Ulcerative Colitis
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary objectives of this study are as follows: 1) To evaluate the efficacy of andecaliximab to induce endoscopy, rectal bleeding, and stool frequency (EBS) clinical remission at Week 8 (Cohort 1); 2) To evaluate the efficacy of andecaliximab to maintain EBS clinical remission at Week 52 (Cohort 2); and 3) To evaluate the safety and tolerability of andecaliximab. The study will consist of 3 parts: Induction Phase (Cohort 1), Maintenance Phase (Cohort 2), and an optional Extended Treatment Phase.
Interventions
Andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection
Placebo matched to andecaliximab administered via SC injection
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Ulcerative Colitis (UC) confirmed on endoscopy * Moderately to severely active UC (Mayo Score 6-12) * May be receiving oral 5-aminosalicylate (ASA), oral corticosteroid, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine (MP), or methotrexate * Treatment failure with at least one of the following agents received: corticosteroids, immunomodulators, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) antagonists, vedolizumab Key
Exclusion criteria
* Diagnose of Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis * Pregnant or lactating females * Any chronic medical condition (including, but not limited to cardiac or pulmonary disease, alcohol or drug abuse) * Exhibit severe UC / clinically significant active infection * History of malignancy in the last 5 years Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 8 | Week 8 | EBS clinical remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes); and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1 (stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 8 | Week 8 | The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA. The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening. The MCS response was defined as a MCS reduction of ≥ 3 points and at least 30% from baseline, with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. |
| For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8 | Week 8 | Endoscopic remission was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). |
| For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 8 | Week 8 | The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and physician's global assessment (PGA). The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. The MCS remission was defined as a MCS of ≤ 2 points and no individual subscore \> 1 point. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening. |
| For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 8 | Week 8 | Mucosal healing was defined as elimination of ulcers/erosion, elimination of crypt destruction, elimination of intraepithelial neutrophils, elimination of lamina propria neutrophils, and reduction in lamina propria chronic inflammatory cells to at most a mild increase. When measured by the Geboes histologic scoring system, it was the selection of the following combined scores of ≤ 3 for Grade 0 (Structural Architectural Change), ≤ 1 for Grade 1 (Chronic Inflammatory Infiltrate), ≤ 3 for Grade 2A (Lamina Propria Eosinophils), and 0 for Grade 2B (Lamina Propria Neutrophils), Grade 3 (Neutrophils in Epithelium), Grade 4 (Crypt Destruction), and Grade 5 (Erosion or Ulceration). Total Geboes histologic score ranged from 0 to 22, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. |
| For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 8 | Week 8 | The MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as a rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease) of 0, and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]) of 0 or 1 for an overall MCS of ≤ 1. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening. |
| For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 8 | Week 8 | Endoscopic response was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were enrolled at study sites in South Africa, Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific. The first participant was screened on 15 September 2015. The last study visit occurred on 22 November 2016.
Pre-assignment details
241 participants were screened.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks Blinded Induction Phase: Participants received andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection alternating with matching placebo weekly for a total of 4 doses of andecaliximab.
Blinded Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved EBS clinical remission and/or MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, continued to receive andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection alternating with matching placebo weekly for up to approximately 40 weeks.
Open-Label Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved neither EBS clinical remission nor MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, were offered open-label andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 41 weeks. | 54 |
| Andecaliximab Weekly Blinded Induction Phase: Participants received andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for a total of 8 doses.
Blinded Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved EBS clinical remission and/or MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, continued to receive andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 33 weeks.
Open-Label Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved neither EBS clinical remission nor MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, were offered open-label andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 34 weeks. | 56 |
| Placebo Blinded Induction Phase: Participants received placebo matched to andecaliximab administered via SC injection once weekly for a total of 8 doses.
Blinded Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved EBS clinical remission and/or MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, continued to receive placebo matched to andecaliximab administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 39 weeks.
Open-Label Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved neither EBS clinical remission nor MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, were offered open-label andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 38 weeks. | 55 |
| Total | 165 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blinded Induction Phase: Up to Week 8 | Adverse Event | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Blinded Induction Phase: Up to Week 8 | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Blinded Induction Phase: Up to Week 8 | Withdrew Consent | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Blinded Maintenance Phase: Up to Week 51 | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Blinded Maintenance Phase: Up to Week 51 | Disease Worsening | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Blinded Maintenance Phase: Up to Week 51 | Disposition Error | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Blinded Maintenance Phase: Up to Week 51 | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 17 | 11 | 15 |
| Open-Label MaintenancePhase: Upto Week51 | Adverse Event | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Open-Label MaintenancePhase: Upto Week51 | Investigator's Discretion | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Open-Label MaintenancePhase: Upto Week51 | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 25 | 29 | 28 |
| Open-Label MaintenancePhase: Upto Week51 | Withdrew Consent | 3 | 4 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Andecaliximab Weekly | Total | Placebo | Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 43 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 | 43 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 | 43 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 | 44 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Not Hispanic or Latino | 56 Participants | 161 Participants | 51 Participants | 54 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Not Permitted | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Asian | 4 Participants | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black | 3 Participants | 10 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Not Permitted | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 48 Participants | 141 Participants | 45 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Bulgaria | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ireland | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Latvia | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment New Zealand | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 4 Participants | 23 Participants | 8 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Romania | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 4 Participants | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Slovakia | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Africa | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Korea | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ukraine | 3 Participants | 9 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 20 Participants | 61 Participants | 21 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 18 Participants | 61 Participants | 24 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 38 Participants | 104 Participants | 31 Participants | 35 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 54 | 0 / 56 | 0 / 55 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 16 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 32 | 0 / 35 | 0 / 34 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 24 / 54 | 31 / 56 | 26 / 55 | 12 / 20 | 12 / 16 | 13 / 18 | 9 / 32 | 6 / 35 | 12 / 34 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 54 | 2 / 56 | 1 / 55 | 1 / 20 | 2 / 16 | 1 / 18 | 1 / 32 | 3 / 35 | 2 / 34 |
Outcome results
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 8
EBS clinical remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes); and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1 (stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal).
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the Blinded Induction Phase (Cohort 1).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 8 | 7.4 percentage of participants |
| Andecaliximab Weekly | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 8 | 1.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 8 | 7.3 percentage of participants |
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8
Endoscopic remission was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8 | 3.7 percentage of participants |
| Andecaliximab Weekly | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8 | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8 | 5.5 percentage of participants |
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 8
Endoscopic response was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 8 | 18.5 percentage of participants |
| Andecaliximab Weekly | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 8 | 7.1 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 8 | 14.5 percentage of participants |
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 8
The MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as a rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease) of 0, and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]) of 0 or 1 for an overall MCS of ≤ 1. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 8 | 1.9 percentage of participants |
| Andecaliximab Weekly | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 8 | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 8 | 0.0 percentage of participants |
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 8
The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and physician's global assessment (PGA). The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. The MCS remission was defined as a MCS of ≤ 2 points and no individual subscore \> 1 point. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 8 | 7.4 percentage of participants |
| Andecaliximab Weekly | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 8 | 1.8 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 8 | 7.3 percentage of participants |
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 8
The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA. The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening. The MCS response was defined as a MCS reduction of ≥ 3 points and at least 30% from baseline, with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 8 | 46.3 percentage of participants |
| Andecaliximab Weekly | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 8 | 30.4 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 8 | 30.9 percentage of participants |
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 8
Mucosal healing was defined as elimination of ulcers/erosion, elimination of crypt destruction, elimination of intraepithelial neutrophils, elimination of lamina propria neutrophils, and reduction in lamina propria chronic inflammatory cells to at most a mild increase. When measured by the Geboes histologic scoring system, it was the selection of the following combined scores of ≤ 3 for Grade 0 (Structural Architectural Change), ≤ 1 for Grade 1 (Chronic Inflammatory Infiltrate), ≤ 3 for Grade 2A (Lamina Propria Eosinophils), and 0 for Grade 2B (Lamina Propria Neutrophils), Grade 3 (Neutrophils in Epithelium), Grade 4 (Crypt Destruction), and Grade 5 (Erosion or Ulceration). Total Geboes histologic score ranged from 0 to 22, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Time frame: Week 8
Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set who did not meet the mucosal healing definition at baseline were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 8 | 18.0 percentage of participants |
| Andecaliximab Weekly | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 8 | 13.7 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 8 | 22.0 percentage of participants |