Skip to content

Trendelenberg Versus Left Lateral Position for Colonoscopy

The Impact of Trendelenberg Positioning as Compared to Left Lateral Positioning on Ease of Colonoscope Insertion During Colonoscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02519686
Enrollment
150
Registered
2015-08-11
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2016-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonic Diseases

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the trendelenberg (TD) position (position in procedures that involves placing the patient at an angle so that their head is lower than their feet on the procedure bed) in select patients undergoing colonoscopy is superior than the left lateral (LL) position (patient laying on their side, traditionally used for colonoscopies) in terms of decreasing time necessary to pass the colonoscope through the left colon, and decreasing the difficulty of the procedure.

Detailed description

The colonoscopists will be asked to rate their prediction of difficulty of the procedure prior to the colonoscopy and to rate the ease of procedure after the colonoscopy. The clinical experience of the study investigators is that TD positioning is superior to LL positioning in patients with risk factors for having a difficult colonoscopy (thin women; those with diverticulosis- small bulging pouches present in the colon; or prior pelvic surgery). Patients with risk factors for difficult colonoscopy will be randomized to undergo colonoscopy while positioned in the TD position or the LL position during advancement of the colonoscope through the sigmoid colon. The sigmoid colon is a section of the colon, proximal to the rectum, that is curved. The sigmoid colon is a normal component of GI tract anatomy, although due to it's shape, especially with the risk factors listed previously; can cause challenges to inserting the colonoscope.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Personal history of pelvic surgery 2. Diverticulosis, identified by patient report or review of previous colonoscopy or imaging studies. 3. BMI \< 25.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who do not meet inclusion criteria. 2. Patients who have undergone colonic resection 3. Patients with glaucoma 4. Patients with uncontrolled acid reflux disease or active nausea/vomiting. 5. Patients who are unwilling or unable to consent. 6. BMI \> 30

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cecal insertion timeintraoperaiveThe time from scope insertion to the cecum

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026