Skip to content

Effect of Dalcetrapib vs Placebo on CV Risk in a Genetically Defined Population With a Recent ACS

A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomized Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of Dalcetrapib on Cardiovascular (CV) Risk in a Genetically Defined Population With a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): The Dal-GenE Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02525939
Acronym
dal-GenE
Enrollment
6147
Registered
2015-08-18
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2021-10-31
Last updated
2022-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Brief summary

A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, phase III multicenter study in subjects recently hospitalized for ACS and with the appropriate genetic profile. Subjects will provide informed consent before any study-specific procedures are performed. Subject enrollment may begin in the hospital and will continue following release from the hospital. Screening procedures may be performed at the time of the index ACS event or anytime thereafter, with the condition that randomization must occur within the mandated window (4-12 weeks after the index event). Subjects will be assessed based on their medical history. Those who are likely to qualify will undergo Genotype Assay testing to evaluate genetic determination for the presence of AA genotype.

Detailed description

This is an event driven study to reach statistical power given all other assumptions. Subjects will visit the clinic 1 month after randomization and at regular intervals thereafter. Additionally, for any subject prematurely discontinuing study medication, assessments will be conducted every 6 months for the collection of study endpoints. Those who are likely to qualify will undergo Genotype Assay Testing to evaluate genetic determination or the presence of the AA genotype. The test is investigational and test procedures are Roche Molecular Diagnostics protocol ADCY9-COB-389.

Interventions

Cholesterol Ester Transfer Protein inhibitor

DRUGPlacebo

matching placebo tablets

Sponsors

The Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center (MHICC)
CollaboratorOTHER
Medpace, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
DalCor Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with the appropriate genetic background and recently hospitalized for ACS (between 4 and 12 weeks following the index event), will be enrolled in this trial. * AA genotype at variant gene as determined by Genotype Assay testing, conducted at a designated investigational testing site (ITS) * Clinically stable, ie, free of ischemic symptoms at rest or with minimal exertion for at least 1 week prior to randomization * Prior to randomization, subject must have evidence of guidelines-based management of LDL-C, at a minimum to include medical and dietary treatment to a target level of LDL-C \<100 mg/dl (\<2.6 mmol/L).

Exclusion criteria

* Females who are pregnant (negative pregnancy test required for all women of child-bearing potential at Visit 2, Day 0) or breast-feeding * Women of childbearing potential (women who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal defined as amenorrhea for \>12 months) who are not using at least one method of contraception\* * New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure * Last known hemoglobin \<10 g/dL * Index ACS event presumed due to uncontrolled hypertension (\*) Varies by region

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, and Non-Fatal StrokeFrom randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite primary endpoint (median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months)All efficacy endpoints were adjudicated by an independent clinical endpoint committee (CEC). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite endpoint, which included death from cardiovascular causes, resuscitated cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke, as positively adjudicated by the CEC.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-Fatal Stroke, Hospitalization for ACS (With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities) or Unanticipated Coronary RevascularizationFrom randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite secondary endpoint (median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months)All efficacy endpoints were adjudicated by an independent clinical endpoint committee (CEC). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite endpoint, which included death from cardiovascular causes, resuscitated cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (with electrocardiogram abnormalities) or unanticipated coronary revascularization, as positively adjudicated by the CEC.
Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-Fatal Stroke or Hospitalization for New or Worsening Heart FailureFrom randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite secondary endpoint (median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months)All efficacy endpoints were adjudicated by an independent clinical endpoint committee (CEC). The secondary efficacy endpoint was the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite secondary endpoint, which included death from cardiovascular causes, cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for new or worsening heart failure, as positively adjudicated by the CEC.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Trial enrolment began in April 2016 and was completed in December 2018. A total of 45,005 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome were screened in order to identify participants meeting the single genetic criterion (AA genotype at rs1967309 in the ADCY9 gene) and other inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria required for randomization.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 6149 eligible patients underwent randomization, among whom two were randomized by error and excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dalcetrapib
Participants received dalcetrapib 600 mg (two 300 mg tablets) orally once daily. dalcetrapib: Cholesterol Ester Transfer Protein inhibitor, 300 mg tablets
3,071
Placebo
Participants received dalcetrapib placebo tablets matching dalcetrapib orally once daily. Placebo: dalcetrapib matching placebo tablets
3,076
Total6,147

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath180179
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2724
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2439

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalDalcetrapib
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Index Event Details:
Hospitalization duration
6.22 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.03
6.14 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.69
6.06 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.33
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Index Event Details:
Time since ACS index event
54.01 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.31
53.91 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
53.82 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.09
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Index Event Diagnosis
Hospitalization for Acute Coronary Syndrome (Electrocardiogram abnormalities without biomarkers)
306 Participants601 Participants295 Participants
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Index Event Diagnosis
Procedure-related Myocardial Infarction (MI) after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
28 Participants48 Participants20 Participants
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Index Event Diagnosis
Spontaneous Myocardial Infarction (MI)
2742 Participants5498 Participants2756 Participants
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Index Event Diagnosis: Second ACS event since qualifying index event
No
3008 Participants6006 Participants2998 Participants
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Index Event Diagnosis: Second ACS event since qualifying index event
Yes
68 Participants141 Participants73 Participants
Age, Continuous62.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.25
62.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.21
62.19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.16
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
469 Participants938 Participants469 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2550 Participants5101 Participants2551 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
57 Participants108 Participants51 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
12 Participants23 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
59 Participants117 Participants58 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
123 Participants253 Participants130 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
68 Participants153 Participants85 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
15 Participants30 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2798 Participants5569 Participants2771 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
74 participants148 participants74 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
102 participants202 participants100 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
27 participants50 participants23 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
17 participants39 participants22 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
213 participants431 participants218 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
185 participants386 participants201 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
228 participants437 participants209 participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
50 participants94 participants44 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
78 participants151 participants73 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
71 participants137 participants66 participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
11 participants20 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
50 participants99 participants49 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
41 participants69 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
101 participants183 participants82 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
175 participants373 participants198 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
54 participants123 participants69 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
147 participants276 participants129 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
74 participants149 participants75 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
169 participants335 participants166 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
27 participants54 participants27 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
4 participants14 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
87 participants179 participants92 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
240 participants455 participants215 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
27 participants48 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
101 participants222 participants121 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
104 participants188 participants84 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
30 participants65 participants35 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
15 participants36 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
26 participants57 participants31 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Arab Emirates
7 participants16 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
183 participants383 participants200 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
358 participants728 participants370 participants
Reproductive status if female
Childbearing potential with double contraceptive protection
24 Participants48 Participants24 Participants
Reproductive status if female
Childbearing potential without double contraceptive potential
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Reproductive status if female
Other
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Reproductive status if female
Postmenopausal
584 Participants1186 Participants602 Participants
Reproductive status if female
Surgically sterilized
60 Participants152 Participants92 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
672 Participants1395 Participants723 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2404 Participants4752 Participants2348 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
180 / 3,076182 / 3,071
other
Total, other adverse events
818 / 3,076971 / 3,071
serious
Total, serious adverse events
923 / 3,076900 / 3,071

Outcome results

Primary

Composite of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, and Non-Fatal Stroke

All efficacy endpoints were adjudicated by an independent clinical endpoint committee (CEC). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite endpoint, which included death from cardiovascular causes, resuscitated cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke, as positively adjudicated by the CEC.

Time frame: From randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite primary endpoint (median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months)

Population: All subjects randomized to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboComposite of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, and Non-Fatal Stroke327 Participants
DalcetrapibComposite of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, and Non-Fatal Stroke292 Participants
Comparison: A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the primary endpoint. This model included treatment as a main effect, and region and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) index event type as stratification factors. The null and alternative hypotheses tested with the above Cox model were: H0: λ = 1 vs HA: λ ≠ 1, where λ is the, assumed constant, hazard ratio (HR) for the time to occurrence of the composite events of the primary endpoint for the dalcetrapib and placebo treated groups.p-value: 0.1295% CI: [0.75, 1.03]Stratified Cox proportional hazard model
Secondary

Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-Fatal Stroke, Hospitalization for ACS (With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities) or Unanticipated Coronary Revascularization

All efficacy endpoints were adjudicated by an independent clinical endpoint committee (CEC). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite endpoint, which included death from cardiovascular causes, resuscitated cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (with electrocardiogram abnormalities) or unanticipated coronary revascularization, as positively adjudicated by the CEC.

Time frame: From randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite secondary endpoint (median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months)

Population: All subjects randomized to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboComposite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-Fatal Stroke, Hospitalization for ACS (With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities) or Unanticipated Coronary Revascularization471 Participants
DalcetrapibComposite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-Fatal Stroke, Hospitalization for ACS (With Electrocardiogram Abnormalities) or Unanticipated Coronary Revascularization471 Participants
Comparison: Secondary endpoints were expressed as time to event and an analysis similar to that for the primary endpoint was conducted. In order to control the family-wise Type I error that results from the multiplicity of endpoints, the secondary endpoints were formally tested using the Hochberg's step-up procedure only if the primary analysis results in significant treatment effect at p\<0.05. Otherwise, statistical tests for the secondary endpoints were presented solely for illustrative purposes.p-value: 0.9595% CI: [0.88, 1.13]Stratified Cox proportional hazard model
Secondary

Composite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-Fatal Stroke or Hospitalization for New or Worsening Heart Failure

All efficacy endpoints were adjudicated by an independent clinical endpoint committee (CEC). The secondary efficacy endpoint was the time from randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite secondary endpoint, which included death from cardiovascular causes, cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or hospitalization for new or worsening heart failure, as positively adjudicated by the CEC.

Time frame: From randomization to the first occurrence of any component of the composite secondary endpoint (median duration of follow-up was 39.9 months)

Population: All subjects randomized to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboComposite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-Fatal Stroke or Hospitalization for New or Worsening Heart Failure346 Participants
DalcetrapibComposite Endpoint of Cardiovascular Death, Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction, Non-Fatal Stroke or Hospitalization for New or Worsening Heart Failure321 Participants
Comparison: Secondary endpoints were expressed as time to event and an analysis similar to that for the primary endpoint was conducted. In order to control the family-wise Type I error that results from the multiplicity of endpoints, the secondary endpoints were formally tested using the Hochberg's step-up procedure only if the primary analysis results in significant treatment effect at p\<0.05. Otherwise, statistical tests for the secondary endpoints were presented solely for illustrative purposes.p-value: 0.2795% CI: [0.79, 1.07]Stratified Cox proportional hazard model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026