Skip to content

Alvocidib Biomarker-driven Phase 2 AML Study

Phase 2, Randomized, Biomarker-driven Clinical Study in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With MCL-1 Dependence ≥30%

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02520011
Enrollment
104
Registered
2015-08-11
Start date
2016-03-14
Completion date
2020-02-12
Last updated
2023-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

Refractory AML, Relapsed AML, AML

Brief summary

The purpose of this two-stage Phase 2 study is to assess the clinical response (Complete Remission) of ACM (Alvocidib/Cytarabine/Mitoxantrone) compared to CM (Cytarabine/Mitoxantrone) treatment in refractory or relapsed AML patients with demonstrated MCL-1 dependence of ≥ 30% by mitochondrial profiling in bone marrow.

Detailed description

In Stage 1 of the study, all eligible AML patients with demonstrated MCL-1 dependence of ≥ 30% by mitochondrial profiling in bone marrow will receive treatment with ACM. In Stage 2, all eligible AML patients with demonstrated MCL-1 dependence of ≥ 30% by mitochondrial profiling in bone marrow will be randomized 1:1 to receive either treatment with ACM or CM.

Interventions

DRUGAlvocidib
DRUGCytarabine
DRUGMitoxantrone

Sponsors

Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Be between the ages of ≥18 and ≤65 years 2. Have an established, pathologically confirmed diagnoses of AML by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL-M3) with a bone marrow of \>5% blasts based on histology or flow cytometry 3. Be in first relapse (within 24 months of CR) or have failed induction therapy\* (no CR or CRi after treatment with an intensive regimen (eg, anthracycline/cytarabine ± etoposide, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, or cladribine). \*Induction therapy may involve 1 or 2 cycles of the same regimen. Efficacy assessment of induction therapy must be \>21 days from the start of the previous induction cycle. 4. Demonstrate MCL-1 dependence of ≥30% by mitochondrial profiling in bone marrow. 5. Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤2 6. Have a serum creatinine level ≤1.8 mg/dL 7. Have an alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level ≤5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) 8. Have a total bilirubin level ≤2.0 mg/dL (unless secondary to Gilbert syndrome, hemolysis, or leukemia) 9. Have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \>45% by echocardiogram (ECHO) or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan 10. Be nonfertile or agree to use an adequate method of contraception. Sexually active patients and their partners must use an effective method of contraception associated with a low failure rate during and for at least 6 months after completion of study therapy. 11. Be able to comply with the requirements of the entire study. 12. Provide written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.

Exclusion criteria

1. Received more than 2 cycles of induction therapy for AML. Investigational agents as part of front-line therapy for AML may by acceptable following discussion with the Medical Monitor. Hydroxyurea is permitted (see #5 below). 2. Received any previous treatment with alvocidib or any other CDK inhibitor 3. Received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant within the previous 2 months 4. Have clinically significant graft versus host disease (GVHD), or GVHD requiring initiation or escalation of treatment within the last 21 days 5. Require concomitant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy. Hydroxyurea is allowed up to the evening before starting (but not within 12 hours) of starting treatment on either arm. 6. Received \>360 mg/m2 equivalents of daunorubicin 7. Have a peripheral blast count of \>30,000/mm3 (may use hydroxyurea as in #5 above) 8. Received antileukemic therapy within the last 3 weeks (with the exception of hydroxyurea or if the patient has definite refractory disease). Refractory patients who received therapy within the last 3 weeks may be eligible with prior approval of the Medical Monitor. 9. Diagnosed with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL, M3) 10. Have active central nervous system (CNS) leukemia 11. Have evidence of uncontrolled disseminated intravascular coagulation 12. Have an active, uncontrolled infection 13. Have other life-threatening illness 14. Have other active malignancies or diagnosed with other malignancies within the last 6 months, except nonmelanoma skin cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 15. Have mental deficits and/or psychiatric history that may compromise the ability to give written informed consent or to comply with the study protocol. 16. Are pregnant and/or nursing 17. Have received any live vaccine within 14 days prior to first study drug administration.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLBest response after at least 1 cycle through study completion approximately 4 yearsComplete Remission (CR) rate = Percentage of patients achieving CR after Cycle 1 as defined in Stage 1 by the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria and 2010 European LeukemiaNet (EN) criteria in patients with relapsed or refractory AML with MCL-1 dependence \>30% and in Stage 2 by the 2017 ELN criteria. The study was terminated in January 2020 due to a steady and marked reduction in enrollment. Thus, the efficacy endpoints could not be analyzed. As sufficient efficacy results were not available to analyze patients based on the percentage of MCL-1 dependency the treatment efficacy was summarized by distributing the safety population into 6 groups based on whether the patients received the ACM vs CM regimen and their disease stages at study entry.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response to TreatmentBest response after at least 1 cycle through study completion approximately 4 yearsTo determine if treatment with ACM can induce CR in patients with relapsed or refractory AML with MCL-1 dependence of \>30% who failed to achieve CR following 1 cycle of CM

Countries

Canada, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrolled 104 pts from 14Mar2016 to 12Feb2020 at 22 of 40 sites. Patients were hospitalized until completion of their chemotherapy. The study terminated early in Jan2020 due to a steady and marked reduction in enrollment. The study protocol underwent a few major amendments during the course of the trial. Although the study protocol and the SAP had planned for comprehensive analysis of the efficacy data, only select efficacy analyses could be performed due to early termination of the trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CM Relapsed/Refractory
Stage 2 Relapsed/Refractory AML patients who were randomized to receive CM
11
ACM Relapsed/Refractory
Relapsed/Refractory AML patients enrolled to Stage 1 and those enrolled to Stage 2 who received ACM.
79
ACM Newly Diagnosed
Newly diagnosed AML patients enrolled and received ACM.
14
Total104

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event012
Overall StudyDeath081
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy4264
Overall StudyPatient went to hospice010
Overall StudyPhysician Decision020
Overall StudyProgressive disease following response042
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject130

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalACM Newly DiagnosedACM Relapsed/RefractoryCM Relapsed/Refractory
2017 ELN genetic risk criteria classification
Adverse
37 Participants3 Participants26 Participants8 Participants
2017 ELN genetic risk criteria classification
Favorable
9 Participants1 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
2017 ELN genetic risk criteria classification
Intermediate
14 Participants0 Participants13 Participants1 Participants
2017 ELN genetic risk criteria classification
Missing
44 Participants10 Participants34 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
104 Participants14 Participants79 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
94 Participants13 Participants70 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants3 Participants40 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants11 Participants39 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1111 / 791 / 1412 / 93
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 1179 / 7914 / 1493 / 93
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1131 / 794 / 1435 / 93

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AML

Complete Remission (CR) rate = Percentage of patients achieving CR after Cycle 1 as defined in Stage 1 by the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria and 2010 European LeukemiaNet (EN) criteria in patients with relapsed or refractory AML with MCL-1 dependence \>30% and in Stage 2 by the 2017 ELN criteria. The study was terminated in January 2020 due to a steady and marked reduction in enrollment. Thus, the efficacy endpoints could not be analyzed. As sufficient efficacy results were not available to analyze patients based on the percentage of MCL-1 dependency the treatment efficacy was summarized by distributing the safety population into 6 groups based on whether the patients received the ACM vs CM regimen and their disease stages at study entry.

Time frame: Best response after at least 1 cycle through study completion approximately 4 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Stage 2 CM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLNot Evaluated0 participants
Stage 2 CM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLPartial Remission (PR)0 participants
Stage 2 CM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLCR with Incomplete Neutrophil Recovery (Cri)0 participants
Stage 2 CM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLComplete Remission (CR)6 participants
Stage 2 CM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLResistant/Relapsed Disease5 participants
Stage 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLPartial Remission (PR)0 participants
Stage 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLNot Evaluated1 participants
Stage 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLCR with Incomplete Neutrophil Recovery (Cri)3 participants
Stage 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLComplete Remission (CR)2 participants
Stage 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLResistant/Relapsed Disease5 participants
Stage 1 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLCR with Incomplete Neutrophil Recovery (Cri)5 participants
Stage 1 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLNot Evaluated6 participants
Stage 1 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLComplete Remission (CR)8 participants
Stage 1 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLResistant/Relapsed Disease5 participants
Stage 1 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLPartial Remission (PR)1 participants
Stages 1 and 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLResistant/Relapsed Disease30 participants
Stages 1 and 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLCR with Incomplete Neutrophil Recovery (Cri)15 participants
Stages 1 and 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLPartial Remission (PR)1 participants
Stages 1 and 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLNot Evaluated12 participants
Stages 1 and 2 ACM Relapsed/RefractoryComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLComplete Remission (CR)21 participants
Stage 1 Newly Diagnosed ACMComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLPartial Remission (PR)1 participants
Stage 1 Newly Diagnosed ACMComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLComplete Remission (CR)6 participants
Stage 1 Newly Diagnosed ACMComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLNot Evaluated1 participants
Stage 1 Newly Diagnosed ACMComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLResistant/Relapsed Disease4 participants
Stage 1 Newly Diagnosed ACMComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLCR with Incomplete Neutrophil Recovery (Cri)2 participants
All Stages and Cohorts (Including Randomized Stage): ACM TotalComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLPartial Remission (PR)2 participants
All Stages and Cohorts (Including Randomized Stage): ACM TotalComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLCR with Incomplete Neutrophil Recovery (Cri)17 participants
All Stages and Cohorts (Including Randomized Stage): ACM TotalComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLComplete Remission (CR)27 participants
All Stages and Cohorts (Including Randomized Stage): ACM TotalComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLNot Evaluated13 participants
All Stages and Cohorts (Including Randomized Stage): ACM TotalComplete Response (CR) Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AMLResistant/Relapsed Disease34 participants
Other Pre-specified

Response to Treatment

To determine if treatment with ACM can induce CR in patients with relapsed or refractory AML with MCL-1 dependence of \>30% who failed to achieve CR following 1 cycle of CM

Time frame: Best response after at least 1 cycle through study completion approximately 4 years

Population: A total 11 patients were initially randomized to the CM arm. 6 had CR from receiving CM so they did not cross over to receive ACM. Of the remaining 5 patients, only 2 crossed over to receive ACM and were included in the analysis of this outcome.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Stage 2 CM Relapsed/RefractoryResponse to TreatmentPartial Remission (PR)1 participants
Stage 2 CM Relapsed/RefractoryResponse to TreatmentNot Evaluated1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026