Skip to content

Six Month Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator

Single-Arm, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator in Participants With Aqueous Tear Deficient Dry Eye

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02526290
Enrollment
97
Registered
2015-08-18
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes, Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

Brief summary

In this study, the safety and effectiveness of the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator after 180 days of use in participants with aqueous tear deficiency will be evaluated.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, open-label clinical trial in which participants will use the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator to stimulate tear production for 180 days. Participants will have a Screening Visit within 60 days prior to the initial device application. Device application will be initiated at Day 0, at which time participants will receive training on the proper use of the device. Participants will receive follow-up visits at Days 7, 30, 90 and 180.

Interventions

DEVICEIntranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator (Oculeve)

Neurostimulation device

Sponsors

Oculeve, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with moderate to severe dry eye disease * Literate, able to speak English or Spanish, and able to complete questionnaires independently * Willing to sign the informed consent and deemed capable of complying with the requirements of the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may lead to clinically significant increased bleeding * Nasal or sinus surgery (including history of application of nasal cautery) or significant trauma * Cardiac demand pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or other implanted electronic device * Diagnosis of epilepsy * Corneal transplant in either or both eyes * Participation in any clinical trial with a new active substance or a new device within 30 days of the Screening Visit * Women who are pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or nursing at the Screening Visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stimulated Acute Tear ProductionThe stimulated and prestimulation (basal) measures were both performed at Day 180.Stimulated acute tear production in the study eye at Day 180 as measured by the difference between the Schirmer test score during stimulation and the test score before stimulation (basal). The Schirmer strip is placed just under the eyelid and wicks up the tears. It measures tear production on a linear scale of 0-35 mm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corrected Distance Visual AcuityBaseline and 6 monthsChange from baseline (Day 0) in corrected distance visual acuity at Day 180. Corrected visual acuity was obtained using the subject's own glasses (for subjects that wear glasses) and measured in logMAR (log of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) units using an appropriate eye chart. A logMAR score of 0.0 is equivalent to a visual acuity of 20/20 and larger logMAR values indicate a poorer visual acuity (eg. A value of 0.3 corresponds to a visual acuity of 20/40).
Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy6 monthsNumber of subjects with clinically significant (CS) findings noted from the slit lamp biomicroscopy examinations. A slit lamp biomicroscopy examination of the eyelids, cornea, conjunctiva, anterior chamber, and lens was performed at each visit for each eye. The results were graded as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS), or abnormal CS. In addition, the cornea was scored specifically for corneal edema using a 4-point scale (0=None, +1=Mild, +2=Moderate and +3=Severe). An increase in corneal edema grade of two or more was considered clinically significant and evaluated as a potential AE by the investigator.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device-related Adverse Events6 monthsNumber of subjects who experienced any device-related adverse events.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active - Device
The Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator will be administered two to ten times per day for up to three minutes per administration. Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator (Oculeve): Neurostimulation device
97
Total97

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive - Device
Age, Customized
50 to <60 years
25 participants
Age, Customized
< 50 years
15 participants
Age, Customized
60 to <70 years
40 participants
Age, Customized
≥70 years
17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 97
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 97

Outcome results

Primary

Stimulated Acute Tear Production

Stimulated acute tear production in the study eye at Day 180 as measured by the difference between the Schirmer test score during stimulation and the test score before stimulation (basal). The Schirmer strip is placed just under the eyelid and wicks up the tears. It measures tear production on a linear scale of 0-35 mm.

Time frame: The stimulated and prestimulation (basal) measures were both performed at Day 180.

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) population included all subjects who received an investigational device and initiated neurostimulation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active - DeviceStimulated Acute Tear ProductionStimulated Schirmer Test17.28 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.948
Active - DeviceStimulated Acute Tear ProductionUnstimulated Schirmer Test7.92 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.386
Secondary

Corrected Distance Visual Acuity

Change from baseline (Day 0) in corrected distance visual acuity at Day 180. Corrected visual acuity was obtained using the subject's own glasses (for subjects that wear glasses) and measured in logMAR (log of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) units using an appropriate eye chart. A logMAR score of 0.0 is equivalent to a visual acuity of 20/20 and larger logMAR values indicate a poorer visual acuity (eg. A value of 0.3 corresponds to a visual acuity of 20/40).

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: The safety population included all subjects who received an investigational device and initiated neurostimulation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active - DeviceCorrected Distance Visual AcuityRight Eye-0.028 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0905
Active - DeviceCorrected Distance Visual AcuityLeft Eye-0.033 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0809
Secondary

Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy

Number of subjects with clinically significant (CS) findings noted from the slit lamp biomicroscopy examinations. A slit lamp biomicroscopy examination of the eyelids, cornea, conjunctiva, anterior chamber, and lens was performed at each visit for each eye. The results were graded as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS), or abnormal CS. In addition, the cornea was scored specifically for corneal edema using a 4-point scale (0=None, +1=Mild, +2=Moderate and +3=Severe). An increase in corneal edema grade of two or more was considered clinically significant and evaluated as a potential AE by the investigator.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The safety population included all subjects who received an investigational device and initiated neurostimulation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active - DeviceSlit Lamp Biomicroscopy0 participants
Other Pre-specified

Device-related Adverse Events

Number of subjects who experienced any device-related adverse events.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The safety population included all subjects who received an investigational device and initiated neurostimulation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active - DeviceDevice-related Adverse EventsSerious device-related AEs0 participants
Active - DeviceDevice-related Adverse EventsNon-serious device-related AEs36 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026