Skip to content

Trial to Assess the Effects of an Antimicrobial Mouthwash on the Esophageal Microbiome

Pilot Randomized Trial to Assess the Effects of an Antimicrobial Mouthwash on the Esophageal and Gastric Microbiome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02513784
Acronym
Mouthwash
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-08-03
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2022-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Barrett's Esophagus, Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Reflux Esophagitis

Keywords

Microbiome, Esophagus, Endoscopy, Mouthwash

Brief summary

This is a randomized, open-label pilot study to assess whether treatment with chlorhexidine mouthwash can alter the esophageal and gastric cardia microbiome

Detailed description

Patients scheduled for upper endoscopy for clinical indications will be randomized to 3 weeks of either no treatment or use of twice daily chlorhexidine mouthwash leading up to the endoscopy. There will be 2-3 study visits, at Day 0 and Day 21, and for those subjects in the mouthwash arm, a final visit 1-2 weeks following the Day 21 visit. Subjects will be required to fast overnight prior to the visits on Days 0 and 21.

Interventions

DRUGChlorhexidine gluconate

Chlorhexidine gluconate is a germicidal mouthwash that reduces bacteria in the mouth.

Sponsors

Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 * Scheduled for upper endoscopy for clinical indications * No allergy or other contraindication to chlorhexidine

Exclusion criteria

* Use of proton pump inhibitors or H2 receptor antagonists within 1 month of enrollment. Acid suppressant medications raise the gastric pH and can dramatically alter the gastric and esophageal microbiome. * History of upper gastrointestinal cancer * History of histologically proven Barrett's esophagus * History of antireflux or bariatric surgery, or other gastric or esophageal surgery * Use of antimicrobial mouthwash within 1 month of enrollment * Use of antibiotics or immunosuppressant medications within 3 months of enrollment * Use of steroid inhalers or nasal sprays within 1 month of enrollment * HIV or other immunosuppressed states or conditions (e.g. active malignancy) * Pregnant or breast feeding * Inability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of F. Nucleatum in Saliva21 daysWithin individual change in relative abundance of F nucleatum in oral samples
Difference in Esophageal F. Nucleatum Between Experimental Group and no Intervention Group21 daysComparison of relative abundance of esophageal F. nucleatum in the mouthwash group vs. the no intervention group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Antibacterial Mouthwash
Subjects will be randomized to twice daily chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash for 21 days. Chlorhexidine gluconate: Chlorhexidine gluconate is a germicidal mouthwash that reduces bacteria in the mouth.
10
No Intervention
Subjects will be randomized to no intervention for 21 days.
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAntibacterial MouthwashNo InterventionTotal
Age, Continuous53.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
51.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Aspirin Use4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Body Mass Index29.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
31.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
30.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
Endoscopic Findings
Normal esophagus
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Endoscopic Findings
Reflux esophagitis
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Endoscopic Findings
Varices
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ever Smoker3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Fat Intake35 % calories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
33.5 % calories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
34.3 % calories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
Fiber intake14.0 gm/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
13.6 gm/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
13.8 gm/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) History7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Indication for Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
Abdominal pain
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Indication for Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
Dyspepsia
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Indication for Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
Other
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Indication for Upper Endoscopy (EGD)
Reflux symptoms
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) Use5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR)0.94 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
0.92 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
0.93 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Esophageal F. Nucleatum Between Experimental Group and no Intervention Group

Comparison of relative abundance of esophageal F. nucleatum in the mouthwash group vs. the no intervention group.

Time frame: 21 days

Population: Data was not collected and analyzed for F. Nucleatum in particular, instead an analysis was done for the microbiome composition across sample sites - oral swab, saliva and esophageal.

Primary

Reduction of F. Nucleatum in Saliva

Within individual change in relative abundance of F nucleatum in oral samples

Time frame: 21 days

Population: Data was not collected and analyzed for F. Nucleatum in particular, instead an analysis was done for the microbiome composition across sample sites - oral swab, saliva and esophageal.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026