Skip to content

Immediate Changes After Manual Therapy in Patients With Non-specific Back Pain

Immediate Changes After Manual Therapy Techniques in Patients With Persistent Non-specific Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02520648
Acronym
EffDorsMan
Enrollment
125
Registered
2015-08-13
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Keywords

Back pain, Manual therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to investigate the immediate effects of neuro-lymphatic treatment, thoracic vertebral and costal articulatory in terms of back pain levels, cervical and dorsal flexibility, sense of body comfort and satisfaction with the treatment received.

Detailed description

Subjects: The study was conducted at the Faculty of Physiotherapy of the University of Valencia (Spain). Persistent non-specific back pain subjects between 20 and 30 years old were recruited and voluntarily participated in the study. Excluded subjects with musculoskeletal injuries such as spine or balance disorders, those which were recovering from an injury of the locomotor or neurological system, or those who had sequelae from any trauma suffered in the past six months that could affect the results of the study. Study design: The conducted study was an experimental, longitudinal and prospective, controlled, randomized and single-blind design (subjects and therapists didn't know the objectives of the treatment nor how many treatments were offered, evaluators were unaware of the treatments applied). There were 3 groups: a) neuro-lymphatic treatment; b) vertebral articulatory treatment; c) proximal costal articulatory treatment.

Interventions

OTHERArticulatory costal Manual therapy

The therapist performs costal-vertebral articulatory movement, from 1st to 12th rib (level of the outside paravertebral muscles, at a distance of 4 fingers from the spinous apophysis on the back of the costal body) applying a sustained pressure during expiratory time and promoting its biomechanics, up to the articulatory barrier.

OTHERNeuro-lymphatic treatment

The physical therapist applied direct firm rotary pressure, via thumb or tip finger, for 1 minute, from the transverse processes of T1 to the transverse processes of T12. To finish the intervention, hands were placed on the skull and sacrum during 2 minutes without movement.

OTHERArticulatory spinal manual therapy

Then the therapist performs pressures in the transverse apophysis from D1 to D12 (level of the paravertebral muscles, at a distance of 2 fingers of the spinous apophysis), applying sustained pressure during expiratory time until the articulatory barrier is reached.

Sponsors

University of Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-specific Back Pain subjects between 20 and 30 years old were recruited and voluntarily participated in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Excluded subjects with musculoskeletal injuries such as spine or balance disorders * Those which were recovering from an injury of the locomotor or neurological system, or * Those who had sequelae from any trauma suffered in the past six months that could affect the results of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Test sit-and-reach15 minutes after treatmentTest sit-and-reach or finger-floor distance. The subject remains standing on a box designed for this purpose, leaving the arms and trunk relaxed. In this position the subject flexes the trunk forward and maintains its maximum flexion for 3 seconds. This is repeated and the most favorable is measured. There is a vertical scale with a range of 50 cm (25 cm negative and 25cm positive). The evaluator is placed next to the scale and records the furthest measure touched by the fingertips of both hands. If the hands reach different measures, the shortest is recorded.
Cervical extension15 minutes after treatmentGlobal cervical movement was evaluated with cervical goniometer. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) system combines inclinometers and magnets arranged on a head support and also supported on the nose bone.
Cervical inclination15 minutes after treatmentGlobal cervical movement on both sides was evaluated with cervical goniometer. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) system combines inclinometers and magnets arranged on a head support and also supported on the nose bone.
Cervical rotation15 minutes after treatmentGlobal cervical movement on both sides was evaluated with cervical goniometer. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) system combines inclinometers and magnets arranged on a head support and also supported on the nose bone.
Cervical flexion15 minutes after treatmentCervical movement was evaluated with cervical goniometer. The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) system combines inclinometers and magnets arranged on a head support and also supported on the nose bone.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
McGill pain perception15 minutes after treatmentThe McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) evaluates quantitatively three dimensions of pain. This questionnaire evaluates quantitative and qualitative aspects of pain, such as location, quality, intensity and temporal characteristics. They are gathered into several categories which in turn form four large groups: sensory, emotional, evaluative and miscellaneous.
Patient global impression of change scale15 minutes after treatmentthe Patient global impression of change scale, it has 7 affirmations to choose from and a pain analogue scale of 10 cm. (Hurst H and J Bolton). This questionnaire was passed only after treatment.
Satisfaction / comfort15 minutes after treatmentTwo questionnaires were used. They were designed for this purpose and adapted. They included assessment of sense of wellbeing and comfort on 7 different body areas through a 10 cm scale where 0 is absolute discomfort and 10 full comfort. Subsequently, 16 affirmations were included (to be confirmed), of which 4 are inverted which are scored with a Likert scale of 1 to 5.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026