Skip to content

A Trial of Mechanical Axis vs Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Replacement

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Mechanical Axis vs Kinematic Alignment in TKR - With a Follow-up, Longitudinal Study of the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02527148
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-08-18
Start date
2011-08-04
Completion date
2018-12-19
Last updated
2025-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasties, Knee Replacement

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized, longitudinal study of the clinical outcomes of osteoarthritis patients treated by two different alignment philosophies for total knee replacement. In this study ShapeMatch® cutting guides will be compared to the conventional approach.

Interventions

DEVICEOtisMed® ShapeMatch® Technology

The appropriate Stryker ShapeMatch® Cutting Guides will be used to guide the surgeons bone resections. The surgeon will implant the knee prostheses following the surgical protocol for Triathlon® Knee System with OtisMed® ShapeMatch® Technology

DEVICEStryker Precision Knee Navigation

Stryker PrecisioN Knee (4.0) Navigation System, comprising of computer hardware and software and associated instrumentation, will be used for intra-operative alignment and orientation of implant. Navigation trackers will be secured to the femur and tibia and registration of the limb will be undertaken according to the PrecisioN Knee System surgical technique.Femoral and tibial resections, followed by device implantation, will be performed according to the Triathlon Knee System Surgical Protocol.

PROCEDURETotal Knee Replacement
DEVICEStryker Triathlon® Total Knee System

Prosthetic components to be implanted including * Triathlon® Cruciate Retaining (CR) Total Knee System (cemented), including Femoral Component and Primary Tibial Baseplate; * Triathlon® Cruciate Substituting (CS) X3® polyethylene insert; * Triathlon® X3 Patella (asymmetric) - treated selectively by surgeon.

Sponsors

Stryker South Pacific
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient is a male or non-pregnant female between the ages of 40-80 years. * The patient requires a primary total knee replacement and is indicated for computer-assisted surgery. * Patient is deemed appropriate for a cruciate retaining knee replacement. * The patient has a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). * The patient has intact collateral ligaments. * The patient is able to undergo MRI scanning of the affected limb. * The patient has signed the study specific, ethics-approved, Informed Consent document. * The patient is willing and able to comply with the specified pre-operative and post-operative clinical and radiographic evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient has a history of total, unicompartmental reconstruction or fusion of the affected joint. * Patient has had a previous osteotomy around the knee. * The patient is morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40). * The patient has a deformity which will require the use of stems, wedges or augments in conjunction with the Triathlon Total Knee System. * The patient has a varus/valgus malalignment ≥ 15° (relative to mechanical axis). * The patient has a fixed flexion deformity ≥ 15°. * The patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device. * The patient has a systemic or metabolic disorder leading to progressive bone deterioration. * The patient is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements. * Patient has a cognitive impairment, an intellectual disability or a mental illness. * The patient is pregnant. * The patient has metal hardware present in the region of the hip, knee or ankle (as this is known to create geometrical distortion in the region of the implant). * The patient has any known contraindications for undergoing assessment by MRI (e.g. ferrous implants, metallic clips, magnetically activated implanted devices such as cardiac pacemakers, etc).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxford Knee ScorePreoperatively, 6-week, 6-months, 12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperativelyTo demonstrate, through calculation of Oxford Knee Score (OKS) post operatively, that total knee replacement (TKR) performed using the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide provides improvement from preoperative levels of patient pain and function comparable to the improvement obtained with TKR performed using computer-assisted Navigation. Oxford Knee Scores will be calculated pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and 5 years. The OKS is a participant completed 12 question form on activities of daily living that assess function and pain. Scores can range from 0 to 48 with lower scores indicating a poor outcome and higher scores indicating a more satisfactory joint outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost Effectiveness: Wound LengthIntraoperative - participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes.To compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the procedure between the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide group and the computer-assisted Navigation control group the surgical incision length is reported in mm.
Cost Effectiveness: Cost of Consumable Items Used During Operating ProcedureIntraoperative - participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes.To compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the procedure between the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide group and the computer-assisted Navigation control group. The data for the cost of consumable items used during the operating procedure is not available. Due to limited site resources, a decision was made not to collect this secondary outcome measure data.
Cost Effectiveness: Length of Stay in Hospital14 daysTo compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the procedure between the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide group and the computer-assisted Navigation control group the length of stay in number of days spent in the hospital is reported..
Cost Effectiveness: Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) From EQ-5D-3L12 monthsA quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) takes into account both the quantity and quality of life generated by healthcare interventions. It is the arithmetic product of life expectancy and a measure of the quality of the remaining life-years. A QALY places a weight on time in different health states. A year of perfect health is worth 1 and a year of less than perfect health is worth less than 1. Death is considered to be equivalent to 0; however,some health states may be considered worse than death and have negative scores.
Knee PainPreoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperativelyPain at rest and pain during mobilization was measured using a 10 centimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants are asked to indicate their level of pain with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Cost Effectiveness: Total Duration of Operating Procedure (Anaesthetic Time and Skin-to-skin Incision Time)Intraoperative - participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes.Skin to skin time is the time in minutes from initial skin incision to skin closure. Anaesthesia time is the time in minutes that anaesthesia administration is started to the time it is stopped. Data for anaesthesia time is not available due to an error on the original case report form that did not correctly capture anaesthesia time.
Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-month and 12 month visits, 2 years and 5 yearsThe EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health state by indicating the most appropriate level for each of the 5 dimensions. Responses may be converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. The index can be calculated by deducting the appropriate weights from 1= the value for full health. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled from 100 ='Best imaginable health state' to 0= 'Worst imaginable health state'.
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)6 week, 6 month, 12 month , 2 years and 5 years visitsThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a 12 question form that asks the patient their level of awareness of their artificial joint in 12 scenarios commonly encountered in daily life. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome (high degree of forgetting the joint in everyday life).
The International Knee Society Score (IKSS)Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperativelyThe Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, range of motion (ROM) and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as excellent, good, fair, or poor, a higher value represents a better outcome.
Perth CT Protocol3 monthsThe Perth CT protocol is a comprehensive assessment of total knee replacement (TKR) component position and orientation. The alignment of the TKR components is measured against the mechanical axis and the transepicondylar axis of the lower extremity. The posted data represents the mean angle between the femoral component and mechanical axis of the femur, the angle between tibial component and mechanical axis of the tibia, the tibial component slope relative to the sagittal mechanical axis, and the femoral component rotation relative to surgical epicondylar axis (positive value=external rotation). For all degree values posted a positive (+) value= valgus and a negative (-) value = varus.
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperativelyThe WOMAC is completed by the participant and measures five items for pain (score range 0-100), two for stiffness (score range 0-100), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-100). The total score is the sum of these three categories.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

For all results participants=knees.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon
Participants who underwent Total Knee Replacement (TKR) with the Stryker Triathlon® Total Knee System and OtisMed® ShapeMatch® Technology.
49
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation
Participants who underwent Total Knee Replacement (TKR) with the Stryker Triathlon® Total Knee System guided by Stryker Precision Knee Navigation.
50
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid not receive study intervention10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonTotalStryker Precision Knee Navigation
Age, Continuous71.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
69.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
49 participants99 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants51 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants48 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 490 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 4925 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
39 / 4938 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Oxford Knee Score

To demonstrate, through calculation of Oxford Knee Score (OKS) post operatively, that total knee replacement (TKR) performed using the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide provides improvement from preoperative levels of patient pain and function comparable to the improvement obtained with TKR performed using computer-assisted Navigation. Oxford Knee Scores will be calculated pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and 5 years. The OKS is a participant completed 12 question form on activities of daily living that assess function and pain. Scores can range from 0 to 48 with lower scores indicating a poor outcome and higher scores indicating a more satisfactory joint outcome.

Time frame: Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months, 12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively

Population: Shapematch: 49 had preoperative,48 had 6 week, 46 had 6 months, 48 had 12 month, 49 had 2 year and 47 had 5 year scores.~Navigation: 50 had preoperative, 47 had 6 week, 46 had 6 months, 49 had 12 month, 50 had 2 years and 48 had 5 years scores.~Participants=knees

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonOxford Knee ScoreOxford preoperative20.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonOxford Knee ScoreOxford 6 weeks32.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonOxford Knee ScoreOxford 6 months41.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonOxford Knee ScoreOxford 12 months41.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonOxford Knee ScoreOxford 2 years42.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonOxford Knee ScoreOxford 5 years41.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationOxford Knee ScoreOxford 2 years41.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationOxford Knee ScoreOxford preoperative21.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationOxford Knee ScoreOxford 12 months43.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationOxford Knee ScoreOxford 6 weeks32.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationOxford Knee ScoreOxford 5 years41.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationOxford Knee ScoreOxford 6 months38.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Comparison: Improvement from preoperative to 6 weeks for the control casesp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Improvement from preoperative to 6 weeks for the Shapematch casesp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare improvement of OKS from preoperative to 6 weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.0004t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Improvement from preoperative to 6 months for Control cases.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Improvement form preoperative to 6 months for Shapematch cases.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare improvement of OKS from preoperative to 6 months between both groups.p-value: 0.3894t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Improvement from preoperative to 12 months for the Control casesp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Improvement from preoperative to 12 months for the Shapematch casesp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare improvement of OKS from preoperative to 12 months between both groups.p-value: 0.4387t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare improvement of OKS from preoperative to 2 years between both groups.p-value: 0.261t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare improvement of OKS from preoperative to 5 years between both groups.p-value: 0.8458t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Cost Effectiveness: Cost of Consumable Items Used During Operating Procedure

To compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the procedure between the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide group and the computer-assisted Navigation control group. The data for the cost of consumable items used during the operating procedure is not available. Due to limited site resources, a decision was made not to collect this secondary outcome measure data.

Time frame: Intraoperative - participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes.

Population: Cost effectiveness data is not available.

Secondary

Cost Effectiveness: Length of Stay in Hospital

To compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the procedure between the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide group and the computer-assisted Navigation control group the length of stay in number of days spent in the hospital is reported..

Time frame: 14 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonCost Effectiveness: Length of Stay in Hospital5.1 daysStandard Deviation 3
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationCost Effectiveness: Length of Stay in Hospital4.2 daysStandard Deviation 4.2
Comparison: To compare average length of hospital stay between both groups.p-value: 0.07t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Cost Effectiveness: Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) From EQ-5D-3L

A quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) takes into account both the quantity and quality of life generated by healthcare interventions. It is the arithmetic product of life expectancy and a measure of the quality of the remaining life-years. A QALY places a weight on time in different health states. A year of perfect health is worth 1 and a year of less than perfect health is worth less than 1. Death is considered to be equivalent to 0; however,some health states may be considered worse than death and have negative scores.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Shapematch preoperative N=48, 12 month N=48.~Navigation preoperative N=50, 12 month N-49.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonCost Effectiveness: Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) From EQ-5D-3LPreoperative QALY0.507 QALY life yearStandard Deviation 0.17
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonCost Effectiveness: Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) From EQ-5D-3L12 Month QALY0.895 QALY life yearStandard Deviation 0.16
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationCost Effectiveness: Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) From EQ-5D-3LPreoperative QALY0.484 QALY life yearStandard Deviation 0.21
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationCost Effectiveness: Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) From EQ-5D-3L12 Month QALY0.852 QALY life yearStandard Deviation 0.19
Comparison: Comparison of baseline differencesp-value: 0.55t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Analysis of QALY between each instrument platform at 12-monthsp-value: 0.23t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Cost Effectiveness: Total Duration of Operating Procedure (Anaesthetic Time and Skin-to-skin Incision Time)

Skin to skin time is the time in minutes from initial skin incision to skin closure. Anaesthesia time is the time in minutes that anaesthesia administration is started to the time it is stopped. Data for anaesthesia time is not available due to an error on the original case report form that did not correctly capture anaesthesia time.

Time frame: Intraoperative - participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonCost Effectiveness: Total Duration of Operating Procedure (Anaesthetic Time and Skin-to-skin Incision Time)82.6 minutesStandard Deviation 26
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationCost Effectiveness: Total Duration of Operating Procedure (Anaesthetic Time and Skin-to-skin Incision Time)92.2 minutesStandard Deviation 32
Comparison: To compare mean duration of surgery between both groups.p-value: 0.1t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Cost Effectiveness: Wound Length

To compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the procedure between the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide group and the computer-assisted Navigation control group the surgical incision length is reported in mm.

Time frame: Intraoperative - participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonCost Effectiveness: Wound Length223 millimetersStandard Deviation 29
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationCost Effectiveness: Wound Length233 millimetersStandard Deviation 34
Comparison: To compare wound length between both groups.p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)

The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health state by indicating the most appropriate level for each of the 5 dimensions. Responses may be converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. The index can be calculated by deducting the appropriate weights from 1= the value for full health. The EQ VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled from 100 ='Best imaginable health state' to 0= 'Worst imaginable health state'.

Time frame: Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-month and 12 month visits, 2 years and 5 years

Population: Patients did not complete CRF to protocol in some instances, resulting in exclusion/missing data points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)6-month EQ-5D VAS86.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.86
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)6-week EQ-5D Index0.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)1-year EQ-5D Index0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)5-year EQ-5D VAS78.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.51
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)1-year EQ-5D VAS85.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.46
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)6-week EQ-5D VAS79.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.58
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)2-year EQ-5D Index0.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)Pre-op EQ-5D VAS71.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.11
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)2-year EQ-5D VAS81.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.57
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)5-year EQ-5D Index0.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)6-month EQ-5D Index0.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)Pre-op EQ-5D Index0.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)5-year EQ-5D VAS78.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.02
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)Pre-op EQ-5D Index0.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)Pre-op EQ-5D VAS75.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.28
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)6-week EQ-5D Index0.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)6-week EQ-5D VAS80.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.41
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)6-month EQ-5D Index0.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)6-month EQ-5D VAS84.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.52
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)1-year EQ-5D Index0.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)1-year EQ-5D VAS85.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.22
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)2-year EQ-5D Index0.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)5-year EQ-5D Index0.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L)2-year EQ-5D VAS84.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.63
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D index preoperatively between both groups.p-value: 0.452t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D VAS preoperatively between both groups.p-value: 0.201t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D index at 6-weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.741t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D VAS at 6-weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.794t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D index at 6-months between both groups.p-value: 0.232t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D VAS at 6-months between both groups.p-value: 0.513t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D index at 1-year between both groups.p-value: 0.18t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D VAS at 1-year between both groups.p-value: 0.864t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D index at 2-year between both groups.p-value: 0.223t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D VAS at 2-year between both groups.p-value: 0.355t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D index at 5-year between both groups.p-value: 0.314t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare EQ-5D VAS at 5-year between both groups.p-value: 0.914t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Knee Pain

Pain at rest and pain during mobilization was measured using a 10 centimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants are asked to indicate their level of pain with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.

Time frame: Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively

Population: Patients did not complete CRF to protocol in some instances, resulting in exclusion/missing data points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee PainPre-op Pain at Rest4.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain6-month Pain at Mobilisation1.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain1-year Pain at Mobilisation0.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain6-week Pain at Rest1.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain2-year Pain at Rest0.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain1-year Pain at Rest0.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain2-year Pain at Mobilisation1.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain6-week Pain at Mobilisation2.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain5-year Pain at Rest0.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee PainPre-op Pain at Mobilisation5.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain5-year Pain at Mobilisation1.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonKnee Pain6-month Pain at Rest0.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain5-year Pain at Mobilisation1.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain6-month Pain at Mobilisation1.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee PainPre-op Pain at Rest4.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee PainPre-op Pain at Mobilisation6.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain6-week Pain at Rest1.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain6-week Pain at Mobilisation2.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain6-month Pain at Rest1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain1-year Pain at Mobilisation1.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain2-year Pain at Rest1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain2-year Pain at Mobilisation1.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain5-year Pain at Rest0.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationKnee Pain1-year Pain at Rest0.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Comparison: To compare VAS mobilisation preoperatively between both groups.p-value: 0.7545t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS rest at 6 weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.6921t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS rest preoperatively between both groups.p-value: 0.724t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS mobilisation at 6 weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.9601t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS rest at 6 months between both groups.p-value: 0.0697t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS mobilisation at 6 months between both groups.p-value: 0.0342t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS rest at 12 months between both groups.p-value: 0.3487t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS mobilisation at 1 year between both groups.p-value: 0.2201t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS rest at 2 years between both groups.p-value: 0.2291t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS mobilisation at 2 years between both groups.p-value: 0.6436t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS rest at 5 years between both groups.p-value: 0.4344t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare VAS mobilisation at 5 years between both groups.p-value: 0.8732t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Perth CT Protocol

The Perth CT protocol is a comprehensive assessment of total knee replacement (TKR) component position and orientation. The alignment of the TKR components is measured against the mechanical axis and the transepicondylar axis of the lower extremity. The posted data represents the mean angle between the femoral component and mechanical axis of the femur, the angle between tibial component and mechanical axis of the tibia, the tibial component slope relative to the sagittal mechanical axis, and the femoral component rotation relative to surgical epicondylar axis (positive value=external rotation). For all degree values posted a positive (+) value= valgus and a negative (-) value = varus.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Participants=knees

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonPerth CT ProtocolCoronal angle tibial comp and mech axis tibia-2.8 degreesStandard Deviation 3.1
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonPerth CT ProtocolCoronal angle fem comp and mech axis femur2.0 degreesStandard Deviation 2.6
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonPerth CT ProtocolSagital tibial component slope3.6 degreesStandard Deviation 2.5
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonPerth CT ProtocolFemcomp rotationrelative to surg epicond axis+=ER-0.5 degreesStandard Deviation 2.5
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonPerth CT ProtocolCoronal mechanical axis:hip knee ankle angle-0.4 degreesStandard Deviation 3.5
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationPerth CT ProtocolFemcomp rotationrelative to surg epicond axis+=ER1.5 degreesStandard Deviation 2.5
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationPerth CT ProtocolSagital tibial component slope1.3 degreesStandard Deviation 2.4
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationPerth CT ProtocolCoronal angle fem comp and mech axis femur0.6 degreesStandard Deviation 1.6
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationPerth CT ProtocolCoronal angle tibial comp and mech axis tibia-0.7 degreesStandard Deviation 1.9
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationPerth CT ProtocolCoronal mechanical axis:hip knee ankle angle-0.7 degreesStandard Deviation 2
Comparison: Comparison of coronal mechanical axis:hip knee ankle angle between both groups.p-value: 0.6t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of coronal angle fem comp and mech axis femur between both groups.p-value: 0.002t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of coronal angle tibial comp and mech axis tibia between both groups.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of sagital tibial component slope between both groups.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Comparison of Fem comp rotation relative to surg epicond axis+=ER between both groups.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)

The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a 12 question form that asks the patient their level of awareness of their artificial joint in 12 scenarios commonly encountered in daily life. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome (high degree of forgetting the joint in everyday life).

Time frame: 6 week, 6 month, 12 month , 2 years and 5 years visits

Population: Patients did not complete CRF to protocol in some instances, resulting in exclusion/missing data points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)6 month60.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.57
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)2 year69.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.93
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)12 month62.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.99
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)5 year68.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.824
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)6 week58.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.53
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)5 year74.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.38
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)6 week57.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.32
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)6 month59.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.27
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)12 month62.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.84
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)2 year66.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.54
Comparison: To compare FJS at 6-weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.523t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare FJS at 6-months between both groups.p-value: 0.932t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare FJS at 1-year between both groups.p-value: 0.934t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare FJS at 2-year between both groups.p-value: 0.566t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare FJS at 5-year between both groups.p-value: 0.263t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

The International Knee Society Score (IKSS)

The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, range of motion (ROM) and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as excellent, good, fair, or poor, a higher value represents a better outcome.

Time frame: Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively

Population: Patients did not complete CRF to protocol in some instances, resulting in exclusion/missing data points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)5 year Range of Motion122.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.69
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 month IKSS Function82.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.72
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 month Range of Motion117.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.31
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)12 month Range of Motion118.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.69
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)2 year Range of Motion119.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.91
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)Pre-op IKSS Pain40.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.87
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)Pre-op IKSS Function54.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)Pre-op Range of Motion118.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.27
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 week IKSS Pain63.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.37
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 week IKSS Function63.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 week Range of Motion108.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.58
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)12 month IKSS Pain76.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.65
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)12 month IKSS Function83.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.38
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)2 year IKSS Pain73.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.92
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)2 year IKSS Function83.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.94
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)5 year IKSS Pain73.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.19
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)5 year IKSS Function80.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.41
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 month IKSS Pain76.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.72
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)12 month IKSS Function80.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.22
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 month IKSS Pain68.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.81
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 week IKSS Function64.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.26
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)2 year IKSS Function80.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 week Range of Motion107.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.99
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)12 month Range of Motion116.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.11
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 month IKSS Function76.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)2 year Range of Motion117.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)5 year IKSS Pain74.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.95
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)5 year Range of Motion120.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.16
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 month Range of Motion113.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.31
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)Pre-op IKSS Pain37.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.82
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)2 year IKSS Pain70.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.32
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)Pre-op IKSS Function55.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.82
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)12 month IKSS Pain73.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.08
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)Pre-op Range of Motion116.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.51
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)5 year IKSS Function85.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.64
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe International Knee Society Score (IKSS)6 week IKSS Pain58.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.28
Comparison: To compare IKSS Pain preoperatively between both groups.p-value: 0.3768t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Function preoperatively between both groups.p-value: 0.6425t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS ROM preoperatively between both groups.p-value: 0.5041t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Pain at 6-weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.223t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Function at 6-weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.8209t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS ROM at 6-weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.6958t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Pain at 6-months between both groups.p-value: 0.0548t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Function at 6-months between both groups.p-value: 0.1958t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS ROM at 6-months between both groups.p-value: 0.2786t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Pain at 1-year between both groups.p-value: 0.2399t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Function at 1-year between both groups.p-value: 0.4135t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS ROM at 1-year between both groups.p-value: 0.5278t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Pain at 2-year between both groups.p-value: 0.2992t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Function at 2-year between both groups.p-value: 0.5462t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS ROM at 2-year between both groups.p-value: 0.5765t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Pain at 5-year between both groups.p-value: 0.5493t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS Function at 5-year between both groups.p-value: 0.1705t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare IKSS ROM at 5-year between both groups.p-value: 0.2918t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)

The WOMAC is completed by the participant and measures five items for pain (score range 0-100), two for stiffness (score range 0-100), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-100). The total score is the sum of these three categories.

Time frame: Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively

Population: Patients did not complete CRF to protocol in some instances, resulting in exclusion/missing data points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)6-week74.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.75
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)1-year90.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.14
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)Pre-op50.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.07
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)2-year88.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)6-month87.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.73
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With TriathlonThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)5-year86.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.49
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)6-month81.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.94
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)Pre-op50.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.91
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)6-week73.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.61
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)5-year89.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.11
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)1-year86.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.93
Stryker Precision Knee NavigationThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)2-year85.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.79
Comparison: To compare WOMAC preoperatively between both groups.p-value: 0.911t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare WOMAC at 6-weeks between both groups.p-value: 0.588t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare WOMAC at 6-months between both groups.p-value: 0.03t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare WOMAC at 1-year between both groups.p-value: 0.131t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare WOMAC at 2-years between both groups.p-value: 0.347t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: To compare WOMAC at 5-years between both groups.p-value: 0.341t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026