Skip to content

High Versus Low SpO2 Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Heart Failure

High Versus Low SpO2 Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02518828
Acronym
HiLo
Enrollment
50
Registered
2015-08-10
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2018-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Acute Heart Failure

Brief summary

The primary objective of this pilot trial is to determine whether inpatients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with symptoms suggestive of Acute Heart Failure (AHF), who receive supplemental oxygen adjusted at either a high (SpO2 range ≥96%) or low (SpO2 range 90-92%) oxygen saturation level, leads to greater reduction in N-terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP) at 72 hours.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized to either a high (SpO2 range ≥96%) or low (SpO2 range 90-92%) oxygen after informed consent.

Interventions

OTHERHigh SpO2

SpO2 range ≥96%

SpO2 range 90-92%

Sponsors

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Alberta Innovates Health Solutions
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>40 years of age presenting to the ED with AHF * objective finding of HF (BNP \>400 pg/ml or Chest X-Ray with pulmonary congestion) * plan to admit with primary diagnosis as HF * must be able to be randomized within 16 hours of presenting to the ED * provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* on home oxygen * known prior hypercapnic failure (PaCO2 \>50 mmHg) * asthma * primary pulmonary hypertension, * patients who require urgent positive pressure ventilation or intubation * patients on \>10 L/min oxygen

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 72 hours72 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of worsening heart failure (WHF) events7 days
Change in global symptoms using the Patient Global Assessment scale (PGA) from baseline to 72 hours72 hours
Change in dyspnea using the visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 72 hours72 hours
Change in Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) from baseline to 72 hours72 hours
Average z-score from the combination of these outcomes: PGA, NT-proBNP, 7-day WHF, 30-day mortality and re-hospitalization30 days
Hochberg endpoint (combination of NT-proBNP and PGA)72 hours
Diuretic response (weight loss up to 72 hours and urine volume up to 24 hours)72 hours
30-day clinical events30 daysAll cause mortality, HF readmission, days alive and out of hospital

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety Outcome - Need for mechanical ventilation (invasive and non-invasive7 daysNumber of participants with post-enrollment respiratory failure with a need for mechanical ventilation as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026