Conscious Sedation
Conditions
Keywords
Children, Emergency Department, Sedation
Brief summary
The role of Adjunct therapies such as Child Life therapy and Music listening during Procedural Sedation and Analgesia(PSA) for children during painful procedures has not been studied in the Emergency Department (ED). The investigators hypothesize that there will be a reduction in sedation medication dosage without change in sedation efficacy by addition of music therapy and Child Life to standard sedation protocol in children 3-15 years of age who undergo PSA for painful (orthopedic procedures, laceration repair, incision and drainage) procedures in a Pediatric emergency Department (PED).
Detailed description
The investigators propose to perform a prospective randomized control trial on children aged 3-15 years of age who undergo PSA for painful procedures (orthopedic procedures, laceration repair, incision and drainage of abscess) at Children's Hospital of Michigan Emergency Department. The investigators will study the effect of child life specialist intervention and listening to music on the sedation medication requirement and sedation efficacy in those patients undergoing orthopedic procedures under PSA with intravenous ketamine Patients will be randomly allocated to one of the three groups: 1) Standard sedation protocol 2) standard sedation protocol with listening to music and 3) standard sedation protocol with child life intervention. This will be done by opening the double sealed envelope after obtaining informed consent from the parents/legal guardians. In addition, an assent will also be obtained from all children older than 7 years of age. Study Intervention: Study population will be divided into 3 groups: 1) Standard sedation protocol 2) Standard sedation protocol with child life intervention and 3) Standard sedation protocol with music listening. All children enrolled in this study will receive sedation only after a pre sedation assessment has been performed using current institutional guidelines as has been applied to all ED sedation patients. Participants will be monitored using published sedation guidelines with measurements of vital signs, pulse oximetry at baseline, every 5 minutes during the procedure and post procedure for the entire duration of sedation. The dose of sedation medication administered will be at the discretion of the sedation physician and the study research assistant will not participate in any of the clinical procedures. For those participants assigned to the child life intervention group, trained child life personnel will introduce the procedure to the child and the family and will provide comforting measures appropriate to the age of the patient during the placement of intravenous line and throughout the procedure. The participants assigned to the music therapy group will be asked to choose a music of their choice which they will listen via head phones. The investigators will collect the following variables: patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, indication for the sedation, sedation medication dosage, need for re-dosing, sedation related adverse events and ED disposition. In addition specifically for this study, the investigators will assess the pre-sedation agitation ,sedation efficacy using Ramsey Sedation Scale, pain scale using FACES-P and parent and consultant satisfaction using a 3-point Likert scale(very satisfied, satisfied, not satisfied). The Ramsey Sedation Scoring and FACES-P scoring will be performed by a trained research assistant who will be blinded to the sedation medication dosage at the following three time periods: just prior to administration of ketamine, during sedation and during recovery just prior to patient discharge. In addition, the study research assistant will also complete a follow-up phone call within 72 hours after discharge from the ED to the parents/guardians of the children to evaluate for the particpant's experience with the sedation(the pain they perceived during the procedure, their memory of the event) and adverse events that occur at home.
Interventions
The participants will receive IV ketamine for sedation. In addition in this arm, 'Child Life Intervention', comfort measures provided by a trained child life therapist during painful procedures.
The participants will receive IV ketamine for sedation. In addition in this arm, 'Music Listening' to music chosen by the patient using headphones
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Children aged 3-15 years * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1 or 2 * Receiving intravenous ketamine for PSA for painful procedures such as fracture/joint reduction, laceration repair, incision drainage of abscess .
Exclusion criteria
1. Known contraindications, allergy or previous adverse events with ketamine 2. Receive intramuscular or oral sedation or sedation medications other than ketamine 3. Receive ketamine for procedures not listed above 4. Outside the age range listed above 5. Parents/guardians refuse study participation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sedation Medication Requirement | Right at the end of the procedure | Total mg/kg of sedation medication administered IV |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sedation Efficacy | During the Procedure | compare sedation efficacy among the 3 groups using Ramsey sedation scales and FACES -P (FACES-Pediatric)scale. The Ramsey sedation scales scores sedation at six different levels, according to how arousable the patient is. The continuum of sedation is measured from 1-6 with higher values representing a deeper level of sedation. 1. Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both 2. Patient is co-operative, oriented, and tranquil 3. Patient responds to commands only 4. Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 5. Patient exhibits a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 6. Patient exhibits no response The Faces- PScale is a self-report measure used to assess the intensity of children's pain. The scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 indicating no hurt or discomfort to 10 :hurts most/worst |
| Adverse Events | during procedure until discharge from the Emergency Department | describe the adverse events experienced by study participants secondary to sedation medication and interventions performed to overcome them |
| Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | within two hours of completion of procedure | Compare consultant satisfaction among three groups using Likert scale |
| Number of Participants Who Were re- Dosed With Sedation Medication | during procedure | compare the need for additional dosages of sedation medication among three groups |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Patients were screened for eligibility using electronic medical records and if eligible were approached by the study Research Assistant(RA) for informed consent. If the parent/guardian refused participation, were non- English speaking and if parent/legal guardian was not present to complete the informed consent process they were excluded from study
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Standard Patients will receive intravenous ketamine (1-2mg/kg) | 20 |
| Music Listening Patients will listen to music of their choice using headphones during sedation
Music listening: The participants will receive IV ketamine for sedation. In addition in this arm, 'Music Listening' to music chosen by the patient using headphones | 20 |
| Child Life Intervention Child life therapist will comfort the child during all painful procedures(including IV insertion) and during sedation
Child life intervention: The participants will receive IV ketamine for sedation. In addition in this arm, 'Child Life Intervention', comfort measures provided by a trained child life therapist during painful procedures. | 19 |
| Total | 59 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Standard | Music Listening | Child Life Intervention | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 5 years | 8.5 years | 9 years | 8 years |
| American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) Classification American Society of Anesethesiologist, ASA II | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 12 Participants |
| American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) Classification American Society of Anesthesiologist, ASA I | 16 Participants | 15 Participants | 16 Participants | 47 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 18 Participants | 20 Participants | 17 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Pre - sedation pain medication Pre sedation pain medication no | 6 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Pre - sedation pain medication Pre sedation pain medication yes | 14 Participants | 10 Participants | 14 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Procedure Type fracture/dislocation reduction | 12 Participants | 16 Participants | 13 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Procedure Type Incision and drainage | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Procedure Type laceration repair | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American | 12 Participants | 9 Participants | 10 Participants | 31 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 4 Participants | 9 Participants | 3 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Mixed | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Others | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 12 Participants | 14 Participants | 6 Participants | 32 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 19 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 4 / 20 | 8 / 20 | 5 / 19 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 | 0 / 19 |
Outcome results
Sedation Medication Requirement
Total mg/kg of sedation medication administered IV
Time frame: Right at the end of the procedure
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Sedation Medication Requirement | 1.58 mg/kg | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Music Listening | Sedation Medication Requirement | 1.68 mg/kg | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Child Life Intervention | Sedation Medication Requirement | 1.42 mg/kg | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
Adverse Events
describe the adverse events experienced by study participants secondary to sedation medication and interventions performed to overcome them
Time frame: during procedure until discharge from the Emergency Department
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | Adverse Events | 4 Participants |
| Music Listening | Adverse Events | 8 Participants |
| Child Life Intervention | Adverse Events | 5 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Were re- Dosed With Sedation Medication
compare the need for additional dosages of sedation medication among three groups
Time frame: during procedure
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | Number of Participants Who Were re- Dosed With Sedation Medication | 9 Participants |
| Music Listening | Number of Participants Who Were re- Dosed With Sedation Medication | 4 Participants |
| Child Life Intervention | Number of Participants Who Were re- Dosed With Sedation Medication | 8 Participants |
Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied,
Compare consultant satisfaction among three groups using Likert scale
Time frame: within two hours of completion of procedure
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Satisfied | 13 Participants |
| Standard | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Not satisfied | 0 Participants |
| Standard | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Very Satisfied | 7 Participants |
| Music Listening | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Satisfied | 8 Participants |
| Music Listening | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Not satisfied | 0 Participants |
| Music Listening | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Very Satisfied | 12 Participants |
| Child Life Intervention | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Not satisfied | 0 Participants |
| Child Life Intervention | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Very Satisfied | 13 Participants |
| Child Life Intervention | Number of Participants With Consultant Satisfaction Rating as Either Not Satisfied, Satisfied, or Very Satisfied, | Satisfied | 6 Participants |
Sedation Efficacy
compare sedation efficacy among the 3 groups using Ramsey sedation scales and FACES -P (FACES-Pediatric)scale. The Ramsey sedation scales scores sedation at six different levels, according to how arousable the patient is. The continuum of sedation is measured from 1-6 with higher values representing a deeper level of sedation. 1. Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both 2. Patient is co-operative, oriented, and tranquil 3. Patient responds to commands only 4. Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 5. Patient exhibits a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 6. Patient exhibits no response The Faces- PScale is a self-report measure used to assess the intensity of children's pain. The scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 indicating no hurt or discomfort to 10 :hurts most/worst
Time frame: During the Procedure
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Sedation Efficacy | FACES-Pediatric during sedation | 0 scores on a scale |
| Standard | Sedation Efficacy | Ramsay Sedation Score during sedation | 6 scores on a scale |
| Music Listening | Sedation Efficacy | Ramsay Sedation Score during sedation | 6 scores on a scale |
| Music Listening | Sedation Efficacy | FACES-Pediatric during sedation | 0 scores on a scale |
| Child Life Intervention | Sedation Efficacy | Ramsay Sedation Score during sedation | 6 scores on a scale |
| Child Life Intervention | Sedation Efficacy | FACES-Pediatric during sedation | 0 scores on a scale |