Skip to content

Study of KRN23 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH)

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study With Open-Label Extension to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of KRN23 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02526160
Enrollment
134
Registered
2015-08-18
Start date
2015-10-22
Completion date
2018-12-06
Last updated
2024-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

X-linked Hypophosphatemia

Keywords

KRN23, Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), XLH, X-linked hypophosphatemia, burosumab, Crysvita

Brief summary

The primary efficacy objective of this study is to establish the effect of burosumab treatment compared with placebo on increasing serum phosphorus levels in adults with XLH.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALburosumab

solution for SC injection

OTHERPlacebo

saline solution for SC injection

Sponsors

Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Kyowa Kirin, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female, aged 18 - 65 years, inclusive 2. Diagnosis of XLH supported by classic clinical features of adult XLH (such as short stature or bowed legs) and at least ONE of the following at Screening: * Documented phosphate-regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X chromosome (PHEX) mutation in the patient or a directly related family member with appropriate X-linked inheritance * Serum intact FGF23 (iFGF23) level \> 30 pg/mL by Kainos assay 3. Biochemical findings consistent with XLH at Screening Visit 2 following overnight fasting (min. 8 hours): * Serum phosphorus \< 2.5 mg/dL * TmP/GFR of \< 2.5 mg/dL 4. Presence of skeletal pain attributed to XLH/osteomalacia, as defined by a score of ≥ 4 on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questions 3 (Worst Pain) at Screening Visit 1. (Skeletal pain that, in the opinion of the investigator, is attributed solely to causes other than XLH/osteomalacia-for example, back or joint pain in the presence of severe osteoarthritis by radiograph in that anatomical location-in the absence of any skeletal pain likely attributed to XLH/osteomalacia should not be considered for eligibility) 5. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min (using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration \[CKD-EPI\] equation) or eGFR of 45 60 mL/min at Screening Visit 2 with confirmation that the renal insufficiency is not due to nephrocalcinosis 6. If taking chronic pain medications (including narcotic pain medications/opioids), must be on a stable regimen for at least 21 days prior to Screening Visit 1, and be willing to maintain medications at the same stable dose(s) and schedule throughout the Placebo-controlled Treatment Period of the study. The dose must not exceed 60 mg oral morphine equivalents/day 7. Provide written informed consent or if a minor, provide written consent and have a legally authorized representative willing and able to provide written informed consent, after the nature of the study has been explained, and prior to any research-related procedures 8. Willing to provide access to prior medical records for the collection of biochemical and radiographic data and disease history 9. Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening and be willing to have additional pregnancy tests during the study. Females considered not to be of childbearing potential include those who have been in menopause for at least two years prior to Screening, or have had tubal ligation at least one year prior to Screening, or have had a total hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy 10. Participants of child-bearing potential or with partners of child-bearing potential who have not undergone a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and are sexually active must consent to use an effective method of contraception as determined by the site investigator (i.e. oral hormonal contraceptives, patch hormonal contraceptives, vaginal ring, intrauterine device, physical double-barrier methods, surgical hysterectomy, vasectomy, tubal ligation, or true abstinence) from the period following the signing of the informed consent through 12 weeks after last dose of study drug 11. Must, in the opinion of the investigator, be willing and able to complete all aspects of the study, adhere to the study visit schedule and comply with the assessments 12. Must have completed at least 4 of 7 days of the patient diaries before the Baseline visit.

Exclusion criteria

1. Use of a pharmacologic vitamin D metabolite or analog (calcitriol, doxercalciferol, and paricalcitol) within 14 days prior to Screening Visit 2 2. Use of oral phosphate within 14 days prior to Screening Visit 2 3. Use of aluminum hydroxide antacids, acetazolamides, and thiazides within 7 days prior to Screening Visit 2 4. Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids defined as more than 10 days in the previous 2 months 5. Corrected serum calcium level ≥ 10.8 mg/dL (2.7 mmol/L) at Screening Visit 2 6. Serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) ≥ 2.5 upper limit of normal (ULN) at Screening Visit 1 7. Use of medication to suppress parathyroid hormone (PTH) (cinacalcet for example) within 60 days prior to Screening Visit 1 8. Use of oral bisphosphonates for 6 months or more in the 2 years prior to Screening Visit 1 9. Use of denosumab in the 6 months prior to Screening Visit 1 10. Use of teriparatide in the 2 months prior to Screening Visit 1 11. Planned or recommended orthopedic surgery within the first 24 weeks of the clinical trial period 12. History of traumatic fracture or orthopedic surgery within 6 months prior to Screening Visit 1 13. Use of KRN23, or any other therapeutic monoclonal antibody within 90 days prior to Screening Visit 1 14. Use of any investigational product or investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Screening Visit 1, or requirement for any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments. OR, in Japan, use of any investigational product or investigational medical device within 4 months prior to Screening, or requirement for any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments. 15. Pregnant or breastfeeding at Screening /Baseline or planning to become pregnant (self or partner) at any time during the study 16. Unable or unwilling to withhold prohibited medications throughout the study 17. Presence or history of any hypersensitivity, allergic or anaphylactic reactions to any monoclonal antibody or KRN23 excipients that, in the judgment of the investigator, places the subject at increased risk for adverse effects. 18. Prior history of positive test for human immunodeficiency virus antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen, and/or hepatitis C antibody 19. History of recurrent infection or predisposition to infection, or of known immunodeficiency 20. Presence of malignant neoplasm (except basal cell carcinoma) 21. Presence of a concurrent disease or condition that would interfere with study participation or affect safety 22. Presence or history of any condition that, in the view of the investigator, places the subject at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline through Week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Question 3 (Q3; Worst Pain in Past 24 Hours) ScoreBaseline, 24 weeksThe BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Question 3 of the short-form BPI (BPI-Q3) asks subjects to rate their pain at its worst in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). From the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model, which includes the change from Baseline for the endpoint of interest as the dependent variable; region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification (not included for analysis of BPI Worst Pain), and visit by treatment as fixed factors; and Baseline value for the endpoint of interest as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness ScoreBaseline, 24 weeksThe WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the WOMAC Physical Function ScoreBaseline, 24 weeksThe WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Physical Function as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Physical Function as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI-Q3 (Worst Pain) score as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Question 3 of the short-form BPI (BPI-Q3) asks subjects to rate their pain at its worst in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for BPI worst pain as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of BPI Worst Pain as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI pain severity score as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). The severity of pain in the last 24 hours is rated on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BPI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BPI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI pain interference score as recorded on the day of the study visit. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Pain interference in the last 24 hours is rated on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BPI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BPI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in Brief Fatigue Inventory Question 3 (Worst Fatigue in Past 24 Hours; BFI-Q3) as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BFI is a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 9 items related to fatigue rated on a 0 to 10 numerical scale with a recall period of 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: fatigue severity and the interference of fatigue on daily life (activity, mood, walking ability, work, relations with others, and enjoyment of life). Participants are asked to rate their worst fatigue over the past 24 hours from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad a you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BFI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BFI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BFI global fatigue score, calculated by averaging all 9 BFI items as recorded on the day of the study visit. The BFI is a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 9 items related to fatigue that are rated on a numerical scale with a recall period of 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: fatigue severity and the interference of fatigue on daily life (activity, mood, walking ability, work, relations with others, and enjoyment of life). BFI Global Fatigue score was calculated by averaging all 9 items on the BFI. Global scores range from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating worse fatigue severity and interference. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BFI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BFI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for BALP as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of BALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for BALP as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28, 34, 36, 46, 48, 60, 70, 72, 84, 94, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for serum phosphorus as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of serum phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28, 34, 36, 46, 48, 60, 70, 72, 84, 94, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for serum phosphorus as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of serum phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 20, 21, 22, 46, 48, 60, 70, 72, 84, 94, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1,25(OH)2D as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 20, 21, 22, 46, 48, 60, 70, 72, 84, 94, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for 1,25(OH)2D as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusBaseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusBaseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for 24-hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline through Week 24
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline through Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline through Week 24
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline through Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline through Week 24
Time-Adjusted Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Phosphorus Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline through Week 24

Countries

France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, South Korea, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo SC Q4W through Week 24
66
Burosumab
Burosumab 1 mg/kg SC Q4W
68
Total134

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-Blind (Placebo-Controlled) PeriodWithdrawal by Subject01
Open-label Treatment Continuation PeriodOther, Not Specified33
Open-label Treatment Continuation PeriodWithdrawal by Subject01
Open-Label Treatment Extension Period IDeath01
Open-Label Treatment Extension Period ILost to Follow-up01
Open-Label Treatment Extension Period IOther, Not Specified31
Open-Label Treatment Extension Period IWithdrawal by Subject01
Open-Label Treatment Extension Period IIOther, Not Specified10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalBurosumabPlacebo
24-Hour Urinary Phosphorus0.77 g/24 hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.255
0.72 g/24 hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.241
0.81 g/24 hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.262
Age, Continuous39.99 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.201
41.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.582
38.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.756
BFI Global Fatigue Score5.12 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.999
5.37 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.044
4.86 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.932
BPI Pain Interference Score5.00 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.21
5.23 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.237
4.76 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.174
BPI Pain Severity Score5.05 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.539
5.18 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.531
4.92 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.547
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst Fatigue Score6.84 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.591
6.94 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.657
6.74 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.526
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Score6.68 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.372
6.81 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.308
6.54 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.433
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
122 Participants61 Participants61 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
21 Participants12 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other, Not Specified
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
108 Participants55 Participants53 Participants
Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate(TmP/GFR)1.639 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.386
1.678 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4004
1.598 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3693
Serum 1, 25 (OH)2 D33.0 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.28
32.4 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.96
33.5 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.61
Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)24.9 μg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.47
25.1 μg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.55
24.6 μg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3
Serum Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)718.8 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 414.89
718.4 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 413.71
719.2 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 419.24
Serum Phosphorus0.635 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.105
0.653 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1072
0.617 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1001
Serum Procollagen Type 1 N- Propeptide (P1NP)87.6 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.3
87.5 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.6
87.6 ng/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.41
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants44 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants24 Participants23 Participants
Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)0.810 fraction of phosphate reabsorbed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0834
0.807 fraction of phosphate reabsorbed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0832
0.812 fraction of phosphate reabsorbed
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0842
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score63.06 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.5
64.71 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.253
61.36 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.77
WOMAC Physical Function Score47.40 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.024
50.79 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.66
43.89 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.938

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 660 / 661 / 681 / 134
other
Total, other adverse events
57 / 6663 / 6668 / 68131 / 134
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 6610 / 6612 / 6822 / 134

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 247.6 percentage of participants
BurosumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 2492.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 240.13 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.265
BurosumabChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 240.69 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.392
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 240.16 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.272
BurosumabChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 241.21 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.513
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary Phosphorus

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 120.06 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.052
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 240.07 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.065
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 360.04 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.054
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 480.07 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 720.08 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.065
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 960.10 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.075
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 720.05 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.052
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 120.05 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.046
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 480.13 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.067
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 240.05 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.046
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 960.10 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.054
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 360.07 g/24 hourStandard Error 0.045
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue Score

Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BFI global fatigue score, calculated by averaging all 9 BFI items as recorded on the day of the study visit. The BFI is a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 9 items related to fatigue that are rated on a numerical scale with a recall period of 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: fatigue severity and the interference of fatigue on daily life (activity, mood, walking ability, work, relations with others, and enjoyment of life). BFI Global Fatigue score was calculated by averaging all 9 items on the BFI. Global scores range from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating worse fatigue severity and interference. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BFI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BFI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 12-0.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.262
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 24-0.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.292
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 36-0.69 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.315
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 48-0.75 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.303
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 72-0.72 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.304
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 96-0.86 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.291
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 72-0.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.266
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 12-0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.261
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 48-0.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.275
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 240.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.261
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 96-0.80 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.285
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Global Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 36-0.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.283
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue Score

Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in Brief Fatigue Inventory Question 3 (Worst Fatigue in Past 24 Hours; BFI-Q3) as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BFI is a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 9 items related to fatigue rated on a 0 to 10 numerical scale with a recall period of 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: fatigue severity and the interference of fatigue on daily life (activity, mood, walking ability, work, relations with others, and enjoyment of life). Participants are asked to rate their worst fatigue over the past 24 hours from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad a you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BFI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BFI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 12-0.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.266
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 24-0.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.298
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 36-1.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.305
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 48-1.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.317
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 72-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.352
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 96-0.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.362
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 72-0.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.309
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 12-0.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.261
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 48-0.99 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.295
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 24-0.65 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 96-0.75 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.306
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreChange at Week 36-0.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.271
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for BALP as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of BALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 12-2.11 μg/LStandard Error 1.529
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 241.03 μg/LStandard Error 1.801
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 3610.42 μg/LStandard Error 2.017
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 486.69 μg/LStandard Error 1.929
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 72-0.92 μg/LStandard Error 1.779
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 96-2.49 μg/LStandard Error 1.887
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 72-3.39 μg/LStandard Error 1.739
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 126.52 μg/LStandard Error 2.832
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 480.23 μg/LStandard Error 1.83
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 245.70 μg/LStandard Error 2.038
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 96-2.76 μg/LStandard Error 1.64
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)Change at Week 364.46 μg/LStandard Error 1.607
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 1226.96 pg/mLStandard Error 35.689
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 24-4.20 pg/mLStandard Error 34.835
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 36350.89 pg/mLStandard Error 53.131
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 48310.67 pg/mLStandard Error 45.003
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 72178.03 pg/mLStandard Error 42.702
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 9679.04 pg/mLStandard Error 45.622
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 7251.59 pg/mLStandard Error 42.863
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 12322.09 pg/mLStandard Error 56.924
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 48138.61 pg/mLStandard Error 37.886
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 24184.56 pg/mLStandard Error 39.213
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 9610.84 pg/mLStandard Error 40.761
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx)Change at Week 36193.50 pg/mLStandard Error 39.461
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 4885.12 ng/mLStandard Error 11.037
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 242.95 ng/mLStandard Error 6.423
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 7248.98 ng/mLStandard Error 7.286
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 36100.00 ng/mLStandard Error 10.562
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 9622.98 ng/mLStandard Error 7.075
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 12-1.86 ng/mLStandard Error 5.958
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 9612.48 ng/mLStandard Error 8.661
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 1296.22 ng/mLStandard Error 14.264
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 3649.71 ng/mLStandard Error 6.786
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 4840.07 ng/mLStandard Error 7.292
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 7218.04 ng/mLStandard Error 9.186
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide (P1NP)Change at Week 2463.50 ng/mLStandard Error 7.239
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference Score

Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI pain interference score as recorded on the day of the study visit. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Pain interference in the last 24 hours is rated on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BPI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BPI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 12-0.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.215
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 24-0.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.242
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 36-1.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 48-1.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.251
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 72-1.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.247
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 96-1.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 72-1.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.263
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 12-0.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.207
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 48-1.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.235
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 24-0.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.207
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 96-1.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreChange at Week 36-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.221
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity Score

Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI pain severity score as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). The severity of pain in the last 24 hours is rated on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BPI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BPI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 12-0.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.166
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 24-0.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.211
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 36-0.97 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.214
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 48-1.13 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.205
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 72-1.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.216
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 96-1.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.195
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 72-1.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.231
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 12-0.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.163
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 48-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.162
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 24-0.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.172
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 96-1.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.229
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreChange at Week 36-0.62 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.184
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain Score

Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI-Q3 (Worst Pain) score as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Question 3 of the short-form BPI (BPI-Q3) asks subjects to rate their pain at its worst in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for BPI worst pain as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of BPI Worst Pain as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 12-0.37 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.216
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 24-0.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.242
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 36-1.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.234
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 48-1.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.243
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 72-1.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.283
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 96-0.99 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.265
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 72-1.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.316
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 12-0.62 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.208
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 48-1.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 24-0.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.228
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 96-1.48 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.299
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreChange at Week 36-0.95 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.228
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 2-0.02 mg/dLStandard Error 0.072
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 4-0.03 mg/dLStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 120.11 mg/dLStandard Error 0.082
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 220.02 mg/dLStandard Error 0.069
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 240.07 mg/dLStandard Error 0.071
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 480.55 mg/dLStandard Error 0.087
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 600.57 mg/dLStandard Error 0.097
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 720.55 mg/dLStandard Error 0.086
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 840.49 mg/dLStandard Error 0.078
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 960.29 mg/dLStandard Error 0.086
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 720.43 mg/dLStandard Error 0.091
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 21.60 mg/dLStandard Error 0.121
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 480.48 mg/dLStandard Error 0.091
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 40.91 mg/dLStandard Error 0.117
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 960.46 mg/dLStandard Error 0.084
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 120.70 mg/dLStandard Error 0.107
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 600.43 mg/dLStandard Error 0.086
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 221.01 mg/dLStandard Error 0.123
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 840.42 mg/dLStandard Error 0.092
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Ratio of Renal Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)Change at Week 240.51 mg/dLStandard Error 0.093
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2D

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1,25(OH)2D as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 20, 21, 22, 46, 48, 60, 70, 72, 84, 94, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 12.04 pg/mLStandard Error 2.251
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 21.40 pg/mLStandard Error 2.113
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 42.61 pg/mLStandard Error 2.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 202.88 pg/mLStandard Error 2.163
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 213.09 pg/mLStandard Error 2.177
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 223.45 pg/mLStandard Error 2.289
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 4625.23 pg/mLStandard Error 2.576
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 4810.50 pg/mLStandard Error 2.418
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 609.29 pg/mLStandard Error 2.336
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 7024.20 pg/mLStandard Error 2.529
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 727.12 pg/mLStandard Error 2.424
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 845.13 pg/mLStandard Error 2.388
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 9418.96 pg/mLStandard Error 2.655
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 963.43 pg/mLStandard Error 2.348
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 1084.76 pg/mLStandard Error 2.349
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 1204.64 pg/mLStandard Error 2.496
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 1324.08 pg/mLStandard Error 3.142
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 144-0.38 pg/mLStandard Error 4.677
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 187.23 pg/mLStandard Error 5.5
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 1328.05 pg/mLStandard Error 4.227
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 258.20 pg/mLStandard Error 3.931
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 7018.82 pg/mLStandard Error 2.486
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 420.55 pg/mLStandard Error 2.828
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 961.95 pg/mLStandard Error 2.356
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 208.11 pg/mLStandard Error 2.294
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 725.52 pg/mLStandard Error 2.607
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 2133.95 pg/mLStandard Error 3.019
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 1205.37 pg/mLStandard Error 2.935
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 2226.10 pg/mLStandard Error 2.952
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 841.16 pg/mLStandard Error 2.549
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 4623.08 pg/mLStandard Error 3.243
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 1084.29 pg/mLStandard Error 2.672
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 487.24 pg/mLStandard Error 2.449
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 9415.26 pg/mLStandard Error 2.502
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 605.69 pg/mLStandard Error 2.583
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum Phosphorus

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for serum phosphorus as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of serum phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28, 34, 36, 46, 48, 60, 70, 72, 84, 94, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 140.02 mmol/LStandard Error 0.022
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2-0.03 mmol/LStandard Error 0.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 4-0.03 mmol/LStandard Error 0.022
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 6-0.00 mmol/LStandard Error 0.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 100.01 mmol/LStandard Error 0.022
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 12-0.01 mmol/LStandard Error 0.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1-0.01 mmol/LStandard Error 0.024
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 180.02 mmol/LStandard Error 0.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 20-0.01 mmol/LStandard Error 0.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 21-0.00 mmol/LStandard Error 0.024
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 22-0.02 mmol/LStandard Error 0.022
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 24-0.00 mmol/LStandard Error 0.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 260.47 mmol/LStandard Error 0.035
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 280.28 mmol/LStandard Error 0.028
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 340.36 mmol/LStandard Error 0.029
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 360.17 mmol/LStandard Error 0.026
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 460.31 mmol/LStandard Error 0.026
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 480.13 mmol/LStandard Error 0.027
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 600.14 mmol/LStandard Error 0.028
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 700.30 mmol/LStandard Error 0.029
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 720.13 mmol/LStandard Error 0.025
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 840.12 mmol/LStandard Error 0.025
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 940.25 mmol/LStandard Error 0.029
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 960.07 mmol/LStandard Error 0.026
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1080.11 mmol/LStandard Error 0.028
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1200.09 mmol/LStandard Error 0.027
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1320.12 mmol/LStandard Error 0.033
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1440.05 mmol/LStandard Error 0.064
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 10.44 mmol/LStandard Error 0.031
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 720.11 mmol/LStandard Error 0.027
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 20.43 mmol/LStandard Error 0.032
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 340.28 mmol/LStandard Error 0.031
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 40.27 mmol/LStandard Error 0.034
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1200.13 mmol/LStandard Error 0.033
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 60.45 mmol/LStandard Error 0.036
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 360.13 mmol/LStandard Error 0.027
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 100.37 mmol/LStandard Error 0.033
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 840.14 mmol/LStandard Error 0.027
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 120.17 mmol/LStandard Error 0.032
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 460.27 mmol/LStandard Error 0.03
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 140.32 mmol/LStandard Error 0.032
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1080.13 mmol/LStandard Error 0.031
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 180.32 mmol/LStandard Error 0.031
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 480.11 mmol/LStandard Error 0.027
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 200.18 mmol/LStandard Error 0.028
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 940.30 mmol/LStandard Error 0.029
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 210.31 mmol/LStandard Error 0.033
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 600.11 mmol/LStandard Error 0.028
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 220.25 mmol/LStandard Error 0.033
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1320.15 mmol/LStandard Error 0.036
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 240.13 mmol/LStandard Error 0.028
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 700.30 mmol/LStandard Error 0.03
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 260.31 mmol/LStandard Error 0.032
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 960.13 mmol/LStandard Error 0.025
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 280.18 mmol/LStandard Error 0.028
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 2-0.02 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.013
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 4-0.03 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.012
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 12-0.00 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 22-0.01 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.009
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 24-0.02 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.012
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 480.02 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.012
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 600.03 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.009
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 720.02 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.011
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 840.02 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 96-0.01 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.014
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 720.02 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.011
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 20.07 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.008
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 480.03 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.009
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 40.03 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.009
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 960.03 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.009
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 120.04 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.008
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 600.02 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.009
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 220.05 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.011
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 840.01 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.012
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate (TRP)Change at Week 240.03 fraction of phosphate reabsorbedStandard Error 0.009
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function Score

The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 12-1.40 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.418
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 241.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.531
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 36-5.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.694
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 48-7.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.801
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 72-8.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.835
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 96-8.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.752
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 120-11.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.685
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 144-19.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.892
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 144-17.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.061
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 12-3.96 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.787
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 72-8.66 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.523
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 24-3.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.193
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 120-11.98 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.291
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 36-7.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.133
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 96-9.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.27
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreChange at Week 48-8.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.057
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness Score

The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 12-1.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.929
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 240.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.289
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 36-13.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.422
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 48-15.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.488
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 72-18.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.613
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 96-17.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.737
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 120-19.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.404
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 144-30.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.407
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 144-25.88 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.501
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 12-7.86 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.622
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 72-15.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.111
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 24-8.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.968
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 120-20.57 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.371
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 36-12.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.411
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 96-15.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.577
BurosumabChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreChange at Week 48-16.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.302
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Question 3 (Q3; Worst Pain in Past 24 Hours) Score

The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Question 3 of the short-form BPI (BPI-Q3) asks subjects to rate their pain at its worst in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). From the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model, which includes the change from Baseline for the endpoint of interest as the dependent variable; region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification (not included for analysis of BPI Worst Pain), and visit by treatment as fixed factors; and Baseline value for the endpoint of interest as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Question 3 (Q3; Worst Pain in Past 24 Hours) Score-0.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.222
BurosumabChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Question 3 (Q3; Worst Pain in Past 24 Hours) Score-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.211
p-value: 0.091995% CI: [-1, 0.08]GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score

The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score0.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.139
BurosumabChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score-7.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.034
p-value: 0.010695% CI: [-14.68, -1.94]GEE model
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the WOMAC Physical Function Score

The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Physical Function as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Physical Function as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the WOMAC Physical Function Score1.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.722
BurosumabChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the WOMAC Physical Function Score-3.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.553
p-value: 0.047895% CI: [-9.76, -0.05]GEE model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 246.1 percentage of participants
BurosumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 2467.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 247.83 percentage changeStandard Deviation 14.755
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 2435.18 percentage changeStandard Deviation 20.731
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 249.85 percentage changeStandard Deviation 15.292
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Each Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 2461.44 percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.961
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary Phosphorus

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for 24-hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 1221.91 percentage changeStandard Error 11.844
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 2428.45 percentage changeStandard Error 15.518
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 3618.19 percentage changeStandard Error 11.784
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 4827.32 percentage changeStandard Error 14.328
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 7229.53 percentage changeStandard Error 14.485
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 9631.17 percentage changeStandard Error 17.248
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 7225.80 percentage changeStandard Error 15.476
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 1221.40 percentage changeStandard Error 11.453
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 4837.50 percentage changeStandard Error 14.687
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 2420.35 percentage changeStandard Error 11.567
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 9630.64 percentage changeStandard Error 10.42
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary PhosphorusChange at Week 3628.31 percentage changeStandard Error 12.173
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALP

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for BALP as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 127.85 percentage changeStandard Error 9.867
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 2427.56 percentage changeStandard Error 10.339
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 3664.41 percentage changeStandard Error 11.669
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 4850.65 percentage changeStandard Error 11.317
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 7219.79 percentage changeStandard Error 11.755
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 9616.46 percentage changeStandard Error 11.027
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 7214.40 percentage changeStandard Error 11.618
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 1230.29 percentage changeStandard Error 13.476
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 4823.46 percentage changeStandard Error 10.041
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 2439.13 percentage changeStandard Error 10.902
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 9621.21 percentage changeStandard Error 9.688
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling BALPChange at Week 3643.13 percentage changeStandard Error 11.473
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTx

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 129.64 percentage changeStandard Error 5.671
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 244.75 percentage changeStandard Error 5.28
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 3661.31 percentage changeStandard Error 10.653
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 4850.35 percentage changeStandard Error 6.464
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 7234.78 percentage changeStandard Error 7.007
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 9627.38 percentage changeStandard Error 7.783
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 7217.09 percentage changeStandard Error 5.957
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 1245.40 percentage changeStandard Error 7.267
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 4828.33 percentage changeStandard Error 5.354
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 2432.48 percentage changeStandard Error 6.414
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 9613.47 percentage changeStandard Error 5.952
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling CTxChange at Week 3634.07 percentage changeStandard Error 6.25
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NP

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 122.30 percentage changeStandard Error 6.318
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 247.83 percentage changeStandard Error 7.076
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 36116.39 percentage changeStandard Error 9.726
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange a Week 4899.10 percentage changeStandard Error 11.442
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 7272.56 percentage changeStandard Error 10.055
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 9641.62 percentage changeStandard Error 8.163
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 7238.82 percentage changeStandard Error 10.225
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 1291.78 percentage changeStandard Error 10.787
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange a Week 4856.51 percentage changeStandard Error 8.771
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 2472.43 percentage changeStandard Error 8.519
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 9631.04 percentage changeStandard Error 8.126
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Biochemical Marker of Bone Remodeling P1NPChange at Week 3663.58 percentage changeStandard Error 8.562
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2D

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for 1,25(OH)2D as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 20, 21, 22, 46, 48, 60, 70, 72, 84, 94, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 110.45 percentage changeStandard Error 13.041
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 210.53 percentage changeStandard Error 12.76
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 416.07 percentage changeStandard Error 12.81
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 2021.36 percentage changeStandard Error 12.424
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 2121.51 percentage changeStandard Error 12.825
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 2221.07 percentage changeStandard Error 12.725
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 46130.29 percentage changeStandard Error 22.718
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 4870.09 percentage changeStandard Error 17.114
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 6065.46 percentage changeStandard Error 13.083
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 70123.58 percentage changeStandard Error 17.315
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 7258.45 percentage changeStandard Error 13.957
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 8455.67 percentage changeStandard Error 15.323
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 94111.25 percentage changeStandard Error 21.97
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 9650.17 percentage changeStandard Error 18.857
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 10844.78 percentage changeStandard Error 14.219
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 12058.37 percentage changeStandard Error 19.621
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 13267.59 percentage changeStandard Error 35.77
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 14422.65 percentage changeStandard Error 19.297
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 1310.72 percentage changeStandard Error 23.225
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 13242.55 percentage changeStandard Error 15.925
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 2207.90 percentage changeStandard Error 16.728
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 7082.03 percentage changeStandard Error 12.604
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 476.22 percentage changeStandard Error 12.147
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 9622.15 percentage changeStandard Error 10.487
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 2041.08 percentage changeStandard Error 11.943
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 7231.14 percentage changeStandard Error 13.07
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 21131.76 percentage changeStandard Error 14.862
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 12036.09 percentage changeStandard Error 13.089
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 22102.81 percentage changeStandard Error 14.619
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 8418.83 percentage changeStandard Error 12.801
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 4696.63 percentage changeStandard Error 16.909
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 10829.16 percentage changeStandard Error 13.326
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 4834.47 percentage changeStandard Error 12.903
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 9471.30 percentage changeStandard Error 12.28
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2DChange at Week 6032.32 percentage changeStandard Error 12.23
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum Phosphorus

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for serum phosphorus as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of serum phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, 12, 14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28, 34, 36, 46, 48, 60, 70, 72, 84, 94, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 143.58 percentage changeStandard Error 3.691
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2-5.91 percentage changeStandard Error 3.969
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 4-4.84 percentage changeStandard Error 3.792
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 6-0.41 percentage changeStandard Error 3.951
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 102.40 percentage changeStandard Error 3.68
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 12-2.14 percentage changeStandard Error 3.798
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1-1.11 percentage changeStandard Error 3.936
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 183.93 percentage changeStandard Error 3.857
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 20-1.81 percentage changeStandard Error 3.759
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 210.21 percentage changeStandard Error 4.011
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 22-3.42 percentage changeStandard Error 3.709
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 24-0.61 percentage changeStandard Error 3.802
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2678.30 percentage changeStandard Error 5.993
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2846.07 percentage changeStandard Error 4.766
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 3459.18 percentage changeStandard Error 4.959
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 3628.03 percentage changeStandard Error 4.424
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 4651.49 percentage changeStandard Error 4.38
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 4821.58 percentage changeStandard Error 4.365
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 6022.90 percentage changeStandard Error 4.338
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 7050.22 percentage changeStandard Error 4.916
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 7221.59 percentage changeStandard Error 4.155
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 8421.47 percentage changeStandard Error 4.089
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 9443.67 percentage changeStandard Error 4.834
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 9612.97 percentage changeStandard Error 4.216
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 10819.21 percentage changeStandard Error 4.665
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 12015.13 percentage changeStandard Error 4.365
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 13220.43 percentage changeStandard Error 5.362
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1445.49 percentage changeStandard Error 12.212
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 169.24 percentage changeStandard Error 4.762
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 7219.45 percentage changeStandard Error 4.344
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 269.39 percentage changeStandard Error 4.881
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 3445.83 percentage changeStandard Error 4.871
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 442.89 percentage changeStandard Error 5.325
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 12021.50 percentage changeStandard Error 5.268
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 672.96 percentage changeStandard Error 5.944
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 3622.34 percentage changeStandard Error 4.256
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1059.96 percentage changeStandard Error 5.356
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 8423.58 percentage changeStandard Error 4.2
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1229.50 percentage changeStandard Error 5.087
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 4645.39 percentage changeStandard Error 5.018
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1452.14 percentage changeStandard Error 5.194
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 10823.39 percentage changeStandard Error 4.749
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 1853.22 percentage changeStandard Error 5.106
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 4819.12 percentage changeStandard Error 4.19
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2031.28 percentage changeStandard Error 4.472
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 9449.36 percentage changeStandard Error 4.501
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2150.59 percentage changeStandard Error 5.123
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 6019.60 percentage changeStandard Error 4.436
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2240.98 percentage changeStandard Error 5.196
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 13225.34 percentage changeStandard Error 5.847
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2422.01 percentage changeStandard Error 4.523
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 7047.81 percentage changeStandard Error 4.768
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2651.51 percentage changeStandard Error 5.204
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 9621.65 percentage changeStandard Error 3.854
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum PhosphorusChange at Week 2831.32 percentage changeStandard Error 4.415
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFR

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 2-2.15 percentage changeStandard Error 4.515
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 4-2.73 percentage changeStandard Error 4.416
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 126.28 percentage changeStandard Error 4.9
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 221.38 percentage changeStandard Error 4.252
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 243.63 percentage changeStandard Error 4.46
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 4835.52 percentage changeStandard Error 5.39
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 6037.13 percentage changeStandard Error 5.855
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 7235.89 percentage changeStandard Error 5.492
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 8433.15 percentage changeStandard Error 4.924
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 9619.95 percentage changeStandard Error 5.417
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 7228.98 percentage changeStandard Error 5.513
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 2100.10 percentage changeStandard Error 7.222
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 4831.02 percentage changeStandard Error 5.489
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 456.53 percentage changeStandard Error 6.816
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 9629.67 percentage changeStandard Error 4.759
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 1243.65 percentage changeStandard Error 6.206
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 6027.49 percentage changeStandard Error 5.002
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 2262.38 percentage changeStandard Error 7.144
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 8427.69 percentage changeStandard Error 5.527
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFRChange at Week 2433.02 percentage changeStandard Error 5.464
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRP

The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, 22, 24, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 2-2.00 percentage changeStandard Error 1.53
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 4-3.75 percentage changeStandard Error 1.486
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 120.56 percentage changeStandard Error 1.261
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 22-0.01 percentage changeStandard Error 1.163
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 24-1.56 percentage changeStandard Error 1.579
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 483.95 percentage changeStandard Error 1.547
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 603.99 percentage changeStandard Error 1.096
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 723.90 percentage changeStandard Error 1.427
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 843.78 percentage changeStandard Error 1.276
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 96-0.09 percentage changeStandard Error 1.582
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 723.24 percentage changeStandard Error 1.414
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 29.81 percentage changeStandard Error 1.111
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 484.70 percentage changeStandard Error 1.183
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 44.86 percentage changeStandard Error 1.114
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 964.44 percentage changeStandard Error 1.116
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 125.45 percentage changeStandard Error 1.079
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 603.00 percentage changeStandard Error 1.123
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 227.03 percentage changeStandard Error 1.451
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 841.97 percentage changeStandard Error 1.516
BurosumabPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in TRPChange at Week 244.21 percentage changeStandard Error 1.141
Secondary

Time-Adjusted Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Phosphorus Between Baseline and Week 24

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime-Adjusted Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Phosphorus Between Baseline and Week 242.08 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.292
BurosumabTime-Adjusted Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Phosphorus Between Baseline and Week 243.08 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.477

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026