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants63 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants47 Participants23 Participants
Smoker (Yes/Now)
No
48 participants96 participants48 participants
Smoker (Yes/Now)
Yes
7 participants14 participants7 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 550 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 550 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Bristle Splay Index (BSI) After a Specific Time-of-use

A digital computer program (ImageJ, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) for evaluating the index was applied. All brushes were photographed from both top and side view in a standardized set-up including a benchmark (Lego GmbH (Gemeinschaft mit beschränkter Haft), Grasbrunn, Germany) as reference for measurement. Subsequently, an independent examiner (N.H.) measured the lengths twice. To devise the BSI formula the results were averaged and inserted. The formula is defined by: BSI (%) = ((a´- a)/a + (b´- b)/b + (c´- c)/c + (d´- d)/d)/4 x 100. BSI was standardized for usage time by dividing it by the number of days used (BSI/T).

Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Manual ToothbrushBristle Splay Index (BSI) After a Specific Time-of-use0.2 percentage of the original bristle fieldStandard Deviation 0.2
Power ToothbrushBristle Splay Index (BSI) After a Specific Time-of-use0.1 percentage of the original bristle fieldStandard Deviation 0.1
Primary

Gingival Recession at Sites With Preexisting Recessions ≥2mm

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Manual ToothbrushGingival Recession at Sites With Preexisting Recessions ≥2mm2.09 mmStandard Deviation 0.29
Power ToothbrushGingival Recession at Sites With Preexisting Recessions ≥2mm2.08 mmStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Comparison of BSI Between Periods

Time frame: 0-3, 9-12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Manual ToothbrushComparison of BSI Between Periods9-12months28.0 percentage of the original bristle fieldStandard Deviation 14.8
Manual ToothbrushComparison of BSI Between Periods0-3 months23.6 percentage of the original bristle fieldStandard Deviation 14
Power ToothbrushComparison of BSI Between Periods0-3 months6.4 percentage of the original bristle fieldStandard Deviation 11
Power ToothbrushComparison of BSI Between Periods9-12months9.8 percentage of the original bristle fieldStandard Deviation 12.1
Secondary

Percentage of Recession Sites Demonstrating a Change of ≥1mm

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Manual ToothbrushPercentage of Recession Sites Demonstrating a Change of ≥1mmdecrease14 percentage of sites
Manual ToothbrushPercentage of Recession Sites Demonstrating a Change of ≥1mmincrease9 percentage of sites
Power ToothbrushPercentage of Recession Sites Demonstrating a Change of ≥1mmdecrease24 percentage of sites
Power ToothbrushPercentage of Recession Sites Demonstrating a Change of ≥1mmincrease5 percentage of sites
Secondary

Pocket Probing Depths at 12months

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Manual ToothbrushPocket Probing Depths at 12months1.91 mmStandard Deviation 0.17
Power ToothbrushPocket Probing Depths at 12months1.88 mmStandard Deviation 0.18
Secondary

Recession at All Buccal Sites

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Manual ToothbrushRecession at All Buccal Sites0.416 mmStandard Deviation 0.18
Power ToothbrushRecession at All Buccal Sites0.007 mmStandard Deviation 0.16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026