Skip to content

CPR Quality Between Flexible Stretcher and Standard Stretcher in OHCA

Comparison of Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Between Flexible Stretcher and Standard Stretcher in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Ambulance Stretcher Innovation of Asian CPR (ASIA-CPR) Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02527694
Acronym
ASIA-CPR
Enrollment
49
Registered
2015-08-19
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2019-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

Emergency medical services, Resuscitation

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the quality of emergency medical services cardiopulmonary resuscitation between flexible stretcher and standard stretcher during ambulance transport to hospital among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Detailed description

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during ambulance transport in Asia has been known to be ineffective for quality and unsafe for emergency medical services(EMS)providers. Small elevators in high rise buildings are the most serious barriers to provide high quality CPR due to too long stretcher cart to enter in the elevators. We developed flexible stretcher cart to be safely used in small elevator through reducing the length of the stretcher. This study aims to compare the quality of EMS CPR between flexible stretcher and standard stretcher during transport to hospital. Method: This is a before and after-trial in a metropolis EMS. Study targets are adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), excluding evident death cases, pregnancy, DNR cases, and too big or too small body size for stretcher cart or mechanical CPR devices. In the before period, the standard stretcher will be used for manual CPR using standard CPR protocol. In the after period, the flexible stretcher will be used with mechanical CPR devices after 3 cycles of standard manual CPR. Individual and Utstein risk factors will be collected. Main outcomes are no-flow fraction (NFF) measured by defibrillators (X-series) and safety will be measured on mechanical error, transportation error, patient injury and EMS provider injury. Sample size were 24 cases for before (12 cases) and after (12 cases) trial from 80% power and 0.05 of alpha error for expecting 20% quality difference (30% NFF inflexible stretcher and 50% NFF in standard stretcher) Expected impact: The study will be expected to find the benefit of flexible stretcher cart during CPR in small elevators. This findings will contribute to revise the Asian EMS protocol for improving quality of CPR.

Interventions

DEVICEFlexible EMS stretcher cart

The flexible EMS stretcher cart is an innovative EMS stretcher cart built to be flexible to fit in smaller spaces such as elevators. The flexible stretcher bends at the hip joint as well as at the knee joint, so that the patient can be put in head-up position at 30 degrees elevation with elevated legs.

DEVICEmechanical CPR

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All EMS-assessed OHCA in (3-4) selected districts in Seoul * 18 years or older of age

Exclusion criteria

* Do-Not-Resuscitation cases or OHCA occurring in result of terminal diseases * Signs of evident death (decapitation, evident livor mortis or rigor mortis) * Pregnant * Physique too large for mechanical CPR device application * Chest deformation or injury * EMS CPR quality not assessed by the defibrillator * Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before scene departure * Cardiac arrest cases during transport

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Percentage of Chest Compression Fraction Between Before- and After-phase GroupsDuring the total prehospital resuscitation timeChest compression fraction was calculated as proportion of CPR time spent providing compressions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
CPR DurationDuring total prehospital resuscitation

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Adult OHCAs transported by five ambulances in a metropolitan area with a population of 3.5 million (many of whom lived in high-rise buildings) from September to October (before-phase) and November to December (afterphase) in 2015 were collected.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Stretcher Cart Group
Standard strecher for manual compression on supine position
21
Flexible Stretcher Cart Group
We manufactured a stretcher that hinged at multiple points to be reduced to fit into small elevators with a patient on board. The stretcher can be used to transport patients without cardiac arrest in the same manner as a standard stretcher. In cases of cardiac arrest, the upper mattress of the stretcher could be removed to install the mechanical compression device. The stretcher has additional sidebars that can be used to attach and lock mechanical CPR devices that are commercially available in Korea. The patient' legs were elevated with V shape body position through knee flection and hip flection on accessory steel bar when the patients are being transporting to avoid decrease of venous return by leg-down. A l0ad-distributing band-type mechanical compression device, the AutoPulse® (ZOLL Medical, Chelmsford, MA, USA), was used for this study.
10
Total31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFlexible Stretcher Cart GroupTotalStandard Stretcher Cart Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants17 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants14 Participants10 Participants
Age, Continuous66 years66 years66 years
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
10 Participants31 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants21 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Percentage of Chest Compression Fraction Between Before- and After-phase Groups

Chest compression fraction was calculated as proportion of CPR time spent providing compressions.

Time frame: During the total prehospital resuscitation time

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard Stretcher Cart GroupComparison of Percentage of Chest Compression Fraction Between Before- and After-phase Groups80.1 Percentage of chest compression fraction
Flexible Stretcher Cart GroupComparison of Percentage of Chest Compression Fraction Between Before- and After-phase Groups85.2 Percentage of chest compression fraction
Secondary

CPR Duration

Time frame: During total prehospital resuscitation

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard Stretcher Cart GroupCPR Duration909 seconds
Flexible Stretcher Cart GroupCPR Duration1131 seconds

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026