Skip to content

Usefulness of Non-contrast MagnetIc Resonance imAging Versus Non-Contrast Ultrasonography for surveiLlancE of HepatoCellular Carcinoma [MIRACLE-HCC]

Usefulness of Non-contrast MagnetIc Resonance imAging Versus Non-Contrast Ultrasonography for surveiLlancE of HepatoCellular Carcinoma [MIRACLE-HCC]

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02514434
Enrollment
416
Registered
2015-08-03
Start date
2015-03-30
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2019-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Compensated Liver Cirrhosis

Brief summary

The investigators will investigate the usefulness of ultrasonography versus non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma through this prospective, randomized trial.

Detailed description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major complications in patients with chronic liver disease. The prognosis of HCC relies on the extent of disease at the time of diagnosis. Hence to detect cancer at an earlier stage, a regular surveillance test is important for the subjects with a high risk of developing cancer. Current guidelines recommend a regular surveillance using ultrasonography at a 6 month-interval. Ultrasonography is a non-invasive and safe procedure, yet it is limited by the skills of the operator and it is often difficult to differentiate cancer from regenerating nodules especially in atrophied cirrhotic liver. According to a recent meta-analysis, the overall sensitivity and specificity of detecting liver cancer using ultrasonography were both over 90%, however the sensitivity was decreased to 60% in detecting early lesions in which surgery or liver transplantation is indicated. Of note, addition of AFP to ultrasonography also failed to increase the sensitivity in detecting small cancers. Taken together, there is a need to develop a new surveillance test with an improved sensitivity and specificity. Recently, a retrospective study reported that CT or MRI showed a better sensitivity than ultrasonography in detecting early liver cancer. However, performing CT as a surveillance test is limited by frequent exposure to radiation and contrast-dye agent. Although MRI does not have the risk of radiation-exposure, it is limited by the high cost. On the contrast, non-contrast MRI offers a cost that is comparable to US and an absence of exposure to radiation or contrast-dye agent, which suggests non-contrast MRI as a good alternative surveillance tool for early detection of HCC. Therefore, in this prospective, randomized trial, the investigators will investigate the usefulness of ultrasonography versus non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Interventions

RADIATIONUltrasonography

Subjects will be randomly allocated to either Ultrasonography arm or Non-contrast MRI arm for their surveillance method.

Subjects will be randomly allocated to either Ultrasonography arm or Non-contrast MRI arm for their surveillance method.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subject between 20 and 70 years of age at the time of randomization * Has chronic liver disease with compensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh score A), defined as 1) histologically confirmed cirrhosis, or 2) has chronic liver disease and shows the presence of splenomegaly or other typical findings of liver cirrhosis on ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging, or 3) has chronic liver disease and shows the presence of endoscopically-confirmed esophageal or gastric varices * Absence of severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal or infectious diseases, other than chronic liver disease * Absence of a history of malignancy within previous 5 years * Can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (e.g. return for follow-up visits), in the opinion of the investigator * Has provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Greater than 70 years of age * Presence of liver cancer or other intrahepatic malignancy * Has a history of malignancy within previous 5 years * Is pregnant or breast-feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor stage of HCC6 monthsComparing tumor stage and resectability rate of HCC between participants undergoing HCC surveillance using ultrasonography and non-contrast MRI.
Resectability rate of HCC6 monthsComparing tumor stage and resectability rate of HCC between participants undergoing HCC surveillance using ultrasonography and non-contrast MRI.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Five-year overall survival5 years after the study enrollment
Liver-related mortality5 years after the study enrollment
Post-treatment recurrence rate5 years after the study enrollment

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026