Skip to content

Administration of Subanesthetic Dose of Ketamine and Electroconvulsive Treatment for Treatment Resistant Depression

Administration of Subanesthetic Dose of Ketamine and Electroconvulsive Treatment on Alternate Week Days in Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression: A Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02522377
Enrollment
15
Registered
2015-08-13
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2018-03-01
Last updated
2019-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder, Severe Depression, Treatment Resistant Depression

Keywords

Ketamine, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment Resistant Depression, electroconvulsive treatment, Severe depression

Brief summary

In this proof of concept study, the investigators plan to administer iv ketamine interleaved with ECT days. Patients with treatment resistant depression who are deemed to be eligible for ECT treatment will randomly be assigned to either ketamine or active placebo.

Detailed description

The study will compare the effects of standard ketamine dosing with an active placebo arm. Hypothesis 1: The investigators hypothesize that interleaved Electroconvulsive Treatment and active ketamine treatment will lead to a meaningful clinical improvement compared to Electroconvulsive Treatment and placebo treatment arm. Hypothesis 2: The investigators hypothesize that interleaved Electroconvulsive Treatment and active ketamine treatment will attenuate cognitive side effects. Methods and Design: Patients with treatment resistant depression who are deemed to be eligible for Electroconvulsive Treatment will randomly be assigned to either ketamine or active placebo Electroconvulsive Treatments: All patients (independent of their depression scores) will receive the same Electroconvulsive Treatment parameters: Bi-frontal brief pulse (0.5 miliseconds) Electroconvulsive Treatment administered by using Thymatron Electroconvulsive Treatment machine. Study blinding: Neither the patients, nor the treating psychiatrist or the nurse will be aware of the patient's assigned arm. The success of blinding will be tested after each ketamine treatment with a questionnaire given to the subject, raters, and treating physician.

Interventions

DRUGKetamine

inter venous injections

DRUGMidazolam

inter venous injections

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males/females at least 18 years of age but no older than 65 years of age 2. Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for Major Depression or Bipolar Disorder, depressed phase, as determined by a clinician's diagnostic evaluation and confirmed by interview using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI PLUS 5.0.0) 3. A current depressive episode that has lasted a minimum of 4 weeks. 4. Have \> 3 trials of antidepressants/augmentation strategies. 5. Have a support system capable of transporting the patient post-treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, mental retardation, pervasive developmental disorder. 2. Meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for other substance/alcohol dependence within the past 6 months or abuse in the past 3 months. 3. Patients who meet

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) at Last Infusionvisit 17Change in HAMD-17 at Infusion 6. Scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores representing more depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Last Infusionvisit 17Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) at Last Infusionvisit 17MoCA scores range between 0 and 30. Higher scores reflect higher cognition.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) at Last Infusionvisit 17The number of words remembered are recorded. Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores reflecting better acquisition.
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) at Last Infusionvisit 17This is a verbal fluency measure. Outcome is the count of words that meet criteria within 1 minute, so the minimum is 0 and no fixed maximum exists. Higher scores reflect a better outcome.
Responder Rate on HAMD-17 by Last Infusionvisit 17Count of the patients who showed response (\>50% decrease).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with TRD who are admitted to the inpatient psychiatric to receive an acute series of ECT will randomly be assigned to one of the study arms.

Pre-assignment details

15 patients with TRD, who were referred to the Cleveland Clinic outpatient depression clinic or ECT service, were recruited in the study. 3 subjects were lost prior to randomization. 2 subjects were lost to follow up after the screening visit, and 1 subject withdrew consent after the baseline visit.12 patients were included in the final analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ketamine Infusions
Subjects who are randomized to be on this group will receive a standard dose of ketamine interleaved with Electroconvulsive Treatments. Ketamine: intervenous injections
7
Midazolam
Subjects who are randomized to be on this group will receive midazolam infusions interleaved with Electroconvulsive Treatments. Midazolam: intervenous injections
5
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyRemission Achieved30
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicKetamine InfusionsMidazolamTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous39.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
37.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Caucasian
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants5 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 70 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) at Last Infusion

Change in HAMD-17 at Infusion 6. Scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores representing more depression.

Time frame: visit 17

Population: Analysis was performed on all patients using a mixed effect model. Maximum likelihood estimation allowed for inclusion of all patients, even when loss to follow-up or remission occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketamine InfusionsHamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) at Last Infusion13.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.62
MidazolamHamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) at Last Infusion14.97 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.85
p-value: 0.72Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Last Infusion

Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60

Time frame: visit 17

Population: Analysis was performed using mixed effect models. Maximum likelihood estimation allowed inclusion of all patients in analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketamine InfusionsMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Last Infusion22.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.52
MidazolamMontgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Last Infusion24.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.93
p-value: 0.77Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) at Last Infusion

This is a verbal fluency measure. Outcome is the count of words that meet criteria within 1 minute, so the minimum is 0 and no fixed maximum exists. Higher scores reflect a better outcome.

Time frame: visit 17

Population: Analysis was performed on all patients using a mixed effect model. Maximum likelihood estimation allowed for inclusion of all patients, even when loss to follow-up or remission occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketamine InfusionsControlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) at Last Infusion33.45 number of wordsStandard Error 2.83
MidazolamControlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) at Last Infusion37.17 number of wordsStandard Error 3.03
p-value: 0.34Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) at Last Infusion

The number of words remembered are recorded. Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores reflecting better acquisition.

Time frame: visit 17

Population: Analysis was performed on all patients using a mixed effect model. Maximum likelihood estimation allowed for inclusion of all patients, even when loss to follow-up or remission occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketamine InfusionsHopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) at Last Infusion9.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
MidazolamHopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) at Last Infusion11.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
p-value: 0.009Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) at Last Infusion

MoCA scores range between 0 and 30. Higher scores reflect higher cognition.

Time frame: visit 17

Population: Analysis was performed on all patients using a mixed effect model. Maximum likelihood estimation allowed for inclusion of all patients, even when loss to follow-up or remission occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ketamine InfusionsMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) at Last Infusion24.81 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
MidazolamMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) at Last Infusion25.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
p-value: 0.4Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Responder Rate on HAMD-17 by Last Infusion

Count of the patients who showed response (\>50% decrease).

Time frame: visit 17

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ketamine InfusionsResponder Rate on HAMD-17 by Last InfusionResponse3 Participants
Ketamine InfusionsResponder Rate on HAMD-17 by Last InfusionNo Response4 Participants
MidazolamResponder Rate on HAMD-17 by Last InfusionNo Response4 Participants
MidazolamResponder Rate on HAMD-17 by Last InfusionResponse1 Participants
p-value: 0.5895% CI: [0.01, 7.2]Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026