Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Andecaliximab (GS-5745) in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

A Combined Phase 2/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Induction and Maintenance Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of GS-5745 in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02520284
Enrollment
165
Registered
2015-08-11
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2019-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this study are as follows: 1) To evaluate the efficacy of andecaliximab to induce endoscopy, rectal bleeding, and stool frequency (EBS) clinical remission at Week 8 (Cohort 1); 2) To evaluate the efficacy of andecaliximab to maintain EBS clinical remission at Week 52 (Cohort 2); and 3) To evaluate the safety and tolerability of andecaliximab. The study will consist of 3 parts: Induction Phase (Cohort 1), Maintenance Phase (Cohort 2), and an optional Extended Treatment Phase.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAndecaliximab

Andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Placebo matched to andecaliximab administered via SC injection

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Ulcerative Colitis (UC) confirmed on endoscopy * Moderately to severely active UC (Mayo Score 6-12) * May be receiving oral 5-aminosalicylate (ASA), oral corticosteroid, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine (MP), or methotrexate * Treatment failure with at least one of the following agents received: corticosteroids, immunomodulators, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) antagonists, vedolizumab Key

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnose of Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis * Pregnant or lactating females * Any chronic medical condition (including, but not limited to cardiac or pulmonary disease, alcohol or drug abuse) * Exhibit severe UC / clinically significant active infection * History of malignancy in the last 5 years Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 8Week 8EBS clinical remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes); and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1 (stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 8Week 8The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA. The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening. The MCS response was defined as a MCS reduction of ≥ 3 points and at least 30% from baseline, with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8Week 8Endoscopic remission was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 8Week 8The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and physician's global assessment (PGA). The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. The MCS remission was defined as a MCS of ≤ 2 points and no individual subscore \> 1 point. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening.
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 8Week 8Mucosal healing was defined as elimination of ulcers/erosion, elimination of crypt destruction, elimination of intraepithelial neutrophils, elimination of lamina propria neutrophils, and reduction in lamina propria chronic inflammatory cells to at most a mild increase. When measured by the Geboes histologic scoring system, it was the selection of the following combined scores of ≤ 3 for Grade 0 (Structural Architectural Change), ≤ 1 for Grade 1 (Chronic Inflammatory Infiltrate), ≤ 3 for Grade 2A (Lamina Propria Eosinophils), and 0 for Grade 2B (Lamina Propria Neutrophils), Grade 3 (Neutrophils in Epithelium), Grade 4 (Crypt Destruction), and Grade 5 (Erosion or Ulceration). Total Geboes histologic score ranged from 0 to 22, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 8Week 8The MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as a rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease) of 0, and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]) of 0 or 1 for an overall MCS of ≤ 1. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening.
For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 8Week 8Endoscopic response was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in South Africa, Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific. The first participant was screened on 15 September 2015. The last study visit occurred on 22 November 2016.

Pre-assignment details

241 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Andecaliximab Every 2 Weeks
Blinded Induction Phase: Participants received andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection alternating with matching placebo weekly for a total of 4 doses of andecaliximab. Blinded Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved EBS clinical remission and/or MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, continued to receive andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection alternating with matching placebo weekly for up to approximately 40 weeks. Open-Label Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved neither EBS clinical remission nor MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, were offered open-label andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 41 weeks.
54
Andecaliximab Weekly
Blinded Induction Phase: Participants received andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for a total of 8 doses. Blinded Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved EBS clinical remission and/or MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, continued to receive andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 33 weeks. Open-Label Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved neither EBS clinical remission nor MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, were offered open-label andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 34 weeks.
56
Placebo
Blinded Induction Phase: Participants received placebo matched to andecaliximab administered via SC injection once weekly for a total of 8 doses. Blinded Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved EBS clinical remission and/or MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, continued to receive placebo matched to andecaliximab administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 39 weeks. Open-Label Maintenance Phase: Participants who achieved neither EBS clinical remission nor MCS response, based on Week 8 assessments, were offered open-label andecaliximab 150 mg administered via SC injection once weekly for up to approximately 38 weeks.
55
Total165

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Blinded Induction Phase: Up to Week 8Adverse Event130
Blinded Induction Phase: Up to Week 8Study Terminated by Sponsor001
Blinded Induction Phase: Up to Week 8Withdrew Consent111
Blinded Maintenance Phase: Up to Week 51Adverse Event110
Blinded Maintenance Phase: Up to Week 51Disease Worsening223
Blinded Maintenance Phase: Up to Week 51Disposition Error020
Blinded Maintenance Phase: Up to Week 51Study Terminated by Sponsor171115
Open-Label MaintenancePhase: Upto Week51Adverse Event213
Open-Label MaintenancePhase: Upto Week51Investigator's Discretion211
Open-Label MaintenancePhase: Upto Week51Study Terminated by Sponsor252928
Open-Label MaintenancePhase: Upto Week51Withdrew Consent342

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAndecaliximab WeeklyTotalPlaceboAndecaliximab Every 2 Weeks
Age, Continuous43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
56 Participants161 Participants51 Participants54 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Permitted
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
4 Participants10 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black
3 Participants10 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Not Permitted
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
48 Participants141 Participants45 Participants48 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
3 Participants6 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
2 Participants5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
4 Participants23 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
2 Participants7 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
4 Participants10 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
3 Participants7 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
3 Participants9 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
2 Participants6 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants61 Participants21 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants61 Participants24 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants104 Participants31 Participants35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 560 / 550 / 200 / 160 / 180 / 320 / 350 / 34
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 5431 / 5626 / 5512 / 2012 / 1613 / 189 / 326 / 3512 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 542 / 561 / 551 / 202 / 161 / 181 / 323 / 352 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 8

EBS clinical remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]); rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes); and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1 (stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal).

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the Blinded Induction Phase (Cohort 1).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Andecaliximab Every 2 WeeksFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 87.4 percentage of participants
Andecaliximab WeeklyFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 81.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With EBS Clinical Remission at Week 87.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8

Endoscopic remission was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Andecaliximab Every 2 WeeksFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 83.7 percentage of participants
Andecaliximab WeeklyFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 85.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 8

Endoscopic response was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Andecaliximab Every 2 WeeksFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 818.5 percentage of participants
Andecaliximab WeeklyFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 87.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 814.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 8

The MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as a rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease) of 0, and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]) of 0 or 1 for an overall MCS of ≤ 1. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Andecaliximab Every 2 WeeksFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 81.9 percentage of participants
Andecaliximab WeeklyFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 80.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 8

The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and physician's global assessment (PGA). The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. The MCS remission was defined as a MCS of ≤ 2 points and no individual subscore \> 1 point. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Andecaliximab Every 2 WeeksFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 87.4 percentage of participants
Andecaliximab WeeklyFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 81.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Remission at Week 87.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 8

The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and PGA. The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating disease worsening. The MCS response was defined as a MCS reduction of ≥ 3 points and at least 30% from baseline, with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Andecaliximab Every 2 WeeksFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 846.3 percentage of participants
Andecaliximab WeeklyFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 830.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With MCS Response at Week 830.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

For Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 8

Mucosal healing was defined as elimination of ulcers/erosion, elimination of crypt destruction, elimination of intraepithelial neutrophils, elimination of lamina propria neutrophils, and reduction in lamina propria chronic inflammatory cells to at most a mild increase. When measured by the Geboes histologic scoring system, it was the selection of the following combined scores of ≤ 3 for Grade 0 (Structural Architectural Change), ≤ 1 for Grade 1 (Chronic Inflammatory Infiltrate), ≤ 3 for Grade 2A (Lamina Propria Eosinophils), and 0 for Grade 2B (Lamina Propria Neutrophils), Grade 3 (Neutrophils in Epithelium), Grade 4 (Crypt Destruction), and Grade 5 (Erosion or Ulceration). Total Geboes histologic score ranged from 0 to 22, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set who did not meet the mucosal healing definition at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Andecaliximab Every 2 WeeksFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 818.0 percentage of participants
Andecaliximab WeeklyFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 813.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboFor Cohort 1, Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing as Determined by the Geboes Histologic Scoring System at Week 822.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026