Skip to content

Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts

Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Mineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Compared to PUROS Mineralized Bone Allograft

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02515058
Enrollment
44
Registered
2015-08-04
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2018-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss

Brief summary

The study is a 2-arm, parallel-design, randomized, prospective clinical trial designed to examine histologic wound healing following ridge preservation using bone allograft that has been prepared by either freeze-drying or via a non-freeze-dried solvent process.This entire protocol involves procedures that are standard care. All materials are FDA-approved materials being used in an FDA-approved manner. The test group subjects will have extraction sockets grafted with a cancellous non-freeze-dried bone allograft (called PUROS graft). This test group will be compared to an active control group using cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft (called FDBA). The null hypothesis is that there will be no significant difference in formation of new vital bone between treatment groups (primary outcome). Each subject will provide a single non-molar tooth site for study treatment. After tooth extraction, the graft material will be placed and covered by a resorbable collagen membrane. Following 3 months of healing, the dental implant will be place, at which time a core of bone will be removed from the site as part of the preparation for the implant. The core biopsy will then be evaluated for the primary histologic outcome of % vital bone formation and secondary histologic outcome of % residual graft material.

Detailed description

The study is designed to examine histologic wound healing following ridge preservation using cancellous bone allograft that has been prepared either by freeze-drying (FDBA) or by a solvent-based processing method (PUROS). This entire protocol involves procedures that are standard care. All materials are FDA-approved materials being used in an FDA-approved manner. The test group subjects will have extraction sockets grafted with a cancellous non-freeze-dried bone allograft (called PUROS graft). This test group will be compared to an active control group using cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft (called FDBA). The null hypothesis is that there will be no significant difference in formation of new vital bone between treatment groups (primary outcome). Each subject will provide a single non-molar tooth site for study treatment. After tooth extraction, the graft material will be placed and covered by a resorbable collagen membrane. Following 3 months of healing, the dental implant will be place, at which time a core of bone will be removed from the site as part of the preparation for the implant. The core biopsy will then be evaluated for the primary histologic outcome of % vital bone formation and secondary histologic outcome of % residual graft material.

Interventions

DEVICEPUROS (Ridge Preservation bone grafting surgery)

Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction

DEVICEFDBA (Ridge Preservation bone grafting surgery)

Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients will be included in this study if they qualify the following inclusion criteria: * Live within 50 miles from the School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio * Are able to attend a minimum of 6 visits over a 4-5 month period, as required by the study protocol * A single rooted tooth that has been identified as requiring extraction * Desire a dental implant to replace the missing tooth * Have adequate restorative space for a dental implant-retained restoration * Have at least 10mm of alveolar bone height, without impinging on the maxillary sinus or inferior alveolar canal. * Have a dehiscence of the buccal or lingual bony plate of the tooth socket extending no more than 50% of the total depth of the socket. * Female patients who have undergone a hysterectomy, tubal ligation, or menopause, and non-pregnant women of child-bearing potential. * Are nonsmokers or former smokers. Current smokers may only be included if they smoke \<10 cigarettes per day

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who live more than 50 miles from the School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio * Patients who do not meet all the inclusion criteria or who will not cooperate with the required follow-up schedule. * Patients will are mentally incompetent, prisoners, or pregnant. * Pregnant women or women intending to become pregnant during the study period. * Smokers who smoke \>10 cigarettes per day * Clinical and/or radiographic determinations which will preclude inclusion in this study are: Active infection other than periodontitis; Inadequate bone dimensions or restorative space for a dental implant; Presence of a disease entity, condition or therapeutic regimen which decreases probability of soft tissue and bony healing, e.g., poorly controlled diabetes, chemotherapeutic and immunosuppressive agents, autoimmune diseases, history of bisphosphonate use or long-term steroid therapy; Positive medical history of endocarditis following oral or dental surgery. * Sensitivity or allergy to Bacitracin, Gentamicin, Polymyxin B Sulfate, alcohol and/or surfactants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% Vital Bone Formation (Histological)3 months after ridge preservationhistologic determination of % of vital bone formation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% Residual Graft Material (Histological)3 months after ridge preservationhistologic determination of % of residual bone graft material

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After enrollment, one subject was withdrawn as a screen failure. This left a total of 43 subjects enrolled to take part in the study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Non-Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (PUROS)
Ridge preservation bone grafting surgery with Non-Freeze-Dried cancellous bone allograft (PUROS) PUROS (Ridge Preservation bone grafting surgery): Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
21
Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)
Ridge preservation bone grafting surgery with Freeze-Dried cancellous bone allograft (FDBA) FDBA (Ridge Preservation bone grafting surgery): Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
22
Total43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (PUROS)Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants21 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 210 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

% Vital Bone Formation (Histological)

histologic determination of % of vital bone formation

Time frame: 3 months after ridge preservation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (PUROS)% Vital Bone Formation (Histological)27.19 percentageStandard Deviation 17.5
Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)% Vital Bone Formation (Histological)24.08 percentageStandard Deviation 12.49
Secondary

% Residual Graft Material (Histological)

histologic determination of % of residual bone graft material

Time frame: 3 months after ridge preservation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (PUROS)% Residual Graft Material (Histological)23.38 percentageStandard Deviation 13.45
Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)% Residual Graft Material (Histological)22.96 percentageStandard Deviation 21.04

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026