Skip to content

Clear-Road Trial, Investigating the Efficacy of the RoadSaver Stent

CLEAR-ROAD; a Physician-initiated Carotid Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Carotid Arterial Disease With the Multi-layer RoadSaver Stent

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02529345
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-08-20
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2017-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Brief summary

The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the clinical outcome (up to 12 months) of treatment by means of stenting with the RoadSaver (Terumo) in subjects at high risk for carotid endarterectomy requiring carotid revascularization due to significant extra-cranial carotid artery stenosis.

Detailed description

It is a Prospective, multi-center, physician-sponsored clinical study. The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the clinical outcome (up to 12 months) of treatment by means of stenting with the RoadSaver (Terumo) in subjects at high risk for carotid endarterectomy requiring carotid revascularization due to significant extra-cranial carotid artery stenosis.

Interventions

DEVICERoadSaver stent

lesion treated with RoadSaver stent of Terumo

Sponsors

Flanders Medical Research Program
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

High risk for carotid endarterectomy due to anatomical or co-morbid conditions and either: * has neurological symptoms and ≥ 50% stenosis via angiography, or * is asymptomatic and has ≥ 80% stenosis via angiography. 1. Target lesion located in the distal common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), or carotid bifurcation. 2. Arterial segment to be stented has a diameter between 4mm and 9mm 3. Age ≥ 18 years. 4. Life expectancy \> 12 months from the date of the index procedure. 5. Provides a signed, IRB (Institutional Review Board) / IEC (Institutional Ethical Committee) approved informed consent form prior to participation. 6. Willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements.

Exclusion criteria

1. Contra-indication to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). 2. Sever vascular tortuosity or anatomy that would preclude the safe introduction of a guide catheter, sheath, embolic protection system or stent system. 3. Lesions in the ostium of the common carotid artery. 4. Occlusion of the target vessel. 5. Evidence of intraluminal thrombus. 6. Known sensitivity to nickel-titanium. 7. Known allergy to heparin, aspirin or other anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapies, or is unable or unwilling to tolerate such therapies. 8. Uncorrectable bleeding disorders, or will refuse block transfusion. 9. History of prior life-threatening contrast media reaction. 10. Previous stent placement in the target vessel. 11. Evolving stroke or intracranial haemorrhage. 12. Previous intracranial haemorrhage or brain surgery within the past 12 months. 13. Clinical condition that makes endovascular therapy impossible or hazardous.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
30-day rate of Major Adverse events (MAE)30 daysThe primary endpoint of this study is the 30-day rate of major adverse events (MAE), defined as the cumulative incidence of any peri-procedural (≤ 30 days post-procedure) death, stroke or myocardial infarction (MI).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late Ipsilateral strokeday 31 through 365 daysnumber of patients presenting late ipsilateral stroke within day 31 through 365 days
System Technical Successprocedure (day 0)Defined as the ability to cross and stent the lesion to achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30% and residual stenosis less than 50% by duplex imaging.
device malfunctionsprocedure (day 0)number of device malfunctions during procedure
in-stent restenosis (ISR)at 1, 6 and 12 month follow-uppatients representing ISR at the different time frames
serious device-related and procedure-related Adverse Events (SAE's)at 1, 6 and 12 month follow-upnumber of SAE's at the different time frames
freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)at 1, 6 and 12-month follow-upDefined as a repeat intervention to maintain or re-establish patency within the region of the treated arterial vessel plus 5mm proximal an distal to the treated lesion edge.
Major Adverse Events (MAE's)at 1,6 and 12 month follow-upnumber of MAE's at the different time frames

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026