Skip to content

Liraglutide in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

Effect of Liraglutide on Glycemic Control, Glucagon Secretion and Inflammatory Markers in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02516657
Enrollment
5
Registered
2015-08-06
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2023-08-03
Last updated
2025-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to study the effect of a liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide agonist, on post-meal blood glucose concentrations, glucagon levels, mean weekly blood sugars, and insulin doses in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease that is usually diagnosed before the age of 20. Individuals with this disease are completely dependent on insulin for survival. While significant advances have been made in technological support for improving diabetes control, insulin remains the only effective treatment for Type 1 diabetes. Liraglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 analog. This drug is approved for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes in adults. This study will test the effect of liraglutide on blood sugar control in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.

Detailed description

Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) affects approximately 1:500 children and represents the major form of diabetes in the pediatric population (1). Diagnosis of T1DM is based on symptoms consistent with hyperglycemia (polyuria, polydipsia, and weight loss) and elevated blood sugars. Diagnosis of T1DM is confirmed by measuring serum autoantibodies against insulin and other beta-cell proteins. Subcutaneous insulin is the mainstay of diabetes care; however, ability to achieve optimal glycemic control is impacted by multiple factors including diet, exercise, and psychosocial barriers. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and follow-up EDIC trial were landmark studies demonstrating that improving glycemic control significantly reduces the risk of both micro and macro-vascular disease (2). While technologic advances in blood sugar monitoring, insulin analogs and insulin delivery devices have been made, it is estimated that less than 40% of individuals meet recommended glycemic standards as set forth by the American Diabetes Association; these estimates may be lower in the pediatric population. Thus, adjuvant pharmacologic therapies that improve glycemic control are being tested in patients with T1DM. Incretin hormones are a class of intestinal peptides that are released in response to nutrient intake (3). The best described incretin hormones are glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). These hormones act at the level of direct stimulation of pancreatic β-cell function and through extra-pancreatic mechanisms. They primarily potentiate glucose-dependent insulin secretion from the β-cell; other β-cell effects include increasing insulin biosynthesis, stimulating β-cell replication, and preventing apoptosis. Secondary effects of incretin hormones include suppression of glucagon secretion, inhibition of gastric emptying, and potentiation of hepatic glucose uptake (3). Currently, there are two GLP-1 analogs approved by the Food and Drug Adminstration as adjuvant treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults (\> 18 years) who fail to reach glycemic targets with metformin and/or oral hypoglycemic agents. The two drugs - exenatide (BID) and liraglutide (QD) are administered subcutaneously. They have been demonstrated to improve glycemic control in this population and, in some individuals, lead to sustained weight loss. This study aims to determine whether acute exposure to liraglutide decreases the mean weekly blood glucose levels in adolescents with T1DM. In addition, we will determine whether liraglutide decreases glucose excursions following a meal challenge. The overall hypothesis to be tested is that short-term exposure (7 days) to liraglutide improves glycemic control in adolescents/young adults with T1DM treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Interventions

DRUGLiraglutide

Liraglutide 0.6 mg

Sponsors

University at Buffalo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus greater than 1 year * Insulin regimen - continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with continuous glucose monitoring device * HbA1c \<10%

Exclusion criteria

* Previous exposure to liraglutide * History of abdominal surgery * Gastrointestinal reflux disease * History of acute or chronic pancreatitis * History of alcohol abuse or unwillingness to abstain from alcohol during the study * History of thyroid cancer * Family history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 2B syndrome * Pregnant/breastfeeding females * Individuals with antibody-negative insulin requiring diabetes that is consistent with Monogenic Diabetes of Youth * Individuals with steroid induced or cystic fibrosis related diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Weekly Blood GlucoseVisit 1 (Before Liraglutide) at baseline (Day 0) vs. Visit 2 (After Liraglutide) on Day 7;The primary outcome is to determine whether liraglutide decreases mean weekly blood glucose (mean mg/dL glucose as measured by continuous glucose monitor readings) in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Daily Insulin DoseVisit 1 (Before Liraglutide) at baseline (Day 0) vs. Visit 2 (After Liraglutide) on Day 7;mean U/kg/day over 7 days

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood Sugar < 70 mg/dLVisit 1 (Before Liraglutide) at baseline (Day 0) vs. Visit 2 (After Liraglutide) on Day 7;Determine whether liraglutide increases episodes of blood sugar \<70 mg/dL as measured by glucometer and CGM
Serum Amylase LevelVisit 1 (Before Liraglutide) at baseline (Day 0) vs. Visit 2 (After Liraglutide) on Day 7;Determine amylase levels before and during liraglutide treatment

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruited from medical clinic

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liraglutide 0.6 mg
Liraglutide 0.6 mg daily injection x 7 days Liraglutide: Liraglutide 0.6 mg
5
Total5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLiraglutide 0.6 mg
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Hemoglobin A1c8.52 Percent of glycosylated HemoglobinA
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
Total Daily insulin dose73.74 Units per day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.09

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Weekly Blood Glucose

The primary outcome is to determine whether liraglutide decreases mean weekly blood glucose (mean mg/dL glucose as measured by continuous glucose monitor readings) in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes

Time frame: Visit 1 (Before Liraglutide) at baseline (Day 0) vs. Visit 2 (After Liraglutide) on Day 7;

Population: Data for mean weekly blood glucose was only collected for 4 of the 5 subjects enrolled in the study. 1 subject had missing CGM data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 0.6 mgMean Weekly Blood GlucoseVisit 1, before liraglutide187 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35
Liraglutide 0.6 mgMean Weekly Blood GlucoseVisit 2, after liraglutide178 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42
Secondary

Total Daily Insulin Dose

mean U/kg/day over 7 days

Time frame: Visit 1 (Before Liraglutide) at baseline (Day 0) vs. Visit 2 (After Liraglutide) on Day 7;

Population: Unable to determine mean U/kg/day for one of the subjects due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 0.6 mgTotal Daily Insulin Dose0.97 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.18
Liraglutide TreatmentTotal Daily Insulin Dose0.67 U/kg/dayStandard Deviation 0.14
Other Pre-specified

Blood Sugar < 70 mg/dL

Determine whether liraglutide increases episodes of blood sugar \<70 mg/dL as measured by glucometer and CGM

Time frame: Visit 1 (Before Liraglutide) at baseline (Day 0) vs. Visit 2 (After Liraglutide) on Day 7;

Population: Unable to determine mean U/kg/day for one of the subjects due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 0.6 mgBlood Sugar < 70 mg/dL5.5 episodesStandard Deviation 7.7
Liraglutide TreatmentBlood Sugar < 70 mg/dL3.3 episodesStandard Deviation 3.3
Other Pre-specified

Serum Amylase Level

Determine amylase levels before and during liraglutide treatment

Time frame: Visit 1 (Before Liraglutide) at baseline (Day 0) vs. Visit 2 (After Liraglutide) on Day 7;

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Liraglutide 0.6 mgSerum Amylase Level36 U/LStandard Deviation 15
Liraglutide TreatmentSerum Amylase Level33 U/LStandard Deviation 11

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026