Skip to content

Mesalamine 2 g Sachet for the Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine 2 g Extended Release Granules (Sachet) for Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02522780
Enrollment
276
Registered
2015-08-13
Start date
2016-02-01
Completion date
2018-09-19
Last updated
2021-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet) once a day (QD) for maintenance of clinical and endoscopic remission in subjects with UC. The duration of treatment for each subject was 6 months.

Interventions

DRUGMesalamine

Pharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use

DRUGPlacebo

Pharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use

Sponsors

Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects aged 18 to 75 years, with Ulcerative Colitis in remission

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of other forms of inflammatory bowel disease * Infectious disease (including human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\], hepatitis B virus \[HBV\], or hepatitis C virus \[HCV\]) * Disease limited to proctitis \<15 cm * Short bowel syndrome * Prior colon resection surgery * History of severe/fulminant UC * Intolerant or allergic to aspirin or salicylate derivatives * Use of rectal formulations (5-aminosalicylic acid \[5-ASA\], steroids) within ≤7 days * Women who are pregnant or nursing * History of known malignancy * History of bleeding disorders, active gastric or active duodenal ulcers, autoimmune diseases, or mental/ emotional disorders, that would interfere with their participation in the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6Month 6The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to RelapseTime from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months)Time to relapse was defined as the number of days from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6Month 6The proportion of subjects with an increase from baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or more points in at least 1 component, or by 1 or more points in at least 2 components were reported. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical Response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6The adjusted mean change from baseline in serum CRP levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult subjects with ulcerative colitis. It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). The total IBDQ was computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. The adjusted mean change from baseline at Month 2, 4, and 6 for the IBDQ total scores were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 2, 4, and 6The proportion of subjects in clinical remission was defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 for stool frequency based on clinical response score component of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score. Clinical response score component had two subscales to assess subject's symptoms: rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes) and stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal). The scores of clinical response component ranged from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Severity of Adverse EventsUp to Month 6The number of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) were presented. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyBaseline, Month 6Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (Hematology): Basophils/Leukocytes: \>=5%, Eosinophils/Leukocytes: \>=10%, Erythrocytes: \<=3.5\*10\^6/μL, Hematocrit: \<=0.32%; \>=0.56%, Hemoglobin: \<=11.5 g/dL, Leukocytes: \<=2.8\*10\^3/μL; \>=16.0\*10\^3/μL, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: \<=10%; \>=80%, Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>=20%, Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<=15%; \>=90%, Platelets: \<=75\*10\^3/μL; \>=700\*10\^3/μL. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: CoagulationBaseline, Month 6Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in coagulation values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (coagulation): Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): \>70 seconds (sec), Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR): \<0.8; \>1.1. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryBaseline, Month 6Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in serum chemistry values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (serum chemistry): Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): \>3\*upper limit of normal (ULN), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP): \>3\*ULN and 25% increase (inc) from baseline (BL), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): \>3\* ULN, Bilirubin: \>=1.5\* ULN, Blood Urea Nitrogen: \>=10.7 mg/dL, Calcium: \<=1.8 mg/dL; \>=3.9 mg/dL, Chloride: \<=90 mmol/L; \>=115 mmol/L, Creatinine: \>=177 mg/dL, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: \>3\*ULN, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): \<30 mL/min, Glucose: \<=2.8 mg/dL; \>=10 mg/dL, Potassium: \<=3.0 mmol/L; \>=5.8 mmol/L, Sodium: \<=130 mmol/L; \>=155 mmol/L. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to Month 6An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical trial. Any AEs includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Any AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] intake) to the end of treatment visit (Month 6) was considered treatment-emergent. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Countries

Bulgaria, Canada, Hungary, Latvia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Switzerland, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 50 sites in 10 countries randomized subjects to this trial between February 2016 to April 2018, the last subject completed last visit in September 2018. Of 403 subjects screened, 276 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either mesalamine or placebo group (138 subjects each), for 6 months.

Pre-assignment details

Of 276 subjects, (a) 53 were rolled-over from Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) who achieved remission after 8-weeks double-blind treatment with placebo (Pathway 1a; 4 subjects) or mesalamine (Pathway 1b; 10 subjects), or an additional 8-weeks open-label treatment with mesalamine (Pathway 2; 39 subjects), and (b) 223 subjects were de novo (Pathway 3).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mesalamine
Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
136
Placebo
Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months.
136
Total272

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse event, non-fatal1116
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn by subject57
Overall StudyProtocol deviation13
Overall StudySubject refused endoscopic procedure01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMesalaminePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants10 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
130 Participants126 Participants256 Participants
Age, Continuous41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.65
43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67
Body Mass Index24.56 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.812
24.89 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.657
24.73 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.729
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
130 Participants127 Participants257 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
130 Participants130 Participants260 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants77 Participants147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants59 Participants125 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1370 / 135
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 13728 / 135
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1373 / 135

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6

The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 682 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 667 Participants
Comparison: Proportions were compared between treatment groups at Month 6.p-value: >0.0595% CI: [0.96, 2.54]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6

The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 2-94.8 mcg/gStandard Deviation 553
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 4-41.7 mcg/gStandard Deviation 533.02
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 6-43.5 mcg/gStandard Deviation 553.13
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 212.8 mcg/gStandard Deviation 509.7
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 453.6 mcg/gStandard Deviation 581.64
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 636.4 mcg/gStandard Deviation 559.98
Comparison: Adjusted mean treatment difference in fecal calprotectin levels over 6 months was reported.p-value: >0.0595% CI: [-140.2, 6.36]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult subjects with ulcerative colitis. It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). The total IBDQ was computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. The adjusted mean change from baseline at Month 2, 4, and 6 for the IBDQ total scores were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6Month 2-1.3 points on a scoreStandard Deviation 17.78
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6Month 4-0.6 points on a scoreStandard Deviation 20.4
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6Month 6-0.5 points on a scoreStandard Deviation 24.8
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6Month 2-0.4 points on a scoreStandard Deviation 20
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6Month 4-0.3 points on a scoreStandard Deviation 18.53
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6Month 6-1.2 points on a scoreStandard Deviation 23.44
Comparison: Adjusted mean treatment difference in IBDQ total scores over 6 months was reported.p-value: >0.0595% CI: [-4.41, 3.77]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6

The adjusted mean change from baseline in serum CRP levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 20.8 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.76
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 41.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 5.69
MesalamineChange From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 60.8 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.67
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 22.2 mg/LStandard Deviation 15.63
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 40.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 5.53
Placebo.Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 62.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 16.66
Comparison: Adjusted mean treatment difference in CRP levels over 6 months was reported.p-value: >0.0595% CI: [-2.7, 0.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical trial. Any AEs includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Any AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] intake) to the end of treatment visit (Month 6) was considered treatment-emergent. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Up to Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set which included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MesalamineNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any Treatment-Emergent AEs42 Participants
MesalamineNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Treatment-Emergent SAEs2 Participants
Placebo.Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any Treatment-Emergent AEs49 Participants
Placebo.Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Treatment-Emergent SAEs3 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6

The proportion of subjects in clinical remission was defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 for stool frequency based on clinical response score component of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score. Clinical response score component had two subscales to assess subject's symptoms: rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes) and stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal). The scores of clinical response component ranged from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Month 2, 4, and 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MesalamineProportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 2122 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 4113 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 696 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 2116 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 4113 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6Month 689 Participants
Comparison: Proportions were compared between treatment groups over 6 months.p-value: >0.0595% CI: [0.76, 2.03]Generalised estimating equation approach
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6

The proportion of subjects with an increase from baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or more points in at least 1 component, or by 1 or more points in at least 2 components were reported. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical Response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 614 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 630 Participants
Comparison: Proportions were compared between treatment groups at Month 6.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [0.19, 0.79]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation

Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in coagulation values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (coagulation): Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): \>70 seconds (sec), Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR): \<0.8; \>1.1. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: CoagulationaPTT: >70 sec0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: CoagulationProthrombin INR: <0.80 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: CoagulationProthrombin INR: >1.146 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: CoagulationProthrombin INR: <0.82 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: CoagulationaPTT: >70 sec0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: CoagulationProthrombin INR: >1.154 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology

Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (Hematology): Basophils/Leukocytes: \>=5%, Eosinophils/Leukocytes: \>=10%, Erythrocytes: \<=3.5\*10\^6/μL, Hematocrit: \<=0.32%; \>=0.56%, Hemoglobin: \<=11.5 g/dL, Leukocytes: \<=2.8\*10\^3/μL; \>=16.0\*10\^3/μL, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: \<=10%; \>=80%, Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>=20%, Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<=15%; \>=90%, Platelets: \<=75\*10\^3/μL; \>=700\*10\^3/μL. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyMonocytes/Leukocytes: >=20%0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyBasophils/Leukocytes: >=5%0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyEosinophils/Leukocytes: >=10%3 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyErythrocytes: <=3.5*10^6/μL2 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyHematocrit: <=0.32%1 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyHematocrit: >=0.56%8 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyHemoglobin: <=11.5 g/dL29 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyLeukocytes: <=2.8*10^3/μL4 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyLeukocytes: >=16.0*10^3/μL2 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyLymphocytes/Leukocytes: <=10%3 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyLymphocytes/Leukocytes: >=80%0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyNeutrophils/Leukocytes: <=15%0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyNeutrophils/Leukocytes: >=90%0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyPlatelets: <=75*10^3/μL0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyPlatelets: >=700*10^3/μL1 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyNeutrophils/Leukocytes: <=15%0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyLeukocytes: >=16.0*10^3/μL0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyBasophils/Leukocytes: >=5%1 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyPlatelets: <=75*10^3/μL0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyEosinophils/Leukocytes: >=10%7 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyLymphocytes/Leukocytes: <=10%4 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyErythrocytes: <=3.5*10^6/μL1 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyNeutrophils/Leukocytes: >=90%0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyHematocrit: <=0.32%0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyLymphocytes/Leukocytes: >=80%0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyHematocrit: >=0.56%12 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyMonocytes/Leukocytes: >=20%1 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyHemoglobin: <=11.5 g/dL23 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyPlatelets: >=700*10^3/μL0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: HematologyLeukocytes: <=2.8*10^3/μL4 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry

Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in serum chemistry values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (serum chemistry): Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): \>3\*upper limit of normal (ULN), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP): \>3\*ULN and 25% increase (inc) from baseline (BL), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): \>3\* ULN, Bilirubin: \>=1.5\* ULN, Blood Urea Nitrogen: \>=10.7 mg/dL, Calcium: \<=1.8 mg/dL; \>=3.9 mg/dL, Chloride: \<=90 mmol/L; \>=115 mmol/L, Creatinine: \>=177 mg/dL, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: \>3\*ULN, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): \<30 mL/min, Glucose: \<=2.8 mg/dL; \>=10 mg/dL, Potassium: \<=3.0 mmol/L; \>=5.8 mmol/L, Sodium: \<=130 mmol/L; \>=155 mmol/L. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryALT: >3*ULN1 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryALP: >3*ULN & 25% inc from BL0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryAST: >3*ULN2 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryBilirubin: >=1.5*ULN8 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryBlood Urea Nitrogen: >=10.7 mg/dL8 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryCalcium: <=1.8 mg/dL0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryCalcium: >=3.9 mg/dL9 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryChloride: <=90 mmol/L0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryChloride: >=115 mmol/L0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryCreatinine: >=177 mg/dL0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryGamma Glutamyl Transferase: >3*ULN6 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryGFR: <30 mL/min0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryGlucose: <=2.8 mg/dL0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryGlucose: >=10 mg/dL11 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryPotassium: <=3.0 mmol/L0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryPotassium: >=5.8 mmol/L0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistrySodium: <=130 mmol/L0 Participants
MesalamineProportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistrySodium: >=155 mmol/L0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryGlucose: >=10 mg/dL14 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryALT: >3*ULN1 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryCreatinine: >=177 mg/dL0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryALP: >3*ULN & 25% inc from BL0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistrySodium: >=155 mmol/L0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryAST: >3*ULN2 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryGamma Glutamyl Transferase: >3*ULN4 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryBilirubin: >=1.5*ULN5 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryPotassium: <=3.0 mmol/L0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryBlood Urea Nitrogen: >=10.7 mg/dL11 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryGFR: <30 mL/min0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryCalcium: <=1.8 mg/dL0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistrySodium: <=130 mmol/L0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryCalcium: >=3.9 mg/dL12 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryGlucose: <=2.8 mg/dL0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryChloride: <=90 mmol/L0 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryPotassium: >=5.8 mmol/L2 Participants
Placebo.Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum ChemistryChloride: >=115 mmol/L0 Participants
Secondary

Severity of Adverse Events

The number of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) were presented. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Up to Month 6

Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MesalamineSeverity of Adverse EventsMild32 Participants
MesalamineSeverity of Adverse EventsModerate18 Participants
MesalamineSeverity of Adverse EventsSevere2 Participants
Placebo.Severity of Adverse EventsMild32 Participants
Placebo.Severity of Adverse EventsModerate22 Participants
Placebo.Severity of Adverse EventsSevere3 Participants
Secondary

Time to Relapse

Time to relapse was defined as the number of days from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MesalamineTime to RelapseNA days
Placebo.Time to RelapseNA days
Comparison: Times to relapse were compared between treatment groups up to 6 months.p-value: >0.0595% CI: [0.25, 1.44]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026