Skip to content

Assessment of the Efficacy of POLYGYNAX® in the Empirical Treatment of Infectious Vaginitis

Assessment of the Efficacy of POLYGYNAX® in the Empirical Treatment of Infectious Vaginitis International, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study, Comparative Versus Miconazole

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02515656
Acronym
PRISM
Enrollment
661
Registered
2015-08-05
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2019-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vaginitis

Brief summary

POLYGYNAX® is a broad spectrum combination of nystatin, neomycin and polymixin B indicated for the local treatment of vaginitis due to sensitive germs and treatment of non specific vaginitis of adults. POLYGYNAX® has been marketed in France since 1969. Nevertheless, despite the well established use of POLYGYNAX®, there is no clinical study supporting the interest of the combination of antifungal and antibiotics agents versus antifungal agent alone. The aim of this project is to demonstrate that POLYGYNAX® is more effective than miconazole in the treatment of women experiencing symptoms of infectious vaginitis.

Interventions

DRUGPOLYGYNAX®
DRUGGYNODAKTARIN®
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

International Clinical Trials Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Venn Life Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Laboratoire Innotech International
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with an abnormal vaginal discharge associated with one (or more) functional vaginal complaints: vaginal burning and/or vaginal pain and/or vaginal irritation clinically evoking an infectious vaginitis: * bacterial vaginitis * non-specific vaginitis (atypical symptoms) * mixed vaginitis (i.e. suprainfected fungal vaginitis) and able to receive an empirical local treatment

Exclusion criteria

1. Recurrent patient; i.e. a patient who has had at least 4 episodes of infectious vaginitis in the 12 months prior to inclusion 2. Vaginal infection justifying systemic therapy 3. History of atrophic vaginitis or suspected atrophic vaginitis at inclusion 4. Patient presenting with signs of genital herpes or signs of non-infectious vulvar pathology (vulvodynia, psoriasis, eczema, lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, contact dermatitis, candida intertrigo, vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN)) 5. Patient with current Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) and/or patients with clinical suspicion of STI 6. Disease or concomitant treatment that could cause decreased immunity (i.e. diabetes mellitus, corticosteroids treatments) 7. Systemic anti-infective treatment (antibiotic, antifungal) within two weeks prior to inclusion 8. Patient menstruating or patient with menometrorrhagia due to hormonal imbalance at the time of inclusion 9. Pregnant or lactating women or delivery within last 1 month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment Visit15 days after first treatment administration* Success is defined by resolution (return to patient's usual gynaecological conditions, i.e. before the episode which warranted inclusion in the study) OR substantial improvement of clinical signs of infectious vaginitis (i.e. abnormal vaginal discharge), and/or vaginal symptoms (vaginal burning and/or vaginal pain, and/or vaginal irritation). * Failure is defined by persistence or worsening of symptoms and clinical signs or requirement of an alternative or specific treatment. Not considered as Treatment Failure: * The need to initiate a specific treatment because of a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) (trichomoniasis; gonococcal and chlamydial infections) detected from the vaginal sample at Visit 1 / D1. * Patients presenting with only vulvar complaints not considered as related to infectious vaginitis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the Diaryduring 14 days after first treatment intakeThis outcome was evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) completed by the patient. The scale measured the level of each vaginal symptom experienced during the day (vaginal discharge, vaginal burning, vaginal pain and vaginal irritation). Scale ranges = 0 to 100 0=none symptom 100=maximum intensity of symptom Time points used in the calculation= D1 to D14
Number of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the Investigator15 days after first treatment administrationThe vaginal discharge is assessed by the investigator by using a score: 0=absent 1. mild: insufficient for speculum collection 2. moderate: sufficient for speculum collection 3. abundant: visible at the introitus even before speculum introduction.
Clinical Treatment Efficacy (Success/Failure) Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Study Visit22 days after first treatment administrationSuccess and Failure (same definition as the primary outcome measure)
Investigator's Global Satisfaction15 days after first administrationThe investigator filled the satisfaction questionnaire during the end of treatment visit. Six ratings are available: Very Bad, Bad, Somewhat Bad, Somewhat Good, Good and Very Good.
Patient's Global Satisfaction15 days after first administrationThe patient filled the satisfaction questionnaire on her patient's diary at home the eve of the End of Treatment Visit. Six ratings are available: Very Bad, Bad, Somewhat Bad, Somewhat Good, Good and Very Good.

Countries

Czechia, France, Serbia, Slovakia

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

3 patients who signed an Informed Consent Form (ICF) were screen failed and were not randomized in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
POLYGYNAX®
Name : POLYGYNAX® Active components : nystatin 100 000 IU + neomycin sulphate 35 000 IU + polymyxin B sulphate 35 000 IU Dosage : 1 capsule intravaginally per day (administered at bedtime lying down) 12 vaginal soft capsules POLYGYNAX®
302
Miconazole + Placebo
Name : GYNODAKTARIN® Active components : miconazole nitrate 400 mg Dosage : 1 capsule intravaginally per day (administered at bedtime, lying down) 3 vaginal soft capsules followed by 9 placebo vaginal soft capsules GYNODAKTARIN® Placebo
309
Total611

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPOLYGYNAX®Miconazole + PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous34.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.13
33.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.07
34.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.11
Sex: Female, Male
Female
302 Participants309 Participants611 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3250 / 328
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 3255 / 328
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3250 / 328

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment Visit

* Success is defined by resolution (return to patient's usual gynaecological conditions, i.e. before the episode which warranted inclusion in the study) OR substantial improvement of clinical signs of infectious vaginitis (i.e. abnormal vaginal discharge), and/or vaginal symptoms (vaginal burning and/or vaginal pain, and/or vaginal irritation). * Failure is defined by persistence or worsening of symptoms and clinical signs or requirement of an alternative or specific treatment. Not considered as Treatment Failure: * The need to initiate a specific treatment because of a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) (trichomoniasis; gonococcal and chlamydial infections) detected from the vaginal sample at Visit 1 / D1. * Patients presenting with only vulvar complaints not considered as related to infectious vaginitis.

Time frame: 15 days after first treatment administration

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
POLYGYNAX®Clinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment VisitSuccess275 Participants
POLYGYNAX®Clinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment VisitFailure27 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboClinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment VisitSuccess268 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboClinical Treatment Efficacy Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Treatment VisitFailure41 Participants
Secondary

Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the Diary

This outcome was evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) completed by the patient. The scale measured the level of each vaginal symptom experienced during the day (vaginal discharge, vaginal burning, vaginal pain and vaginal irritation). Scale ranges = 0 to 100 0=none symptom 100=maximum intensity of symptom Time points used in the calculation= D1 to D14

Time frame: during 14 days after first treatment intake

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
POLYGYNAX®Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal combined clinical symptoms score absolute28.96 mm
POLYGYNAX®Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal irritation absolute change29.37 mm
POLYGYNAX®Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal discharge absolute change31.43 mm
POLYGYNAX®Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal pain absolute change16.93 mm
POLYGYNAX®Change in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal burning absolute change27.89 mm
Miconazole + PlaceboChange in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal pain absolute change17.17 mm
Miconazole + PlaceboChange in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal burning absolute change27.03 mm
Miconazole + PlaceboChange in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal irritation absolute change28.79 mm
Miconazole + PlaceboChange in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal combined clinical symptoms score absolute28.20 mm
Miconazole + PlaceboChange in Vaginal Discharge and in Each Associated Vaginal Clinical Symptoms Reported by the Patient in the DiaryVaginal discharge absolute change29.54 mm
Secondary

Clinical Treatment Efficacy (Success/Failure) Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Study Visit

Success and Failure (same definition as the primary outcome measure)

Time frame: 22 days after first treatment administration

Population: There were 5 and 6 missing values respectively in Polygynax and Miconazole + placebo arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
POLYGYNAX®Clinical Treatment Efficacy (Success/Failure) Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Study VisitSuccess252 Participants
POLYGYNAX®Clinical Treatment Efficacy (Success/Failure) Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Study VisitFailure45 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboClinical Treatment Efficacy (Success/Failure) Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Study VisitSuccess250 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboClinical Treatment Efficacy (Success/Failure) Assessed by the Investigator After Thorough Gynaecological Examination and Patient's Interview at End of Study VisitFailure53 Participants
Secondary

Investigator's Global Satisfaction

The investigator filled the satisfaction questionnaire during the end of treatment visit. Six ratings are available: Very Bad, Bad, Somewhat Bad, Somewhat Good, Good and Very Good.

Time frame: 15 days after first administration

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
POLYGYNAX®Investigator's Global SatisfactionBad - Very bad10 Participants
POLYGYNAX®Investigator's Global SatisfactionVery good - Good265 Participants
POLYGYNAX®Investigator's Global SatisfactionSomewhat good - Somewhat bad25 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboInvestigator's Global SatisfactionBad - Very bad15 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboInvestigator's Global SatisfactionVery good - Good252 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboInvestigator's Global SatisfactionSomewhat good - Somewhat bad40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the Investigator

The vaginal discharge is assessed by the investigator by using a score: 0=absent 1. mild: insufficient for speculum collection 2. moderate: sufficient for speculum collection 3. abundant: visible at the introitus even before speculum introduction.

Time frame: 15 days after first treatment administration

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
POLYGYNAX®Number of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the InvestigatorLeucorrhoea score change - Deterioration1 Participants
POLYGYNAX®Number of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the InvestigatorLeucorrhoea score change - No change19 Participants
POLYGYNAX®Number of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the InvestigatorLeucorrhoea score change - Improvement280 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboNumber of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the InvestigatorLeucorrhoea score change - Deterioration7 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboNumber of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the InvestigatorLeucorrhoea score change - No change24 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboNumber of Patients With Change in Vaginal Discharge Assessed by the InvestigatorLeucorrhoea score change - Improvement276 Participants
Secondary

Patient's Global Satisfaction

The patient filled the satisfaction questionnaire on her patient's diary at home the eve of the End of Treatment Visit. Six ratings are available: Very Bad, Bad, Somewhat Bad, Somewhat Good, Good and Very Good.

Time frame: 15 days after first administration

Population: There were 10 and 11 missing values respectively in Polygynax and Miconazole + placebo arms.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
POLYGYNAX®Patient's Global SatisfactionVery good - Good239 Participants
POLYGYNAX®Patient's Global SatisfactionSomewhat good - Somewhat bad50 Participants
POLYGYNAX®Patient's Global SatisfactionBad - Very bad3 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboPatient's Global SatisfactionVery good - Good233 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboPatient's Global SatisfactionSomewhat good - Somewhat bad63 Participants
Miconazole + PlaceboPatient's Global SatisfactionBad - Very bad2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026