Skip to content

Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy

Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02524756
Enrollment
46
Registered
2015-08-17
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2018-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer

Keywords

nerve sparing radical hysterectomy

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess: 1. Evaluation of the feasibility of laparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy type III/C1 as regard surgical technique, blood loss and operative time. 2. Evaluate patients' outcome as regard bladder function. in order to preserve the function of the bladder and the rectum, it is necessary to modify the traditional procedures, so as to identify the precise anatomical information directing the technique for optimal preservation of bladder function at the time of radical hysterectomy. The laparoscopic technique offers several well-known advantages. Under the magnified view of the laparoscope, the anatomy can be clearly visualized to allow for the meticulous and precise dissection of the para-cervical structures and areolar tissue, including the blood vessels and the nerves. Laparoscopic identification (neurolysis) of the inferior hypogastric nerve and inferior hypogastric plexus is a feasible procedure for trained laparoscopic surgeons who have a good knowledge not only of the retroperitoneal anatomy but also of the pelvic neuro-anatomy as this qualification could prohibit long-term bladder and voiding dysfunction during nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy

Interventions

PROCEDURElaparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy-type III/C1
PROCEDURElaparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III/C2).

Sponsors

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
CollaboratorOTHER
Osama Mohammad Ali ElDamshety
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \> 18 years. 2. Karnofsky \> 80, or American Society of anaethesiology (ASA) I-II 3. Stage IA2-IB1-IB2-IIA1-IIA2-IIB cervical cancer according to FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) staging. 4. Stage II, III endometrial cancer

Exclusion criteria

1. Non Invasive Cancer 2. Pregnancy 3. Bladder dysfunction detected prior to surgery. 4. Previous pelvic lymphadenectomy. 5. Tumour recurrence 6. Incomplete surgery, unresectable lesion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional outcome of laparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy type III/C11 monthDuration of postoperative catheterization untill PVR urine volume is less than 100 ml

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood lossDay of surgeryAmount of blood intraoperative blood loss in ml. units
Operative timeDay of surgeryMinutes for the surgical intervention
Intraoperative complicationsDuring Surgeryintraoperative complications
Late postoperative complicationmore than 30 days postoperativecomplications related to surgery more than 30 days postoperative
Bladder training exercise1 monthRemoval of urinary catheter on the 3rd day postoperative without prior bladder training exercise and measurement of PVR urine volume
Early postoperative complication30 daysOccurence of early postoperative complication within 30 days of operation

Countries

Egypt, Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026