Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lumacaftor in Combination With Ivacaftor in Subjects With CF, Homozygous for the F508del-CFTR Mutation

A Phase 3, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lumacaftor in Combination With Ivacaftor in Subjects Aged 6 Through 11 Years With Cystic Fibrosis, Homozygous for the F508del-CFTR Mutation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02514473
Enrollment
206
Registered
2015-08-03
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lumacaftor in combination with ivacaftor in subjects aged 6 Through 11 years with cystic fibrosis (CF), homozygous for the F508del CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutation

Interventions

DRUGVX-809
DRUGPlacebo
DRUGVX-770

Sponsors

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who weigh ≥15 kg without shoes a the Screening Visit * Subjects with confirmed diagnosis of CF at the Screening Visit. * Subjects who are homozygous for the F508del CFTR mutation * Subjects with ppFEV1 of ≥70 percentage points adjusted for age, sex, and height * Subjects with a screening LCI2.5 result greater than or equal to 7.5

Exclusion criteria

* History of any comorbidity reviewed at the Screening Visit that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose an additional risk in administering study drug to the subject. * Any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities at the Screening Visit that would interfere with the study assessments or pose an undue risk for the subject * Clinically significant abnormalities in hemoglobin, liver function, or renal function at the Screening Visit. * An acute upper or lower respiratory infection, pulmonary exacerbation, or changes in therapy for pulmonary disease within 28 days before Day 1 * History of solid organ or hematological transplantation at the Screening Visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Lung Clearance Index 2.5 (LCI2.5) Through Week 24Baseline, Through Week 24Lung clearance index (LCI) is a measure of ventilation inhomogeneity that is derived from a multiple breath washout test using Nitrogen (N2). LCI2.5 represents the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal inert gas concentration to 1/40th of its starting value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 24Baseline, Week 24BMI was defined as weight in kg divided by height in square meter (m\^2).
Absolute Change From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) Respiratory Domain Score Through Week 24Baseline, Through Week 24The CFQ-R is a validated participant-reported outcome measuring health-related quality of life for participants with cystic fibrosis. Respiratory domain assessed respiratory symptoms (for example, coughing, congestion, wheezing), score range: 0-100; higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and better health-related quality of life.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Lung Clearance Index 5.0 (LCI5.0) Through Week 24Baseline, Through Week 24LCI is a measure of ventilation inhomogeneity that is derived from a multiple breath washout test using Nitrogen (N2). LCI5.0 represents the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal inert gas concentration to 1/20th of its starting value.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride at Week 24Baseline, Week 24Sweat samples were collected using an approved collection device.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (ppFEV1) Through Week 24Baseline, Through Week 24FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration. Wang standards were used to calculate ppFEV1 (for age, gender, race, and height).
Relative Change From Baseline in ppFEV1 Through Week 24Baseline, Through Week 24FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration. Wang standards were used to calculate ppFEV1 (for age, gender, race, and height).
Absolute Change From Baseline in BMI-for-age Z-score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24BMI was defined as weight in kg divided by height in m\^2. z-score is a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It describes whether a mean was above or below the standard. BMI, adjusted for age and sex, was analyzed as BMI-for-age z-score (BMI z-score). The BMI-for-age z-scores were calculated using National Center for Health Statistics growth charts.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weight at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
Average Absolute Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride at Day 15 and Week 4Baseline, Day 15 and Week 4Sweat samples were collected using an approved collection device. Baseline was defined as the average of the measurements at screening and on Day 1 pre-dose. Change from Baseline in sweat chloride at Day 15 and Week 4 was calculated. The average of the 2 values (Change at Day 15 and Week 4) was reported.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Height at Week 24Baseline, Week 24
Absolute Change From Baseline in Height-for-age Z-score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24Z-score is a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It describes whether a mean was above or below the standard. Height, adjusted for age and sex, was analyzed as height-for-age z-score (height z-score). The height-for-age z-scores were calculated using National Center for Health Statistics growth charts.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Baseline, Through Week 24The TSQM is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures participants' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Number of Pulmonary Exacerbation EventsBaseline through Week 24Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms. The number of events were reported.
Percentage of Participants With At Least 1 Pulmonary Exacerbation EventBaseline through Week 24Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms.
Time-to-first Pulmonary ExacerbationBaseline through Week 24Time-to-first pulmonary exacerbation was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 28AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant during the study; the event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. This includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency after the informed consent form is signed. AE includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. SAE (subset of AE): medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Any AE that increased in severity or newly developed at or after initial dosing of study drug to Week 28 was considered treatment-emergent.
Average Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough,Ave) and Average 3 to 6 Hours Post-dose Concentration (C3-6h,Ave) For Lumacaftor and IvacaftorFor Ctrough,ave: before morning dose on Week 4 and 24; For C3-6h,ave: 3 to 6 hours after morning dose on Day 1, 15 and Week 4Ctrough,ave is average of individual pre-dose observed concentrations across Week 4 and 24. C3-6h,ave is average of individual 3 to 6 hours post-dose observed concentrations across Day 1, 15 and Week 4. This outcome was not planned to be assessed in Placebo arm.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weight-for-age Z-score at Week 24Baseline, Week 24Z-score is a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It describes whether a mean was above or below the standard. Weight, adjusted for age and sex, was analyzed as weight-for-age z-score (weight z-score). The weight-for-age z-scores were calculated using National Center for Health Statistics growth charts.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 206 participants were randomized in the study, of which 204 participants were exposed to study treatment (101 participants received 'Placebo' and 103 participants received '(lumacaftor \[LUM\] / ivacaftor \[IVA\])'.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to LUM in combination with IVA FDC tablets orally q12h for 24 weeks.
101
LUM/IVA
Participants received LUM 200 mg in combination with IVA 250 mg FDC tablets orally q12h for 24 weeks.
103
Total204

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyOther11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboLUM/IVATotal
Age, Continuous8.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
8.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
8.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants63 Participants121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants40 Participants83 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1010 / 103
other
Total, other adverse events
98 / 10198 / 103
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 10113 / 103

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Lung Clearance Index 2.5 (LCI2.5) Through Week 24

Lung clearance index (LCI) is a measure of ventilation inhomogeneity that is derived from a multiple breath washout test using Nitrogen (N2). LCI2.5 represents the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal inert gas concentration to 1/40th of its starting value.

Time frame: Baseline, Through Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lung Clearance Index 2.5 (LCI2.5) Through Week 240.08 RatioStandard Error 0.13
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lung Clearance Index 2.5 (LCI2.5) Through Week 24-1.01 RatioStandard Error 0.13
Comparison: Analysis was performed using mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model included treatment, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects; and participant as a random effect with adjustments for baseline, weight (less than \[\<\] 25 kilogram \[kg\] versus greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 25 kg) and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) severity (\<90 versus \>=90) at screening.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.43, -0.75]MMRM
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in BMI-for-age Z-score at Week 24

BMI was defined as weight in kg divided by height in m\^2. z-score is a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It describes whether a mean was above or below the standard. BMI, adjusted for age and sex, was analyzed as BMI-for-age z-score (BMI z-score). The BMI-for-age z-scores were calculated using National Center for Health Statistics growth charts.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in BMI-for-age Z-score at Week 240.05 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.04
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in BMI-for-age Z-score at Week 240.08 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.04
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 24

BMI was defined as weight in kg divided by height in square meter (m\^2).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 240.27 Kg/m^2Standard Error 0.07
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 240.38 Kg/m^2Standard Error 0.07
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) Respiratory Domain Score Through Week 24

The CFQ-R is a validated participant-reported outcome measuring health-related quality of life for participants with cystic fibrosis. Respiratory domain assessed respiratory symptoms (for example, coughing, congestion, wheezing), score range: 0-100; higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and better health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Through Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) Respiratory Domain Score Through Week 243.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) Respiratory Domain Score Through Week 245.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Height at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Height at Week 242.6 Centimeter (cm)Standard Error 0.1
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Height at Week 242.9 Centimeter (cm)Standard Error 0.1
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Height-for-age Z-score at Week 24

Z-score is a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It describes whether a mean was above or below the standard. Height, adjusted for age and sex, was analyzed as height-for-age z-score (height z-score). The height-for-age z-scores were calculated using National Center for Health Statistics growth charts.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Height-for-age Z-score at Week 240.00 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.02
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Height-for-age Z-score at Week 240.03 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.02
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Lung Clearance Index 5.0 (LCI5.0) Through Week 24

LCI is a measure of ventilation inhomogeneity that is derived from a multiple breath washout test using Nitrogen (N2). LCI5.0 represents the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal inert gas concentration to 1/20th of its starting value.

Time frame: Baseline, Through Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lung Clearance Index 5.0 (LCI5.0) Through Week 240.08 RatioStandard Error 0.05
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Lung Clearance Index 5.0 (LCI5.0) Through Week 24-0.36 RatioStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (ppFEV1) Through Week 24

FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration. Wang standards were used to calculate ppFEV1 (for age, gender, race, and height).

Time frame: Baseline, Through Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (ppFEV1) Through Week 24-1.3 Percent predicted of FEV1Standard Error 0.8
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (ppFEV1) Through Week 241.1 Percent predicted of FEV1Standard Error 0.8
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride at Week 24

Sweat samples were collected using an approved collection device.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride at Week 243.2 mmol/LStandard Error 1.3
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride at Week 24-21.6 mmol/LStandard Error 1.3
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24

The TSQM is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire which measures participants' experiences with their medication on four dimensions: effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction. For each dimension, responses are added and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline, Through Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = those participants who were evaluable for this endpoint and 'Number Analyzed' = those participants who were evaluable at the specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Change Through Week 24: Effectiveness0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Change Through Week 24: Convenience9.9 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Change Through Week 24: Global Score-2.3 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Change Through Week 24: Side Effects0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Change Through Week 24: Global Score-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Change Through Week 24: Effectiveness1.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Change Through Week 24: Side Effects-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Domains Through Week 24Change Through Week 24: Convenience11.9 Units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Weight at Week 24

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weight at Week 241.7 KgStandard Error 0.2
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weight at Week 242.0 KgStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Weight-for-age Z-score at Week 24

Z-score is a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It describes whether a mean was above or below the standard. Weight, adjusted for age and sex, was analyzed as weight-for-age z-score (weight z-score). The weight-for-age z-scores were calculated using National Center for Health Statistics growth charts.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weight-for-age Z-score at Week 240.02 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.02
LUM/IVAAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weight-for-age Z-score at Week 240.06 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.02
Secondary

Average Absolute Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride at Day 15 and Week 4

Sweat samples were collected using an approved collection device. Baseline was defined as the average of the measurements at screening and on Day 1 pre-dose. Change from Baseline in sweat chloride at Day 15 and Week 4 was calculated. The average of the 2 values (Change at Day 15 and Week 4) was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 15 and Week 4

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAverage Absolute Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride at Day 15 and Week 40.8 Millimole per liter (mmol/L)Standard Error 1
LUM/IVAAverage Absolute Change From Baseline in Sweat Chloride at Day 15 and Week 4-20.0 Millimole per liter (mmol/L)Standard Error 1
Secondary

Average Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough,Ave) and Average 3 to 6 Hours Post-dose Concentration (C3-6h,Ave) For Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor

Ctrough,ave is average of individual pre-dose observed concentrations across Week 4 and 24. C3-6h,ave is average of individual 3 to 6 hours post-dose observed concentrations across Day 1, 15 and Week 4. This outcome was not planned to be assessed in Placebo arm.

Time frame: For Ctrough,ave: before morning dose on Week 4 and 24; For C3-6h,ave: 3 to 6 hours after morning dose on Day 1, 15 and Week 4

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) set included all randomized participants who received any amount of study drug and had a PK assessment. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' = those participants who were evaluable for this endpoint and 'Number Analyzed' = those participants who were evaluable at the specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAverage Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough,Ave) and Average 3 to 6 Hours Post-dose Concentration (C3-6h,Ave) For Lumacaftor and IvacaftorLUM: Ctrough,ave10200 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 4460
PlaceboAverage Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough,Ave) and Average 3 to 6 Hours Post-dose Concentration (C3-6h,Ave) For Lumacaftor and IvacaftorLUM: C3-6h,ave20600 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 6560
PlaceboAverage Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough,Ave) and Average 3 to 6 Hours Post-dose Concentration (C3-6h,Ave) For Lumacaftor and IvacaftorIVA: Ctrough,ave107 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 91.2
PlaceboAverage Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough,Ave) and Average 3 to 6 Hours Post-dose Concentration (C3-6h,Ave) For Lumacaftor and IvacaftorIVA: C3-6h,ave821 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 348
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant during the study; the event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. This includes any newly occurring event or previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency after the informed consent form is signed. AE includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. SAE (subset of AE): medical event or condition, which falls into any of the following categories, regardless of its relationship to the study drug: death, life threatening adverse experience, inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, persistent/significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event. Any AE that increased in severity or newly developed at or after initial dosing of study drug to Week 28 was considered treatment-emergent.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 28

Population: Safety Set included all participants who were exposed to any amount of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent AEs98 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Participants With Treatment-Emergent SAEs11 participants
LUM/IVANumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent AEs98 participants
LUM/IVANumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Participants With Treatment-Emergent SAEs13 participants
Secondary

Number of Pulmonary Exacerbation Events

Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms. The number of events were reported.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Pulmonary Exacerbation Events18 Pulmonary exacerbation events
LUM/IVANumber of Pulmonary Exacerbation Events24 Pulmonary exacerbation events
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With At Least 1 Pulmonary Exacerbation Event

Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With At Least 1 Pulmonary Exacerbation Event14.9 Percentage of participants
LUM/IVAPercentage of Participants With At Least 1 Pulmonary Exacerbation Event19.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Relative Change From Baseline in ppFEV1 Through Week 24

FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration. Wang standards were used to calculate ppFEV1 (for age, gender, race, and height).

Time frame: Baseline, Through Week 24

Population: FAS. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboRelative Change From Baseline in ppFEV1 Through Week 24-0.9 Percent changeStandard Error 1
LUM/IVARelative Change From Baseline in ppFEV1 Through Week 242.2 Percent changeStandard Error 1
Secondary

Time-to-first Pulmonary Exacerbation

Time-to-first pulmonary exacerbation was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimates. Pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the treatment with new or changed antibiotic therapy (intravenous, inhaled, or oral) for greater than or equal to 4 sinopulmonary signs/symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime-to-first Pulmonary ExacerbationNA Days
LUM/IVATime-to-first Pulmonary ExacerbationNA Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026