Skip to content

Impact of an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST) on Thromboprophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation

Impact of a Quality Improvement And Education Initiative on 'Appropriate' Use of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02524977
Enrollment
70
Registered
2015-08-17
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2018-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter

Brief summary

Study objective was to improve decision-making and thromboprophylaxis for patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) by developing and implementing a computerized decision support tool for individual patient-level decision-making about oral anticoagulant therapy. To accomplish these goals, the investigators studied the incremental impact of adding a quality-improvement (QI) intervention to an educational package (for practice staff and clinicians) using a computerized aid, the Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST) for individual patient-level decision-making about oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with non-valvular AF. The decision support tool incorporates individual patients' risk factor profiles for ischemic stroke and bleeding and provides a recommendation for treatment based upon the projected quality-adjusted life expectancy gained or lost with the addition of either oral anticoagulant therapy or aspirin compared with no thromboprophylaxis.

Detailed description

Setting - Cluster randomized trial. Setting - Primary care practices of an integrated healthcare system. Participants - 1,493 adults with non-valvular AF seen between April 2014 and March 2015. Intervention - Treatment recommendations were made by an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST) based on projections for quality-adjusted life expectancy calculated by a decision analytic model that integrates patient-specific risk factors for stroke and hemorrhage.

Interventions

Provision of recommended antithrombotic therapy based on atrial fibrillation decision support tool that uses both stroke and bleeding risk

BEHAVIORALEducational Intervention Only

Educational conference series

Sponsors

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Study subjects were physicians in our primary care network. * Patients included in the study were identified through our health system's clinical data store with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (427.31) or atrial flutter (427.32)

Exclusion criteria

Diagnoses of mitral valve disease (394.x), aortic valve disease (395.x), heart valve transplant (V42.2) or heart valve replacement (V42.3).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Discordant Antithrombotic TherapyOne yearChanges in the proportion of patients with current therapy that was discordant from the decision support tool recommendation between the start and finish date of the study (one year period).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Antithrombotic Therapy Discordant From AFDST Among Patients for Whom AFDST Report Was ReviewedOne yearChange in discordance between decision support tool recommendation and actual treatment among patients whose physicians reviewed the decision support tool report.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Educational Intervention Only
Educational Intervention Only - Educational package was delivered as 2 didactic noon-conferences on atrial fibrillation with a review of up-to-date anticoagulation guidelines for stroke prevention, and distribution of educational materials. Physicians delivering the noon conference series at all of the general internal medicine and primary care practice sites included 3 stroke neurologists, 2 cardiologists, and a general internist (PI) who were co-investigators in this study. Internists who were faculty at the University of Cincinnati and Internal Medicine residents also had an opportunity to participate in the first of the noon conferences in a special Department of Medicine Grand Rounds delivered by the PI. All practices (intervention and control groups) received the educational package focused on physicians, and clinical and non-clinical staff who would be involved in this QI process. Educational Intervention Only: Educational conference series
692
Educational Intervention Plus Decision Support
Educational Intervention plus Decision Support - Physicians in the intervention arm received a practice-level and physician-level summary report via a secure web site designed for patients with treatment recommendations that were discordant with current therapy, along with an explanation for the recommendation, the gain or loss in QALYs predicted by the decision model and the current 2014 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines. Providers were also reminded of upcoming visits for patients being seen within the next week so they could review their reports and use them in discussions with their patients. Decision Support: Provision of recommended antithrombotic therapy based on atrial fibrillation decision support tool that uses both stroke and bleeding risk Educational Intervention Only: Educational conference series
801
Total1,493

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEducational Intervention OnlyEducational Intervention Plus Decision SupportTotal
Age, Continuous
Mean Age
69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
70.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
CHADSVASc3.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.93
3.60 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.86
3.67 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.91
HAS-BLED2.18 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
2.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.15
2.12 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19
Proportion Receiving Oral Anticoagulant Therapy346 participants400 participants746 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
332 Participants352 Participants684 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
360 Participants449 Participants809 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 6920 / 801
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6920 / 801

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Discordant Antithrombotic Therapy

Changes in the proportion of patients with current therapy that was discordant from the decision support tool recommendation between the start and finish date of the study (one year period).

Time frame: One year

Population: Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis of AF (427.31) or atrial flutter (427.32) who did not have diagnoses of mitral valve disease (394.x), aortic valve disease (395.x), heart valve transplant (V42.2), or heart valve replacement (V42.3) in their active problem list.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Educational Intervention OnlyChanges in Discordant Antithrombotic TherapyTherapy Discordant from AFDST in 2014291 participants
Educational Intervention OnlyChanges in Discordant Antithrombotic TherapyTherapy Discordant from AFDST in 2015277 participants
Educational Intervention Plus Decision SupportChanges in Discordant Antithrombotic TherapyTherapy Discordant from AFDST in 2014335 participants
Educational Intervention Plus Decision SupportChanges in Discordant Antithrombotic TherapyTherapy Discordant from AFDST in 2015329 participants
p-value: 0.02Chi-squared
Secondary

Antithrombotic Therapy Discordant From AFDST Among Patients for Whom AFDST Report Was Reviewed

Change in discordance between decision support tool recommendation and actual treatment among patients whose physicians reviewed the decision support tool report.

Time frame: One year

Population: Number of patients for whom antithrombotic therapy was discordant from AFDST recommendation among patients for whom AFDST report was reviewed

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Educational Intervention OnlyAntithrombotic Therapy Discordant From AFDST Among Patients for Whom AFDST Report Was Reviewed152 Participants
Educational Intervention Plus Decision SupportAntithrombotic Therapy Discordant From AFDST Among Patients for Whom AFDST Report Was Reviewed140 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026