Ulcerative Colitis
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet) once a day (QD) for maintenance of clinical and endoscopic remission in subjects with UC. The duration of treatment for each subject was 6 months.
Interventions
Pharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use
Pharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female subjects aged 18 to 75 years, with Ulcerative Colitis in remission
Exclusion criteria
* Evidence of other forms of inflammatory bowel disease * Infectious disease (including human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\], hepatitis B virus \[HBV\], or hepatitis C virus \[HCV\]) * Disease limited to proctitis \<15 cm * Short bowel syndrome * Prior colon resection surgery * History of severe/fulminant UC * Intolerant or allergic to aspirin or salicylate derivatives * Use of rectal formulations (5-aminosalicylic acid \[5-ASA\], steroids) within ≤7 days * Women who are pregnant or nursing * History of known malignancy * History of bleeding disorders, active gastric or active duodenal ulcers, autoimmune diseases, or mental/ emotional disorders, that would interfere with their participation in the trial
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6 | Month 6 | The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Relapse | Time from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months) | Time to relapse was defined as the number of days from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6 | Month 6 | The proportion of subjects with an increase from baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or more points in at least 1 component, or by 1 or more points in at least 2 components were reported. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical Response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6 | The adjusted mean change from baseline in serum CRP levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6 | The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6 | Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6 | The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult subjects with ulcerative colitis. It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). The total IBDQ was computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. The adjusted mean change from baseline at Month 2, 4, and 6 for the IBDQ total scores were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2, 4, and 6 | The proportion of subjects in clinical remission was defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 for stool frequency based on clinical response score component of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score. Clinical response score component had two subscales to assess subject's symptoms: rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes) and stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal). The scores of clinical response component ranged from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Severity of Adverse Events | Up to Month 6 | The number of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) were presented. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Baseline, Month 6 | Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (Hematology): Basophils/Leukocytes: \>=5%, Eosinophils/Leukocytes: \>=10%, Erythrocytes: \<=3.5\*10\^6/μL, Hematocrit: \<=0.32%; \>=0.56%, Hemoglobin: \<=11.5 g/dL, Leukocytes: \<=2.8\*10\^3/μL; \>=16.0\*10\^3/μL, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: \<=10%; \>=80%, Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>=20%, Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<=15%; \>=90%, Platelets: \<=75\*10\^3/μL; \>=700\*10\^3/μL. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation | Baseline, Month 6 | Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in coagulation values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (coagulation): Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): \>70 seconds (sec), Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR): \<0.8; \>1.1. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Baseline, Month 6 | Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in serum chemistry values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (serum chemistry): Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): \>3\*upper limit of normal (ULN), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP): \>3\*ULN and 25% increase (inc) from baseline (BL), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): \>3\* ULN, Bilirubin: \>=1.5\* ULN, Blood Urea Nitrogen: \>=10.7 mg/dL, Calcium: \<=1.8 mg/dL; \>=3.9 mg/dL, Chloride: \<=90 mmol/L; \>=115 mmol/L, Creatinine: \>=177 mg/dL, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: \>3\*ULN, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): \<30 mL/min, Glucose: \<=2.8 mg/dL; \>=10 mg/dL, Potassium: \<=3.0 mmol/L; \>=5.8 mmol/L, Sodium: \<=130 mmol/L; \>=155 mmol/L. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
| Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Up to Month 6 | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical trial. Any AEs includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Any AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] intake) to the end of treatment visit (Month 6) was considered treatment-emergent. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways. |
Countries
Bulgaria, Canada, Hungary, Latvia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Switzerland, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 50 sites in 10 countries randomized subjects to this trial between February 2016 to April 2018, the last subject completed last visit in September 2018. Of 403 subjects screened, 276 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either mesalamine or placebo group (138 subjects each), for 6 months.
Pre-assignment details
Of 276 subjects, (a) 53 were rolled-over from Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) who achieved remission after 8-weeks double-blind treatment with placebo (Pathway 1a; 4 subjects) or mesalamine (Pathway 1b; 10 subjects), or an additional 8-weeks open-label treatment with mesalamine (Pathway 2; 39 subjects), and (b) 223 subjects were de novo (Pathway 3).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Mesalamine Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months. | 136 |
| Placebo Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months. | 136 |
| Total | 272 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse event, non-fatal | 11 | 16 |
| Overall Study | Consent withdrawn by subject | 5 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Protocol deviation | 1 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Subject refused endoscopic procedure | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Mesalamine | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 6 Participants | 10 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 130 Participants | 126 Participants | 256 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 41.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 | 45.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.65 | 43.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67 |
| Body Mass Index | 24.56 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.812 | 24.89 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.657 | 24.73 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.729 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 130 Participants | 127 Participants | 257 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 130 Participants | 130 Participants | 260 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 70 Participants | 77 Participants | 147 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 66 Participants | 59 Participants | 125 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 137 | 0 / 135 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 23 / 137 | 28 / 135 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 137 | 3 / 135 |
Outcome results
Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6
The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Month 6
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6 | 82 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6 | 67 Participants |
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2 | -94.8 mcg/g | Standard Deviation 553 |
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 4 | -41.7 mcg/g | Standard Deviation 533.02 |
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 6 | -43.5 mcg/g | Standard Deviation 553.13 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2 | 12.8 mcg/g | Standard Deviation 509.7 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 4 | 53.6 mcg/g | Standard Deviation 581.64 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 6 | 36.4 mcg/g | Standard Deviation 559.98 |
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult subjects with ulcerative colitis. It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). The total IBDQ was computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. The adjusted mean change from baseline at Month 2, 4, and 6 for the IBDQ total scores were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2 | -1.3 points on a score | Standard Deviation 17.78 |
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6 | Month 4 | -0.6 points on a score | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6 | Month 6 | -0.5 points on a score | Standard Deviation 24.8 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2 | -0.4 points on a score | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6 | Month 4 | -0.3 points on a score | Standard Deviation 18.53 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6 | Month 6 | -1.2 points on a score | Standard Deviation 23.44 |
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
The adjusted mean change from baseline in serum CRP levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2 | 0.8 mg/L | Standard Deviation 4.76 |
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 4 | 1.0 mg/L | Standard Deviation 5.69 |
| Mesalamine | Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 6 | 0.8 mg/L | Standard Deviation 3.67 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2 | 2.2 mg/L | Standard Deviation 15.63 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 4 | 0.9 mg/L | Standard Deviation 5.53 |
| Placebo. | Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 6 | 2.5 mg/L | Standard Deviation 16.66 |
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical trial. Any AEs includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Any AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product \[IMP\] intake) to the end of treatment visit (Month 6) was considered treatment-emergent. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Up to Month 6
Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set which included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of IMP.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Any Treatment-Emergent AEs | 42 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Treatment-Emergent SAEs | 2 Participants |
| Placebo. | Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Any Treatment-Emergent AEs | 49 Participants |
| Placebo. | Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Treatment-Emergent SAEs | 3 Participants |
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
The proportion of subjects in clinical remission was defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 for stool frequency based on clinical response score component of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score. Clinical response score component had two subscales to assess subject's symptoms: rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes) and stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal). The scores of clinical response component ranged from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Month 2, 4, and 6
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2 | 122 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 4 | 113 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 6 | 96 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 2 | 116 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 4 | 113 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6 | Month 6 | 89 Participants |
Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6
The proportion of subjects with an increase from baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or more points in at least 1 component, or by 1 or more points in at least 2 components were reported. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical Response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (\>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Month 6
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6 | 14 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6 | 30 Participants |
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in coagulation values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (coagulation): Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): \>70 seconds (sec), Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR): \<0.8; \>1.1. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation | aPTT: >70 sec | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation | Prothrombin INR: <0.8 | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation | Prothrombin INR: >1.1 | 46 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation | Prothrombin INR: <0.8 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation | aPTT: >70 sec | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation | Prothrombin INR: >1.1 | 54 Participants |
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (Hematology): Basophils/Leukocytes: \>=5%, Eosinophils/Leukocytes: \>=10%, Erythrocytes: \<=3.5\*10\^6/μL, Hematocrit: \<=0.32%; \>=0.56%, Hemoglobin: \<=11.5 g/dL, Leukocytes: \<=2.8\*10\^3/μL; \>=16.0\*10\^3/μL, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: \<=10%; \>=80%, Monocytes/Leukocytes: \>=20%, Neutrophils/Leukocytes: \<=15%; \>=90%, Platelets: \<=75\*10\^3/μL; \>=700\*10\^3/μL. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Monocytes/Leukocytes: >=20% | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Basophils/Leukocytes: >=5% | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Eosinophils/Leukocytes: >=10% | 3 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Erythrocytes: <=3.5*10^6/μL | 2 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Hematocrit: <=0.32% | 1 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Hematocrit: >=0.56% | 8 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Hemoglobin: <=11.5 g/dL | 29 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Leukocytes: <=2.8*10^3/μL | 4 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Leukocytes: >=16.0*10^3/μL | 2 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: <=10% | 3 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: >=80% | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Neutrophils/Leukocytes: <=15% | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Neutrophils/Leukocytes: >=90% | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Platelets: <=75*10^3/μL | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Platelets: >=700*10^3/μL | 1 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Neutrophils/Leukocytes: <=15% | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Leukocytes: >=16.0*10^3/μL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Basophils/Leukocytes: >=5% | 1 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Platelets: <=75*10^3/μL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Eosinophils/Leukocytes: >=10% | 7 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: <=10% | 4 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Erythrocytes: <=3.5*10^6/μL | 1 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Neutrophils/Leukocytes: >=90% | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Hematocrit: <=0.32% | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: >=80% | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Hematocrit: >=0.56% | 12 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Monocytes/Leukocytes: >=20% | 1 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Hemoglobin: <=11.5 g/dL | 23 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Platelets: >=700*10^3/μL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology | Leukocytes: <=2.8*10^3/μL | 4 Participants |
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in serum chemistry values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (serum chemistry): Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): \>3\*upper limit of normal (ULN), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP): \>3\*ULN and 25% increase (inc) from baseline (BL), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): \>3\* ULN, Bilirubin: \>=1.5\* ULN, Blood Urea Nitrogen: \>=10.7 mg/dL, Calcium: \<=1.8 mg/dL; \>=3.9 mg/dL, Chloride: \<=90 mmol/L; \>=115 mmol/L, Creatinine: \>=177 mg/dL, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: \>3\*ULN, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): \<30 mL/min, Glucose: \<=2.8 mg/dL; \>=10 mg/dL, Potassium: \<=3.0 mmol/L; \>=5.8 mmol/L, Sodium: \<=130 mmol/L; \>=155 mmol/L. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of subjects with available data at specified category for each arm, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | ALT: >3*ULN | 1 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | ALP: >3*ULN & 25% inc from BL | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | AST: >3*ULN | 2 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Bilirubin: >=1.5*ULN | 8 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Blood Urea Nitrogen: >=10.7 mg/dL | 8 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Calcium: <=1.8 mg/dL | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Calcium: >=3.9 mg/dL | 9 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Chloride: <=90 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Chloride: >=115 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Creatinine: >=177 mg/dL | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: >3*ULN | 6 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | GFR: <30 mL/min | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Glucose: <=2.8 mg/dL | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Glucose: >=10 mg/dL | 11 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Potassium: <=3.0 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Potassium: >=5.8 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Sodium: <=130 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Sodium: >=155 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Glucose: >=10 mg/dL | 14 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | ALT: >3*ULN | 1 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Creatinine: >=177 mg/dL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | ALP: >3*ULN & 25% inc from BL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Sodium: >=155 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | AST: >3*ULN | 2 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: >3*ULN | 4 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Bilirubin: >=1.5*ULN | 5 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Potassium: <=3.0 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Blood Urea Nitrogen: >=10.7 mg/dL | 11 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | GFR: <30 mL/min | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Calcium: <=1.8 mg/dL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Sodium: <=130 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Calcium: >=3.9 mg/dL | 12 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Glucose: <=2.8 mg/dL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Chloride: <=90 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Potassium: >=5.8 mmol/L | 2 Participants |
| Placebo. | Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry | Chloride: >=115 mmol/L | 0 Participants |
Severity of Adverse Events
The number of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) were presented. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Up to Month 6
Population: The analysis was based on safety analysis set.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Severity of Adverse Events | Mild | 32 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Severity of Adverse Events | Moderate | 18 Participants |
| Mesalamine | Severity of Adverse Events | Severe | 2 Participants |
| Placebo. | Severity of Adverse Events | Mild | 32 Participants |
| Placebo. | Severity of Adverse Events | Moderate | 22 Participants |
| Placebo. | Severity of Adverse Events | Severe | 3 Participants |
Time to Relapse
Time to relapse was defined as the number of days from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Time frame: Time from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months)
Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who were assigned to mesalamine 4 g extended release granules in Trial 000174 (NCT02522767) (Pathway 1b) or randomized via Pathways 2 or 3.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Time to Relapse | NA days |
| Placebo. | Time to Relapse | NA days |